 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
What if you can't log back into bitfunder because of 2fa and password issues. I used the same email with b itfunder as I did with c-t. I know how many shares I have and everything except the bitfunder info. How do I proceed.
I had the same issue, click help on the bitfunder page and use the embedded irc window. Talk to Ukyo and explain the situation. He responded to me and fixed it within 15 minutes i can't get the irc window to work. any idea how i can verify my account, i have the same issue as above. is a signed message from your wallet good enough? |
|
|
|
|
lol someone bought the .041 ipo instead of the .0395 ipo..
|
|
|
|
Why would you worry about that? Don't you know how many shares you own? Your shares are already attached to the bitcoin address you had connected to bitfunder.
Shares were sent to AMC-tender, that means they are no longer attached to my bitfunder address. They were sent to an account that Ken controls, how am I supposed to prove ownership of said shares? They were sent to AMC-TENDER from your bitfunder account that is connected to your bitcoin address so if you can prove ownership of that bitcoin address then you're good. Ken controls them so he can move then to a non-defunct securities exchange. What is to stop Ken saying he purchased those shares from me? Don't get me wrong I'm pretty confident that wont happen but technically I transferred my shares to another person, so whilst I can prove I owned them at some point in time proving ownership currently is nigh on impossible since they are not in my possession and I freely transferred them to another party. Who would you have to prove ownership to other than Ken? wasn't there a list posted for the amc tenders? if so, doesn't that mean that at the point in time that address transferred said shares? btw how exactly do you use your bitcoin address to send a verification??? does anyone have a step by step guide or a link to one? |
|
|
|
BTC dropped under 400 $ , so divs may will suffer from hosting costs
|
|
|
|
when are div's paid out??  when is the 'normal' time? |
|
|
|
how do we know that is Ken? edit: found it...   |
|
|
|
Yes, I see.. CryptX treats bitcoins in payout queue as already 'paid' and uses them in divs calculations.
Is there ever an instant that eligius would not be able to payout the all the bitcoins due? |
|
|
|
Weekly Update 4/2/2014
Shares:
Next week I will start transferring shares to CT so our investors can start trading.
Sounds familiar... |
|
|
|
AM price is $0.5-$1 per Gh/s, not per chip.
Also, you used just the cost of a bare chip.
Need to add the cost to design and manufacture the PCBs, populate PCBs with chips, add cooling, power...
good catch |
|
|
|
with asicminer gen 3 successful, any ideas about getting a large batch of chips from them like rockminer is doing
that would make waaay too much sense Isn't the 3rd gen 55nm vs the 28nm they are working with now? And you can totally mine with chips alone. Just PNP. Asicminer gen3 chips are 40nm, and very efficient, based on specifications: Specification
Process node: 40nm
Package type: QFN64 8mmx8mm (with another option of QFN64 7mmx7mm possible)
I/O: Standard SPI protocol with clk, in, out and cs.
Rated Hashrate: 12.8GHash/s per chip, with a wide range of overclock/downclock options
Rated Voltage: 0.72V, recommended voltage range is 0.55V-1V
Power Consumption: 0.2J/GHash low voltage, 0.35J/GHash rated voltage Yesterday they (AM) got first batch of chips, and now are doing some testing. I would really like that CryptX take AM chips into consideration. Reference board design will be open-source. I second that, with the same amount of bitcoins that we spent on 18TH we could have had alot more possibly within the next month as AM expects to mass produce within the next month. 108 BTC @500= $54000 @ .5-1$ per chip hashing at 12.8GH = 691200 GH (691.2TH) earliest delivery - 1382400 GH (1382TH) (later delivery). someone check my math... |
|
|
|
with asicminer gen 3 successful, any ideas about getting a large batch of chips from them like rockminer is doing
that would make waaay too much sense |
|
|
|
|
its been 3 months since my last check in, three links (i think) from the original forum later i find this thread. we still are not hashing, can't trade our shares and there is no verification system... this is fucking stupid.
|
|
|
|
Of course not.
I just wanted to correct Usman056 on that 13-16%.
Understood so sorry, i didn't feel like going through and collecting the all the data points. point taken  |
|
|
|
seems more hw coming online, default miners is 67 TH  73.50 Th/s now for 'default' worker, 134 Th/s total  (22 min average, so it's not variance) yup more stuff coming online 12 hours 116.44 Th/s 1171148624 3 hours 119.81 Th/s 301266688 22.5 minutes 134.24 Th/s 42194176 256 seconds 136.00 Th/s 8106033 128 seconds 136.04 Th/s 4054342 MOAR HASH!! 12 hours 117.61 Th/s 1182927104 3 hours 124.51 Th/s 313100816 22.5 minutes 137.63 Th/s 43261440 256 seconds 143.09 Th/s 8529042 128 seconds 146.50 Th/s 4366045 we are still not keeping up with predicted difficulty increase (18.48% https://bitcoinwisdom.com/bitcoin/difficulty)... We only increased hash by 13-16%. if we keep getting equipment weekly at 20TH per week we may be able to squeeze out some more div's per difficulty but thats if there isn't a supply problem which there clearly is.. |
|
|
|
5000$/TH ? Seems overpriced to me. Plus they're not new models, meaning that the power consumption is probably high. With the current reinvestment fund you'll buy 5TH at most... not sure if it's a good idea. Definitely overpriced. Ironically the current cost of buying 1TH by simply purchasing PETA shares is around $5000. 1000GH / 8.68 = 115.2 shares of PETA required to equal 1TH. 115.2 * 0.073 (Current price on Havelock per share) = 8.4 BTC to purchase 1TH of PETA. 8.4 * $610 (rate per BTC on Bitstamp) = $5124.00 Keep in mind that the PETA share price is already up 46% from the initial price that CryptX sold them for. If we base it on the IPO price per share of 0.05 then the cost per TH for PETA is only around $3500.00. Any reinvestment in PETA needs to be for faster/better equipment. It seems that most trying to sell (old) mining equipment are greedily trying to get all the profit that such equipment would have generated until it had become obsolete. The party purchasing this equipment would get little more than their initial investment back. How is this overpriced? The spreadsheet cryptx released prices their cost per TH @ 4500. Yes, we aren't at the 700th starting line yet, but we will get there. I am not sure you are up to speed on what/how cryptx/petamine is designed to operate. At the moment there is no "better/faster" equipment than the 28nm chips they are buying from bitmine. There is no reason to believe that bitmine is mining with equipment before selling it. After the hardware that was ordered from bitmine/cointerra is deployed, going forward it will be custom equipment with the A1 chips from bitmine. AFAIK KnC is the only one working on 20nm and they wont be ready for months. So we are "stuck" with 28 for the time being, it will be profitable for quite sometime. Looking further down the road, hopefully cryptx has or will reach out and align themselves with someone working on the next gens of chip design so that when that tech is ready it can be deployed as soon as chips are available. I am up to date, what we need is an actual update about the bitmine fiasco, are they or not delivering PETA's hardware on time? as someone mentioned earlier, this is all time sensitive if we can't get hashing now while the difficulty is relatively lower than it will be in say 3 months when we get the 700 TH deployed that hashing power will never make ROI. So what needs to be done is to calculate, if the price difference between the "true" contract rate of mining hardware from Bitmine and other hardware available is close enough to make a profit now while we wait for them to deliver then why not do so? IE ( price of available hardware at a good hash rate - price of contracted rate from bitmine) = small amount of money ($500?) Can that hardware boost increase our hash to a level that will ROI on that hardware before the difficulty increases to such a level that all the hardware becomes obsolete? based on the other contributors on Eligius pool, if we look at 1swrtyBsp9odruX65upeyubAVSAyggh78 take the difference between their daily BTC earning and hashing power difference which at this time is about 6 TH. if we bought 6 TH and could start hashing immediately (this is theoretical but i hope you get the point) we could be making about 0.72666091 more BTC per day. IF the difficulty had just changed, and we hashed at this rate for one difficulty change (12 days) we could make an extra 8.71993092 BTC which is the cost of about 1/6 of those miners. Its an arms race to squeeze the most BTC out of current difficulty period.  |
|
|
|
|
YAY! were hashing at a wopping 1 gh/s per share... actually its more like .82 gh/s per share.. and this is what a month after "deployment"? your seriously telling me that after putting hundreds of thousands into hardware they don't consider you a priority or that they aren't giving you additional hardware to compensate?
|
|
|
|
Probably stats flutuation on eligius.
Stil the same amount of workers. currently 64TH
My mistake, i've never seen it fluctuate that high.. jumping to conclusions. |
|
|
|
|
