Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
|
hey guys what am i missing here? heres what im getting and my .bat [2017-11-24 23:41:46] NVML GPU monitoring enabled. [2017-11-24 23:41:46] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled. [2017-11-24 23:41:46] 8 miner threads started, using 'lyra2v2' algorithm. [2017-11-24 23:41:47] HTTP request failed: Failed to connect to 127.0.0.1 port 4533: Connection refused [2017-11-24 23:41:47] get_work failed, retry after 30 seconds ______________________ ccminer-x64-75.exe -a lyra2v2 -o http://127.0.0.1:4533 -u ustraks -p ******** Yeah you need to connect to a pool not a local ip address. Or are you trying to solo mine and have a server running for this? Because that's probably a waste. Go register on suprnova if you want to try mining this coin, make a worker/password and then use something like: cminer-x64.exe -i 18 -d 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://stak.suprnova.cc:7706 -u username.worker -p password --cpu-priority=3 ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda9 works fine for this.
|
|
|
It's kind of funny that I think signatum would of have done well if some of the developers did not betray the community in exchange for a quick dollar and PoS was delayed, or instead a hybrid PoS/PoW existed for years. Because oddly enough what attracted many of us originally to signatum was the no premine, no dev fees and the whole it was something new and maybe had some different things happening. However while the first part of no fees and no premine was true, it was nothing really that special just a different hash algorithm and some random changes.
I think straks messed up for having fees and premine first off all, second of all the whole swap thing seems like guess work. You really need some economist or market analyst to figure out the market, you can't rely on polls or community. Because the people who voted probably held signatum and were only interested in a pump. Also the reward was probably too low at 10 coins.
I guess time will tell what happens next.
It's probably possible to take the tech we have in cryptocurrency and make a successful long-term altcoin that would compliment bitcoin and the rest of the big players. It just seems to me people get too greedy or don't focus enough time to research the correct parameters & settings and to introduce some innovative new twist or purpose for a new coin. Or perhaps it's too saturated of a market and impossible to achieve such a dream.
Regardless, best of luck.
|
|
|
There is a lot of money to be made because of the entire signatum exchange thing, if you time it right you can probably make a massive profit. But who knows at which point that would be? Nobody does. So I don't really believe in anything anymore, and especially any new coins promising the moon. Put it this way if you bough sigt at 1 cent yesterday and dumped it at 3 cents today, you would have already made x3 times your money in a day. But I don't see this coin having a use besides that at this point.
|
|
|
Where do people get a few of these coins?
Only way to get it is to mine it for the moment, a SIGT to STRAKS swap is coming at some point, from richlist 34,374,997 is set for SIGT swap. No one except devs have a significant supply at the moment, each block only gives 10 STRAKS, with 0.5 going to devs. Based on current difficulty roughly 20 MH/s seems to give 0.01 per hour (based on my own results). 1000 MH/s should do at least 0.5 but under 1.0 STRAKS. As people move away their hashing power (because this makes no sense profit wise), then you might be able to mine a bit more.
|
|
|
About 2 hours of mining @ 21.69 MH/s average on a GTX 1060 6GB with intensity 18, current balance is 0.0221 STAK, using ccminer-x64-2.2.2-cuda9.
Launch parameter for suprnova.cc: ccminer-x64.exe -i 18 -d 0 -a lyra2v2 -o stratum+tcp://stak.suprnova.cc:7706 -u username.worker -p password --cpu-priority=3
I like lyra2v2 however, as it doesn't seem to mess with CPU too much even at higher intensity, 1-4% CPU use with 200MB RAM. Interesting algorithm, skunks was more intensive from what I recall. Lyra2REv2 appears to use hash functions: BLAKE, Keccak, CubeHash, Lyra2, Skein & Blue Midnight Wish.
|
|
|
There is no Premine u dumb ass .
And the DIFF is so went to mars and beyond
1.2 TH now !!!!
Devs allocated to themselves 6,874,997 STRAKS correct? Even if they didn't physically have to mine that coin, that would still be a premine, would it not? https://straks.info/richlist
|
|
|
1 hour of mining @ 21 MH/s, made about 0.01 on supernova at current difficulty. So it will take 11 hours to reach 0.1 to cash out and 0.01 for fee. How is this worth it 1 hour of mining @ 1100 MH/s, made about 0.7884 STAK on supernova at current difficulty. the coin should cost 3-4 dollars, then miners was interest it, but it's impossible Yeah devs alone have 6.8 million supply, if it reached even a $1...instant millionaires + the 5% they take Not to mention 34.3 million coins for SIGT swap. Current market cap of SIGT is under $3 million, for a brief period it was $11 million. I don't see it happening anywhere close to that unfortunately. Has there ever been a successful coin that has had a low reward, a premine, a fee & on top of that a coin swap of a once popular coin? Too many factors going against this coin.
|
|
|
1 hour of mining @ 21 MH/s, made about 0.01 on supernova at current difficulty. So it will take 11 hours to reach 0.1 to cash out and 0.01 for fee. How is this worth it ah sorry I forgot to switch the fee, fixed now "A 0.0001 STAK TX fee will apply" nice, thanks lol, not sure still worth it for me to mine with a single GTX 1060 unless this coin is going to reach the moon or something. I figure realistically I am able to get maybe 2 STRAKS every 24 hours. I doubt it will be worth $0.25 a each, considering the massive supply of SIGT waiting to flood the swap.
|
|
|
1 hour of mining @ 21 MH/s, made about 0.01 on supernova at current difficulty. So it will take 11 hours to reach 0.1 to cash out and 0.01 for fee. How is this worth it
|
|
|
Anybody knows why block reward is split by 9.5 and 0.5? Or it is just mpool "feature"?
Dev fund, they are taking 5% of every block, on top 5% is premined if I am not mistaken. Mining almost makes no sense, there will be a huge supply after SIGT swap.
|
|
|
So the issue was with the pool software for mining? Because ccminer-x64-2.2.2 is working well now, getting 18-18.9 MH/s on a GTX 1060 6GB.
I retract my earlier speculations, perhaps this coin has a chance.
|
|
|
If the devs have a working GPU miner before the community when the reward hits tomorrow, then they will be able to quickly mine tons on top of the 5% premine & surely will be dumped at massive profits. I was wrong, the issue was with pool software.
Very skeptical of this coin, seems like another get rich quick scheme. On top of that by offering signatum exchange, it will drive interest as many have been left holding a bunch, which would probably cause a fast pump and dump, as many try to exchange to more stable coins from sigt to straks to something else.
Furthermore the dev team seems rather anonymous & straks doesn't really offer anything new to the scene.
Hope I am wrong, but that's my initial impression.
|
|
|
Has anyone tested skunk hashrate with Vega 56/64, would be interesting to see the results out of curiosity.
|
|
|
Not a single miner I have tried is reported accurately on suprnova.cc, so I am guessing it has to be supernova. I see reported hash from 11 MH/s to 45 MH/s and I keep at 17MH/s in reality.
SIGT has been a very hard coin to predict in general no calculators are right either, only way to track is by how much you get paid in the end.
|
|
|
19 MH/s on a GTX 1060 6GB with intensity at 18 with -202 memory clock ccminer-x86-2.2: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releasesWas getting 17 MH/s with just about every miner before that on exact same settings. Power has some drops however, Goes from 91-89 to 34-35 every minute or so, seem to utilize more power as well compared to others which are 83-86. Would this cause any issues long term? (Explanation provided: Epsylon3: The diff change can trigger a small pause (500ms) that generally doesnt hurt) ccminer-x86-2.2:3 other miners compared earlier:Intensity 17 for ccminer 2.2 seems to lower power draw and temps, 83-84% power, 66-67C with 67% Fan Speed @ 17.7 MH/s.
|
|
|
Intensity 17 for ccminer 2.2 seems to lower power draw and temps nicely, 83-84% power, 66-67C with 67% Fan Speed.
Hash is still above others @ 17.7-17.8 MH/s or so.
Thanks for your work btw, too bad so many violate the GPL3 licensing with the private builds.
|
|
|
Nice, nearly 19 MH/s on a GTX 1060 6GB with intensity at 18 with -202 memory clock ccminer-x86-2.2: https://github.com/tpruvot/ccminer/releasesWas getting 17 MH/s with just about every miner before that on exact same settings. Power has some drops however, any idea why it keeps happening? Have same thing with krnlx. Goes from 91-89 to 34-35 every minute or so, seem to utilize more power as well compared to others which are 83-86. Would this cause any issues long term? ccminer-x86-2.2:3 other miners compared earlier:
|
|
|
Here's what I am going to do...
With my setup it is taking me a consistent 5:45 to mine 50 coins. That is using the ccminer_krnlx_170810 build I mentioned earlier. I am 3 coins away from another 50 and when that is awarded I am going to change everything over to palginmod. If the established ratio of miner reported hashrate and awards suddenly diverges when we will have some evidence that something nefarious might me up...
Difficulty is not stable, so you won't get a meaningful result. Only way to test it alone is to perhaps to make a fork of the entire coin and premine a set amount, then reset and test again. Might be way too much effort. Otherwise have identical setups in the same pool, mine for X amount of time using different miners at the exact same time, repeat results 3-10 times and then average results to compare.
|
|
|
so what I did: - 2 identical rigs (6x undervolted gtx 1070 both at same clocks / hashrate when using an identical miner)
- both running on the same pool with static diff set to 1.0
- started miners exactly at the same time
- stopped the miners after one hour
apparently the skunk miner seems to work a bit better on my rig, but this comparison is more for checking the reported hashrate vs accepted shares. Since people feel the reported hashrate is not fair on the skunk miner. Actually this test is running for a too short time to draw conclusions, but it gives an idea already. Next update will be after 12 hours of mining I will do more testing. I will test some more miners on request. Please PM me when you want me to test a private miner (ie. spmod 6 or something else) or give me a link to a public miner if you want it to be tested.my mistake: skunk = krnlx miner I will update the graphics on the next update Interesting nice work. As I mentioned before spmod cannot be trusted as the source is not available. It could be redirecting hash rate somewhere else (which you can in theory prove with network analysis) or more likely it's reporting false hashrate. Ofcourse a single point of data is not enough.I don't recommend using spmod, since it's technically a leaked private build (which should not be distributed at all) and because we cannot trust it due to not having any source available (potentially a GPL3 violation as well). Instead use: palginmod - https://github.com/palginpav/ccminer/releases/or krnlx - https://github.com/krnlx/ccminer-skunk-krnlx/For me palginmod is the most stable on a GTX 1060 6GB.
|
|
|
What started the sudden decrease? Did someone start dumping a ton of coins? It seems a little bit odd and artificial.
It's not supposed to go below $0.06 in my opinion, unless people panic too much.
Will be interesting to see what happens next, my predictions suggested it should reach $0.15-$0.25 sometime after reward split and possibly more if picked up by a major exchange.
I guess we will see, I'm just going to wait it out.
|
|
|
|