The ants give it a really awesome style, like the ants you will need work hard to get any bitcoins  Anyhow, for me the wrong thing is that there is really no way to master Bitcoin, it cant be mastered. Sure you can learn one thing or two but you will never be the all mighty god of Bitcoin. PS: Y u no BTC instead of B 1E4w3EkiUW4cs5C9gRUKdTJja9KUadAh2X That is the right answer. You can't be the god of bitcoin and it can't be mastered. https://blockchain.info/tx/96dede883008ec8b33033a2d6033b005de502c41fe841fde09c783f77db5e515enjoy the 0.5 btc Tune in next time for hopefully even more drama! I don't think I ever said I wouldn't pay   |
|
|
|
Andreas is resorting to really drastic measures to market his book, eh?
Would you give me 0.5 BTC if I didn't tell anybody that you're the OP? HAHAHA According to the logs, deliciousowl and the OP, gumcruise, are the same person. Anybody wanna see the logs, just ask me and I'll provide the proof. Logs don't lie. HAHAHA glad you had a laugh xoxo |
|
|
|
|
Andreas is resorting to really drastic measures to market his book, eh?
|
|
|
|
What's wrong with it? It's a book on software and it's covered in bugs!
The honey badger would eat all the bugs?  |
|
|
|
|
Symbiont has repeatedly said that XCP is a major part of their toolkit, and they will use it when applicable. But I would also like to know more about this gateway.
|
|
|
|
Bump. UNAVAILABLE until further notice.  |
|
|
|
Thanks guys. Turns out it's provably fair with a 1% house edge.  |
|
|
|
|
Love it, very entertaining.
|
|
|
|
|
Hey uh I found this game called Bitkong.me and im wondering if you guys have played it? Has anyone won a bigger amount on it?
Seems interesting but I wanna know if its worth it, i dont like spending my btc
|
|
|
|
|
Of course those screenshots are you, there are many witnesses. And being objective is not trying to badmouth Ethereum. It's just they already started from scratch once resulting in a huge deal of extra work. The new platform needs to be reliable to prevent compatilbility issues. Once it's stable it will be implemented. That's all.
|
|
|
|
|
It's really a simple question, 100% now with a huge risk to go to 0 through exploits and instability or 1000%+ later with a system that is secure enough for worldwide trillion dollar markets. I'll wait.
|
|
|
|
|
I think the scrutiny and hashrate required for serious financial transactions is lost on you. And that's ok. I personally prefer my coins to be safe over a quick high and the dramatic novelty of a premature release. Therefore please consider that only very recently, Ethereum has already had some grievous security exploits and glitches. The fact that they began with a new brand engine midway isn't within Counterparty's domain of responsibility either.
Development is progressing as usual with a focus on core stability, performance and security. These are pre-requisites for building a production-ready platform, and are instrumental to implementing something as complex as a smart contracts engine in the future. Official statements from the devs corroborate this, and screaming - "But I want it now!" - is neither constructive nor valid critique.
|
|
|
|
|
Fact is, the ethereum virtual machine needs to be more stable and security audited before it can be safetly ported into Counterparty without jeopardizing user funds.
|
|
|
|
Hello: I'm in trouble, I put money into my GEMZ gem P XCP network address goes. To help.
Is this poloniex? Contact support there: https://poloniex.com/support/ |
|
|
|
But why are we talking about BTC here? Did I ever say BTC is going down? Perhaps re-read what I wrote. BTW BTC is not stable it's up 100% in just a month or two. Not sure what your definition of stable is but that doesn't seem so stable to me.
Network effect takes years to develop. Just go on meetup.com and see how many Ethereum meet up there are, sure not as many as BTC, but way higher then say CounterParty - wonder why that is? Maybe because... wait here it is...
You misunderstood both "stability" and "network effect'. Network effect doesn't mean how many people are drinking coffee together, it means the hash rate and network that secures the chain. And stability refers to code stability, not price. Whether it costs $1000 or $1,000,000 a day to compromise a system, is a big difference. Whether there are 12 dimensions of exploits on a novel system vs. 1-2 in a viciously tested one (over half a decade) is also a large difference. It is more than clear that your only intent is profit, but I believe that to be a bit short sighted. There are absolutely plans to implement the EVM once it is stable enough for production. Quitting on that would be PR suicide for literally everyone involved in the project. But don't be fooled that price has anything to do with merit or long-term viability, people made that mistake with Paycoin and Bitshares before and look how that turned out. Also, the XCP devs have not 'dropped their work'. There are commits every day and Symbiont is funding development. I'm betting they have enough on a private repo to surprise you. |
|
|
|
now that Ethereum is out and in production
You believe that?  because XCP and other meta coin protocols are practically worthless now that Ethereum is out and in production, so either the founders of this project live up to their promises or this coin (and many others) will soon be evolutionary dead ends.
Unlike BTC, Ethereum lacks what matters most for a currency, security, stability and network effect. |
|
|
|
Why do people still still trade xpy?
why do people go to church? talk to the dead? believe in astrology, bigfoot. alien abductions, pay for psychic readings?... you know, that sort of thing.... wait, there's still trade volume on XPY? why would you still trade this garbage? This is why: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/bitcoin-religion-filip-martinka- |
|
|
|
BTC-XCP trading on the decentralized exchange is still supported both in the protocol itself and in the command-line client. The functionality was removed from Counterwallet simply because, based on user feedback, it proved to be rather unwieldy. I.e. it required users to stay logged in to complete the trades, which many users didn't/couldn't do, causing liquidity issues and frustrating users on the XCP side of the trade.
I feel the need to emphasize this further, as it is getting mentioned in rumors rather frequently:
BTC-XCP trading still works if you use the command-line client and counterparty-lib: https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterparty-cli
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
