Well, scorpio18 from icg.coin-miners.info is online. Let's hope he will post here soon explaining the problem. |
|
|
|
im out all pools are possible scam. goodluck
Relax a little. I remember I was just as stressed out a few month ago.  After a while, you get used to the technical miss-happenings. I don't believe pool owners are trying to scam anyone, they probably are just overwhelmed and/or don't care as much as the miners. We can only hope they manage to do something soon. |
|
|
|
Let's hope not. However, scorpio's profile says his local time is 3 PM. I wonder, is he really asleep at 3 PM? If he fails to give people access to their coin in time, he will lose a lot of trust from miners. Lets hope he cares about that. |
|
|
|
|

{
"blocks" : 69,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 0.08615488,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 11000000000,
"netmhashps" : 0.35274774,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"stakeinterest" : 1000000,
"testnet" : false
}
|
|
|
|
Coin miners, why is your pool down?
|
|
|
|
I'll artfully translate the OP into English for just 0.1 BTC
wow that's expensive for 3 lines  (IPO doesn't count) But of course, good sir, the art is expensive. I did say "artfully". A man needs art to fill in the logical and syntactical blanks in the OP. |
|
|
|
|
I'll artfully translate the OP into English for just 0.1 BTC
|
|
|
|
|

{
"blocks" : 455,
"currentblocksize" : 1000,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : 0.08100902,
"errors" : "",
"generate" : false,
"genproclimit" : -1,
"hashespersec" : 0,
"networkhashps" : 58983,
"pooledtx" : 0,
"testnet" : false
}
|
|
|
|
... how is it possible ?
I've asked this very question to agx.io support. Still waiting for the answer. I'll keep you posted. |
|
|
|
|
This really piqued my interest. I'd like to know what is the truth. I've opened a ticket on AGX, asking them about the history.
|
|
|
|
one bloc per minute.
So, there is (60*24*100) 144000 new coin each day.
current block : 13809
so i think there is 1380900 coin mined so far right ?
Looking at the history of coin sold yesterday on AGX :
7/7/2014 05:34:05 bid 0.00000005 780000.00000000 0.03900000
7/7/2014 05:34:05 bid 0.00000005 330000.00000000 0.01650000
7/7/2014 05:34:05 bid 0.00000005 520000.00000000 0.02600000
7/7/2014 05:34:05 bid 0.00000005 460000.00000000 0.02300000
7/7/2014 05:34:05 bid 0.00000005 350000.00000000 0.01750000
7/7/2014 05:34:05 bid 0.00000005 135564.16541435 0.00677821
7/7/2014 05:34:05 bid 0.00000005 470000.00000000 0.02350000
7/7/2014 05:34:05 bid 0.00000005 120000.00000000 0.00600000
7/7/2014 05:34:05 bid 0.00000005 580000.00000000 0.02900000
7/7/2014 05:34:05 bid 0.00000005 350000.00000000 0.01750000
7/7/2014 05:34:05 bid 0.00000005 120000.00000000 0.00600000
6/7/2014 23:51:14 bid 0.00000002 540000.00000000 0.01080000
6/7/2014 23:51:14 bid 0.00000002 1920000.00000000 0.03840000
6/7/2014 23:51:14 bid 0.00000002 760596.94955558 0.01521194
6/7/2014 23:17:05 bid 0.00000002 2170000.00000000 0.04340000
6/7/2014 23:17:05 bid 0.00000002 2720000.00000000 0.05440000
6/7/2014 23:17:05 bid 0.00000002 1930000.00000000 0.03860000
6/7/2014 23:17:05 bid 0.00000002 1321424.71834672 0.02642849
more than 15 million coin were sold (dumped).
Total coin the first year should be 17M. Mined so far should be 1.3Million. You sold for 15M yesterday.
Dev, nice SCAM.
Guys, stop mining this shit.
Or maybe agx.io is showing fake transactions. Check out the richlist. The richest address has only 72500 SPEC: http://spec.coinzone.info/RichListCheck out the blockchain. The total amount of coin is around 1.38 million http://spec.coinzone.info/chain/SpectrumCoinSo, either coinzone is wrong or agx.io is wrong. I'm not sure wich one is true, but I never heard of agx.io before, so I'm inclined to believe that there's something wrong with their transactions list. In any case you should first check your facts more thoroughly before you start with the FUD. |
|
|
|
i tested with nfactor 12 (hashrate like 40KH on 280x...) and it didn't work (block rejected)
tested with a fork of shp-sgminer, param is "--algorithm adaptive-n-scrypt --nfactor 12"
I was having some rejects on x11 and x13 algo at the very beginning. So I went to scrypt N and I had 0 orphans so far. Yes, nVidia (cudaminer) works fine. But AMD (sgminer/vertminer) is getting only rejects on N=12, or miner just crashes |
|
|
|
"nfactor" : "12", but don't wok  Yeas, it falls back to N=10. Maybe it needs some more parameters tweaked down. |
|
|
|
28.02. version, nfactor 12 (2^12, 4096).
Oh. So N=12 after all. Thank you! Anyone has any idea on how to set vertminer for N=12? Or how to mine with N=12 on AMD? |
|
|
|
Cudaminer works great on scrypt-N. I can't say I'm not satisfied.
What version of cudaminer? And what parameters? |
|
|
|
addnode=108.4.96.158 Thanks! Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #TRJWeqD2sVw1F1Rf |
|
|
|
|
Can't sync. Nodes, please? Thanks.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #N1RtX2CgfOhq8Mx6
|
|
|
|
|
Also, pushing for a decent exchange would be very good. Maybe c-cex or bittrex.
There is almost no trade on Alcurex, even for coins older and known, and that I think it does more bad than good to this coin.
|
|
|
|
The Scrypt-N implementation was taken from VertCoin, but with different times for N value adjustment (every 2 years) and different starting N value (11).
But didn't Vertcoin also started at N=11 (2048) ? Why do you say "different N value"? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
