 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
|
|
Still for sale, make me an offer
|
|
|
|
I just tried the latest version of the miner and temperature and fan always show 0 in my case I run 4xRx550 and 1xRX570 Any Ideas? {
{
"hashrate":
{
"thread_0": 257.86,
"thread_1": 255.29,
"thread_2": 260.17,
"thread_3": 255.44,
"thread_4": 262.53,
"thread_5": 265.25,
"thread_6": 232.00,
"thread_7": 239.94,
"thread_8": 503.44,
"thread_9": 465.08,
"thread_all": [257.86, 255.29, 260.17, 255.44, 262.53, 265.25, 232.00, 239.94, 503.44, 465.08],
"thread_gpu": [513.14, 515.60, 527.77, 471.94, 968.51],
"total": 2996.95,
"max": 3004.91
},
"result":
{
"wallet": "45UCHuYkQfriTrWoCC2vhFYBSUHtrTsm4DJduNye42ssJagZPjG2tiFBmdgpvehAhSTCqBo2AfiS5Ukx8R1CVv1A2WiEoHk+18450",
"pool": "monero.pool-moscow.ru:8888",
"ssl": false,
"currency": "Monero (XMR/XMV)",
"difficulty": 18450,
"shares": 1685,
"hashes": 31088250,
"uptime": "2:47:16",
"effective": 3097.67
},
"gpu_status":
[
{ "index": 0, "temperature": 0, "fan": 0, "processor": "gfx804", "memory": 2048, "good_shares": 245, "bad_shares": 0 },
{ "index": 1, "temperature": 0, "fan": 0, "processor": "gfx804", "memory": 2048, "good_shares": 289, "bad_shares": 0 },
{ "index": 2, "temperature": 0, "fan": 0, "processor": "gfx804", "memory": 2048, "good_shares": 314, "bad_shares": 0 },
{ "index": 3, "temperature": 0, "fan": 0, "processor": "gfx804", "memory": 2048, "good_shares": 255, "bad_shares": 0 },
{ "index": 4, "temperature": 0, "fan": 0, "processor": "Ellesmere", "memory": 4096, "good_shares": 582, "bad_shares": 0 }
],
"miner":
{
"version": "jce/0.32f/gpu",
"platform": "Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU G3930 @ 2.90GHz",
"system": "Windows 64-bits",
"algorithm": "3"
}
}
I Also noticed that the last RX550 never goes above 470h/s for some reason The same was noticed in 31f build i an before |
|
|
|
|
Just FYI, Latest 31f version has the same performance for me on RX580/580/550 mixed rig with 18.6.1 driver on windows 10
|
|
|
|
|
Updated the posting, now 16GB RAM and 256 GB SSD in the lenovo for only $50 more
Corsair RAM is sold
|
|
|
|
|
Added photos of all items for sale
|
|
|
|
Hi guys. Has anyone tried Masari on RX550 / 2 GB. I can not adjust parameters either as stable. on the buffin, the cards give out a maximum of 950 h/s for a short time and then the system drops, and 4 cards on the Lexa give out only 800 h/s and then the system drops.
Here is what i used, don't remember exact numbers but hash was around 900 h/s from RX550 2G Hynix { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":432 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":432 },
|
|
|
|
Hi, how old is the M900? Can you post some pics of it to see the condition please. (Inside as well)
Thanks!
M900 was bought last year by a company i used to work at, but was hardly used, just sitting in storage. I bought it from them last fall with the intention of building a firewall appliance with it but opted out for VM ware based server. I'll take some pictures today and will update the post |
|
|
|
I'm cleaning my place and have some computer equipment i have no use for anymore. Everything is located in GTA area Ontario,CanadaI accept crypto or Fiat, though crypto proffered, escrow no problem at buyers expense For some reason not all pictures are displayed inline, here are alternative URLs:https://ibb.co/dSZPBohttps://ibb.co/f5UPBohttps://ibb.co/ghXcWohttps://ibb.co/dEOjBohttps://ibb.co/eoF9cThttps://ibb.co/f4sBrohttps://ibb.co/dLTUcThttps://ibb.co/cmLLj8All prices are in CND dollars Lenovo ThinkCentre M900 I7-6700 16GB Ram 256GB SSD small desktop - $650Lenovo part number is : 10FH000MUS I have upgraded the system with a Samsung 950 Pro 256GB Solid State Drive, PC comes with authentic Windows 10 Pro OS Installed (Product key built in to the BIOS) Detailed Specs: Product Description Lenovo ThinkCentre M900 10FH - Core i7 6700 3.4 GHz - 16 GB - 256GB SSD Type Personal computer - small form factor Platform Technology Intel vPro Technology Localization English Processor 1 x Intel Core i7 (6th Gen) 6700 / 3.4 GHz ( 4 GHz ) ( Quad-Core ) Processor Socket LGA1151 Socket Processor Main Features Hyper-Threading Technology, Intel Turbo Boost Technology 2 Cache Memory 8 MB Cache Per Processor 8 MB RAM 16 GB (installed) / 64 GB (max) - DDR4 SDRAM - non-ECC - 2133 MHz - PC4-17000 Storage Controller SATA ( SATA 6Gb/s ) Hard Drive 1 x 128GB Solid State Drive - SATA 6Gb/s Optical Storage DVD±RW (±R DL) / DVD-RAM Multi-GPU Configuration 1 single GPU card / integrated GPU Graphics Controller Intel HD Graphics 530 Audio Output Stereo Networking Gigabit Ethernet Power AC 120/230 V ( 50/60 Hz ) OS Provided Windows 10 Pro 64-bit Edition / Windows 7 Professional 64-bit Edition downgrade Preinstalled OS Win 7 Pro 64-bit Dimensions (WxDxH) 3.5 in x 14.1 in x 13.3 in Weight 12.35 lbs Corsair Vengeance LPX 32GB (2x16GB) DDR4 2400 (PC4-19200) C16 for DDR4 Systems - Black - $$$SOLD$$$3 x Axiom 8GB DDR3-1600 modules for Lenovo desktops/workstations, brand new sealed - $80 each4 x Original Dell 8GB DDR4-2133 MHz laptop memory upgrade modules, brand new sealed - $100 eachCyberPower CP1500AVRLCD Intelligent LCD UPS System, 1500VA/900W, 12 Outlets, AVR, Mini-Tower, brand new sealed box, reciept from amazon - $160Pictures:       |
|
|
|
|
Anyone has some good settings mining Cryptonight-Fast? Thats the latest Masari Algo. So it looks like the regular V7 settings work pretty good.
|
|
|
|
Could you show me how are you running? im still having problems to connect to my proxy.
all i did just added --nicehash to the command line jce_cn_gpu_miner64.exe -c confgpu.txt --any --forever --nicehash --mport 16000 --variation %FORK% --low -o %POOL%:%PORT% -u %WALLET% -p %PASSWORD% %SSL% %* result: 10:09:40 | CPU Thread 3 finds a Share, value 37173
10:09:40 | Accepted by the pool.
10:10:04 | Pool changes Difficulty to 37182.
10:10:07 | Pool sends a new Job.
10:10:09 | Pool sends a new Job.
10:10:36 | GPU Thread 5 Lane 84 finds a Share, value 37182
10:10:36 | Accepted by the pool.
10:11:24 | Pool changes Difficulty to 37199.
10:11:50 | Pool changes Difficulty to 37219.
10:12:38 | GPU Thread 5 Lane 124 finds a Share, value 37219
10:12:38 | Accepted by the pool.
10:12:50 | Hashrate CPU Thread 0: 75.57 h/s
10:12:50 | Hashrate CPU Thread 1: 77.23 h/s
10:12:50 | Hashrate CPU Thread 2: 77.23 h/s
10:12:50 | Hashrate CPU Thread 3: 75.76 h/s
10:12:50 | Hashrate GPU Thread 4: 259.98 h/s
10:12:50 | Hashrate GPU Thread 5: 262.06 h/s
10:12:50 | Total: 827.81 h/s - Max: 832.13 h/s
10:13:25 | CPU Thread 1 finds a Share, value 37219
10:13:25 | Accepted by the pool.
10:13:26 | GPU Thread 5 Lane 397 finds a Share, value 37219
10:13:26 | Accepted by the pool.
10:13:33 | GPU Thread 5 Lane 57 finds a Share, value 37219
10:13:33 | Accepted by the pool.
10:14:52 | CPU Thread 0 finds a Share, value 37219
10:14:52 | Accepted by the pool.
|
|
|
|
JCE explicitly forbids use of any proxy, i tell it in the doc. that's a security feature, otherwise a miner+proxy packed together could be turned into a botnet with ease.
Jyst FYI, im running one of my miners with JCE through xmrig-proxy with no issues, all i had to do is add --nicehash to the start command line. |
|
|
|
i don't know why, i just bought two rx550, same speed and half the price, and consumes less power. ho, and to answer a previous question: gpu and cpu combined. i think it's good because it allows a cpu to participate to big share mining without being kicked. sure it will find one share per hour but it will worth a lot. i like to see my core2 find a 120000-value share, in the middle of my gpus  I agree, 550s are great but only when you have space to put 12GPU rigs and a lot of them. In my case, its all about the density, but VEGAs are too expensive so i rely on 570/580s |
|
|
|
However i could invest into a Vega if JCE GPU is successful, even if my favorite GPU is RX550 (1/4 speed of vega for 1/8 of price)
Can i suggest also invest into rx570/580, i think the majority of people (myself included) have those cards and would really appreciate any further optimizations I really like the miner, running it already for 2 days on both rigs. Keep up the good work! |
|
|
|
Ohhh. For my RX 580 8Gb finded new best intensity for heavy algo: { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":832 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":832 },
Also finded good parameters for cn-v7 algo for 8Gb cards: { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":1696 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":1696 },
Also miner often gives rejected shares "Job not found"... Just to add more data, for RX570/580 4GB cards, the best settings so far for me on cn-V7 are: { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash": 944},
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash": 944},
|
|
|
|
Ohhh. For my RX 580 8Gb finded new best intensity for heavy algo: { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":832 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":832 },
Also finded good parameters for cn-v7 algo for 8Gb cards: { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":1696 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 64, "beta" : 8, "gamma" : 4, "delta" : 4, "epsilon" : 4, "zeta" : 4, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":1696 },
Also miner often gives rejected shares "Job not found"... Nice settings, thanks for the tip! |
|
|
|
I get Starting GPU Mining thread 0, on GPU 0
Created OpenCL Context for GPU 0 at 0000019eeeb67980
Created OpenCL Thread 0 Command-Queue for GPU 0 at 0000019efc3225f0
Allocating big 4800MB scratchpad for OpenCL Thread 0...
Scratchpad Allocation success for OpenCL Thread 0
Compiling kernels of OpenCL Thread 0, it will be long...
Compilation of OpenCL kernels failed.
Error: CL_BUILD_PROGRAM_FAILURE
When i try to run this for both threads. [/quote] Try to lower "multi_hash":1200 in 16 decrements, so first try "multi_hash":1184 |
|
|
|
is there a better config for a RX580 8GB? With cast xmr i can get pretty much stable 1kH/s.
"gpu_threads_conf" :
[
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":944 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 1, "multi_hash":944 },
]
EDIT: Algo is cryptonight heavy. Also the hashrate with JCE is much more stable. nice work!
For RX580 8GB the best settings i found to be below: { "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1200 },
{ "mode" : "GPU", "worksize" : 8, "alpha" : 128, "beta" : 16, "gamma" : 8, "delta" : 8, "epsilon" : 8, "zeta" : 8, "index" : 0, "multi_hash":1200 },
|
|
|
|
XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.
I tried them all my friend, SRB for me does give a higher hashrate displayed on the rig, but on the pool the hashrate is lower, also SRB is higher about 1-3 % so not worth the hassle considering the fee You just didn't know optimal settings for SRB miner for your cards. It's faster significunt. Expeccially on heavy. On normal v7 srb 1.6.0 can give max speed with the right .srb kernel file. For heavy 1.6.1 can give max speed with the right kernel. On the pools side all right. I checked SRB on few pools, all right. Many forgot that often pool take fee. Can you share you SRB config/kernel for V7 on RX570/580 4/8GB? I would love to try it out Ok. I didn't have 4Gb 570/580 card. There is .srb kernel bin file for rx 580 8Gb: https://yadi.sk/d/1QFcuG-g3YVNWgThis file needs to be copied to "cache" subfolder of SRB miner folder. Than you need 1.6.0 version of miner. On 1.6.1 speed on v7 is lower. In config: { "id" : 0, "intensity" : 116.0, "worksize" : 8, "threads" : 2, "persistent_memory" : false}, It's for 580 8Gb card without connected monitor (more available video memory). Maked and tested on Windows 10 x64 1803 with AMD 18.6.1 driver. This settings require about 7.2Gb of free video memory. P.S. Kernel bin from link woudn't work on 1.6.1 version. doctor changed cn kernels on 1.6.1 version... Thanks for the link, just tried and in fact its a better kernel for RX580 8GB. Where did you get it, is it possible to get one for 4GB RX570/580, i only have 2 8GB cards  |
|
|
|
XMR-Stak is not fastest cryptonight miner. You must try SRB miner. It faster XMR-Stak or XMRig.
I tried them all my friend, SRB for me does give a higher hashrate displayed on the rig, but on the pool the hashrate is lower, also SRB is higher about 1-3 % so not worth the hassle considering the fee You just didn't know optimal settings for SRB miner for your cards. It's faster significunt. Expeccially on heavy. On normal v7 srb 1.6.0 can give max speed with the right .srb kernel file. For heavy 1.6.1 can give max speed with the right kernel. On the pools side all right. I checked SRB on few pools, all right. Many forgot that often pool take fee. Can you share you SRB config/kernel for V7 on RX570/580 4/8GB? I would love to try it out |
|
|
|
|
