|
Well, let's put things in perspective, segwit (what you call 'original bitcoin') came AFTER bitcoin cash.
What I think is happening is that people are starting to accept the fact that bitcoin cash (BCH) can successfully deliver on both fronts: store of value AND transactional/payment capabilities so it'd have the best of both worlds whereas core/segwit seems to focus mainly on store of value.
Personally, I'd give priority to store of value but the transaction/payment/currency market is actually a LOT larger than gold so if BCH can deliver on both fronts then Bitcoin in general will face NO competition and will cement its place as THE cryptocurrency king and really take off. What I really like about BCH is that the block size can be dynamic and not fixed so it could adjust accordingly.
Most of the comments you will find around in forums refer to calling names the people behind these projects to discredit them and play the fundamentalism card. I couldn't' care less about that. I only care about the power of their ideas and ability to deliver. :-)
It's unfortunate that the community is divided but let's not forget that we are all for bitcoin and we should not be divided. I'm cautiously optimistic about BCH but let's see what the market decides.
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry. It didn't work. I'll PM you instead to see if you can help me complete a similar code I have already and work something out.
|
|
|
|
|
Since there's no uninstaller, I tried to re-install it and this time around it gets stuck in "Download Files" forever. This happens regardless of whether the AV is turned off or on.
Which directory does it employ? I'd rather delete all of it manually and try again.
|
|
|
|
|
Hi,
Thanks. I have Windows 10 with its standard built-in Defender AV but I'll give it another shot today and let you know soon.
|
|
|
|
|
I did follow the video but somehow the Bitfinex connection provider doesn't show up in NT 7 after installing the connector. I have Win 10.
|
|
|
|
|
After installing it, it doesn't seem to show up in NT 7 or 8 (I have both).
Is there any uninstaller? It doesn't seem to show up in "Installed programs".
|
|
|
|
|
Do you have open source of the connector? (Just to make sure it's all good/clean). I was mostly interested in the BCH/BTC and ETH/BTC pairs
|
|
|
|
Is anybody also having display issues with the site? The depth chart, order book and other panels are only partially displayed at the bottom of the page (rather than at the right) and only the title of those sections is displayed. Please help.  |
|
|
|
|
Does anyone know if there is any daily limit to withdraw BTC from Poloniex? (NOT fiat).
|
|
|
|
Any plans to finally add Kraken BTC-ETH pair? Hope you realize it's one of the top traded pairs. Please add it soon!  Thanks!! |
|
|
|
|
Mycelium seems to be poorly integrated with Trezor: I keep getting stuck at "scanning Accounts" for 5 minutes before it can find (when successful. It's a hit and miss) any btc account in the trezor device.
In addition, it doesn't seem to be correctly adding up the full balance shown as when I use Electrum instead with the same exact Trezor.
Any pointers?
|
|
|
|
Is it possible to use Trezor from an android phone?
Not yet. There is a library that allows Android app to communicate with TREZOR here: https://github.com/trezor/trezor-android and BitcoinJ people are working on adding necessary stuff (BIP39, BIP44) to their library so we'll have everything needed to build a TREZOR App for Android. Very nice. Cannot wait to receive mine.  I just bought a blackphone, so if you build this app, it would be nice to publish apk on github and/or amazon store or f-droid as I don't use the playstore  I read somewhere in reddit that Trezor does work with Blackphone with its own secure/modified version of Android (since Google is NSA partner) and Mycelium. Expensive but worth it if you have enough btc to protect. I hope the TREZOR team keeps supporting Mycelium. It seems like a great combo. |
|
|
|
The value of S5s have depreciated faster than the value of S7s this week.
That will continue until the S5 is obselete. Not so sure . When I look at the market I have the feeling some tried to use the panic to push the market down . But with the next diff and BTC price the ROI should stay below 180 days for at least 20 more days . So right now some whale is making good money . +1, if the S5 price still goes down while bitcoin price increases, it would only benefit the people who bought the GH, those people who sold their GHs for reason become jelly for the mining shares. nowadays the transaction fee is increasing, thus the mining is now much more fierce than ever. Do people buying hashes in Hashnest get any transaction fees? If no, any reason why? I don't think I've seen my payouts increase |
|
|
|
|
So how are the miner transaction fees passed to Hashnest miners? I expect Hashnest to be "dynamic fee-ready"
It's very likely that bitcoin moves to a transaction-based economy after halving.
Can anyone here tell us how we'll need to be fairly compensated in order to keep our mining operations minimally profitable in harmony with the pool?
|
|
|
|
Hello, I'm getting this error after installing the last electrum 2.6 version for Ubuntu (previous version was working perfectly). Any pointers? Note the import name error at the end... :-( Using /usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages
Finished processing dependencies for Electrum==2.6
waingro@ubuntu:~/electrum$ ./electrum
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "./electrum", line 316, in <module>
plugins = init_plugins(config, config.get('gui', 'qt'))
File "./electrum", line 247, in init_plugins
return Plugins(config, is_bundle or is_local or is_android, gui_name)
File "/home/waingro/electrum/lib/util.py", line 171, in <lambda>
return lambda *args, **kw_args: do_profile(func, args, kw_args)
File "/home/waingro/electrum/lib/util.py", line 167, in do_profile
o = func(*args, **kw_args)
File "/home/waingro/electrum/lib/plugins.py", line 49, in __init__
self.load_plugins()
File "/home/waingro/electrum/lib/plugins.py", line 55, in load_plugins
m = loader.find_module(name).load_module(name)
File "/usr/lib/python2.7/pkgutil.py", line 246, in load_module
mod = imp.load_module(fullname, self.file, self.filename, self.etc)
File "/home/waingro/electrum/plugins/btchipwallet.py", line 11, in <module>
ImportError: cannot import name make_password_dialog
|
|
|
|
|
Is Hashnest down? I get only scrambled, partial web page stuff displayed.
|
|
|
|
|
Would it be possible to make semi-transparent the price box that's displayed in the cross pointer.
Blocking completely the underlying chart doesn't allow me to pinpoint the specific price of any candlestick section. This is a bit cumbersome so improving it would be awesome!
|
|
|
|
People are crazy. S7 will be sooo expensive. S5 is still the place to be for the next month at least. Cheap GH for me!  At current price 8 BTC/S7=1.66BTC/THs is the ROI at about 250 days which is not bad considering the fact S7 can survive next year's halving while S5 at current BTC price/diff combination surely not. So I can understand the frenzy of selling off S5. That is true, but it is still a month away and ROI on S5 at these prices is the best it's been in months. Something like 222 days, I'm scooping some up at least for a short period! Or perhaps some of those selling now are selling on purpose to dump the price down so they can buy back in and get more hash than they started with. I can not think of any other reason really because if S7 hashpower is not available for a month or so, why sell it otherwise..Could understand if people started selling the same day S7 hashpower was available. People are unreasonable. And once the price starts heading down down down, more people jump on the sell bandwagon because they don't want to see their investment lose money, so they sell. Give it a couple of days and they price will recover to where it was before. I don't find it unreasonable. Many sellers might simply want to cash out after a long period of mining and just want to take home good money or simply retire and be done with it before the price keeps going down further. People don't necessarily have to keep mining until death. |
|
|
|
Does the "PPS/TH Earnings" number in the HashNest website already factor in maintenance or is it mining revenue BEFORE maintenance expenses?
Same question on the cumulative "Payout Total" number.
A small sample. Payout Total(BTC) 41.01489779 Maintenance(BTC) 21.49802663 Maintenance/Payout(PPS) is today not important at all Hasnest pays per PPLSN Mining Revenue Distribution 1. Mining revenues generated from Hashnest mining contracts will be paid out using the PPLSN (Pay Per Last N Shares) method. But the PPS/TH Earnings line in the chart is AFTER or BEFORE maintenance? |
|
|
|
|
Does the "PPS/TH Earnings" number in the HashNest website already factor in maintenance or is it mining revenue BEFORE maintenance expenses?
Same question on the cumulative "Payout Total" number.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
