Bitcoin Forum
June 21, 2024, 03:17:03 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
21  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Premier League Prediction Thread 2022/2023 on: February 06, 2023, 06:09:39 AM
Manchester city didn't profit from arsenal lose against Everton and they also lost against Tottenham with 1 goal scored in the first half by hare kane, arsenal fans are for sure very happy with this result and the club but in my opinion the situation had to be better if the club was more efficient against Everton, if the won the match the gap would be 8 points - 1 to arsenal which will make the situation easier for theme
As a result of not being able to take advantage of opportunities for Arsenal failure to win over Everton, Manchester City also failed to stick to Arsenal at the top of the Premier League standings. Tottenham Hotspur Stadium Still very haunted for Manchester City, so far The Cityzen has always failed to pick up points and has also been unable to score goals in the last four matches.

Tottenham managed to take advantage of playing at home and the tactical mistakes carried by Guardiola to get full points. Guardiola decision not to include Kevin De Bruyne name in the main squad made Erling Haaland and Julian Alvarez lack bait support on the front lines, as a result Manchester City were unable to score a goal in this match.


I didn't even know that Tottenham was able to beat Manchester City a couple of times now in home games. But that goes to show that Tottenham can never be underestimated. With a striker like Harry Kane they know that they are able to score a goal at any moment in the game. He is strong and versatile, can score after free kicks and corners but also in very dynamic situations.
It is hard to believe when Manchester City can't score a single goal during the game given that they have the most dangerous striker in the world. But Haaland is also just human and ultimately also depends on his teammates to create chances for him.
22  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Germany League - Bundesliga Prediction Thread on: February 05, 2023, 04:58:11 PM
Ugh! Considering that Wolfsburg and Bayern attacked each other here and there verbally before the game, I guess this went in favor of Bayern Cheesy

21 minutes into the game and they have a 3:0 lead. I assume that Kovac hoped for another start into the game...

There is no coming back from this and this is already over. Now it is just a question of whether Bayern decides to slow down or to destroy Wolfsburg as hard as possible. It is a bit as if they wanted to punish Kovac for his statement that it is harder to play against Berlin than against Bayern right now.
23  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Germany League - Bundesliga Prediction Thread on: February 05, 2023, 04:05:11 PM
Schalke have started to get points for two weeks which might be seen as positive news. However they got the same scores in both games like 0-0 as well. They are still struggling with scoring problems but at least they didn't concede any goal. The opponents were even teams like Koln and Gladbach. This might seem as some improvement I assume but it is still not changing much for them now.

Schalke are like destined to relegate from the Bundesliga as long as they keep playing poorly. I would have liked to see them surprising me though but I'm sure of it.
Surely a positive change for them as now they have two draws after conceding six goals from Leipzig they have two clean sheets but sadly their attack is also crap as it completely fails to give any positive output if they want to stay in Bundesliga then surely they need to improve their attack as well because right now things are manageable, and they can do few things which allow them to stay into Bundesliga.

Currently, situation is interesting with few teams are struggling and losing matches consistently which is also creating some mess up at the bottom and if Schalke able to improve their attack then surely we can expect good fight from them for their survival which is currently looking difficult because their attack is having nothing to give them good support even their defence is having some lifeline for them.

It would be no less than a miracle if Schalke can somehow turn this around. Now that Stuttgart is behind, it is still only 5 points away from the 16th position in the table, but compared to Stuttgart Schalke has almost nothing going for them despite these two points they just collected because as you said, their offensive game is utterly weak.

Even when they are trying to solve problems physically, they still need a minimum of creativity to score goals or otherwise they'll just end up with 1 point in a game in a best case scenario.
24  Economy / Services / Re: [OPEN] Blackjack.fun Signature Campaign | Up to $80/wk | Rate Increase on: February 16, 2022, 04:41:35 AM
Your bitcointalk profile link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=289355
Your current posts count (including this one): 989
Amounts of merits that you earned in the last 120 days: 4
Your blackjack.fun username: Germsite
25  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Andreas' current use of BTC on: November 04, 2021, 12:44:51 PM
It's interesting that anyone could think of introducing a "solution" like that into the bitcoin protocol? It wouldn't be bitcoin anymore.
Not only that, but the proposal doesn't actually solve the problem of people not spending their bitcoin - it only incentivizes people to move bitcoin around between their own addresses and clog up the network with unnecessary transactions.

It might also change more towards Bitcoin being used a currency when there are more favorable tax laws all around the world.
Agreed. In the US, at least treat it the same as any other foreign currency in which there is no tax for any purchases under $200. Unfortunately our legislators don't understand the first thing about bitcoin or cryptocurrency.

Ok, that is quite good then already, but correct if I am wrong, that wasn't always the case was it? Has that regulation officially been applied to crypto recently? The European Union is much more complex in that regard.

Oh and the under $200 rule, is that nationwide or does it depend on the state?


26  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Russia doesn't wants its citizens earning with cryptos on: November 03, 2021, 09:57:29 PM

And maybe this the reason why Russia doesn't want their citizens to earn through crypto currencies because it will give them so much financial freedom.
Once the citizens learn about how to acquire, manage, store securely, transact with bitcoin, it will be a difficult task for the government to prevent them from continuing doing so. However, the thing is that the vast majority of Russian people don't seem interested in cryptocurrencies, they show a clear unwillingness to learn more about it. Moreover, in order to access valuable resources where they can learn, such as this forum, they have to have at least basic technical knowledge regarding how to get through the wall of censorship. Yes, bitcointalk was blocked by Roskomnadzor a couple of years ago, which has resulted in almost zero activity from Russian newcomers. Unfortunately, censorship appears to be an effective way to hinder uneducated people from finding out how to deal with cryptocurrency and earning off of it.

But prosecution could also be an issue. Not many news seem to reach us from China about people being prosecuted for breaking the rules right now, but I think that the Chinese government is going to be extremely brutal if people violate the law in this case. But can they really control them all? I have no idea. I would say that Russia is not as strict as China? That would be my uneducated guess, but even if Russia bans it, I don't think it is going to be enforced as hard as it probably will be in China.
27  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Andreas' current use of BTC on: November 03, 2021, 09:52:31 PM
That's my issue. If BTC has value because it can be used to buy goods, what happens where everyone is HODLing and nobody is using it to buy goods?
We will never reach a point where nobody is using it to buy goods. There will always be at least some people like me who use bitcoin primarily as a currency. And indeed, I think the number of people using it at least partly as a currency is increasing - certainly I personally know of far more merchants accepting it and I spend it in a much wider variety of places than I did 5 years ago. But I still think those people are very much in the minority and are growing at a slower rate compared to the percentage of people that are only here to make fiat profits.

And now that I think about this, one solution could be to introduce a system in the Bitcoin protocol where a small, but increasing portion of BTC that are not moving from an address are transferred automatically to a "community address" for other users to buy, or maybe it goes to active nodes as a way to incentivize network security. The more you hold, the more BTC are transferred to this community address or to nodes.
I would be against this proposal 100%. One of the basic principles of bitcoin is that you can be your bank, hold and secure your own money, without any intervention from third parties. As soon as you start effectively stealing other people's coins for any reason, then you have violated this principle and bitcoin is little better than seizable and freezable fiat.

It might also change more towards Bitcoin being used a currency when there are more favorable tax laws all around the world. Right now using Bitcoin can lead to capital gains taxation if the BTC you use increased in value. That makes it quite cumbersome for all the accounting requirements if you have to list buy and sell/use prices for every coffee you purchase or every package of chewing gum. I think that is one major aspect that would have to change in a number of countries in order to see Bitcoin circulate much more as a currency at least for everyday purchases (Lambos and stuff, you know...) Wink
28  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Walmart Sells Bitcoin on: November 03, 2021, 09:48:08 PM
Well, it's not Walmart itself. Walmart is just hosting Coinstar kiosks which sell Bitcoin. This is in partnership with the crypto wallet and exchange, CoinMe.
Even if this is not directly a Walmart action towards selling Bitcoin yet their participation is quite a big to help this community grow more.
this will lead to more adoption from Walmart costumer specially those who has no idea what  is Bitcoin all about.

Quote
Do you think this will be successful?
Successful or not? what i am thinking is there will be a positive effect towards Bitcoin and also Walmart users.
I'm sure that there will come a time that they will try to adopt or at least Use Bitcoin towards their transacting .

I don't know if that is such a boost to Bitcoin and its ecosystem. As far as I know Walmart charges crazy high fees. I am not sure where they have their businesses in the world, but in the USA why would someone pay a hefty fee for acquiring Bitcoin when that person can just sign up with an exchange?

Doesn't make all too much sense to me.

"The machines charge a 4% fee for the Bitcoin option and a 7% cash exchange fee, Coindesk said." 

The machines are not owned by Walmart. Walmart is not the one charging the fees. As I've specified in the OP, Walmart is only hosting Coinstar ATMs which has a partnership with CoinMe in selling Bitcoin. Walmart is only providing Coinstar the place for them to sell Bitcoin so I don't think it is appropriate to blame Walmart for the high fees.

Anyway, Walmart is operating in 24 countries around the world. But I don't think each Walmart store will necessarily install a Coinstar kiosk.

Ok so I should substitute "Walmart" for Coinstar then, but still it would be shocking if people buy in at a 4% markup. Might work out though as there are some lazy people or when Bitcoin goes parabolic and they are just in the middle of a walmart and want to take part in the rally, so they might not even care about the 4% extra (or 4% minus the fee they would pay at an exchange to be precise).
29  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Walmart Sells Bitcoin on: November 03, 2021, 12:12:24 AM
Well, it's not Walmart itself. Walmart is just hosting Coinstar kiosks which sell Bitcoin. This is in partnership with the crypto wallet and exchange, CoinMe.
Even if this is not directly a Walmart action towards selling Bitcoin yet their participation is quite a big to help this community grow more.
this will lead to more adoption from Walmart costumer specially those who has no idea what  is Bitcoin all about.

Quote
Do you think this will be successful?
Successful or not? what i am thinking is there will be a positive effect towards Bitcoin and also Walmart users.
I'm sure that there will come a time that they will try to adopt or at least Use Bitcoin towards their transacting .

I don't know if that is such a boost to Bitcoin and its ecosystem. As far as I know Walmart charges crazy high fees. I am not sure where they have their businesses in the world, but in the USA why would someone pay a hefty fee for acquiring Bitcoin when that person can just sign up with an exchange?

Doesn't make all too much sense to me.

"The machines charge a 4% fee for the Bitcoin option and a 7% cash exchange fee, Coindesk said." 
30  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Happy 13th Anniversary Bitcoin Whitepaper on: November 03, 2021, 12:00:45 AM
I cannot believe it is 13 years already..... "13" the number that are unlucky for some... but lucky for other. I wonder what Satoshi Nakamoto will say about his invention now? Will Satoshi be happy that it lasted this long... or unhappy that centralized financial institutions has latched onto it to make profits? (effectively destroying pseudo anonymity for a lot of people)   Roll Eyes

I think he will be happy that adoption has grown and that countries like Venezuela has accepted Bitcoin as a currency. (After all... Bitcoin is not supposed to be a commodity, but rather an alternative currency)  Tongue

I wonder if we will ever get to find out who Satoshi is within our lifetimes. Right now there is not the slightest indication that that will ever be the case, which is an odd thing to imagine. If Bitcoin is a government project we may find out in thirty or forty years, who knows. For now it all is unlikely.
31  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Russia doesn't wants its citizens earning with cryptos on: November 02, 2021, 11:55:45 PM
If the reason is that they don't want the citizen to earn bitcoin, then that is a stupid reason.

There should be a bigger reason than that, it could be the risk that they can't and don't want to manage.
I'm afraid that Russia would treat bitcoin and crypto as a whole like China, I hope they won't impose a total ban.

They won't impose a total ban. In mid of October Putin said that cryptocurrencies will play an important role, but that that doesn't mean he is the biggest fan of Bitcoin. Still, although Putin is dependent on mass surveillance and presidential power, he most likely won't decide the way the Chinese government did. I think he does have quite a different opinion about cryptocurrencies than the Chinese president has.

But the topic here obviously refers to earnings and that is the point: it would make taxation much harder (if not impossible to a certain degree) as has been stated before here. But how is he going to prevent people from accepting Bitcoin as a payment method while he does not intend to ban Bitcoin entirely? That is going to be an interesting law.
32  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Bounties (Altcoins) / Re: [Bounty] ITSMYNE 🚀 Talk NFTs, Trade NFTs 🚀 35k USD worth of tokens Allocated on: October 25, 2021, 09:31:28 AM
Bitcointalk username: germsite
Bitcointalk link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=289355
Rank: Senior Member
Current Post count: 980
BSC Address: 0x2B0154B8Db2195C5bEE8b879e791Ca04981051e8
33  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: some people uneducate about Bitcoins on: August 09, 2021, 02:43:56 PM
Due to lack of research and knowledge not just only in bitcoins but with other cryptocurrencies. It also helps when a friend or relative is involved in cryptocurrencies just like trading and investing at the same time. It will be a lot easier to ask if someone knows the ins and outs of cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin. If someone is interested in bitcoin, he or she must be patient to learn.

That is how many people got involved I guess. You know someone who knows someone and so on and so forth. By now it's of course the media who get most of the people involved, but when it was not so well know you could be lucky enough to have a friend who dived into it and let it know about you and also got you excited.
34  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Can China takeover Bitcoin network? on: August 09, 2021, 02:42:34 PM
I don't think China will be able to take over the bitcoin network, because we know the Chinese government really hates bitcoin, but I admit that China dominates in bitcoin mining, but if the problem is they want to take over the bitcoin network, I don't think it will be possible, even though they do. any way, I'm sure they will not be able to do it all..
China is an old fox in scams and changes between black and white very quickly, a stormy day will allow them to confide in their interest in bitcoin, even disgust for the network but as long as the situation of the world and surrounding countries show special behavior with bitcoin, they become a more friendly and sociable face. The takeover is probably also one of the few strategies they are working on, even readying parts to manage, it's just that they're not the only wolves in this world, countries all have an insularity about the bitcoin network as well as approaching takeovers.

Nobody knows whether they have taken it over already or not. From my point of view the easiest takeover could already have happened years ago when Bitcoin was so cheap that a country like China would laugh about the money they needed to purchase a couple of million Bitcoins. Why is it a takeover and the most effective one probably? If the world gets into problems with a hostile China and it is discovered that China owns 25% of the units of the most powerful value network in the world, that would be the end for it I think. Then again China would probably keep it a secret and reign over the world with richness.
35  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Crypto market adds over $140 billion in one day on: August 09, 2021, 02:39:51 PM
Not very soon. They clearly stated at least they aren't going to accept Bitcoin this year. But it doesn't mean they will not accept in the future. As far as I know, there were many rumors before as well, but it looks like manipulation.

Anyway, crypto means volatile. So at the same time market cap will increase and decrease based on investor's movements.
Rumors circulating about amazon that will start accepting bitcoin were able to provide a significant price increase, although the rumors were directly denied by amazon. it does seem like a deliberate manipulation.

Amazon is still focused on exploring what bitcoin is like and how it can impact the Amazon shopping experience.
In time amazon may officially announce that it accepts bitcoin, but not now.

Many new investors are starting to enter bitcoin so that market capitalization is increasing.

Even when the rumors become true, hasn't that rumor been absorbed by the market already as we saw Bitcoin going up?

Amazon accepting Bitcoin would be a great step, but it doesn't mean right away that Bitcoin gets used more or people will now use Bitcoin instead of USD. The problem remains that it is a hassle to use crypto on so many levels that Amazon accepting Bitcoin won't change much on its own. It would though if a law was passed that says purchases up to $20 remain exempt from taxation on crypto gains.
36  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Google starts accepting Bitcoin ads on: August 09, 2021, 02:37:43 PM
Although it's good for us that Google will start accepting crypto ads soon I think Google will have to find strong ways to differentiate scams from genuine ads.
Google was being criticized frequently before the ban on crypto ads for displaying ads which lead to scams. Many people lost their money following those ads.
I think it will be of no use if Google doesn't find a way to display only genuine ads because sooner or later the same problem will arise and people will lose money following crypto ads on Google.
If the same thing happens frequently then sooner or later Google will ban crypto ads again.

If they can differentiate manually using their staff to analyze who are the people behind the projects, including the data they gathered since the ICO days, they may be able to extract the data of scammers and exclude them automatically when they try to advertise once again. They are good at gathering data, they may even have more data than the ones from exchanges.

It's necessary to have an AI that will thoroughly check the data and confirm scam projects but there will really be a massive adoption because of the regulation that is coming.

That sounds impossible to me. Scammers could just use other ways. Incognito browsers with VPN or so, I don't know, but I doubt Google will have a look at that anyway. All kinds of scammers are advertising their scam products on Google, that is nothing really exclusive to crypto. They all do it and I wonder why they are allowed to do it. Well, because they pay Google for it.
37  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Google starts accepting Bitcoin ads on: August 08, 2021, 09:07:21 AM
Google has begun to accept advertisements for Bitcoin, and Google lifted its ban on advertisements related to Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies. Starting August 3, companies using Bitcoin and cryptocurrencies can once again advertise on the search giant and various websites that are part of its platform. The ban was implemented in March 2018 to comply with the new regulations of the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network of the United States (FinCEN).

Article Source: https://updateonbitcoin.com/google-lifted-the-ban-on-advertising-related-to-bitcoin/

Correct me if I am wrong, but I thought this is old news? Didn't they lift the ban in a first step quite a while ago anyway?

Whatever, all these companies like Tesla, Amazon (even though just a "rumor" at this point) and Google willingly associating themselves more and more with cryptocurrencies clearly shows the direction this market will take in the future. How naive would one have to be to think that these tech companies do NOT have a group of experts solely dedicate to research any kind of cryptocurrency related opportunities? They are all deep diving into it, guaranteed.
38  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Crypto market adds over $140 billion in one day on: August 08, 2021, 09:04:28 AM
The price of Bitcoin has exceeded $ 43,000, while the price of Ethereum has risen 24 percent in a week, bringing the total market value of cryptocurrencies to $ 1.8 trillion, which has risen to $ 140 billion in just 24 hours.
Finbold reported yesterday that Bitcoin trades above its simple 100-day moving average. Further gains could pave the way for short-term gains in the $ 42,500 resistance area that Bitcoin has crossed as cows seek to raise the price of Bitcoin to a significant $ 50,000.
More specifically, the world's leading digital asset in terms of market value has increased by more than 7.06% in the last 24 hours and 4.41% in the last week. Its current price is $ 43,670. In addition, according to CoinMarketCap.com, the overall bitcoin market dominance is 45.93%, up 0.02% from the previous day.


Source: https://finbold.com/crypto-market-adds-over-140-billion-in-a-day/

Thanks for the post and this shows even more that the topics started on this forum asking whether it is game over for Bitcoin or whether we are in a bear market now are completely off the rails. We will certainly see six figures for Bitcoin in the future. There are too many giants involved now to just call it a day for BTC and leave it where it is. Bitcoin will go up unless some really bad stuff happens.
39  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Can China takeover Bitcoin network? on: August 08, 2021, 09:01:55 AM
China controls over 50% of the btc hashrate meaning they can do a 51% attack on the bitcoin network or control which btc transactions are valid according to their liking correct?
I believe a bulk of the mining hashrate is as a result of mining pools; miners from all over the world concentrate their computing power to a single server to increase the chances of them getting the next block collectively. This does not mean the hashrate is controlled by China, miners can easily switch to pools from other nations.

Indeed, there is no monopoly from China on the hashrate of BTC. Since the ban, the bulk of mining to maintain the network coming out of China is somewhat something of the past, as miners have already started to relocate.

As for China manipulating BTC's consensus, well, that's not so easily achieved because despite the miners having been in China it doesn't mean miners knew exactly where each were located to forum such an organised attack. Plus, the penalties if found out are harsh and it would destroy any miner's equipment and trust for future mining participation, a risk not many are prepared to take.

I think the owners of the largest pools have been known pretty much forever and if they wanted they could coordinate an attack regardless of their location anyway. As for China dominating the network on purpose, I guess they would only do it with the intent to harm the network and thereby perhaps destroy it. As that is almost practically impossible I guess, and as China isn't interested in a strong network that might give their own citizens possibilities to hide capital and get it out of China without anyone noticing, they are just trying to support the network as least as possible and to lock up their citizens within their own borders by cracking down on access to foreign capital markets and technologies like Bitcoin.
40  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: some people uneducate about Bitcoins on: August 08, 2021, 08:58:03 AM
5 years ago I heard about Bitcoins  some feedback are good but some of them are negative

Untill now In my country if you say/discuss about Bitcoins expect that their response are negative.

Why does some people always say negative about Bitcoins?

1. Lack of knowledge about Bitcoins, uneducate People only saw the negative sides of Bitcoins.
2. Some of them say negative feedback because of their experience on some sites about Bitcoins,  because now a days Bitcoin are popular but there are many site will scam you if you are spontaneous to invest in not trusted sites.


Depending on the arguments they put forward, maybe they say negative things because they are simply right? Bitcoin does have its negative side as well. In the truest sense of the words, there is two sides to the coin for everything, also for Bitcoin. Not everything that's negatively reported or said about Bitcoin is the result of bad education or the lack thereof. Actually, it might be the result of good education or vast experience in the field of cryptos.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!