Bitcoin is not a magic wand which will pop up from the sky without mining hardware. You need to have a mining hardware to start mining any coins. Otherwise you will have to invest in cloud mining companies to buy power from them.
I know two websites where you can start mining without any hardware. If you are interested, please PM me and I will guide you accordingly. But you have to be patient as the earning will be low. If you want to start earning bitcoin or other coins, pm me and I will guide you through web mining, for that you need to have high speed internet.
CPU early adopter mining was damn near close wasn't it? At the time of CPU miners they were hardly making a profit mining bitcoin as it was not even really tradable and very low value. I would stay away from bitcoin mining, it is not for the normal average joe anymore. Instead, just use the money you would invest in miners to buy some bitcoin and be happy that you now own some bitcoin. CPU miners knew exactly what Bitcoin's price potential was. They programmed the first bots. But yes that is correct. It is not for the average Joe. It is for that average Chan. China FTW!
|
|
|
Bitcoin is not a magic wand which will pop up from the sky without mining hardware. You need to have a mining hardware to start mining any coins. Otherwise you will have to invest in cloud mining companies to buy power from them.
I know two websites where you can start mining without any hardware. If you are interested, please PM me and I will guide you accordingly. But you have to be patient as the earning will be low. If you want to start earning bitcoin or other coins, pm me and I will guide you through web mining, for that you need to have high speed internet.
CPU early adopter mining was damn near close wasn't it?
|
|
|
I have heard rumors that this guy may be Satoshi himself.
He is really smart and has intimate knowledge about Bitcoin, the markets, and the world at large.
Seems like a good candidate.
I have seen some videos of him and I doubt he is satoshi, he doesn't seem to have deep technical knowledge of bitcoin, he understands it well and knows how it works and so on, but not at a technical level, which would be a requirement to be a satoshi proposal. I still think Adam Back is a potential satoshi, he was credited in the whitepaper. I also think Nick Szabo is still a decent candidate. But Gmaxwell and PWuille are also potential satoshis... we can't know. My money is on Nick Szabo, but for some reason I seem to think that Satoshi is not a individual... but rather a small group of people. Can you imagine if Satoshi turns out to be some whack job that believe in Aliens and even worst inspired by Aliens to create this technology. It is for reasons like this, that we should not know who Satoshi is, so that we cannot judge. I used to think Nick Szabo was the real Satoshi too. Then he did a talk at Ethereum's developers conference which made me think that it could not be him. The real Satoshi, I do not think will support Ethereum. If you ask why, search for Peter Todd's and Adam Back's and GMaxwell's opinions on Ethereum. I am not a technical person but it is easy to pick up that those 3 BTC developers already knew Ethereum will not work. You all "think" alot these days. Truth is none of you long time bitcointalkers know anything. All you can do is hodl and prey.... Obvious choice will not be Satoshi. Clif High is closer than all of your guesses.
|
|
|
There are two opposite ideas: some are saying Bitcoin has been created by them to be implemented worldwide and to then be used and controlled by them while others are saying that Bitcoin hasn't been created by them and that means they want it down as soon as it grows up enough. There is no reason (FOR NOW!) for them to worry about it. Although the volume is very high, we are international so the amount per wallet or per person should be pretty low. I think it was not created by them but became their idea now, and they want to create something similar to conquer with Bitcoin.
Whoever made up the story that the Rohthschilds are behind the creation of Bitcoin has some really crazy mind! Why would somebody built something decentralized which he can not control? This makes no sense to me. The second case makes much more sense to me, that they and all the others of the elite doesn't like Bitcoin and would do almost anything to get rid off it when BTC would have reached some certain size and global significance. Right.....because it is so uncontrollable now.... Centralized exchanges = check IRS taxation = check Big banks adopting blockchain = check Built on the internet (which is not in Bitcoin's control) = check Am I missing anything else? I suggest that perhaps you are the one that is crazy and swallowed the biggest lie of all (freedom). Hell I could even throw in some tin foil hat stuff and tell you how Poloniex (the Ethereum launchpad) has an owner that sports a red shield in his own trollbox on their trading page. But you are too lazy to look up ROT SCHILD on Google to see the obvious symbolism. https://www.google.com/search?client=opera&q=red+shield&sourceid=opera&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8Only to find one of the top three search entries to be: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rothschild_familyBut hey you must be crazy for that kind of in your face obvious stuff right?
|
|
|
There are two opposite ideas: some are saying Bitcoin has been created by them to be implemented worldwide and to then be used and controlled by them while others are saying that Bitcoin hasn't been created by them and that means they want it down as soon as it grows up enough. There is no reason (FOR NOW!) for them to worry about it. Although the volume is very high, we are international so the amount per wallet or per person should be pretty low. I think it was not created by them but became their idea now, and they want to create something similar to conquer with Bitcoin.
Whoever made up the story that the Rohthschilds are behind the creation of Bitcoin has some really crazy mind! Why would somebody built something decentralized which he can not control? This makes no sense to me. The second case makes much more sense to me, that they and all the others of the elite doesn't like Bitcoin and would do almost anything to get rid off it when BTC would have reached some certain size and global significance. Right.....because it is so uncontrollable now.... Centralized exchanges = check IRS taxation = check Big banks adopting blockchain = check Built on the internet (which is not in Bitcoin's control) = check Am I missing anything else? I suggest that perhaps you are the one that is crazy and swallowed the biggest lie of all (freedom).
|
|
|
Another useless "I want to see a pump" post. Dont you people have anything constructive to do instead of posting this shit?
Nope Autopilot engaged. Next stop Moon. Everyone loves Bitcoin. Everyone loves blockchain. Next stop --> moon.
|
|
|
I'm catching conflicting stories here. Which is it? http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/01/28/the-naked-truth-about-bitcoin.html“You can bet the Rothschild Global Central Bankers (who work for the Jesuit global trusts) do not want this currency to succeed, and will do everything in their power and considerable wealth to crash it or cause it to become invalidated. They have openly stated throughout history they do not like competition, sinking the Titanic (actually the Olympia) to rid some of their foes (do your homework). That is just one of hundreds of examples. If world wars, etc. are not beyond their means to secure their dominance, what makes you think they wouldn’t attempt to game this system? Bitcoin represents their worst nightmare.”
|
|
|
If it is true that the Rothschild banking cartel runs the IRS then isn't it a bit curious that the IRS wants to get serious about taxing bitcoin?
Especially after this cointelegraph article that speculates that Rothchilds are dumping dollars for Bitcoin?
Seems like a win win for them.
Bitcoin would be way better at taxing the population at the micro level.
|
|
|
Anyone ever discuss this in here? https://cointelegraph.com/news/rothschild-dumps-us-dollar-for-gold-other-currencies-bitcoinThese guys also supposedly own: http://humansarefree.com/2013/11/complete-list-of-banks-ownedcontrolled.htmlROTHSCHILD OWNED & CONTROLLED BANKS:
Afghanistan: Bank of Afghanistan Albania: Bank of Albania Algeria: Bank of Algeria Argentina: Central Bank of Argentina Armenia: Central Bank of Armenia Aruba: Central Bank of Aruba Australia: Reserve Bank of Australia Austria: Austrian National Bank Azerbaijan: Central Bank of Azerbaijan Republic Bahamas: Central Bank of The Bahamas Bahrain: Central Bank of Bahrain Bangladesh: Bangladesh Bank Barbados: Central Bank of Barbados Belarus: National Bank of the Republic of Belarus Belgium: National Bank of Belgium Belize: Central Bank of Belize Benin: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Bermuda: Bermuda Monetary Authority Bhutan: Royal Monetary Authority of Bhutan Bolivia: Central Bank of Bolivia Bosnia: Central Bank of Bosnia and Herzegovina Botswana: Bank of Botswana Brazil: Central Bank of Brazil Bulgaria: Bulgarian National Bank Burkina Faso: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Burundi: Bank of the Republic of Burundi Cambodia: National Bank of Cambodia Came Roon: Bank of Central African States Canada: Bank of Canada – Banque du Canada Cayman Islands: Cayman Islands Monetary Authority Central African Republic: Bank of Central African States Chad: Bank of Central African States Chile: Central Bank of Chile China: The People’s Bank of China Colombia: Bank of the Republic Comoros: Central Bank of Comoros Congo: Bank of Central African States Costa Rica: Central Bank of Costa Rica Côte d’Ivoire: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Croatia: Croatian National Bank Cuba: Central Bank of Cuba Cyprus: Central Bank of Cyprus Czech Republic: Czech National Bank Denmark: National Bank of Denmark Dominican Republic: Central Bank of the Dominican Republic East Caribbean area: Eastern Caribbean Central Bank Ecuador: Central Bank of Ecuador Egypt: Central Bank of Egypt El Salvador: Central Reserve Bank of El Salvador Equatorial Guinea: Bank of Central African States Estonia: Bank of Estonia Ethiopia: National Bank of Ethiopia European Union: European Central Bank Fiji: Reserve Bank of Fiji Finland: Bank of Finland France: Bank of France Gabon: Bank of Central African States The Gambia: Central Bank of The Gambia Georgia: National Bank of Georgia Germany: Deutsche Bundesbank Ghana: Bank of Ghana Greece: Bank of Greece Guatemala: Bank of Guatemala Guinea Bissau: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Guyana: Bank of Guyana Haiti: Central Bank of Haiti Honduras: Central Bank of Honduras Hong Kong: Hong Kong Monetary Authority Hungary: Magyar Nemzeti Bank Iceland: Central Bank of Iceland India: Reserve Bank of India Indonesia: Bank Indonesia Iran: The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran Iraq: Central Bank of Iraq Ireland: Central Bank and Financial Services Authority of Ireland Israel: Bank of Israel Italy: Bank of Italy Jamaica: Bank of Jamaica Japan: Bank of Japan Jordan: Central Bank of Jordan Kazakhstan: National Bank of Kazakhstan Kenya: Central Bank of Kenya Korea: Bank of Korea Kuwait: Central Bank of Kuwait Kyrgyzstan: National Bank of the Kyrgyz Republic Latvia: Bank of Latvia Lebanon: Central Bank of Lebanon Lesotho: Central Bank of Lesotho Libya: Central Bank of Libya (Their most recent conquest) Uruguay: Central Bank of Uruguay Lithuania: Bank of Lithuania Luxembourg: Central Bank of Luxembourg Macao: Monetary Authority of Macao Macedonia: National Bank of the Republic of Macedonia Madagascar: Central Bank of Madagascar Malawi: Reserve Bank of Malawi Malaysia: Central Bank of Malaysia Mali: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Malta: Central Bank of Malta Mauritius: Bank of Mauritius Mexico: Bank of Mexico Moldova: National Bank of Moldova Mongolia: Bank of Mongolia Montenegro: Central Bank of Montenegro Morocco: Bank of Morocco Mozambique: Bank of Mozambique Namibia: Bank of Namibia Nepal: Central Bank of Nepal Netherlands: Netherlands Bank Netherlands Antilles: Bank of the Netherlands Antilles New Zealand: Reserve Bank of New Zealand Nicaragua: Central Bank of Nicaragua Niger: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Nigeria: Central Bank of Nigeria Norway: Central Bank of Norway Oman: Central Bank of Oman Pakistan: State Bank of Pakistan Papua New Guinea: Bank of Papua New Guinea Paraguay: Central Bank of Paraguay Peru: Central Reserve Bank of Peru Philip Pines: Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas Poland: National Bank of Poland Portugal: Bank of Portugal Qatar: Qatar Central Bank Romania: National Bank of Romania Russia: Central Bank of Russia Rwanda: National Bank of Rwanda San Marino: Central Bank of the Republic of San Marino Samoa: Central Bank of Samoa Saudi Arabia: Saudi Arabian Monetary Agency Senegal: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Serbia: National Bank of Serbia Seychelles: Central Bank of Seychelles Sierra Leone: Bank of Sierra Leone Singapore: Monetary Authority of Singapore Slovakia: National Bank of Slovakia Slovenia: Bank of Slovenia Solomon Islands: Central Bank of Solomon Islands South Africa: South African Reserve Bank Spain: Bank of Spain Sri Lanka: Central Bank of Sri Lanka Sudan: Bank of Sudan Surinam: Central Bank of Suriname Swaziland: The Central Bank of Swaziland Sweden: Sveriges Riksbank Switzerland: Swiss National Bank Tajikistan: National Bank of Tajikistan Tanzania: Bank of Tanzania Thailand: Bank of Thailand Togo: Central Bank of West African States (BCEAO) Tonga: National Reserve Bank of Tonga Trinidad and Tobago: Central Bank of Trinidad and Tobago Tunisia: Central Bank of Tunisia Turkey: Central Bank of the Republic of Turkey Uganda: Bank of Uganda Ukraine: National Bank of Ukraine United Arab Emirates: Central Bank of United Arab Emirates United Kingdom: Bank of England United States: Federal Reserve, Federal Reserve Bank of New York Vanuatu: Reserve Bank of Vanuatu Venezuela: Central Bank of Venezuela Vietnam: The State Bank of Vietnam Yemen: Central Bank of Yemen Zambia: Bank of Zambia Zimbabwe: Reserve Bank of Zimbabwe
The FED and the IRS
Virtually unknown to the general public is the fact that the US Federal Reserve is a privately owned company, siting on its very own patch of land, immune to the US laws.
This privately owned company (controlled by the Rothschilds, Rockefellers and Morgans) prints the money FOR the US Government, which pays them interest for the "favor." This means that if we would reset the nation's debt today and would begin reprinting money, we would be in debt to the FED from the very first dollar loaned to our Government.
Also, most people living in the USA have no clue that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is a foreign agency.
To be more accurate, the IRS is a foreign private corporation of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and is the private “army” of the Federal Reserve (Fed).
Thoughts?
|
|
|
Hi, i believe the bitcoin will be the currency of the future and it's a threat to the federal reserve but they are not going to just watch their system collapse of course how do you think the federal reserve will react ?
Their mindset is just like that of Bitcoin. The other team does not exist.
|
|
|
This guy is weird to say the least. He is the tinfoil hat type of guy, with a bunch of conspiracy theories to make things interresting. When people start talking about Hilary and her body double and her being missing, then the red flag for coocooness goes up for me. He talks about Bitcoin and the price going up and down when there is polital instability, which is normal. The price of Bitcoin are being influenced by political instability, and so is any other commodity that are used for a Safe haven.
Listen to him talking about Space Aliens and Space Goat farts and tell me that he is Satoshi Nakamoto. Seriously?
Perhaps maybe you just don't hear him? Check your dial. Dude is way smart.
|
|
|
Just sit back and relax fellas.
Bitcoin just snapped into awesome mode.
Nothing can stop it now.
Watch all other currencies sink and die a miserable death while Bitcoin soars to all time highs in the near future.
Bitcoin = 1 The rest = 0
Everyone is doing just that,what could be the best time for bitcoin to pump,but this holiday season,I thought it could hit the $1000 mark before the end of the year,but $800 is not bad at all as long as it will not go down to below $700,then we are all good. The future is Bitcoin. Nothing else matters at all.
|
|
|
A few years ago I saw people predict bitcoin to $1000 then to $10000. I did not believed it. Bitcoin went to $1000 but not $10000. Now I think it will definitely go to $10000. Why? because it is like gold, the fiats devalue quickly, not bitcoin.
Bitcoin is untouchable. It will go to $10,000 easy. I agree.
|
|
|
What's the date on that Draper quote? Didn't he cry like a bitch when his block size proposal was ignored.
Another 100% price increase would be great though & I definitely see that as realistic?
Bloomberg has it written so shall it be so.
|
|
|
Just sit back and relax fellas.
Bitcoin just snapped into awesome mode.
Nothing can stop it now.
Watch all other currencies sink and die a miserable death while Bitcoin soars to all time highs in the near future.
Bitcoin = 1 The rest = 0
|
|
|
It must be time to go all in if Bloomberg is reporting this.
|
|
|
The miners have spoken: Bitcoin’s Rally Crushed Every Other Currency in 2016. Here’s Why https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2016-12-16/bitcoin-s-rally-crushed-every-other-currency-in-2016-here-s-why“My personal expectation is that bitcoin will at least gain another 100 percent,” said Krohn, chief financial officer of Hong Kong-based Genesis Mining, which deploys server farms to mine the currency.
“Bitcoin is coming into its own,” says Tim Draper, a venture capitalist who’s bought thousands of bitcoins over the years. “There are starting to be consumer uses for bitcoin, and if people have any concerns about their own fiat currency -- the rupee, for example -- they flee to bitcoin as an alternate currency.”
|
|
|
The least likely candidate is most likely Satoshi IMO.
At least that is if Satoshi was very good at masking his own identity.
All those other guys are most likely decoys aimed at throwing off the scent.
But as you all have said....no one knows....
Clif High being Satoshi Nakamoto is just as good a guess as anyone else in the Bitcoin scene.
|
|
|
It is bad for business that this company is out. It is bad for bitcoin in general, for if a number of companies like this go out, then others will get scared and follow to collect while they can. Just IMO
Maybe, but for right now there is no reason to panic or worry about financial institution investing in bitcoin. Just because circle decided to bail out with its +100 million dollars and stop bitcoin transactions does not mean other businesses will follow. For example, in South Korea a new blockchain, consortium launched. Where many South Korean financial firms invested in the creation of it. So, back to circle, just because one big player went out, does not mean other worldwide businesses will stop meddling with BTC. no need to panic, but still not good for bitcoin. circle isnt a small company going out of crypto market... we are talking about a considerable amount of money. so, at least in a short term, it's bad for bitcoin. especially because every time a company stop using bitcoin, the media does not waste the opportunity. As an investor things like this should not be taken lightly. Between this and the IRS thing with Coinbase it would be wise to stay on your toes. If I didn't know any better I would say exits are being eyeballed.
|
|
|
|