 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
ROUND #1: ~11 hours z-enemy 1.16 : 38.63 RVN: pool linkt-rex 0.5.7 : 42.50 RVN (+10.0%) : pool link ***** WINNER ROUND #1 ******* t-rex takes round #1 by a solid 10% in earnings. could be due to the variability in the X16R algorithm, so we'll need a few more rounds before we declare t-rex the winner.
|
|
|
|
|
ROUND #1 complete. I will post results here soon. On to ROUND #2 , I switched which set of 2 GPUs is used for each miner.
|
|
|
|
please highlight links to pool
done. |
|
|
|
GPU-Z shot of one of the 1080 Tis:  Z-enemy 1.16 starting:  T-rex 0.5.7 starting:  |
|
|
|
Head to Head test of Z-enemy 1.16 Vs t-rex 0.5.7 (X16R Ravencoin)
I've been wanting to compare performance between z-enemy and t-rex on the X16R algorithm for some time. This will be a test done in the vein of JackIt's tests in the past, where I ask which miner puts more coins in my wallet?
Setup: For this first test, I'm using a 4 GPU rig with Zotac 1080 Ti Minis running Windows 10 x64. I started an instance of each miner at the same time (using 2 GPUs each) running on the same pool (Ravenminer) and the same machine. The miners will run for ~12 hours (started around 8AM PST 8/15), I'll stop them simultaneously, and we'll see how many coins are in the 2 wallets. I will likely run this test 2-3 times to ensure that the results are consistent.
Overclock: 100% TDP, +110 core clock, stock memory
Drivers: 398.82
Miners: Z-enemy 1.16 x64, CUDA 9.2, intensity 22 (thread here) vs. T-rex 0.5.7 , CUDA 9.2 , intensity 22 (thread here) . Both miners have a 1% dev fee. Running auto (server set) difficulty on both miners, it appears to stabilize in the 60-75 range. For the first test Z-enemy will use GPU0&1 and t-rex will use GPU2&3. For the second round, I'll switch which GPUs each software uses to control for variations in hardware & PCIe slot.
Results:
ROUND #1: 650 minutes
z-enemy 1.16 : 38.63 RVN: pool link
t-rex 0.5.7 : 42.50 RVN (+10.0%) : pool link ***** WINNER ******* (GPU2&3)
ROUND #2: 750 minutes
z-enemy 1.16 : 109.63 RVN (+7.3%): pool link ***** WINNER ******* (GPU2&3)
t-rex 0.5.7 : 102.16RVN : pool link
Round #3: 250 minutes
z-enemy 1.16 : 39.79 RVN (+13.7%) : pool link ***** WINNER ******* (GPU2&3)
t-rex 0.5.7 : 35.98 RVN : pool link
TEST FAILED!!!
GPU2&3 are winning every test (rig unbalanced). I'm going to redo the test on another rig in hopes of conclusive results.
new test here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4907176 |
|
|
|
CryptoDredge 0.8.3 destroys T-Rex in both lyra2z and phi2  Not always. I got 0H/s when 50PL on 1070 (at least) z-enemy much faster for phi2 than both cryptodredge/t-rex |
|
|
|
|
also this only seems to be an issue with X16R. All other algos seem normal and report consistent hashrates (including X16S).
|
|
|
|
|
For X16R my reported hashrates seem to vary wildly. 3 starts on a single 1080 Ti gives:
27MH/s
24MH/s
22MH/s
I let it run for ~10 minutes and the hashrate stays at these levels. I get that X16R hashrate can vary dramatically depending on the block, but this seems way out of whack.
Anyone else seeing this? Has anyone tested against the latest Z-enemy on x16r?
|
|
|
|
|
I'd like to see a few things from this coin:
1) Another charity/outreach event SOON. When I saw the photos of the first one, this is what got me excited for the potential of this coin. I think this will bring over new investors.
2) Advertising! This thread is dead and the masternode listings don't seem to be generating much interest, with 9 founders it seems like ya'll could be doing more to get the word out.
3) Don't feed the trolls. Lots of the discord recently seems to be the founders arguing with trolls about the coin's legitimacy. Just ignore these trolls, the defensiveness comes off poorly.Just put in the work to make the coin great and ignore the haters.
Wish this coin the best and hope to see it bring on new investors here soon!
|
|
|
|
I just got a quick question, I was using Zergpool to mining HTH coin, and got paid out 2 hours ago at 7 am EST USA on 7/22/2018. However it is not showing up in the wallet, and it is the one from the Github (Full Node) but I notice there is a Windows Exe version. I didn't think it mattered, but my first question is, how long does it take to confirm transaction? 2nd because I mined it before July 19th, did I lose it? 3rd, should I use the EXE wallet instead of a Full node? I will try to contact Zergpool, but it shows paid, just can't check it in the Explorer. Where can I find it in explorer? I want to make sure it works before I continue to mine. So if anyone has some insight please let me know, I am excited to support the cause  1) Both wallets should work fine. 2) 360 conformations (blocks) or about 6 hours (1 block/min) for the pool to receive the coins before they're available to release to men's. When they send to you it should almost be instant. 3) You shouldn't lose any $$ assuming zergpool updated their wallet. 4) Explorer is here: https://explorer.hthcoin.world . Enter your wallet address and see if you can show the transaction from the pool to you. |
|
|
|
HTH is now live to mine on BlockCruncher!Come enjoy our low 0.25% fee -a x16r -o stratum+tcp://blockcruncher.com:1234 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> -p worker1,c=HTHCome join us and mine Help The Homeless on https://blockcruncher.com
|
|
|
|
|
Glad to see MN activation was so seamless on this project
|
|
|
|
XCG is now live to mine on BlockCruncher!Come enjoy our low 0.25% fee -a x16r -o stratum+tcp://blockcruncher.com:1414 -u <WALLET_ADDRESS> -p worker1,c=XCGCome join us and mine XCG on https://blockcruncher.com
|
|
|
|
|
Will a masternode setup guide be posted before the launch? Thank you, really liking this project.
|
|
|
|
|
will this project fork for masternodes?
love that you are already supporting the homeless!
|
|
|
|
|
will you be adding API support (perhaps ccminer compatibility)? would be nice to be able to use fully with awesome miner.
|
|
|
|
|
Noticed that I need to reduce overclock on most cards compared to ccminer2.3/coolminer otherwise I get "result does not validate on CPU" errors in windows 10.
Even with reduced overclock, this is much faster, getting around 3.2Mh/s on 1070tis.
Thanks for your work!
|
|
|
|
gtx1070 +500mem, +150core, 65%Power win10 latest driver -i 21: lyra2z 2.4 MH/s vs 2.0 with coolminer
gtx1080ti +400mem, +80core, 65%Power win10 latest driver -i 22: lyra2z 4.45 MH/s vs 3.9 with coolminer,
in phi2/lux, hashrate slightly lower than enemy 1.12
Does memory oc actually increase speed of Lyra2z / phi2 ? My understanding was only core clock was necessary for these algorithms. |
|
|
|
|
Yeah I haven't ever been able to get this to run with Awesome Miner for some reason either.
|
|
|
|
|
