 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
|
Maybe some past grudge from signature selection or envy.
Past grudge from signature selection? I highly doubt because there's no such campaigner who will earn sats here and spend them here for no reason.
What's the offer? If it's a good deal and above average price than usual signature campaign, take it lol. I think AB De Royse777 won't mind that. That's more like becoming a hired gun. Not sure I can cope as an assassin. It's a hell of a thing to kill a man. |
|
|
|
I'm positive that I've seen a signature space wearing exactly that on this forum. Never knew someone paid for it. Anyway, I told them no deal. I'm sure you'd see another wearing it if you observe well. It's actually a newbie account so you can't know the person behind it.
Really I haven't come across any member wearing that signature and even if anyone does that, it won't take long before the account gets tagged by DT members, this is because we don't welcome such blackmail here in the forum. And again can you please share a link to the member wearing such a signature, I am curious to know how that signature looks, and also the member wearing it, it could be someone trying to get back at Royse by all means and he chose this cheap blackmail. I can't possibly remember the username wearing an odd signature. Not possible even if I came across it an hour ago though it's been months, because people barely focus on random signatures. I'll copy the code here. |
|
|
|
A member asked for the cost of renting my signature space and I told them. Was kinda shocked that the signature is "FUCK Royse777" What sort of signature is that. Would Royse777 or any member be informed about this mind explaining? Have you seen anyone wearing that signature? I think I have but didn't observe closely. What is the purpose of this signature ad? Is it a sort of promotion for Royse777? Why the aspersion?
That could be an enemy or a competitor trying to use you to use you to promote blackmail and cyberbullying against the person of Royse777 who is a notable signature campaign and other manager here in the forum, and this can be the lowest point anyone can go trying to destroy the person of Royse. Just stay away from such offers and better still expose the user here and ignore them ASAP, they don't mean well for you and other members of this forum. Lastly, I still find it hard to believe this accusation to be true, and I can figure out the possibilities, maybe, you have to share more details about this. I'm positive that I've seen a signature space wearing exactlly that on this forum. Never knew someone paid for it. Anyway, I told them no deal. I'm sure you'd see another wearing it if you observe well. It's actually a newbie account so you can't know the person behind it. It seems to me that someone is highly against Royse777 and that's why that person might want to see such signature on someone's profile. It's more like trolling to you rather than an offer to rent your signature.
I suggest you to be careful from such offers because it's not worth it to get paid for defaming of someone. Royse is among the most reputed managers of the forum, I don't know why someone would want to have a signature like that.
I suggest you to be careful from such offers and ignore all such offers. By the way, your profile is still not a full member, so someone might be trolling you.
Roger that. |
|
|
|
|
A member asked for the cost of renting my signature space and I told them. Was kinda shoked that the signature is "FUCK Royse777" What sort of signature is that. Would Royse777 or any member informed about this mind explaining? Have you seen anyone wearing that signature? I think I have but didn't observe closely. What is the purpose of this signature ad? Is it a sort of promotion for Royse777? Why the aspersion?
|
|
|
|
|
The first offer fell through. Waiting for more...
|
|
|
|
|
I just received a request for my signature spot from a member. Let me just leave this open because I responded to them after failing to see it in time. I'm open to offers if you're interested in renting my iconic space.
What renting gets you is as follows:
Several postings on a regular basis to advertise my OddJobsforBitcoin company. This guarantees regular visibility to a specific audience interested in services relevant to Bitcoin.
The forum's Bitcoin section is where regular coverage initiation takes place. I take an active part in the forum's Bitcoin discussion threads.
You will gain from interaction and discussion I start in this community by renting my signature area, which will increase the visibility of your business even more.
Tailored Posting to Meet Your Requirements: Additionally, I may change my postings to include any section of the forum debar local non-English sections. I am especially knowledgeable in games and gambling sections, trending cryptocurrency news and events and more.
If you're interested in renting my signature space, feel free to make your offers. I'll be considering offers on a first-come, first-served basis. Don't miss out on this opportunity to enhance your brand visibility and reach a targeted audience within the forum community. Meanwhile, I'll give top preference to the first requester if they respond soon.
|
|
|
|
|
I've always suspected that big players like Bitmain could build a lot of hashrate to increasingly centralize Bitcoin. For the experts in the house, how true is it that Ethereum is more decentralized than Bitcoin? Could it be the reason the SEC isn't bothering Ethereum and may even approve spot ETH ETF?
Here's what he wrote:
"Bitcoin (BTC) – Score: 29/60
Bitcoin, the pioneer of blockchain technology, showcases a strong foundation in certain aspects of decentralization:
Validator Count: It has the second-highest validator count, earning an 8/10.
Client Ecosystem: Dominated by Bitcoin Core, leading to a 1/10 score.
Permissionless Nature: Scores a perfect 10/10, with no permissioned elements.
Governance: Lacks on-chain governance, resulting in a 0/10.
Consensus Mechanism: Proof of Work (PoW) without native delegation, scoring 5/10.
Community Diversity: A growing “wizard faction” contributes to a 5/10 score.
Ethereum (ETH) – Score: 43/60
Ethereum leads in decentralization, thanks to its robust validator ecosystem and client diversity:
Validator Count and Client Ecosystem: Achieves top marks in both, with a 10/10 for the highest validator count and most diverse client ecosystem.
Permissionless and Governance: Shares Bitcoin’s lack of on-chain governance, scoring 0/10, but is fully permissionless, scoring 10/10.
Consensus Mechanism: Transitioned to Proof of Stake (PoS) without native delegation, earning a 7/10.
Community: Its vast ecosystem with many united factions scores a 6/10.
Solana (SOL) – Score: 32/60
Solana presents a mixed picture with high validator counts but challenges in its consensus mechanism:
Validator Count: A high validator count scores 7/10.
Client Ecosystem: A reasonably diverse ecosystem earns a 7/10.
Permissionless Nature: Like Ethereum, it scores a 10/10.
Consensus Mechanism: Proof of History (PoH) and high node requirements lower its score to 2/10.
Governance: Has plans for on-chain governance, scoring 3/10.
Community: A big ecosystem with few factions scores a 3/10.
XRP (Ripple) – Score: 17/60
XRP struggles with decentralization, particularly in validator diversity and permissioned elements:
Validator Count and Client Ecosystem: Scores the lowest in these categories, with 1/10 and 0/10 respectively.
Permissioned Elements: The presence of permissioned elements further reduces its score to 0/10.
Governance and Community: No plans for on-chain governance and a small ecosystem with powerful factions result in low scores.
Cardano (ADA) – Score: 35/60
Cardano shows promise with high scores in permissionless nature and plans for on-chain governance:
Validator Count: A high unique validator count scores 7/10.
Permissionless Nature: Scores a perfect 10/10.
Consensus Mechanism: Native delegation and plans for on-chain governance contribute to higher scores in these areas.
Avalanche (AVAX) and TRON (TRX)
Both blockchains present unique cases in decentralization, with Avalanche showing strength in its governance model and TRON in its fully implemented on-chain governance."
|
|
|
|
|
Give me that odd job you want done.
|
|
|
|
|
Still in business of handling your odd jobs. What do you want done at the moment?
|
|
|
|
I stand corrected, what programming languages do you know?
How good are you with HTML5 ? Any working examples?
If not can you draft some stuff up?
None. Searching for more odd jobs.... |
|
|
|
I'm just curious to see how your busienss is going m8, have you brought in a lot of revenue from these odd jobs???
Barely enough, mate. But enough to be thankful for. More odd jobs please. |
|
|
|
I have two questions: First, after all this time you have been offering to do jobs (and odd jobs), did you ever manage to get even one job done for a member of the forum? Second, is there any trustworthy member that can vouch for you by stating they employed you to do a job and you carried out the job requirements to their specifications? Any job you need done?
I need an odd job from you, mate. Even the vouching would be nice coming from you. Any odd jobs here?
May I ask what languages you are fluent in? Check again, their question was answered. More odd jobs folks. |
|
|
|
more odd job?
I think that you could learn or improve (if you already know) prompting, I mean, asking the correct things to AI so you get the desired output. You could sell that skill, or directly the output. I can't be more concise, because that's not something I know a lot about myself, but it seems that there will be great opportunities for those who master this new ability. Thanks for the suggestion. Any odd jobs available here? |
|
|
|
|
War is unstoppable. There's war raging in all our souls which is untamable by us as persons. How much less is our ability to stop war between nations.
|
|
|
|
|
Can you share your caziest experience of your country's army? If you've served before or currently serving, what spooked you the most?
For me, the fact that nearly every commander secretly wants a psycho in every company to do the dirty jobs normal men don't really like is ... shocking.
|
|
|
|
Do you wonder why the biggest crypto thieves still get caught, with all that money? Imagine having just $200,000. What all that money could do for you? As a thief, you could even disapper, but you can't. You know why? There are few hiding places on earth for fugitives these days. And when you've got lots of money, those few hiding places practically make your money useless. Even Crypto Queen may not have disappeared as we presumed. How about CAR? Easter Island? Somalia? Siberia? In any case, never believe that you could steal from people and get away to enjoy the loot happily ever after. This is what these duo never reckoned with. And I think there are many like them who wouldn't mind doing anything just for money. https://coinmarketcap.com/community/articles/65b41174f00d2a6f4b9880b8/ |
|
|
|
Any odd jobs here?
May I ask what languages you are fluent in? Only English. As i can see you are a good person. Good luck at your business!
Thanks, though no one but God is good. |
|
|
|
No private key given on centralized exchanges and that is just it. To have full control, move all your coins to a noncustodial wallet. Cold wallets are the safest.
Even if you have the private key in one way or the other, I mean on the centralized exchange that you are using, you will still not be able to recover your coins if the exchange is hacked and coins stolen
This question is kind of funny.
Yeah, though I'm thinking along the line in case the hacker didn't steal from all the wallets like Mt Gox. Mine could be one of the unaccessed wallets and I wouldn't have to wait 10 years to get my coins. |
|
|
|
|
