Firstly you have to enable coin control it'll say for experts only. Just search through the settings and you will find it no problem, and check the box. Then, in the same place you send coins, you'll notice a few new options.
It's very easy to figure out for yourself. When you split blocks always put your receiving address and copy the after fee, then send to yourselt and viola.
Your understanding is somewhat correct yes. You should break up most of your blocks into 2000-2200 and you will get 200 TRK at current difficulties.
As for staking daily, that all depends on how many blocks you have, the more blocks you have the more TRK you will stake over time.
Don't use big blocks. Example: trk block size 20,000 Your reward is 200trk.
You will stake faster but you only get 200trk. Essentially you're losing out with such big blocks.
Use 'small' blocks Example: trk block size 2100 Your reward should be 200trk
Trk has a maximum block size which is 200, so it's better to put the most minimum amount per block to get the maximum reward. I'd recommend 1900 to 2300 at the moment. I like to differ between 1900-2300 because when they split sometimes I get lazy and miss looking by a day or 2 and the block is already aged, so I'll still get a decent reward for that block.
It can get pretty strategic.
Since you've been staking for 2 years you may already have quite a lot of split blocks, all with ages etc. You can use those once they finish staking to start getting optimum rewards.
Thanks for this guide.
|
|
|
I'll be on The Michael Artsis Show on Tuesday.
Looking forward to hearing you bring up Truckcoin and the benefits it will have on transportation industry.
|
|
|
I'm interested in mining this coin through my web browser. I've already registered on the https://hadron.cloud/ website and joined the telegram group. My specs are: Processor: Intel Core i5-2500K @ 3.30GHz RAM: 16 GB DDR 3 Graphics: AMD Radeon HD 7950 HD: 256 GB SSD OS: Windows 7 Browser: Google Chrome Thank you!
|
|
|
Looks like cryptopia is back up for trading Truck
|
|
|
Now anonymous tokens are popular, I mean transactions. I advise you to advertise yourself. If you do not have ideas for the future, then focus on anonymous transactions and the price will fly to the moon)). You must have a brand. Sorry for my English.
You probably can run Truckcoin inside of TAILS, similar to this: First: sudo iptables -I OUTPUT 2 -p tcp -d 127.0.0.1 -m tcp --dport 18776 -j ACCEPT Second: DNS_PUBLIC=tcp TORSOCKS_ALLOW_INBOUND=1 torsocks ./truckcoind --p2p-bind-ip 127.0.0.1 --no-igd --rpc-bind-ip 127.0.0.1 Anonymous enough.
|
|
|
Any word or news on the wallet going back up at Cryptopia?
@paramind22 AFAIK the fake/scam truckcoin isn't moving ahead very well at all.
|
|
|
Just an update: Both the daemon and qt, built successfully with libdb4.8 Seems to be working fine.
|
|
|
I'd suggest to build from the source to match your system config, there is no point to install libdb5.3. These linux wallets binaries are usually incompatible when run on different config, it's always better to compile.
Will do, thanks.
|
|
|
I get this error on Ubuntu 16.04 when trying to run your compiled truckcoin-qt I have libdb4.8 installed, i'm assuming i have to install libdb5.3? But will that break my other wallets? error while loading shared libraries: libdb_cxx-5.3.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory In the readme's it still talks about 4.8 .. might want to update it if using a newer version. Also might want to make note of this (already in readme): Now the nasty thing is that databases from 5.X are not compatible with 4.X.
If the globally installed development package of Berkely DB installed on your system is 5.X, any source you build yourself will be linked against that. The first time you run with a 5.X version the database will be upgraded, and 4.X cannot open the new format. This means that you cannot go back to the old statically linked version without significant hassle!
|
|
|
I don't want by any means FUD here, that is not my intention, but maybe it is the high POS rate that keeps this coin from drawing attention to it. It just does not sound sustainable. Especially for those who are late to the party.
Don't mean to sound like an ass, but if you can read : its " up to 200%". Its not actually 200%. Plus everyone gets the same percentage, whether you're new or not. So yeah please rethink your false accusations.
|
|
|
Aside from this fake shill attempt with pbc in OP above, Ok truth about Verge now: Private: Verge (XVG) has a rich list, so it's not private. Put a Verge address in the blockchain explorer (or here) and see for yourself how much money it has, as well as all of its past transactions. If they've sent money, you can see to which addresses they've sent it. While the IP address of the transaction maker is hidden through TOR and/or I2P, that's only one part of the privacy equation. Almost all coins, including Bitcoin, can be run over TOR or I2P to hide an IP address. In fact, Verge is essentially just Bitcoin over TOR/I2P. A blockchain must be completely private in order to be a private coin, but the Verge blockchain is as public as Bitcoin's blockchain. To Bitcoin's credit, they have never claimed to be private.
Untraceable: Since all Verge transactions are visible on the blockchain, all Verge transactions can be traced. On their home page, Verge claims to be "completely untraceable." But put a Verge address in a blockchain explorer (try DGjVzyPaKMBiwzWoQyVsEAD2YLT5xoht9z) and you can see its balance and related transactions. It's completely traceable.
Secure: Transactions are cryptographically secure.
Fungible: Since no transactions are private, the potential exists for an entity to block or blacklist certain coins, making them less valuable than the others. See the note on the lack of Bitcoin fungibility below since the same principle applies to Verge. Also regarding Zencash: As far as I know it is not trustless setup. I personally would not buy these coins, they have backdoors and transactions *could* be rolledback. Just my .02 crypto-cents
|
|
|
Ok truth about Verge now: Private: Verge (XVG) has a rich list, so it's not private. Put a Verge address in the blockchain explorer (or here) and see for yourself how much money it has, as well as all of its past transactions. If they've sent money, you can see to which addresses they've sent it. While the IP address of the transaction maker is hidden through TOR and/or I2P, that's only one part of the privacy equation. Almost all coins, including Bitcoin, can be run over TOR or I2P to hide an IP address. In fact, Verge is essentially just Bitcoin over TOR/I2P. A blockchain must be completely private in order to be a private coin, but the Verge blockchain is as public as Bitcoin's blockchain. To Bitcoin's credit, they have never claimed to be private.
Untraceable: Since all Verge transactions are visible on the blockchain, all Verge transactions can be traced. On their home page, Verge claims to be "completely untraceable." But put a Verge address in a blockchain explorer (try DGjVzyPaKMBiwzWoQyVsEAD2YLT5xoht9z) and you can see its balance and related transactions. It's completely traceable.
Secure: Transactions are cryptographically secure.
Fungible: Since no transactions are private, the potential exists for an entity to block or blacklist certain coins, making them less valuable than the others. See the note on the lack of Bitcoin fungibility below since the same principle applies to Verge. Also regarding Zencash: As far as I know it is not trustless setup. I personally would not buy these coins, they have backdoors and transactions *could* be rolledback. Just my .02 crypto-cents
|
|
|
How do you buy pbc .. all memberships are sold out for now?
When will it be available again?
|
|
|
SCAMMMMM !!! THEY TOOK MY MONEY !!
|
|
|
This is b.s. ...the other "Truckcoin" needs to change its name.
Why don't they just call it TransportCoin or something.
Do they suck that much, they can't even think of a unique name?
|
|
|
This is a great coin, nice site!
|
|
|
This is not the original Truckcoin. You should really change the name, and cause less confusion.
|
|
|
|