|
Un petit peu de promo pour un projet GOLEM like à la française.
Iexec (I execute) suit la même idée que GOLEM, la grosse différence tient surtout à l'équipe qui parait bien plus compétente que celle de GOLEM.
Gilles Fedack, le fondateur de Iexec est professeur à l'INRIA à Lyon et il travaille sur le cloud computing depuis un moment (avant même que le bitcoin existe).
Il y a aussi un pôle chinois ce qui n'est pas trop mal pour ce genre de projet.
Donc si vous avez raté la crowdsale GOLEM profitez en celle de Iexec démarre le 12 Avril et à mon avis le projet est plus solide que GOLEM.
|
|
|
|
It's a nice project, but I think that if its this low its because its hard for investors to understand where the value comes from. BTC is a decentralized transparent ledger that can serves as a store of value, its simple (well kinda). XMR is anonymous cash, its simple too.
But factom? the right to store data on the blockchain? what do I do with that? Its a business coin. I wonder if its going to get used, maybe it is already?
Counter argument is ETH... I've no idea how to explain what it is or what it does but its super high!
Anyway, I bought some because I had good feelings about it.
Factom and bitcoin / ether cannot be compared. Bitcoin is a coin used to make some transaction, to transfert / store value, it has value because there is a limited number of coin a inflation is getting lower every 4 years (halving). Ethereum has the same basic properties as bitcoin but on top of that you can do smart contract for insurrance / gambling, etc...you can store value (ETH) in these smart contract and you need ether to buy gas and execute the contract. As there is plenty of DAPPS develloping on ethereum it seems that the gas usage will increase overtime so we can think that the price of ether as well. FACTOM is completely different, it has never been intended to be a currency and actually needs bitcoin / ethereum to work, people can timestamp data and it is really valuable as with IOT / smart cities etc... the needs for data will increase and FACTOM can make all these timestamp at a very low cost. Everytime a data is stored using FACTOM, some factoids are burnt so if it is massively used by the industry, the supply will decrease so the price could skyrocket. Hope it can help you |
|
|
|
|
Iexec for decentralized computation, BAT from brave new coin and maybe gnosis.
|
|
|
|
|
ICO is not a gamble it is just high rish investment with potential high returns.
Look at people who have invested in ethereum.
When you gamble in a casino you have more probability to loss than to win, it's called house edge, however with ICO you are in unknown place.
The most important things to check in ICO are :
1/Is the idea disruptive?
2/Is this a scam?
3/Are the devs telented?
If these 3 points are good then the ICo is worth investing, however it is often complicated to be sure it is not a scam.
Lot of ICO are scam but not all of them.
|
|
|
|
|
@Ridley69 Est-ce que tu asreussi à débloquer tes BTC depuis que tu as répondu au KYC? La situation s'est arrangé?
Je n'utilisais plus trop bitstamp depuis un moment et je viens d'envoyer quelques bitcoin, j'espère que je ne serais embêté.
|
|
|
|
So according to your website the ICO starts 12th April. That is in 2 weeks. I think the developers should post some update here on this thread.
How long will this ICO be going?
I also have a suggestion for you: Change the name "iEx.ec" is difficult to remember and even more difficult to pronounce.
The crowdsale thread is here : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1746241.0 |
|
|
|
|
Bitcointalk Username: marechoux
Forum rank: Full Member
Current post count: 153
Ethereum address: 0xB42757A34E9aB5cFa34C03A01D85d2b165d673eA
|
|
|
|
whats the status ? IPO delayed again ?
IPO delayed to end Feb / early March |
|
|
|
and will users and/or investors be able to run nodes? or will they be private secured nodes or? sorry if i didn't quite get that ;p
The goal is to have an open network where everyone can monetize their servers. However we'll proceed gradually. As you can understand, there are quite some challenges to address before being able to allow any applications to run on any node. For the first version, we'll only allow specific Cloud providers to execute the applications. We already have some partnership going on (like Stimergy), and we also have miners who would like to experimentally join the network. Later, as the development goes on, we'll include more and more providers, until the point where every one will be able to provide its own resources. hmm, ya no i can understand that  idk, for me it seems like this could be something, i'm wiling to give you the time to grow the idea on the community. Either way, your not asking for our money for a few weeks yet, so everyone has time to decide themselves ;p and will users and/or investors be able to run nodes? or will they be private secured nodes or? sorry if i didn't quite get that ;p
The goal is to have an open network where everyone can monetize their servers. However we'll proceed gradually. As you can understand, there are quite some challenges to address before being able to allow any applications to run on any node. For the first version, we'll only allow specific Cloud providers to execute the applications. We already have some partnership going on (like Stimergy), and we also have miners who would like to experimentally join the network. Later, as the development goes on, we'll include more and more providers, until the point where every one will be able to provide its own resources. Cut the crap. This is bullshit and you know it. haha, dont be so quick to judge man, theres some big names here. Time will tell. i would suggest trying to "expose" them by asking some hard questions rather than just say their a scam and thats it ;p who knows, maybe you will actually help the community, as shitty one liners do not. OK The big names means everything is peachy. I get it. No I don't. What big names and what have they done other than enrich themselves with btc? they have dudes with Ph d's and a 100 Talent Professor to start. How bout you, hmm? what have they done? from that page i bet alot more than you will EVER do (or me for that matter). Each person will have to do their own research and independent verification, but you coming here yelling scam with no basis (i just threw the basis you mentioned in your face), its just garble, and helps noone. idk, maybe ill just add you to my ignore, as you seem like one of those "just noise" users that add nothing to this forum. Good day to you sir. Did Satoshi had a PHD ? or was he a big name before bitcoin ? You don't need a PHD to make an altcoin scam. maybe it helps to collect more coins in the ICO?   If you give these clowns your btc you are a fool. ICO'S are scams. Period. Giving btc to anonymous entities is idiotic. This crap has no chance of ever being adopted. If you want to give away your btc then give it to me. Why are you talking about anonymous entities? The CEO is a reknown professor in France which has worked for CNRS and other members gave their names, thought it is not 100% scamless proof but you cannot say it is anonymous. It is good to wish to expose scam, however if you just call scam any ICO you see with false accusation then you're not a scam_exposer, you are just the girl who screams fire...nothing more and everybody's will ignore you. |
|
|
|
Bitland might be legit but the behaviour of its CSO and co-founder is really unbecoming of an entrepreneur.
There is nothing legit when you say to people that they are stupid to not make a 2500X profit. That's a scammer tactic... |
|
|
|
The only solution I can see is if the bonus coins are taken from the devs or from the 30% that are continually distributed.
I'm starting to want my bitcoins back.
Actually that does not really solve the problem as early investors would still be less rewarded than new ones... |
|
|
|
|
Last trades were below 1 BTS so below 0.004$.
Chris announced they will be sold in a Japan exchange at 10$ very soon and we are all stupid people who don't understand that....
So if we buy cadastrals at 0.4 cents and they will worth soon 10$ we can make easily X2500 profit ! Then chris why you don't tell your friends / family that they can easily make X2500 profit?Dear mum please send me 400$ and I will give you back 1 million $ in few weeks...Are they also too stupid like us to understand that???
I have tried to pass over your rude language which was definitely not appropriate for a project of this scale, also your statement about he 3X price increase after ICO when you said that because it is cheap anyway 3X times increase in price has no meaning, but finally I was wrong and should have listened to my feelings and not loose any btc on you. At least I have learnt a lesson and will be able to recongnize scammers more easily.
If you come back in France be carefull, you could be welcome by the police.
|
|
|
|
|
This is really crazy, and not professional.
That really look like they just want more money and don't care at all...I will not send a satoshi anymore to this...
Be carefull massnetwork, you are going to create an army of people against you and your project !
|
|
|
|
E、All the BCDN primary holders can be rewarded with 40% of the total revenue of the first
three years that will be sent to the wallet of holders with average gross. After the first three
years, the reward will not be release anymore, and the initial circulated and transferred
BCDN will be excluded from the reward, the minimum reward will be greater or equal to
1ETH.The minimum reward that is less than 1ETH will be extended to next time in
accumulation. The remaining 60% is used as expendure for CDN technology innovation,
team maintainance, platform maintainance and undating.
So there will be fees between transaction to generate profits? How much % will be theses fees?
Hi Operating Income Lets say CDN costs 1 BCDN per Gigabyte of data needed The Demander needs 100BG so the cost is 100 BCDN + 5% fee to BlockCDN for managing service. Total 105 BCDN The miner supplys 100GB and gets paid 100 BCDN - 5% fee to BlockCDN so total 95 BCDN I hope that answers your question. Totally answered, thanks  |
|
|
|
|
E、All the BCDN primary holders can be rewarded with 40% of the total revenue of the first
three years that will be sent to the wallet of holders with average gross. After the first three
years, the reward will not be release anymore, and the initial circulated and transferred
BCDN will be excluded from the reward, the minimum reward will be greater or equal to
1ETH.The minimum reward that is less than 1ETH will be extended to next time in
accumulation. The remaining 60% is used as expendure for CDN technology innovation,
team maintainance, platform maintainance and undating.
So there will be fees between transaction to generate profits? How much % will be theses fees?
|
|
|
|
|
"On December 2nd, Mass will calculate their investment as if N/0.25 was invested, where N is the amount of BTC that is confirmed before the deadline of 23:59:59 PST November 1, 2016."
N/0.25 = X4
I guess there is a mistake in the blog post.
piannist can you confirm?
|
|
|
|
|
If someone can help me to understand ?
During crowdsale each token worth 2 cents and then the cost to make a bill of lading will be 1 token which will worth 1$.
So how do they fix a price of 1$ / token when there will be free market with investors? If there is few success the token will be worth much less than 1$. Also when the token is used for a bill of lading, whet doest it becomes, is it burnt?
|
|
|
|
Regarding manual claims, since everything will be processed before exchanges, what's the rush?
It is not about "a rush" it is that when you still don't have your IOTA in your wallet you are not 100% confident that you really have your IOTA... Furthermore David said 2 weeks ago that manual claims will be processed in few days, since that there is absolutely no news. So just talking for me, I am not in the hurry but more communication about the delay would have been really appreciated, even if devs are busy, a 1 minute post on the thread would have been welcome, especially that some of manual claim have donation included, like mine, so I guess asking for a little post about the situation is not asking too much. It has been posted several times that it was due to network issues and then travelling. I cannot see any post about that in this thread... |
|
|
|
Regarding manual claims, since everything will be processed before exchanges, what's the rush?
It is not about "a rush" it is that when you still don't have your IOTA in your wallet you are not 100% confident that you really have your IOTA... Furthermore David said 2 weeks ago that manual claims will be processed in few days, since that there is absolutely no news. So just talking for me, I am not in the hurry but more communication about the delay would have been really appreciated, even if devs are busy, a 1 minute post on the thread would have been welcome, especially that some of manual claim have donation included, like mine, so I guess asking for a little post about the situation is not asking too much. |
|
|
|
So additionally to all the features, IOTA could replace FACTOM as it seems to have the same characteristics of ensuring data integrity but for free... Am I right,if yes that would be awesome. Besides, David, do you think that the manual claim for thoses who have donated for the bid deal will receive their IOTA this weekend? Yes, indirectly IOTA makes Storj, Maidsafe and Sia obsolete. The two core features of IOTA core is Settlements without fees and Data Transfers without fees, since these are the 2 essential ingredients to IoT, combine the two and you have a superior system to all these other projects by default. And I personally believe that it's way better to have all of these technological resources, whether it be storage, processing, electricity, bandwidth or whatever trade in 1 'Economy-of-Things' rather than split each resource into its own token. Manual claims that have contacted via contact@iotatoken.com will be processed in the weekend/early beginning of next week, yes. Is there a chance that manual claims will be processed today? Any update ? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
