 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2]
|
Is it mandatory to send the coins to Cryptopia? Can we just import the wallet.dat on the new wallet to do the swap? |
|
|
|
Poloniex delisting is a sad day, i still remember when they first started with marking, there was so much potential with bitmark, one of the biggest under achiever coins in the whole cryptosphere. Never really recovered after Nathan Rixham was expossd as a scammer, i know later devs tried, but the rixham scam and lies drove away a lot of the original community.
Glad to see people here from way back in the day.. (this is medic writing, so I remember this all to well)...
I do hope you continue to stick around, I know we have more potential now than we ever did at any point. Solid framework (Melvin Carlvalho's main focus over the last 18 months) is complete and starting to take form. Take note that Tim Berners-Lee is heading the SOLID development project, so having Bitmark transactions/payment structures (in development) integrated into Solid means the MARKS is NO small scale crypto project anymore. Additionally, we see this as an opportunity...and we are going to capitalize on this.
We have other news which should shape our direction (we hope to announce this very soon), and we have begun to shift our direction to Marking & MARKS transition into an everyday use currency This sounds very good. It will be very helpfull for this project to have a presentable website. The current website is a template with many "lorem ipsum" pages , it have a very poor performance and do not have https (Needed if a good SEO is desired). If someone try to know more about Bitmark by visiting bitmark.io, as it is right now, for sure they will think this project is not worth to invest in it. Using a cheap VPS from kimisufi (OVH) and the free tier from cloudflare will provide a very good performance, SEO optimizations and https. If you need it I can help you to complete the website or at least to set it presentable as a real project. |
|
|
|
Printex is coin with perspective. Printex an international community, hou to allow to use a Printex which will secure all transaction on a decentralized currency.
I think, this coin is dinamit future.
It is starting to look a dead project. @PrintexTeam, is this project dead? |
|
|
|
|
@TeamBitmark, is it planned to list Bitmark on more exchanges in the near future?
|
|
|
|
Bitmark is dead, price has already been 10k + and today is 350, will it recover?
There is activity in the GitHub repository of this project. If marking is not dead now is a good time to buy cheap. |
|
|
|
|
I already have submitted my ticket requesting to keep Bitmark listed
|
|
|
|
We can try to open as many support tickets as we can (I mean one per user) to Poloniex support, asking to keep Bitmark listed or to list it again. If many Poloniex users show interest in this coin/project then it will help to be able to trade Bitmark on Poloniex again. https://poloniex.freshdesk.com/support/tickets/newIf we act as a community it could help us all and this project. |
|
|
|
I just received this email from Poloniex: Hello,
If
you are receiving this message, it is because you currently hold a balance in BTM on Poloniex.
In order to bring Poloniex forward into a new phase of innovation and development, we have decided to delist some of our currently supported assets. Section 16 of the User Agreement provides that Poloniex may delist an asset at any time in its sole discretion based on a number of factors, in this case, the technical and operational challenges associated with continuing to support the asset.
On
Tuesday September 25th, at 12:00 ET, the following assets will be delisted from Poloniex: BTCD, BTM (Bitmark), EMC2, GRC, NEOS, POT, VRC, XBC.
Please finalize all trades and close any positions in these assets prior to September 25th. Once delisted, you will have 30 days (up to and including October 25th) to withdraw any balances in these assets. We will send an email to balance holders reminding
them to withdraw their funds prior to October 25th.
The
exact timeline of events is as follows:
September 25: Markets for
BTM will be closed
October 25: Withdrawal of
BTM will be disabled
To
withdraw your assets, please visit the Balances page of your account and provide a withdrawal address for the currency you wish to withdraw. We will send another email reminder in the coming days. For more information about these changes, please visit
our blog post. We greatly appreciate your help.
Thanks
so much,
The
Poloniex Team |
|
|
|
|
Maybe having an easy and functional Marking feature will benefit more the Bitmark price than the CEM or the available algos. Once the users start purchasing Bitmarks to mark documents on the blockchain, then the demand will grow. Most of the users will prefeer purchase Bitmarks than to put their computers to mine or to buy ASICs.
An easy marking and an easy way to query the marked data is the key to put at Bitmark where it belongs (Along with more exchanges having the Bitmark trading enabled).
I would not like to be rude (I do not fully understand all you are talking about the CEM, the algos and their consequences), but you look like perfectionists trapped in the details, without throwing the project forward because it is still not perfect for the next step, when you already have achieved a very very good project.
|
|
|
|
Is this a new project? What are your key features compared to other wallets that may appeal to users? Your wallet is a new version so I think it needs to be improved, and you already have the person in charge of this part yet? You should improve the wallet so that users can use the best way
The Bitmark project was started in July of 2014. The key feature of our Blockchain is our focus on Marking. Marking is a broad term that encompasses many different uses and applications, most involving anchoring data sets on the blockchain via hashes embedded in transactions. It's a deep, fascinating topic that we can expand on to many useful areas. We welcome your suggestions on how to improve our wallet and any others you may have too. Having the marking feature in the wallet would be nice. Like offering the option to select a file to be marked before you do a transaction and then, when it do the transaction, it hashes the file and stores the file hash into the blockchain. If there were an option to set file name, file description and an optional storage of the file in the bitmark servers, allowing to publicty query the file, that would be very useful to many companies and entities. I like your suggestion ! That would be a great and simple way to enable users to mark anything they had on file. The optional storage part is interesting too because it would in essence be the storing of the file which originated in the user's machine to the Bitmark servers, or " Bitmark Storage Cloud" which could be a federation of machines which are willing to commit storage space for a length of time in exchange for MARKS. Agreed, that would be a good way to implement Marking and leverage our "Bitmark Storage" solutions. Thanks for the recommendation! We will see if this is a feature the community would like/support, and if it is we can add it to our short term milestones list (after the completion of the code base upgrades). May be it could be a new tab intended explusively for marking, showing the available fields to fill, and when the user commits the action then it automatically do the transaction, marks the file and upload it to the bitmark storage. A webpage having a "marked files explorer" that allows anyone to search and to check the marked files, additional data, timestamp and hashes would be very useful. The main problem I can think on this is what happens when someone marks illegal content and it is stored on the bitmark servers or bitmark storage. There should be a way to report illegal content and a way to delete it. The question of legality is always tied to jurisdiction. It's an interesting question, because what is legal in one place might not be legal in another. There should be a way to report questionable content, and for contributors to the storage federation to decide whether they want to keep it or not. Those are good points. We could look into the Firewall offerings (through the web server/services provider) It is easy to block certain types of traffic, however files (with illegal content) gets a bit trickier. https://www.paloaltonetworks.com/documentation/71/pan-os/pan-os/policy/create-best-practice-security-profileshttps://live.paloaltonetworks.com/t5/Management-Articles/Complete-List-of-PAN-DB-URL-Filtering-Categories/ta-p/129799Not sure if google offers an API for this. That said it would be prudent to take a similar approach as services like reddit. Relying on the community is much more feasible, since we don't have the resources/assets for this at the moment. The distributed storage idea and to get paid in Bitmarks for hosting the marked content is pretty attractive. It is a groundbreaking idea, like what Dash did with the masternodes, but it is pretty risky too. With no content control, Bitmark could become a network to share child pornography or something scary as that. Allowing the content to be controlled by a public community could not always avoid legal problems: In an hipotetical case where someone marks a leaked hollywood movie or some content DMCA protected, publishing it without authoritzation, then maybe the users in the comunity would like to keep accessing to the content because they like it but that would be illegal in the USA where many lawyers would take action. From my point of view, the best way would be to keep it simple: Store the content in one server, in one legislation and managed by one entity. In one hand it would imply resources in terms of hardware and support but in the other hand that would make all the marking storage easy to acomplish with laws. The fees for marking could be higher than a normal transaction and destined to pay the server storage and support. By support I mean what could be review the content complaints and content removals. A Bitmark association or fundation backing all the process would be nice and would provide confidence to the users. |
|
|
|
Is this a new project? What are your key features compared to other wallets that may appeal to users? Your wallet is a new version so I think it needs to be improved, and you already have the person in charge of this part yet? You should improve the wallet so that users can use the best way
The Bitmark project was started in July of 2014. The key feature of our Blockchain is our focus on Marking. Marking is a broad term that encompasses many different uses and applications, most involving anchoring data sets on the blockchain via hashes embedded in transactions. It's a deep, fascinating topic that we can expand on to many useful areas. We welcome your suggestions on how to improve our wallet and any others you may have too. Having the marking feature in the wallet would be nice. Like offering the option to select a file to be marked before you do a transaction and then, when it do the transaction, it hashes the file and stores the file hash into the blockchain. If there were an option to set file name, file description and an optional storage of the file in the bitmark servers, allowing to publicty query the file, that would be very useful to many companies and entities. I like your suggestion ! That would be a great and simple way to enable users to mark anything they had on file. The optional storage part is interesting too because it would in essence be the storing of the file which originated in the user's machine to the Bitmark servers, or " Bitmark Storage Cloud" which could be a federation of machines which are willing to commit storage space for a length of time in exchange for MARKS. Agreed, that would be a good way to implement Marking and leverage our "Bitmark Storage" solutions. Thanks for the recommendation! We will see if this is a feature the community would like/support, and if it is we can add it to our short term milestones list (after the completion of the code base upgrades). May be it could be a new tab intended explusively for marking, showing the available fields to fill, and when the user commits the action then it automatically do the transaction, marks the file and upload it to the bitmark storage. A webpage having a "marked files explorer" that allows anyone to search and to check the marked files, additional data, timestamp and hashes would be very useful. The main problem I can think on this is what happens when someone marks illegal content and it is stored on the bitmark servers or bitmark storage. There should be a way to report illegal content and a way to delete it. |
|
|
|
Is this a new project? What are your key features compared to other wallets that may appeal to users? Your wallet is a new version so I think it needs to be improved, and you already have the person in charge of this part yet? You should improve the wallet so that users can use the best way
The Bitmark project was started in July of 2014. The key feature of our Blockchain is our focus on Marking. Marking is a broad term that encompasses many different uses and applications, most involving anchoring data sets on the blockchain via hashes embedded in transactions. It's a deep, fascinating topic that we can expand on to many useful areas. We welcome your suggestions on how to improve our wallet and any others you may have too. Having the marking feature in the wallet would be nice. Like offering the option to select a file to be marked before you do a transaction and then, when it do the transaction, it hashes the file and stores the file hash into the blockchain. If there were an option to set file name, file description and an optional storage of the file in the bitmark servers, allowing to publicty query the file, that would be very useful to many companies and entities. |
|
|
|
|
