Bitcoin Forum
July 05, 2024, 12:05:03 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
21  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New version 1.1.3 on: October 14, 2014, 09:15:34 PM
Any one know how to become better connected to the Burst Network? Sometimes I'm lagging several minuts behind the apperant block on https://bchain.info/BURST/tools/calculator, and my node seems to process a fork quite often, usually twice a day or so.
22  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient HDD Mining | New version 1.1.3 on: October 12, 2014, 06:18:17 PM
Does anyone else have a problem with forks? My node seems to process a fork twice every day or so, and I have now twice seen my miners mine a block only for it to disappear  (orphans basically).
23  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: Profitability 30 TB ( Solo ) on: October 11, 2014, 01:12:46 PM
nvm, I should read the headline
24  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient POC Mining | New version 1.1.3 on: October 04, 2014, 08:15:14 PM
It's been a few weeks since I last checked in after getting everything plotted and working.  Can anyone point me to updated tools I should be using (if any)?  I'm mining on dev's v2 pool with dev's java miner.  Also, is there a working windows version of dcct's plot merger/optimizer?  I had to plot everything with like 1k stagger....guessing I should try to make that higher now that I've got more RAM to work with Smiley

Thanks for the quick update!
Just use dcct's optimize tool, it will  make each file optimal. What size are your files?

So there is a working Windows version?  Files are anywhere from 50gb to 900gb.  Most are about 350gb.  I have 14gb RAM, any idea what kind of stagger size I can use?

The latest release have a Windows executeable that works for me. You don't have to worry about staggesize, the entire point of the optimize tool is to optimize the file such that the staggersize is equal to the number of nounces.
25  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient POC Mining | New version 1.1.3 on: October 04, 2014, 07:40:14 PM
It's been a few weeks since I last checked in after getting everything plotted and working.  Can anyone point me to updated tools I should be using (if any)?  I'm mining on dev's v2 pool with dev's java miner.  Also, is there a working windows version of dcct's plot merger/optimizer?  I had to plot everything with like 1k stagger....guessing I should try to make that higher now that I've got more RAM to work with Smiley

Thanks for the quick update!
Just use dcct's optimize tool, it will  make each file optimal. What size are your files?
26  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient POC Mining | New version 1.1.2 on: September 25, 2014, 07:01:18 PM
Blago, any change you'll release the source and build instructions for your miner?
27  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient POC Mining | New version 1.1.2 on: September 16, 2014, 08:39:35 AM
No it is not safe to send to trex from another exchange, since you need to attach a message.

Attaching a message requires you have the new ui in burst 1.1.2

The trex article also says this:
Quote
When you are withdrawing, the address you are withdrawing to MUST have a previous deposit. NXT addresses require the presence of a public key.  We currently have no way for you to specify a public key like other exchanges.  This may mean you can't deposit directly to another exchange as well.
This does not apply to burst. Public key announcements are optional in burst, not required like in nxt.

I send BURST to bittrex from 1.1.1 and i didnt attach a message ... i lose all my BURST ?
Yes you did. Bittrex states explicitly that you MUST attach a message. Try their support. If you have a few burst left, you can still prove you own the account and they might add the transaction to your balance on the exchange.
28  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient POC Mining | Update to 1.0.2 before block 2700 on: August 18, 2014, 08:17:21 AM
Is there a new richlist somewhere?
The link to the code is somewhere in this thread. You can run it yourself and make an up to date list Smiley
29  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient POC Mining | Update to 1.0.2 before block 2700 on: August 17, 2014, 09:39:30 PM
Still curious am I supposed to run one instance for plots on each drive?  As in if I plots on c and e this run a run_mine.bat file from each drive?
read above about "mklink"

But for mining it is important CPU Power?
Or CPU Power is really important just for generate plots?

CPU Power only Matters when generating Plots.


Another question by me:

The instance to generate plots with #myAdress #startingPlot #plotsToCreate #??? #Threads
That does the #??? Number stand for? And is it a problem, if some of my plots got different #???  numbers?
It's stagnation, really just how many plots it will generate before flushing to the disk. Higher number uses more RAM during plot generation, personally I use 1024, so I can get away with using 1gb RAM for the generation.
30  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient POC Mining | Update to 1.0.2 before block 2700 on: August 17, 2014, 09:23:22 PM
Still curious am I supposed to run one instance for plots on each drive?  As in if I plots on c and e this run a run_mine.bat file from each drive?
Since the miner only reads from a single directory, you either have to run an instance for every folder with plots (usually 1 per drive), or link them all into one folder.
31  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient Proof of HDD Capacity Mining | No IPO, No Pre on: August 17, 2014, 07:38:51 PM
this sounds like a plan but i think the main goal should be to develop a c version of the wallet and supply this to the exchanges.
the nxt hack at bter was only a matter of time cause all is based on java....
- this is FUD. But what else can you expect from a newbie ...
if this is FUD how can you explain why there are on regular base and not on demand critical security updates for JAVA advised?
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alerts-086861.html

or compare the cve submission dates to patch availability:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/public-vuln-to-advisory-mapping-093627.html

now please tell me why i state a huge nxt hack was only a matter of time.

Really if Java was that bad, it's hard to understand why it is so widely used in the enterprise world. 

It's FUD because security is not about a vulnerability in Java. A vulnerability STILL needs some malicious code to run before it can be exploited- this is a problem because the average user do run such code every now and then, or another vulnerability in e.g. a browser is used to execute said code. In short don't run untrusted code and you'll be fine, properly firewall the system, and you'll be fine.
you currently mix up javascript and java but thats not the point here. the enterprise world loves java because its powerfull and can be secured by the application design. the most critical point in any design is to only allow defined and trusted network peers access to the java vm. in 99% of all enterprise apps this is done by secured networks. a core element of a wallet application design is to communicate with "anonymous" peers. firewalling a java wallet vm in a exchange environment may only be possible by analysing the traffic payload with snort or similar tools. then you let only pass "known good" packets. this is a really hard (if even possible) job to do which would not have to be done if the wallet code is ported to c. thats the point in my inital reply.

No I do not confuse anything. What I am saying that if you want to exploit a vulnerability in Java the user must either run untrusted code, or it must be a 2 stage exploit where AS AN EXAMPLE a bug in the browser that allow the adversary to execute any code of his choice. That could be a 0-day in the OS or a 0-day in Java.

The simple fact that you really try to tell the world that C is inherently more secure than Java, show quite well you do not understand 101 of hardening applications and securing networked systems.
32  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient Proof of HDD Capacity Mining | No IPO, No Pre on: August 17, 2014, 10:30:13 AM
this sounds like a plan but i think the main goal should be to develop a c version of the wallet and supply this to the exchanges.
the nxt hack at bter was only a matter of time cause all is based on java....
- this is FUD. But what else can you expect from a newbie ...
if this is FUD how can you explain why there are on regular base and not on demand critical security updates for JAVA advised?
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/alerts-086861.html

or compare the cve submission dates to patch availability:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/topics/security/public-vuln-to-advisory-mapping-093627.html

now please tell me why i state a huge nxt hack was only a matter of time.

Really if Java was that bad, it's hard to understand why it is so widely used in the enterprise world.  

It's FUD because security is not about a vulnerability in Java. A vulnerability STILL needs some malicious code to run before it can be exploited- this is a problem because the average user do run such code every now and then, or another vulnerability in e.g. a browser is used to execute said code. In short don't run untrusted code and you'll be fine, properly firewall the system, and you'll be fine.
33  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient Proof of HDD Capacity Mining | No IPO, No Pre on: August 15, 2014, 07:10:49 AM
If I generate plot files of 10GiB, and say 50 of them, it's the same as generating one on 500GiB? It makes it a lot easier to stop and start the generation process, and one machine can create plots full time and then move the plot files to other machines.
Yes it's the same. Just make sure the nonce ranges don't overlap.

Thanks, if they do it's only by a single plot, I can live with that Smiley Now I have to go on a cleaning mission, my harddrives are running out of space!
34  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN][BURST] Burst | Efficient Proof of HDD Capacity Mining | No IPO, No Pre on: August 15, 2014, 06:32:38 AM
If I generate plot files of 10GiB, and say 50 of them, it's the same as generating one on 500GiB? It makes it a lot easier to stop and start the generation process, and one machine can create plots full time and then move the plot files to other machines.
35  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [GroupBuy]8985 Avalon Chips - 0.081 BTC / Klondike16 - 0.75 BTC (Global+Escrow) on: June 19, 2013, 12:03:07 PM
Okay, from what I have been able to find, the time from finalizing the batch, it will take up to 10 weeks to deliver the chips, and another 3 weeks to assemble the boards - t13hydra, is this correct?
36  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [Group Buy] 0.081 - Avalon Chips - Escrow by John K. (Europe / RO) + PCB on: June 19, 2013, 09:09:56 AM
...

I believe this may answer your questions.

Batch 2 people get it for .75 batch 1 for .8 and anyone else just purchasing through his website .85.  it looks like you need to PM Steve if you are batch 1 or 2 to arrange a special coupon to get the discount from his website.


Thanks Smiley Do you know if there has been any information on the time from completion of the batch to delivery of the assembled boards to the shipping company?
37  Bitcoin / Group buys / Re: [GroupBuy]8985 Avalon Chips - 0.081 BTC / Klondike16 - 0.75 BTC (Global+Escrow) on: June 19, 2013, 08:20:52 AM
t13hydra

I'm not going to read all 20+ pages, but I'd like to get the prices clarified (and I'm sure others will as well). 0.081 for each chip, and how much for a board? 0.75, 0.8, or 0.85 ? (those are the prices I've seen in the OP and the latest pages.
38  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Auction]Avalon chips already ordered arriving @ end of July / beginning of Aug. on: June 13, 2013, 11:31:42 AM
I'll try again Smiley

32 chips @ 0.09
39  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Auction]Avalon chips already ordered arriving @ end of July / beginning of Aug. on: June 11, 2013, 10:15:52 AM
32 chips @ 0.09

There are higher bidders than 0.09 BTC, look at the above table, please
Don't you have 248 chips for sale?
I'm sorry, i could not edit the 1st post anymore. I've had 168 chips, because in a way i was forced to reserve 80 chips for a local business here.
You can contact the current bidders and ask them if they are willing to sell. Or you can wait 24 hours and see if all of them have paid the amount they have bid. If no payment is made, i will reput the chips at auction.
Sorry, again, for the inconvenience
At least you could have made a post. I would have bid sufficiently to get the chips in any case, but too late now I suppose. Where are you based in any case?
40  Economy / Auctions / Re: [Auction]Avalon chips already ordered arriving @ end of July / beginning of Aug. on: June 11, 2013, 09:58:12 AM
32 chips @ 0.09

There are higher bidders than 0.09 BTC, look at the above table, please
Don't you have 248 chips for sale?
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!