 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »
|
|
Inflation makes the dollar more valuable. As a rule, btc will decrease if the USD increases. I think this is a short-term correction. The nft market is huge, it's all just getting started.
|
|
|
|
Hi Anastasia! Stay tuned to cryptizen.io. Soon you can sell your products, including: Content, img, text, video...On cryptizen.io. Your product will be proven first by IPFS technology. Social networks will rate your products, from which you can sell them. |
|
|
|
|
Thank everyone, we will launch a big campaign, hope everything goes well, the project will reach Backers.
|
|
|
|
How good is the project and can it attract users without having the need for hype?
Conceptually, we are working on a blockchain social network project. Supporting users to create NFTs for articles is similar to owning an NFTs photo. Besides we also have many other features related to SocialFi, GameFi. For me, this is a huge project. So every choice becomes difficult. So I really appreciate everyone's input. You can check whitepaper or pitchdeck on our website: https://Cryptizen.ioIn project development, every aspect becomes very important, including Backer. however, without Backer, there are many suspicions of the project, such as manipulation and others. because that's why so many projects are looking for partnerships, then with that they convince people to support the projects they develop. it doesn't stop there, they are even willing to pay expensive advertising to gain people's trust. a good project, has many Backers, with many Backers, investors will be easier to enter. well, every aspect becomes very important of a project.
I understand, but I'm having a problem. Small ''Backer'' are easy to reach, but I don't want that option. Big supporters, big organizations are hard to reach. My weakness is relationships, but my strengths are funds and real passion. I think we will work naturally. Do your best and We will be welcome. |
|
|
|
I am developing my project. My relationships always say that backers are important. But I have seen many backers that bring no value to the project. Fb posts only bring 50-100 likes. What I'm interested in is:
- If there are no good backers, should I choose any backers?
- I raised $300k from angel investors. The project's available capital is $100k. So what should I do?
- What if the project has no backer, but I have the capital. Will users rate it as a bad project?Thanks! 
|
|
|
|
|
I am developing my project. My relationships always say that backers are important. But I have seen many backers that bring no value to the project. Fb posts only bring 50-100 likes. What I'm interested in is:
- If there are no good backers, should I choose any backers?
- I raised $300k from angel investors. The project's available capital is $100k. So what should I do?
- What if the project has no backer, but I have the capital. Will users rate it as a bad project?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
NFTs is BIG market. it makes digital ownership commonplace. I believe it will thrive in 2022
|
|
|
|
I think a little more explanation on this would have been helpful for people to understand what you're trying to talk about here. When you say owning your content online, are you trying to say that people will own a particular content that they write online, and when readers wants to read it they would have to pay them for it?
I have seen quite a few platforms that are similar to what you are talking about here. Take for example, steemit.com is one of the platforms where users write content, and when readers appreciate their contents they drop a like on it, and the more likes that the writers are able to get, the more that they are going to be paid for the content that they create on the platform.
So, I am guessing that you mean something like that, or maybe you’re trying to say that readers may have to buy the content from the writers?
Readers do not need to pay. What I mean is that they will only pay when they want to be the owner of a valuable phrase, story, or content. Then that person can sell it. Ownership means that the post will be on your social profile. If so, that will be good for your readers but I hope that the readers do not have to pay a subscription fee that they should pay because I see that some websites apply this to get something from their readers. I guess it is like Facebook that users can upload their content to their social page but this time, they own that content and no one can use that content unless they buy from the real owner. But how to prevent the other users from downloading the content without buying from the owner? When it comes to the internet, if you want to buy something from the site, you should become a member and pay some amount to download the content. It will interest if you explain more details. The user owns the content and it's public. Anyone can reuse the content because it's public, but it helps the content prove valuable. Because the blockchain is public and transparent, the author will sell valuable, interesting content. We still have the ability to pay to read content if the author wants it, and that content is not public. Do you know about IPFS? We apply it, the author needs to understand and build reasonable content and choose the right way to make money. |
|
|
|
Does this appeal to you?
Please share your thoughts
that really depends on what you mean and which social media's you are talking about. If you are talking about social medias like Facebook or similiar, you may find that a lot of content is being stolen and its basically nearly impossible to track down and do anything against the culprits. So owning is a big problem. And selling something anyone can steal anyway.... Well... Thats a problem too. Imagine Cryptizen as Facebook. If you post a story, we will generate a hash. This helps you verify this hash you are the first creator on the Cryptizen social network. So it will get you native. If someone else uses it (100% same as your content) then it is considered reused. |
|
|
|
I think a little more explanation on this would have been helpful for people to understand what you're trying to talk about here. When you say owning your content online, are you trying to say that people will own a particular content that they write online, and when readers wants to read it they would have to pay them for it?
I have seen quite a few platforms that are similar to what you are talking about here. Take for example, steemit.com is one of the platforms where users write content, and when readers appreciate their contents they drop a like on it, and the more likes that the writers are able to get, the more that they are going to be paid for the content that they create on the platform.
So, I am guessing that you mean something like that, or maybe you’re trying to say that readers may have to buy the content from the writers?
Readers do not need to pay. What I mean is that they will only pay when they want to be the owner of a valuable phrase, story, or content. Then that person can sell it. Ownership means that the post will be on your social profile. |
|
|
|
This will be made possible if there will be exclusivity of the product you are sellinging but most of those are not, once they are on the internet, everything can be copy and paste. Imagine, even the games that are worth millions to create are not safe to be crack, what makes a content to be unique? If only we can implement like an NFT where every item is unique and exclusive, and has some feature whenever someone owns it, no one can use it at all.
I will give specific examples. You create a saying ''OMG'' If you post it on the platform of the Cryptizen project. It will be yours, because you are the first. What I mean here is that everything becomes valuable if it is analyzed for value. Does this appeal to you? When your simple sentence is used by many people. Thank you. I am developing project in this direction. To help the community sell their content. If you have any ideas or suggestions please help me. About Difficulty, issues related to selling content. In your opinion, when the product is sold, should the author be entitled to any future transactions? Opensea is allowing it
You mean royalty, why not it still depends on the agreement, record companies are doing that even though they sold their content they still get a slice of the royalty you should have an option for royalty so the original author can still promote his works even though he did not own his works anymore, like composers or singers of songs, looking forward to get an update of your project that will benefit the community. Thank you! we will apply this. |
|
|
|
When it comes to buying and selling content, I don't think it's appropriate for this word because there are cases where they are paid specifically to introduce a project.
other than that there may be some people who introduce it voluntarily but this is only for their personal benefit and hope that there will be feedback from those who own the project
If you are the writer of a good story, you own it. People will buy if the story makes them feel. Similar to NFTs, but I want to talk about a broader issue, which is content (images, text, etc.) |
|
|
|
|
Thank you. I am developing project in this direction. To help the community sell their content. If you have any ideas or suggestions please help me. About Difficulty, issues related to selling content. In your opinion, when the product is sold, should the author be entitled to any future transactions? Opensea is allowing it
|
|
|
|
Does this appeal to you?
Please share your thoughts
what kind of content do you mean? videos, articles, images or whatever it seems pretty good if there is such a platform. Selling social media content is interesting enough, but we have to be aware of a value. Such content basically has no selling point because it is private. so I thought it wouldn't work. I want talk about content on social. Example: a Post (picture, text, video...) having 10000like, 50000comment. You can sell it for other users. Depends on the content created. Some content is just create to keep a memory about something, other content is created to earn.
For example my photos on my facebook page is my content and I would never sell them. I would not sell anything that is connected with my private life. But if I have a hobby or do something during free time, upload it to social media to get some feedback, and get an offer from a buyer, then perhaps I can consider selling it. I can sell any videos I've filmed, photos taken, text written, only if they dont have anything of my private life and life of my family. I have an experience of freelancing in text writing, photostocks. So I think yes, if someone is interested, I would consider selling.
With current technology. We can make your content a unique hash. If someone else steals them they have to add characters to change the hash of the content. If others use the same content as you, you will be proud of it because you were the first to create it. And you can sell it if you want. |
|
|
|
We are applying web3 technology to make it possible for users to sell their content. The testnet is expected to launch in Q1. Please give us your comments, many thanks. You can follow us if you want, Join https://Cryptizen.io
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, this will appeal to everyone. I believe in the future everyone will get this. We are growing in that direction. Thanks for your opinion. A platform that ensures the origin of the content, supports the trading and selling of the content. But the biggest problem is copied content.
I appreciate all ideas. Please exchange to help me have the best PLAN!
|
|
|
|
|
Does this appeal to you?
Please share your thoughts
|
|
|
|
|
in case we don't have good partners. We have available Angel investors to provide capital for marketing and attracting users. Follow us, it's very important to cryptizen. Thank you so much!
|
|
|
|
How about partnerships and project backers, Does Cryptizen have them? Currently many Metaverse projects have started and they are all selling land, and only Projects that have good backers and partnerships have users.
Cryptizen has just started. You can see it on the roadmap. The search, contact backers and partnerships is going on. |
|
|
|
|
