 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
|
Cracking arbitrary addresses - funds that belong to other people - is completely different. IMHO.
If you find a large wallet in low addresspace (or address with collision to low addresspace) then actually you've done a security audit. Whether you are thief or not is decided by your FOLLOWING actions, but not the fact that you bruteforced something. |
|
|
|
I want to start Bitcrack on Ubuntu i know that exe works on win.
In any linux it's a matter of minutes to compile bitcrack. Install git and cuda with packet manager git clone https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack/then edit Makefile in 2 places: COMPUTE_CAP=30 CUDA_HOME=/usr/local/cuda-9.2 for gtx1070 thats COMPUTE_CAP=61 and right path depends on distro, probably somewhere to /opt then make |
|
|
|
Ничего не понимаю, когда ты шлёшь свои простыни и комментарии по английски. Если твои расчёты работают, почему ты ещё все баунти не собрал?  |
|
|
|
should i only download the exe file from github ?
Why not? In windows you have 99% or even 100% of software in form of EXE. Why bother compiling bitcrack? |
|
|
|
on 1080ti, can run 100 programs on one card with speed 1-2mk\s, this allows a larger scatter range to scan simultaneously ().
Are you sure that overall speed is not lower with 100 copies? You can easily do the same with simplest scripts and switches -s, --start Staring key, in hex -r, --range Number of keys to search to scan each range at full speed, then skip to next. |
|
|
|
Don't listen to ignorant andzhig. Theoretically it should work on CPU or Intel GPU, NDV said that he made some fixes to original vg code. You should use NDV OCL version, but you have to setup OCL drivers for CPU first. I haven't tried. I don't think it makes sense now, when puzzles 55-57 are found. phrase "Xeon CPUs, not the best, but alright. I was getting at least 33.6 million keys/sec on a 96-CPU machine." from https://github.com/brichard19/BitCrack/issues/40dunno who is this. Maybe UnknownHostname dude and crappy LBC software. But still, it only makes sense to search with several GPUs now, not 48CPU cores. Even if they are free/stolen. |
|
|
|
This is a game for geniuses with great minds.
The most funny thing - the guy who took 3 puzzles in a row just bought 3 gtx1080ti. The next megagenius is the one, who will step in with 5 1080ti's |
|
|
|
Looks like the LBC is behind and someone else is solving these puzzles.
Looks like you've been sleeping for too long Stupid rico is still continuing on depleted 55-range. Of course not a single sane person will participate in LBC now. I am pretty sure some large farm of >1000 GPUs or so switched from mining ETH to solving these private keys, already 2 of them were solved beating LBC pretty much.
Maybe a Martian Colony of Sectoids awoke to snatch our precious 32BTC! p.s. If you do a simple math, you'll see that the guy who took puzzle 55 and puzzle 56 only have speed of 1000 megakeys. That's less than LBC had several months ago. If rico wasn't such a worthless project manager, this could be LBC. Now sane people use BitCrack, it makes 1000megakeys with only two gtx1080ti.  |
|
|
|
|
Arulbero's magic proggie can calculate PK of spent puzzle56 because 2^55 - 2^56 is relatively small range.
puzzle161 is spent, but the range 2^161 - 2^162 is 40564819207303340847894502572032 times larger
>Vanitygen's main purpose if for creating personalized address, not to bruteforce private keys.
nc50lc, you should read at least first page before commenting in topic.
|
|
|
|
I have try with my 1060
This result give the same speed of Vanitigen, but it not support multi GPU at now.
Default settings are not optimal. Play with -p -b -t settings And it doesn't check uncompressed until you say so. For gtx1070 I got 80MK instead of 40MK with vanitygen. But I dig for collisions also, not only 32BTC bounty. While searching for 32BTC bounty alone I get about 240MK on gtx1070 and that's impressive! |
|
|
|
Tested BitCrack a bit. Seems to work and around 2 times faster then NDV fork. For my list of 97k wallets with gtx1070 I get 80MK, not 40. And CPU is not used at all, not even 1 core. This probably makes NDV fork useless as well. RIP LBC, RIP vanitygen |
|
|
|
and you cant find the key unless you know exactly where it lies in the hexadecimal range
Do you really think that guy who found p55 and p56 "knew exactly" magic numbers? Why a fsck he waited for 3 months between p55 and p56? Why he will spend p57 not tomorrow, but after several months? The correct answer: because he brutforces whole zillion of addresses. And your speed 227MK is fscking awesome - it is almost the whole crapy-bla-bla-fastest-on-the-planet LBC. So this proggie is several times faster then VG from NDV. |
|
|
|
|
Hey! Still no benchmarks on good cards?
|
|
|
|
There is another project BitCrack that does the same thing and some people are getting 440 million keys per second on a GTX 1080. Why is it so much faster than VanityGen??
So? Did you test puzzle56? Is it really working? |
|
|
|
Vanitygen Plus has been reported not fully using all Vga when run multiple card (6 cards).
Do you test vg from ndv with 6 cards, is the hash rate is sum of 6 cards.
Tried 2 cards. If you have 6 CPU cores, it will probably SUM performance fine. |
|
|
|
...
you're not only shitcoin crupto guru, but also a negotiations guru. OK, let it be - replaced "fork" for "upgrade" in title. At your age you should start taking nootropics, because you've read the performance comparisons, but still cannot commit in memory. maybe no free space in brain, heh? |
|
|
|
There is another project BitCrack that does the same thing and some people are getting 440 million keys per second on a GTX 1080. Why is it so much faster than VanityGen??
Theoretically CUDA doesn't have noticeable advantage over OPENCL. So being 4-7 times faster means either this guy is a genius either this proggie is a scam. I see that latest commit was in August, so it is easy to check for scam, try to search near 44218742292676575 (puzzle 56, which was found in September), if it finds - maybe it is not scam. Also it is good idea to order some 3rd part review. |
|
|
|
The fastest tool now is not vanitygen from NDV, but profanity from NDV Someone ELSE ordered him another version and this time he took ethereum vanity generator profanity and modified it for BTC. Says now it does 170megakeys on single amd 580 card  This software is NOT for cracking 32btc puzzle, but the speed is relevant, so the guy who took p55 and p56 probably invested not much money to become fastest and collect all loot I guess he already returned investments in hardware. Or maybe he is using vanitygen with around 10 1080ti cards. But that's not funds efficient as 3-4 cards + better software. |
|
|
|
|
