 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2]
|
I heard a source that the CS might be listed on binance in April and this could happen because I believe this project has a very good development strategy and they have the support from all over the community Cryptocurrency. I am considering investing more CS because the price of CS is very cheap
Binance does not list scams. Credits will never moon because people who buy this coin does not have the money to buy it up. If they had the money, they would not buy this coin. HAHA, that's an overstatement  Or a lie, whatever suits you. With pre-Beta Credits have shown that they're not a scam, there is a product behind it, which is functional, though they logically still have a few bugs. But they should eliminate most of them for Beta and certainly until the main-net in June. The question is how many transactions per second can they achieve, but we need to wait for a proper test with enough transactions. Right now there's not enough transactions to view that. It doesn't matter how much Sebastian and therat can FUD the project, Credits at least have something to show unlike most of other ICO projects. I am still waiting for the code to see if they are really legit or just another project, who claim to be ETH killer without a substance. |
|
|
|
some parts of the new beta codereview....No. Just. No. Come on Credits team, you guys are better than this, let’s have a telegram chat or something and discuss this architecture and design, but it hurts me to keep seeing implementations like this, as a [Suspicious link removed]munity we can do a lot better and we should do a lot better! New coins are created and saved locally in a CSV.
Ok guys, I’m done for now, I really loved that the guys from Credits gave me the client early, and I really wanted to like the code more, but it’s still very very basic and very junior. This is student level code unfortunately, they did improve from last time, but it’s still so far away from being something real, we aren’t at PoC level yet, we can’t be talking about beta already.
Conclusion: They did update MD5 to Blake, but the rest is unfortunately still no where near the level it needs to be able to compete in this field or against the caliber of developers out there. Credits team, let’s talk, I want to help
still amateurish........... This just shows the ignorance and FUD incentives of people, Credits haven't released the preBeta yet and he just reviewed an Alpha. |
|
|
|
Unbelievable how naive people are for investing into this scamtoken. Reminds me of bitconnect, history repeating itself lol.
LOL at you comparing this to Bitconnect, which was known to everybody that it was a ponzi scheme from the beginning and is totally different to Credits, which you claim is a scam. Take your pills you piece of sh*t and relax watching these scammers going to zero.
We dont care for your investment if you are such a looser.
We care for newcomers that they are seeing your bullsh*ts and they are thinking of investing.
They should know your true potential that its to scam them.
Create more new accounts to comment on us you sh*ts! And LOL at you warning newcomers, who don't even know what Bitcointalk is. Everyone reading this thread (counting out alleged bots) who also invested in Credits are somewhat more knowledgeable and know the associated risks. We/they have also estimated that the possible reward is worth it. |
|
|
|
Sebastian has ruined this thread I would like to hear other peoples views without them getting all this crap
If its crap warning newcomers because you want to scam them then im fine with that. I never thought i can make scammers so pissed off. Block me as your team is doing on telegram, reddit, medium, twitter and facebook. Your sh*ty ico is banning everyone who asks for proofs for their claims in all social media. Thats not how legit projects work. That how scams work. Majority of banned people were not asking for proof, but were accusing them of being a scam. I somewhat agree with you though and some of them were asking legit questions. |
|
|
|
Can you give some evidence you were banned only for asking for the proof? Because I saw a lot of FUD-ers on Credits Telegram and there were some really ignorant, hateful people spreading nonsense and it's no wonder many were banned. Many people were also asking the same question over and over again when it was already answered, so it was absolutely necessary to ban them to keep the discussion at least somewhat informative and civil. On the other side there's also many lambos and mooners, but enthusiasm is not really bannable offense.
They were a lot of people banned on telegram. Search the net and you will find out yourself. Deleting posts on reddit from the army they created. Deleting posts on medium when their army reported about it too. Plenty of times. For the last time. ITS NOT FUD ASKING FOR PROOFS! They made a statement about 300k transcations and as everybody knows you have to prove your statement too. Thats how things work. They made a statement about 1.000.000 and 300k TPS but their "expert devs" used MD5 for providing private keys. They made a statement about 1.000.000 and 300k TPS but they need bots to promote their sh*ty coin. They made a statement about 1.000.000 and 300k TPS but their whitepaper is written by basic marketers. These statements and how they are acting are two contradictory things. And I said that they had to ban people because they were just spreading hate or nonsense by screaming SCAM! STUPID INVENSTORS!... so I can see why a legitimate FUD-er could be mistaken for a troll. And I also know for a fact that at least 1 guy was banned for trolling and yelling "scam" and he later went on some forum to complain he was banned for no particular reason. So you see why I can't completely believe you when you say that you were banned for no reason. |
|
|
|
I see that people continue to write negative reviews about CREDITS. If you do not like the project, then sell your tokens and forget about this project!! Time will tell who will be right.
Of course time will show who is right. Until then we will inform newcomers and potential investors what is going on so they can find by themselves the truth. They cant ban us here because we speak the truth and inform others as they did on telegram. they said they managed to 300k tps. we asked for proofs and they banned us from telegram channel. thats not how a legit project works. thats how scams work. Can you give some evidence you were banned only for asking for the proof? Because I saw a lot of FUD-ers on Credits Telegram and there were some really ignorant, hateful people spreading nonsense and it's no wonder many were banned. Many people were also asking the same question over and over again when it was already answered, so it was absolutely necessary to ban them to keep the discussion at least somewhat informative and civil. On the other side there's also many lambos and mooners, but enthusiasm is not really bannable offense. |
|
|
|
Also tomorrow should the bountys be credited, so I expect another dump.
Do you or anyone else have any idea how many Credits are going to be credited? |
|
|
|
You macho man i forgot to give you a reply about my hobby.
My hobby is to expose scammers and im sure i helped here so new potential investors think twice before they throw their money to an empty project.
You can go and cry in the corner with stejas.
If time tells that the project and the team are legit, will you apologize for constant spamming? Don't you think that for a investment you need much more certainty? If they going to bring up real proofs I will be the first one who will put money in this project again, but I doubt that they will You're talking about more certainty in crypto space where almost all ICO's are BS anyway without any product? Credits at least have a sort of deadline for their progress unlike many ICO's, who are in development for eternity. I do agree that some important things are missing for Credits that is why I am still undecided about them. But almost everthing will be cleared by April, because the following things need to be done until the end of March: - Release a video confirmation for 300k t/s - Release the Beta - Upload more code to Github |
|
|
|
You macho man i forgot to give you a reply about my hobby.
My hobby is to expose scammers and im sure i helped here so new potential investors think twice before they throw their money to an empty project.
You can go and cry in the corner with stejas.
If time tells that the project and the team are legit, will you apologize for constant spamming? |
|
|
|
Now reviewers go to work That's a big part of the FUD answered, so anyone can see that there is something behind this project. I don't know if this part of the code is legit, but at least they wanted to show that they want to be taken seriously. |
|
|
|
Very good growth showed credits after the ico,I think if it were not for the falling market, the figure of$ 1 would not be the limit.
I am really surprised when the price of CREDIT can grow too much like that after ICO. Really the rumor can be affect the trend. FOMO is stronger than my imagine, this project got success faster than any project I have invested until today  When the opening price on the exchange is the same as in the ICO, a 2-3x increase (current price in sat) isn't really such an unbelieavable growth. |
|
|
|
|
I bought few millions of DIME and sold it at profit later when I realised that any progress will be made very very slowly with enormous sell walls and multiple arbitrage opportunities with DOGE (at 2,3,4,5,6,... sats). But I will pay close attention to any sudden decreases in sell walls and announcements in the future. The fact is that the development of DIME is still at pre-ICO levels after changing the guard and don't count it as a scam.
|
|
|
|
52 BTC of sells at 2 SAT on livecoin. Do you guys really see this moving?
And 90 BTC on Coin Exchange. Who the hell has so many coins? The old guard,...? |
|
|
|
I think that this coin will soon cost a lot, and you can get a good profit, wow. Currently the price is too low and people are buying it in DOGE for arbitrage and try to sell it on BTC market for 2 satoshis. I hope once DOGE price rises above 0.018 (2 sat of BTC), this will eliminate arbitrage opportunities and more growth. |
|
|
|
|
