That’s incorrect, they literally bought a NEW computer at the store, unpackaged it and Craig signed the keys on that computer because Gavin told him to. This was 100% documented in the ‘Satoshi Affair’ piece by Andrew O’Hagan (Who also believes Craig is Lying).
What's the point of signing keys ? You are either ignorant or full of bad faith. I can sign satoshis' keys with my primary BTC address too. Does that makes me satoshi ?  The way to authentify Faketoshi's claim that he is "the real satoshi" would be to sign a message saying Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto But signed with an address that has received a 50 BTC block reward, from the early days. Such as ... one of these :  (source : https://bitslog.com/2013/04/17/the-well-deserved-fortune-of-satoshi-nakamoto/) Also, it shouldn't be forged, such as demonstrated here : https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4hhreq/how_craig_constructed_the_message_that_he_signed/Other than that, you can keep spreading FUD and showing "proof of unicorns", it is meaningless nonetheless. If Satoshi can sign a msg with one addy, why not with the rest of them ? Why on Earth do you think Gavin Anderson, the person Satoshi passed the project on to would not understand this? Call us all ignorant and in bad faith as you are clearly god. Edit: speaking of acting in bad faith, you are promoting a mixing service. Where the hell do you think the mixed Bitcoins go? Some poor person is going to end up with your illegally used Bitcoins and yet your trust rating is higher than anyone’s. This whole forum is ran by backwards broke ex scammers who are slowly watching their BTC fortune die. |
|
|
|
... but .. but Craig Wright is Satoshi... even Gavin Andresen confirmed that.. like he singed a message from a the genesis block addy in front of him /sNutildah literally believes he’s greater than Gavin Anderson. I don't, actually. I simply wonder why Craig can't do the same thing for the general public. If he's Satoshi, it would be incredibly easy to do so. Furthermore, why couldn't he let Gavin verify the signature on his own computer? Even furthermore, if keys don't constitute proof of ownership, like your camp has been saying since Craig bungled his last signature attempt, why did he bother "doing so" for Gavin in the first place? That’s incorrect, they literally bought a NEW computer at the store, unpackaged it and Craig signed the keys on that computer because Gavin told him to. This was 100% documented in the ‘Satoshi Affair’ piece by Andrew O’Hagan (Who also believes Craig is Lying). |
|
|
|
... but .. but Craig Wright is Satoshi... even Gavin Andresen confirmed that.. like he singed a message from a the genesis block addy in front of him /sNutildah literally believes he’s greater than Gavin Anderson. |
|
|
|
Clarifications
Bitcoin Cash & Bitcoin SV both offer real scaling potential , as true scaling can only occur ONCHAIN.
Bitcoin Segwit using LN is not scaling, it is Offloading.
As BTC segwit offloads transactions to the LN network because the btc onchain network is inferior due to it's transaction capacity being purposefully limited by it's core devs.
bch dev forced changes into the base layer which caused a split. These changes work incrementally to remove the miner competition from the BitCoin experiment. In other words bch devs do not want BitCoin they want to destroy BitCoin but lock up the name "BitCoin" and associate it with crime etc. This move officially makes Bitcoin Cash ‘BCash.’ I have no idea why Ver forced this. |
|
|
|
What does the market think? |
|
|
|
|
They discuss copyright law in the ‘anarco-capitalism’ section of reddit? That’s quite contradicting
|
|
|
|
What is your point exactly?
Our point is that BSV is nothing but a fork of a REAL Bitcoin (In fact it is a fork of a fork) and the team member of BSV is a well known scammer and a liar Craig Wright who is pretending to be Satoshi Nakamoto. This is OUR POINT that is very easy to understand for everyone, except fucking paid shills and a liars like you. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lPbh2ltm1wI&t=503sBTW 4 of my posts have been deleted in this thread, ive seen less censorship in North Korea.
This is NOT self moderated thread. No one can delete your posts except moderators (For spamming) If you take Doug Polk or Richard Heart seriously you are an idiot, full stop. |
|
|
|
|
These forks come from disagreements amongst miners, if they did not exist, we would have a full on dictatorship. This is the beauty of the Bitcoin economic model. With the UASF Blockstream has literally done the polar opposite in an attempt to limit the blocksize and hold all your funds in their lightning network.
BTW 4 of my posts have been deleted in this thread, ive seen less censorship in North Korea.
|
|
|
|
|
I wholeheartedly disagree with all your points, your facts, and your hostile attitude.
Only time will tell. Seems as though I’ve made a much better investment since we started arguing. Those facts don’t lie.
I’ve said all I’ve need to here, read and interpret as you wish.
Spectators, please do your own research and understand these BTC maximalists have ALOT to lose.
|
|
|
|
|
Could I get a response for a miner who understands what I am talking about please?
BSV will implement gigabyte blocks in July, by then the mining reward will actually be less than the fees collected by the miners at that scale.
You see where I’m getting started? Time will tell, ive said all I’ve need to here.
Miners are NOT second rate citizens in this capitalist economic model. Lightning Network damn well won’t save you. Raise the blocks or get everyone’s BTC on the lightning Network.
You have now 1 month until 1 GIG blocks are implemented, and with OP return and all these applications being built on the OG protocol of BSV, it’s in the networks best interest to spam as many transactions as possible through as many applications as possible built on top of the original protocol (BSV)
A super computer that powerful with that much hashpower can destroy all the other blockchains. Time to understand the facts. I really, god honestly believe none of you guys understand Bitcoin.
|
|
|
|
|
You guys are pretty triggered by BSV. Craig Wright aside, How can we deny that the original protocol is NOT Bitcoin? Did you see all the applications being built on BSV? Attacking one character does not constitute a scam given there is a fair economic capitalist model of competition for the miners. When BTC shrinks the blocksize, where the hell do you think the miners are going to go on the next halveneing? Better get all your BTC on the third party lightning network fast boys.
|
|
|
|
Why it is accused of being a scam:
A. Fake Team Member* LMAF Did you mean to write "LMAO"? That's the traditional acronym. Don't forget it also has a plagiarized white paper. Craig got caught trying to pass off the bitcoin white paper as a paper he submitted to the Australian government in 2001. He included edits made from an earlier version of the bitcoin white paper written in August 2008 that we was unaware of. In short, the bitcoin white paper is not his own, but he's pretending that he wrote it. That's plagiarism at best and fraud at worst. ‘Craig Wrigs a Fraud’ ....here’s my Livecoin referral link. |
|
|
|
Yeah, and the pump was while China was asleep. That post was fake news of fake news to give an excuse of BsV’s price pump during this brilliant CoinGeek Conference (the actual result of the pump). < snip paranoia >
The buying started around 08.30 UTC May 29, about ninety minutes before the fakenews WeChat was posted (10.05 UTC*), after which time the pump immediately accelerated. *18.05 CST. China is asleep at six in the evening? The Coingeek Conference opened to the public at 13.00 UTC May 30, over 24 hours after the start of the market manipulation, not during it. Since it opened the BSV price has gone down. Profit taking on the goody bag pump? Unless, by during, you are referring to the start of the prior Dev Day, which was roughly contemporaneous to the manipulation? Maybe some geeks were chatting in the accreditation queue and decided to splash out a billion or so to pass the time? OP SENORING POSTS |
|
|
|
No time for empty phrases.
Ignore ya
But why? Are my feelings supposed to be hurt or something? Too bad, I though we were on track to make you a BTC maximalist. Like we need more balding overweight middle aged carnivores and their young naive ‘yes man’ predecessors. |
|
|
|
With the professionalism and investment going on into the CoinGeek conference, along with a massive multi billion dollar price spike (during the release of this article). It’s hard to take this seriously. The OP predicted a 0$ BSV last week, he’s 100% wrong on that Clearly none of you guys are watching or at the CoinGeek Conference now. Absolutely brilliant Do your research before you trust a bunch of .pdf jpegs. None of this constitutes proof in a court of law. Should have taken you up on that peter McCormack bet nutildah. Here’s where the smart money is: https://vimeo.com/339365256Catch it live folks |
|
|
|
Gotta cover up your last weeks price predictions for 0$ BSV, look who the real scammer is. My god you must have no life. This CoinGeek conference is incredible. BSV truly is Bitcoin. |
|
|
|
Hmm. CMC says BTC is up 13% in the last seven days. This warms my cockles.
But what's this!? BSV is up 94% over the same period!? Impossibru!
Don't play dumb jbreher. We both know it's mostly because BTC is rallying. Other than that, BSV did gain ground compared to BTC (from 0.008 to 0.013 per Shit Vision), which will probably loose (again) - before Craig goes to jail. So what’s the other portion? 3 ways bitcoin is Turing Complete. https://youtu.be/QJ1DTeexpvANot convinced big blocks are the solution? WATCH FROM 15:15. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
