I have no idea what you're talking about. I'm simply asking if a Windows miner is being worked on for the 210,9 algo. At the very top of this thread, it says that 200,9 solver has been deleted and that it may be worked on later, and thought it was mistaken for 210, 9.

that's all, relax bro!

I think you have it wrong. it's 210,9 I am questioning. Are you working on a Windows miner that supports 210,9?

You say "*  Solver for equihash 200,9 has been deleted." and "I'll probably return 200,9 variant later"

Can you confirm that you are working on a Windows miner for 200,9?