Да, бывает и такое. Остается только завидовать белой завистью таким людям. А вообще у самого есть тоже подобная идея - подзаработать различных токенов на баунти, только не продавать их, а отложить на несколько лет и забыть про них, а самому уйти в другую сферу. Интересно что из этого получится)
ну половина токенов будут пустышками и лишь единицы возможно выростут в цене на такой случай сливаю до 80% кол-ва токенов, и немного оставляю прозапас, кто его знает, вдруг эта невзрачная сейчас монетка, когда-нибудь будет в топ 5, шансы очень маленькие, но если сливать все что есть, то шансов не будет никаких, а если все холдить то велика вероятность получить жирную красную линию на весь портфель свой. |
|
|
|
Если у них и будут ещё этапы баунти, то хз кто в них войдёт, с такой-то репутацией...
а с чего в них не войти если токен на бирже будет к тому времени уже. Вы такой кипишь подняли как-будто первый скам какой-то. Да 60% проектов откровенного скама, а из остальной половины еще 10% кинут или порежут выплаты. А тему развели как будто событие века. В баунти участвовал, выплаты порезали, назад не отправлял. Если как и заявляют сборы в основном от крупных инвесторов то им это баунти ... |
|
|
|
А мне кажется что альты и эфир уже выжали и теперь возьмутся за серьезный дамп битка, при этом эфир еще может просесть немного пока дампят биток, но ниже 200$ эфир не пойдет.
Мне кажется на дампе битка и эфир может просесть ниже 200, ненадолго, но может. Все зависит от того, насколько сам биток просядет. у битка доминация растет даже не по часам а по минутам, а альты худеют. Считаю что еще увидим дно эфира в баксов 200-210 а там уже может полетим наверх, но пока скорее всего будет краснота жесткая. Хотя тут как гадание на гуще |
|
|
|
|
по поводу посчитать стаки, тоже сталкивался у него, но не скажу что он самый худший, у него что то кроме скама есть, в отличии от того же нидмани и его команды токен съют, вот там прям беда печаль, насколько я помню выплатила только 1-а компашка мне и то в пару баксов. а компаний было прилично
|
|
|
|
|
ох чую ребят ща после сегодняшнего роста в 17% так вальнет, что увидим мы эфир по 200 баксов, и еос по бакса 3, процентов на 80% уверен что через неделю будет именно такое развитие событий, а там уже может и рост пойдет, когда достригут все что можно, имхо конечно
|
|
|
|
|
need reports to the thread for signature company?
|
|
|
|
Лично меня привлекает, что не надо вкладаваться в проект, а только уделять ему некоторое время для выполнения того или иного задания.
да да . причем проект еще в дальнейшем (год-два) может неплохо выстрелить. |
|
|
|
|
hahah, go outside or write on the social network
|
|
|
|
|
maybe there is something, but I do not really believe
|
|
|
|
|
Blocked the bad nodes as well.
Here's the list of ip's to block:
5.9.115.0/24
46.105.210.0/24
2001:41d0:a:605c::/48
46.105.210.194, 46.105.210.11, 46.105.210.255, 46.105.210.138, 46.105.210.196, 46.105.210.246, 46.105.210.220, 46.105.210.204, 46.105.210.179, 46.105.210.189, 46.105.210.10, 46.105.210.42,
Source: Reddit
I've had a few of those and another connected to my node, so add this one to the list as well: 46.105.210.137 .
Personally I've taken it to block 46.105.210.* since obviously we don't know all IP's involved (yet). What scares me is that it's relatively easy for people to evade blocks like this.
Looks like the people at mycellium and kraken are involved...
|
|
|
|
Ok, here we go..... Its been 6 years and bitcoin has not gone mainstream..
6 years after the internet was invented they didn't even have the ARPANET yet... even photo sharing apps are having more users, network effect and valuations than this..
We're currently at a 3 billion US$ market cap, not bad for a 6 year old open source technology. Internet wasn't even worth 1 million $ after 6 years One of the key reasons that bitcoin has not gone mainstream or it could not is because of the limit of tranactions per second and block size..
Actually, we have never hit any limit yet, so block size or TPS doesn't seem to be a limiting factor at all currently. while people who want bitcoin to succeed try to innovate and take bitcoin mainstream with VISA like tps, there are people who want bitcoin to fail.
Not really sure if this can really be called a point, but there are people that want every company in the fortune 500 fall. And yes, VISA like TPS is possible. They are paid shills of central banks who want bitcoin to be as a nerd and geek money and never see the lightof mainstream adoption..
Or maybe we're all in the US secret service If bitcoin was a central institution, people could have raised a lot of money and could have taken it mainstream by now..
Do I really have to refer back to the early internet again now? But see how bitcoin suffers, the core developers are saying something for scalability while some are saying other things, and in the end what happens is nothing and bitcoin just becomes weaker and weaker..
Stating that democracy could never succeed really isn't much of a point seeing how the biggest economies are running "successfully" using the very same system thus bitcoin inability to scale and go mainstream is simply showing the world how decentralized systems are weak in reaching consensus and go mainsteam
Once again I refer you to the early internet. VISA like TPS is possible, it just takes a while to implement the proper back/frontend to support it. In 1951, the first bank credit card appeared in New York's Franklin National Bank for loan customers. Want to know how much TPS they had in the first 40 years? |
|
|
|
|
I'd take any prediction with a huge grain of salt, especially one that costs 1750 ponds to purchase.
|
|
|
|
Rig owners should extend for the downtime, that's at least what I'll be doing so my renters don't have to file tickets. Kind of a messy situation.....
I'll be extending down time to renters, any idea how much time they've lost so far? I've been aware of the outage for about 3 hours. Edit: Would be nice to pause rental timers - in the event when the hosts stratum proxy goes out. @mrbodz - What can be done about the timers that continue burning our renters BTC? Not sure exactly how long it's been. But I think the charts will come back up once Betarigs starts working again. |
|
|
|
Rig owners should extend for the downtime, that's at least what I'll be doing so my renters don't have to file tickets. Kind of a messy situation.....
I would, if I could see the hash rate charts, but they are gone. I believe they'll be back up once the site starts running again as well. (they were before) |
|
|
|
|
Rig owners should extend for the downtime, that's at least what I'll be doing so my renters don't have to file tickets. Kind of a messy situation.....
|
|
|
|
60% is pro, according to the polls, and yet the minority complains about gavin not caring about the userbase?
can someone please just send these idiots to another planet?
only 20% is anti the rest dont even know enough to vote one way or the other so the argument could be made that 80%+ will be in favour when they learn more about how important this is If you ignore 'agnostics' and 'DGAFs' you'll get: 202 pro 74% 71 anti 26% But let's not pretend this poll is a solid indicator of anything. The vast majority of users is probably not aware of technical details and implications. The vast majority won't use Gavincoin with that requirements of hardware and bandwidth. Nobody is going to upgrade their system all the time just to be able to run Gavincoin. Lol - gavincoin doesn't even have a usecase. And also doesn't have users. The only users will be the current bagholders and that's it. There is zero probability it can compete with more efficient coins for new users. Lol. The poll on the thread is just a poll "am i a sheep that follows the flock?" - yes or no lmao It's hilarious how you didn't bother to respond to even the slightest of sense that buries all your arguments against the fork into the ground, for example, my previous argument. |
|
|
|
You are looking at it wrong. Transactions are signed with privatekeys. Same adresses have same privatekeys on both networks. Mpcoin nodes don't have to communicate with Gavincoin nodes to doublicate the transactions.
There are not two networks. There are two sets of nodes which disagree on which is the "One True Blockchain". Up until the fork (a certain block height) all the nodes have 100% agreement, but then after the fork, a subset, "MPnodes", start to reference utxo from blocks which are unknown to the Bitcoin nodes. These tx are rejected by Bitcoin nodes just the same way, as if I created a tx for 123,000 BTC to send to an address I own, so I can have a nice fat bitcoin holding to rival the Winklevoss'. Companies which accept bitcoins for products and services will be anxious to ensure that their nodes conform to the majority view and have the same blockchain that the exchanges, and payment processors do. You don't get it. Nodes of the different networks don't have to communicate. Hashes are the same on both networks so anyone who watches the transactions on one chain can broadcast them on the other chain. The majority of the people will make the step, there won't be a mess. I know me, and all of the miners I spoke to will make the step as well, as well as 90++% of all leading mining pools. Leaving you with a chain stuck with really high difficulty without enough hash to properly move it forward. When you finally do get it to the point where it readjusts difficulty you'll probably realize that it was incredibly stupid and that 1MBcapcoin is useless..... Maybe there will be people that will start using 1MBcapcoin to broadcast all their holdings to loads of different addresses, it won't matter because 1MBcapcoin won't be worth anything anyway. |
|
|
|
|
The most used currency for drugs and terrorism is still (and will continue to be) the US dollar.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
