Question:
What that line means: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)
That's a range check, it means if dAmount is below 0 or over 150,000,000. Or to put it differently if dAmount is not between 0.00000001 and 150,000,000 then do whatever is in the code block that follows. Yes, that's a range check for returning the error "Invalid amount." The purpose of including that is to show that the 150 Million number was typed explicitly in two different places. Coins typically use the MAX_MONEY variable there. |
|
|
|
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.
That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics? MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity. MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system. What the fuck are you talking about? How would those "extra coins" be generated? You clearly have no idea how cryptocurrencies function. The most likely way would be for them to push an update to adjust the reward. As I said, we did not find evidence of a hidden premine currently in existence. What legitimate explanation for this obviously deliberate adjustment to the variables do you have? |
|
|
|
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident.
That's retarded. How the fuck are you able to run an exchange, if you can't even figure out the basics? MAX_MONEY doesn't indicate maximum supply, it's a check value for transaction validity. MAX_MONEY itself doesn't provide extra coins, but it means they could be inserted into the blockchain and the network would consider them valid. This would be even easier to do using the "trustless" anon system. |
|
|
|
Poloniex has decided not to list SuperCoin because of some disturbing things we turned up in our code review. I would like to draw your attention to this part of the ANN post: - Total PoW coins will be 18.2 millions.
- Total coins (including PoS) will be about 50,000,000.
And these parts of the source code: if (dAmount <= 0.0 || dAmount > 150000000.0)
static const int64_t MAX_MONEY = 150000000 * COIN;
static const int64_t POW_MAX_MONEY = 50000000 * COIN;
MAX_MONEY is pretty much what it sounds like. This means that the actual maximum supply of SuperCoin is 150 million, not 50 million. Furthermore, the maximum PoW coins is 50 million, rather than the claimed 18.2 million. The 150 million number appears twice in the code, so it can hardly be considered an accident. We did not find evidence of an existing hidden premine, but extra coins could potentially be minted all at once at the end of the PoW phase, sent to exchanges via the "anon" feature, and dumped. We have other concerns about the coin, particularly concerning the proposed method of anonymity, but the shenanigans with the maximum supply is sufficient for us to reject this coin. |
|
|
|
|
I am still holding onto the seized funds for now. It is likely they will simply go to the Qora foundation, as there is absolutely no way of proving Qora holdings on ShareXcoin, and I'm not sure what else there is to do. Perhaps they can go to a special Qora-related project that the community votes on. I think at this point, it's up to you guys and the Qora dev.
|
|
|
|
|
Since seizing 0.8 BTC and 24M Qora from suspicious accounts, ShareXcoin has remained silent and the account holders on Poloniex have not objected. It seems pretty safe to assume that the funds I have seized are indeed stolen.
The question now is what to do with them. I do not see a way of distributing them to affected people, because there is no source of proof about ShareXcoin balances. Has this question been discussed?
I am still waiting to hear back from qora (dev) about the stability of Qora and the suitability of it for an exchange; that is why the market is still frozen.
|
|
|
|
|
I've been updating people on Twitter and in this thread. The wallet is not syncing, I'm in contact with the dev. Transactions cannot be sent if the wallet does not sync. I'm sorry the market has been frozen for so long, but we're doing everything we can.
|
|
|
|
|
I am still waiting to hear back from the Qora dev about whether it is safe to continue trading Qora. When the recent Sharexcoin transaction vanished from the block explorer, only to reappear hours later, I decided I needed to hear from the dev about the current stability of this coin. That is why it is still frozen--it has nothing to do with ShareXcoin.
Regarding ShareXcoin, at the moment it looks like I have seized about 24 million Qora and 0.80 BTC. I'm not sure what should be done with this money, as we don't have a record of people's ShareXcoin balances.
|
|
|
|
|
You're absolutely right. I could give you excuses, but the short and long of it is that we screwed up. I'll tweet a status update now.
|
|
|
|
Can anyone tell me why GRC has been frozen at Poloniex for like a week and counting? This seems worrisome to me (and the fact that I bought some GRC just before the market got frozen isn't helping). Since Poloniex is listed as an official exchange in the OP, it would be at least partially the responsibility of the devs to get that fixed..
Just a quick update: - Still no progress from Poloniex' side (been frozen for well over a week now) - I had opened a ticket with Poloniex 3 days ago, which got closed without a response 2 days ago. I have reopened it myself, still no response The fact that Poloniex doesn't seem to care about its users is a very bad signal. You can't just leave a whole market frozen for more than a week, without news and without responding to support tickets, while in the meanwhile the users have no way of touching their coins. A week in crypto is like a lifetime, and this is absolutely ridiculous. I'll be pulling out all of my coins from Poloniex, because this exchange just doesn't seem trustworthy at all. I am very sorry your tickets received no response. There is really no excuse for that. GRC has only been frozen due to the compilation issues. We have just gotten it compiled and running, and are now trying to get it to sync. I anticipate the GRC market will be unfrozen today. |
|
|
|
|
It seems the same person deposited a pile of Qora to Poloniex on another account, dumped a lot of it, and withdrew around 14M. I have frozen this account as well. There is 0.80 BTC in this account. I believe I have closer to 24M Qora from the other account, but the block explorer keeps changing its mind about transactions, so I can't be certain.
Curiously, the account holder had plenty of opportunity to withdraw the 0.8 BTC, but never did. The only reason I have to believe that the accounts are connected is that this account also withdrew to the Sharexcoin address.
Has no one heard anything from Sharexcoin? Did they just vanish without a word?
|
|
|
|
|
Devs have sponsored a BCC giveaway at Poloniex. Claim your 500 BCC at poloniex.com/giveaways.
|
|
|
|
It seems that Sharexcoin run away. This account( QXx7SnaEPvEczS8rX7HZKH3pY4vXG8ATxK ) is belong to Sharexcoin. It's really weird. The blance is 65,039,585 at this moment. Most of them was transfered in at last two trasactions(one is 49,999,998, and other is 14,517,059,the total is 64517057) which all come from poloniex. That means before the last two trasactions the blance only have 522,528 Qora. Where is the coins? Most of them(77,500,896) sent to this account:QjVweW35i1D8FqCNaGDuQ4xWHQyYHaT3Gp at the same time which sent to poloniex to dump. Most likely this account:QjVweW35i1D8FqCNaGDuQ4xWHQyYHaT3Gp is belong to Sharexcoin too(I hope I am wrong). None of us know ziplibrary, and nobody can contact him. If he dispear, we all lost our money in his exchange. It's really risk to trade at Sharexcoin.com. We have frozen the account to which the address QjVweW35i1D8FqCNaGDuQ4xWHQyYHaT3Gp belongs -- there is some odd activity there. Can we verify that the QXx7SnaEPvEczS8rX7HZKH3pY4vXG8ATxK address belongs to Sharexcoin? Have multiple people received withdrawals from that address? |
|
|
|
YOUR CHEAP EXCHANGE IS CONSTANTLY SLOW. I think when you say upgrading servers you really mean downgrading. It seems the only thing bulsoni puts time in is making his friends into mods.. . I mean how many mods do you need for one troll box...
I find myself visiting polo less and less each day.... I suggest you visit Mintpal and Bteer and learn what it takes to be a credible exchange.
Also traders should get an option to cancel a new buy or sell order, but all you get once placing an order is a popup with ONLY "ok" button. This popup should give the option to cancel and the fact that it doesn't says that ur exchange is preying on peoples typing mistakes... Again look at how credible exchanges do it.
Actually, I don't hire new mods myself; I haven't for some time. I do apologize for the recent slowness. We're rapidly making progress in moving the site to all new servers with proper load balancing. It should be done today or tomorrow. |
|
|
|
I want to transfer some MRO from cryptonote.exchange to Poloniex.
Seem's I have to transer MRO to my wallet and after than transer it to poloniex
It's Complex
I'm hopeful that over time the exchanges will just switch to the usual method of generating a deposit address for each customer. The current method is a pain and is putting unencrypted payment IDs into the block chain, potentially compromising privacy. I think they are doing it the way they are because the wallet APIs for Monero are currently very rough, but that will improve over time. Shorter term, the exchanges may provide a method to give a payment ID for withdrawals, which would allow direct transfers. For now, yes you need to need to send to your own wallet first. I think this is something the wallet needs to implement. As far as I can see, the only way to do this now would be to have separate wallet files for each deposit address, which is insane. |
|
|
|
Is Chancecoin traded on exchanges ?
It will be soon.  |
|
|
|
|
It seems the dev is going through some personal issues. Hopefully he'll answer someone soon. I'm willing to leave it up if something is going to be done with it.
|
|
|
|
|
I can't really seize control of someone's funds. If you all want to do some sort of community takeover, I would be open to considering leaving the WOLF market up, but we really should get in contact with this guy. I'll send him an email and see if he answers.
|
|
|
|
From Poloniex...... "Markets for the following coins will be delisted on May 13th: MZC, SPA, SXC, SOC, SMC, MAX, LOVE, WOLF"
Seriously?!!! So what do we need to do with the remaining wolf?! It can't be traded anywhere else, and when you send it somewhere else, we lose 10%! I suggest to contact Dev via the people who vouched for him right how. Can someone try to negotiate with Poloniex? As far as I know they also vouched for thye Dev. This is just ridiculous! I assumed the coin was dead, as it has had practically no volume for some time. How long has the dev been missing? Did he just run out? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
