 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2]
|
What's the command line you're using.
I'm doing ./hashcat64.bin -1 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789 -d 1 -a 3 -m 1800 example.hash ?1?1?1?1?1
..oh looks like it's working now..
hashcat -m 1800 -a 3 --increment -O --session 8char --outfile ~/hashcat.txt ~/hash.txt ?a?a?a?a?a?a?a?a That says it'll take 290 years for me  . Using upper case alpha characters really ups the entropy. I get 45 days if it's just alphanumerics. Could split that up? |
|
|
|
|
What's the command line you're using.
I'm doing ./hashcat64.bin -1 abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789 -d 1 -a 3 -m 1800 example.hash ?1?1?1?1?1
..oh looks like it's working now..
|
|
|
|
The SWU file is several files in one, each with a section and hash of the data of that file. If you search for "$6$", you'll find that contents of the shadow file which has that root:$6$... structure. The $6$ indicates it's a SHA512. The salt is the characters in between the second and third "$" signs. The hashed portion of the password is after the third "$" sign. Note that these are put into a different format due to linux's "crypt" routine. Read here: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/trusty/man3/crypt.3.htmlThis is why brute-force cracking this is not reasonable (in my mind). I think it's more probable that the SWU image gets updated to a known hashed password. I'm going to throw 8 1080Ti at it for a while trying to brute force crack it. Well, it's not a 1-5 character password. Checking 6 characters is going to take a week... Can you try all 8 character passwords with inno as the first 4 chars? Are you using hashcat? I'd throw a rig at it but I'm not sure how to proceed witih the salt part. |
|
|
|
I have a good offer for some A9's.
Does it worth investing in 5 A9's now?
I have read about the small problems above and I am concerned about ordering them.
I'd want to make my money back pretty quickly given there's so many more being delivered end of next month. |
|
|
|
they provided no explanation...pretty much just said no, sorry, wont give it to you, neener neener neener.
ive started looking at brute forcing the ssh password knowing that some keywords will probably be "inno" "t1t2t3" "a9" based on previous innosilicon passwords but probably wont have much luck....
Is it possible to mount the firmware on a linux box or something, so could try and brute force it a little more firmly Yes, it's possible! Here is the /etc/shadow entry from the firmware file if anyone wants to take a go at it: root:$6$AFqSg1Lk$PcjGWzIPX1ghz7GqGzXoFq0WsYTAwz5VsbG/DiKBQmxYno4igKlPLhqwTkdenTevxS9K9bFqzUMGiB1KdIX3G.:10933:0:99999:7::: Please share any results here! I'm trying to figure out the ssh password to my Inno D9 and it looks like you guys are going down the same paths as I have (without success). I don't think it's reasonable to brute force this. I tried it with hashcat for about a week and didn't find anything. My latest theory is to modify the SWU file as it contains the rootfs.ubi file. Change the hashed password in the binary that's in the shadow file to a known hash value (with the particular salt), then update the hash of the rootfs.ubi section. Unfortunately, I'm stuck at being able to reproduce the hash of the original .ubi file section. Then, flash the modified SWU file. However, I'm really trying not to brick my miner. I just haven't dealt with SWU files before so I'm a little cautious here. I'm interested in learning a bit more about this. How did you get the /etc/passwd? I've extracted the .swu but just see BOOT.bin and rootfs.ubi etc. Do we know which hashing algorithm that password is? MD5 or SHA512 Which part of the root:$6$AFqSg1Lk$PcjGWzIPX1ghz7GqGzXoFq0WsYTAwz5VsbG/DiKBQmxYno4igKlPLhqwTkdenTevxS9K9bFqzUMGiB1KdIX3G.:10933:0:99999:7::: are we trying to force? I guess if there's a salt as well there's little chance of figuring it out. |
|
|
|
they provided no explanation...pretty much just said no, sorry, wont give it to you, neener neener neener.
ive started looking at brute forcing the ssh password knowing that some keywords will probably be "inno" "t1t2t3" "a9" based on previous innosilicon passwords but probably wont have much luck....
Is it possible to mount the firmware on a linux box or something, so could try and brute force it a little more firmly |
|
|
|
Are you guys using the Innosilicon PSU? If so is your fan spinning at 100% all the time? Mine is so loud. I'm thinking about buying a few of these: https://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=1W7-001B-00004I can then place the PSU through the wall in the hot room. Also is there anyway to manually control the fans on the A9? I'd like to ramp those up a bit since they are running at 10 to 15% but my temps are at about 70c per board. I'd like to make it run a little cooler. Thanks Same for me. Fan alwys at 100%, extremely loud. No solution. I'm using an EVGA SuperNOVA 1200 P2 1200W 80+ that I recovered from a GPU rig, it's pretty much silent. The Innosilicon PSU was way too loud for my basement. |
|
|
|
i also do not see much of a difference in performance mode. i feel like innosilicon could really overclock this thing. my temps sit around 67C/71C/67C in a 73F ambient environment...and fan speed never goes above 10%.
Id like to see PLL clock increase considerably and fan speed hit something like 50%.
Sometimes on a fresh reboot, i can get super fast hash rates at the start when the cards are cold....not sure if its a fluke in how it calculates it, but I see upwards of 60-70Ksols, until the temp goes up to >60C.
innosilicon would not give me ssh password over official tech support email without any reason.
yes my fan speeds sit at 10% and temps 69C. Would be very nice to get a bit more out of this before the market is flooded. Would having the root password give ability to increase clock speeds? Judging by the root passwords on their other ASICs being all lowercase and numbers ~8char might not be hard for someone enterprising to find it |
|
|
|
|
Does anyone find that performance mode is actually any faster?
I don't see any difference between it and balanced.
The power draw is exactly the same from the wall which leads me to suspect it's not implemented yet.
If you watch the miner logs it ramps up the clock speed to 1250 and stops on both settings:
Jul 16 22:53:55 InnoMiner mcompat_lib[26727]: A1 PLL Clock = 1248MHz
Jul 16 22:53:55 InnoMiner mcompat_lib[26727]: A1 = 1230,352
Jul 16 22:53:55 InnoMiner mcompat_lib[26727]: A1 PLL Clock = 1224MHz
Jul 16 22:53:55 InnoMiner mcompat_lib[26727]: chain 2 set PLL Lv.355 success
Jul 16 22:53:56 InnoMiner mcompat_lib[26727]: chain 0 pll 1250 finished
Jul 16 22:53:56 InnoMiner mcompat_lib[26727]: chain 1 pll 1250 finished
Jul 16 22:53:56 InnoMiner mcompat_lib[26727]: chain 2 pll 1250 finished
|
|
|
|
I don't believe ZEN has announced if they are going to fork. But regardless, like you said they are going to reduce the mining reward soon so miners will only be seeing like 75%. That makes it look even less appealing to me than ZEC.
I'm thinking get some ZEN now before the reward changes and maybe run a secure node. Also when the reward does change some people will stop mining so difficulty will probably decrease so might end up getting something equivalent. What I"m really wondering is how much of the Equihash hash rate is still GPUs surely some percentage maybe 50% of the ZEC hash rate is still GPUs (judging by the hash rate near the beginning of the year when it seems unlikely there were secret ASICs mining). |
|
|
|
|
What about ZEN? Doesn't look like they're going to fork does it? Although they are reducing the mining reward soon. But that'll probably move some hash power to ZEC so not sure how much difference it'll make.
|
|
|
|
report:
my single a9 is running stable at >50ksol/s. 10% fan speed right now, not too loud.
good build quality. easy to setup. no complaints so far.
Same, wondering if there's a chance they'll release firmware with option to increase clock speed (e.g like the Bitmain z9 minis.) Temps seem to suggest there's some thermal headroom. |
|
|
|
Does anyone order Jun promotion for 2500USD(compensation of 9999USD A9)?
I ordered it.
However they doesn't ship it.
Innosilicon seems to be a scammer.
I have never bough products from Innosilicon in future..
My $2.5K A9 is out for delivery this morning by DHL. Seems like Innosilicon shipped my unit on time as announced. When did you send your payment? Mine also is with DHL to be delivered today or tomorrow (waiting for tax payment to clear). Innosilicon never sent me a tracking number. |
|
|
|
|
I don't see any difference in performance between Balanced and Performance mode. They hash the same and the power draw from the wall is exactly the same. My A9 hashes at ~52K/Sols and with fan at 10-15% the temperatures are 68-70C. Seems like there's a bit of overhead to increase the clock speed. Hopefully Innosilicon will release a firmware that actually clocks the Performance mode faster.
I am using the July 6 firmware.
|
|
|
|
|
