Bitcoin Forum
June 05, 2024, 01:11:54 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2]
21  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Spartacus Letter on: October 01, 2021, 01:26:24 AM
Holy smokes, we’re we able to summon the REAL Spartacus here to bitcointalk?

Yes. As a matter of fact, I have the latest versions of the docs:

ICENI Mission Statement: https://mega.nz/file/LIdixBwY#3sv5b0saEvZ6vsHpQuRBMCc84-08uvIfFYdcxUtYx9U
Spartacus Letter V2: https://mega.nz/file/HZNmyRKB#xF15FrsAEZkwBPi4tdUP5toBBqeRHDJJAHzZt6Hg_Qg
Spartacus Letter URLs: https://mega.nz/file/HIdCxJoL#ru6yOS3Fap9rBdcdR-Twxwfm0tX8-44TN4ztoYpC5yc

The Spartacus Letter was reorganized ever-so-slightly, released under Creative Commons, and now features inline citations.

I have been researching COVID-19 and the surrounding events nonstop since about January 25th, 2020. I followed the leaked vids from Wuhan. I've been in contact with other researchers continuously. I can't spell out the nature of my day job, exactly. Suffice it to say, I've passed my files along to numerous biologists and virologists and maintained constant correspondence with them. It all checked out. The analysis was on the money.

That's frankly disturbing, because it means they're treating the virus incorrectly, to the point where it will cause more deaths than otherwise. Early treatment with antioxidants and antivirals would likely have saved millions of lives. Instead, they send people home, wait for the sepsis to set in, and then tube them until they die. It's basically murder.

I'm going to be working on a node map and a very large Mega folder full of documents. I'll be sure to drop updates in the days and weeks to come.

Spartacus, this is a free speech board, you should absolutely be able to post/publish anything you want here and feel secure that it was not a waste of your time.. This IS a good place for you..

I saw your letter being removed left and right everywhere I searched and thought to repost it here in full as I knew this would be a safe sanctuary..
(Someone tried deleting one on technical grounds but was foiled)

This website is wealthy beyond reason and holds freedom of speech to the highest degree.. It will battle nations for our right to speak our minds I am sure..

If you have ANY deleted posts here, you let me know and I will go to battle here for this principle, or directly contact the administrator theymos..

Read the rules (that have nothing to do with censorship) and you will be free to record anything you want here..

Glad to hear it.

I also have a question..
What do we do now?
If all you say is true, then what is the path forward?

How many people could you name that have the wealth and influence to do this? Shutting down the whole planet, to implement something like this? The first groups that come to my mind are, basically, the deepest and darkest of spooks. The human cattle ranchers.

Anywhere that you see "IOT", as in Internet-of-Things, that's very likely to be mind control/smart dust infrastructure. Julian Assange was right.

This isn't just Targeted Individual schizo stuff. What we're talking about is the possibility of sensitizing neurons to external stimuli by introducing nanoparticles into the brain. The tech is real.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BKy9HT4vktM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Zp8nHYegqI

SARS-CoV-2 Spike makes the BBB more permeable, which would assist nanoparticles in crossing it.

Robert Langer, the cofounder of Moderna, was a colleague of Charles Lieber and co-wrote a paper with him.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/01/28/metro/harvard-scientists-arrest-stuns-colleague/

Excuse my cherry picking - but this grabbed my attention. For all the microchip talk or nanoparticle talk, none have described and mechanism at which how the vaccines cause any damage. So you believe through Dr. Lieber's work, there are nanoparticles that create perforations in the BBB, causing the nanoparticles to attach itself in the brain and allow for remote control?

And so, where in Dr. Liber's research specifically, what paper, do you have that provides evidence of this?

Did he sell all this info to china and no public records exists of how far advanced his research goes? This would not be the giant conspiracy that it may seem, because the Chinese are always ripping the top labs in the world so they don't have to produce the cash to fund R&D. In this case, there was collusion. Perhaps slightly more sinister, but China does this in all fields.


See the following:

http://cml.harvard.edu/research/brain-science

http://cml.harvard.edu/publications

http://cml.harvard.edu/assets/Nanowire-probes-could-drive-high-resolution-brain-machine-interfaces.pdf

Lieber claimed he was working on silicon nanowire batteries for the Chinese. His colleagues claim he has never worked on batteries before. It was a cover story.

It's not necessarily the nanoparticles that penetrate the BBB on their own. It's the Spike itself. It affects BBB permeability, absolutely without a doubt.

https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/201029141941.htm

Dig into DARPA's N3 program, and this is what you find:

https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2019-05-20

Battelle's team is the one getting the $20 million dollar contract because theirs was the most successful, apparently. Let's see what that consists of.

https://magneticsmag.com/magnetism-plays-key-roles-in-darpa-research-to-develop-brain-machine-interface-without-surgery/

They came up with a nanoparticle that can be introduced into the brain and manipulated with a helmet that generates electromagnetic fields.

Okay. Who is Dr. Guarav Sharma?

https://www.battelle.org/site/battelle-medical-devices-updates/featured-experts/guarav-sharma

Quote
Since joining Battelle in 2011, Gaurav has served as the technical lead or lead investigator on a number of cutting-edge projects involving peripheral nerve stimulation, spinal cord stimulation and brain-computer interfaces. He was also the lead investigator for the Blood-Brain Barrier (BBB) engineering program, a Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA)-funded project aimed at developing nanotechnology-based strategies for delivery of drugs to the brain.

Huh. The same DTRA that funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology's GOF research into coronaviruses through EcoHealth Alliance.

Let's see their BBB engineering program documents.

https://www.dvidshub.net/news/204956/early-successes-dtras-blood-brain-barrier-program-suggest-new-countermeasures

They are looking for ways to penetrate the blood-brain barrier on purpose. Based on the use of viruses in their testing, I would assume that their BBB-weakener would be protein-based. Like the Spike.

But that's not all.

https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com/coronavirus-gives-dangerous-boost-darpas-darkest-agenda/

https://singularityhub.com/2019/06/05/darpas-new-project-is-investing-millions-in-brain-machine-interface-tech/

Quote
In contrast, minutely invasive technologies allow scientists to deliver nanotransducers without surgery: for example, an injection of a virus carrying light-sensitive sensors, or other chemical, biotech, or self-assembled nanobots that can reach individual neurons and control their activity independently without damaging sensitive tissue. The proposed use for these technologies isn’t yet well-specified, but as animal experiments have shown, controlling the activity of single neurons at multiple points is sufficient to program artificial memories of fear, desire, and experiences directly into the brain.

SARS-CoV-2 Spike is amyloidogenic. It aggregates amyloid. That's Alzheimer's/dementia.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7988450/

My hunch is that the shot is for both population reduction and mind control, all in one. The two goals complement one another. If you just start exterminating people with an injection that causes chronic illness, morbidity, and eventual death (we're talking a hugely delayed effect here, like 5 to 15 years before neurodegeneration sets in, if the clotting, inflammation, and cancers don't get people first), people will flip the hell out. They are going to be remotely pacified, like with Soma from Brave New World or wireheading from Ringworld, so they don't react to their own genocide. Those who survive will be kept docile in perpetuity, gradually modified and "upgraded" over time as new human augmentation tech becomes available.

This was never about the virus. These people are playing Dr. Mengele. With billions of innocent people.

They didn't think anyone would refuse it. Not on this scale. They are panicking right now.
22  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Spartacus Letter on: September 30, 2021, 09:42:53 PM
I am Spartacus. I can answer any questions you may have.

In terms of the actual content, the author has designed the letter quite smartly knowing full well that the vast majority of conspiracy nuts won't read it, and the parts that they do read, they won't understand so will just accept what he has said is true. He starts off stating mostly accurate facts with good references to scientific studies about how COVID attacks almost every body system, causing widespread organ failure, to lure people in to thinking he knows what he is talking about. (But I thought it was just a flu? Or according to some, it doesn't even exist? So it is a deadly disease now that you think it suits your agenda? Gotcha.)

Most people who claim that COVID-19 is "just a flu" do not understand the disease even remotely and have made no effort to study the underlying pathophysiology. Hyperinflammatory COVID-19 that puts people in the ICU is basically sepsis. It has been shown that sepsis can be treated with antioxidants, like intravenous Vitamin C (see the MATH+ protocol for COVID-19, as well as papers regarding the repurposed drugs - fluvoxamine, budesonide, famotidine, and so on - and their antioxidant activity).

Ultimately, the damage of COVID-19 is caused by lipid peroxidation, where electrons are stripped from fats in the body, causing them to become oxidized. As a matter of fact, COVID-19's pathology is somewhat unique among viruses in the sense that immune over-activation and free radical damage is a primary mechanism of injury. It is very likely that it shares this trait with SARS, however.

By the time he gets on to talking about treatments, he knows most of his audience won't be checking the references (if they ever did to begin with). For example, his reference for the statement that intubation is what kills these patients - https://www.nature.com/articles/pr2009174 - is a vaguely related paper published in 2009 that has absolutely nothing to do with COVID at all. Out of his three links for this statement - "The correct treatment for severe COVID-19 related sepsis is non-invasive ventilation, steroids, and antioxidant infusions" - only one of them talks about ventilation and clearly states that intubation is necessary.

Read it again.

Quote
A delicate balance exists between ROS production and the antioxidant defenses that protect cells in vivo. This balance may become disturbed under conditions of hyperoxia, inflammation, or ischemia-reperfusion (excessive generation of ROS) or in the presence of limited or impaired antioxidant defenses.

COVID-19 down-regulates Nrf2, impairing antioxidant defenses. This means that the enzymes your phagocytes (neutrophils, etc.) use to attack pathogens start digesting your own cells with peroxide and bleach instead.

Ischemia causes a buildup of hypoxanthine, succinate, et cetera, that form superoxide radicals when O2 is reintroduced and these substances begin breaking down by their enzymatic pathways. This is called ischemia-reperfusion injury.

What those "unrelated" documents show, to a thorough reader, is that shocking hypoxic cells with oxygen causes lipid peroxidation by reperfusion.

Since the virus already causes lipid peroxidation, this merely layers even more lipid peroxidation atop lipid peroxidation, causing the tissues in the lungs to basically dissolve.

COVID-19 patients have blood that is chemically incapable of transporting oxygen due to a buildup of hypochlorous acid that is stripping iron out of their heme and competing for O2 binding sites. What this means is that they will suffer from "silent" hypoxia, where they appear to be breathing just fine, but are suddenly turning blue in the face as their red blood cells chemically refuse to carry O2.

This has been directly observed in COVID-19 patients.

Pumping O2 into the lungs does not make RBCs chemically incapable of carrying O2 somehow magically capable of carrying it. All it does is produce more ROS injury.

By the way, all this iron stripped out by hypochlorous acid is reactive, and forms deadly hydroxyl radicals that oxidize the lining of blood vessels through the Haber-Weiss and Fenton chemical reactions with hydrogen peroxide and superoxide.

Proning and venting without scavenging radicals will 100% kill people. The radicals strip electrons from phospholipids, PUFAs, cholesterol, cardiolipin, DNA, anything within reach. The oxidized lipids cause a feedback loop of inflammation and autoimmunity by triggering pattern recognition receptors. Look up what "damage-associated molecular patterns" means.

These people are dying of something that's sort of like lupus and rheumatoid arthritis going off simultaneously in the lining of their vascular system. It is a virus that triggers an autoimmune syndrome akin to sepsis, but strangely without any shock and accompanying loss of blood pressure, in many cases.

The rest of this section follows the same theme, with him either not referencing sections which are purely speculation, using references which do not support his claims as above, or in some cases, using references which actively disprove his claims, such as one of his references "supporting" ivermectin - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7539925/ - which clearly states "The antiviral activity of ivermectin has not been consistently proven in vivo." (In vivo means in living organisms).

The majority of clinical trials of antivirals (any antivirals, not just Ivermectin) enroll people who have no virus left in their bodies. That is, hospitalized patients. Then, they idiotically claim that these antivirals don't shorten the length of hospital stays.

Why don't they shorten the length of hospital stays? Because there is no virus left in the patients' bodies.

Google it. Go to Google Images, and put in COVID-19 clinical course. They all show the same thing. Peak viral load occurs right around when someone becomes symptomatic. By the time hyperinflammation sets in about 5 to 7 days later, the viral load has tapered off to almost nothing.

Using antivirals on people who have no virus in their bodies is not only futile, it tells us nothing about their prophylactic effects, if any.

Many of the concerns raised about the vaccine have been corroborated (in far greater detail) by Stephanie Seneff:

https://dpbh.nv.gov/uploadedFiles/dpbhnvgov/content/Boards/BOH/Meetings/2021/SENEFF~1.PDF

By the time we get to all the insane ramblings about it being a criminal conspiracy, the author has abandoned all pretense of providing credible references, instead linking a bunch of news articles, blog posts, and right wing conspiracy sites such as https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com and https://www.thelibertybeacon.com.

Read the sources and the leaked documents within.

https://rightsfreedoms.wordpress.com/2021/06/26/confidential-documents-reveal-moderna-sent-mrna-coronavirus-vaccine-candidate-to-university-researchers-weeks-before-emergence-of-covid-19/

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/6935295/NIH-Moderna-Confidential-Agreements.pdf

Ralph Baric signed a Material Transfer Agreement that showed he took delivery of Coronavirus mRNA vaccine-related materials co-owned by NIH and Moderna on December 12th, 2019, practically a whole month before we were sent the sequence to SARS-CoV-2 (a.k.a. 2019-nCoV), on January 11th, 2020. Moderna claims they made a vaccine from that sequence two days later, on January 13th. But as the MTA shows, Moderna already had a vaccine for an unspecified coronavirus a whole month earlier, before an outbreak was even announced. This is incredibly suspicious.

Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, previously worked for Alain Merieux's company, bioMerieux. Alain Merieux is a buddy of the CCP and helped them build the WIV's P4 laboratory.

The NIH/NIAID, DTRA, and USAID contributed over a hundred million dollars to Peter Daszak's EcoHealth Alliance NGO. EcoHealth Alliance subcontracted these grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for them to conduct gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses, in violation of the 2014 moratorium on federal funding for SARS GOF research (essentially, Anthony Fauci and the NIH ignored the moratorium, offshored the research to China, and laundered the money through EcoHealth Alliance).

https://peterdaszak.com

As for the neural lace stuff, this is not just hypothetical, nor is it science fiction. It is very much real.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N02SK9yd60s

James Giordano's files show that nanoparticles can be used to influence brain activity, and explicitly describes their use by hostile foreign powers to target civilians and use them to change mood, behavior, et cetera, in such a way as to damage society and cause chaos.

SARS-CoV-2 Spike makes the BBB more permeable, which would assist nanoparticles in crossing it.

Robert Langer, the cofounder of Moderna, was a colleague of Charles Lieber and co-wrote a paper with him.

https://www.bostonglobe.com/2020/01/28/metro/harvard-scientists-arrest-stuns-colleague/

Charles Lieber is a bionanotechnology expert at Harvard whose papers describe brain-computer interfaces made with nanoparticles.

Charles Lieber was arrested for douple-dipping and taking money both from DARPA and from the Wuhan University of Technology, under China's R&D-headhunting Thousand Talents Plan.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/harvard-university-professor-indicted-false-statement-charges

DARPA has a program called the BRAIN Initiative, as well as the N3 program, the explicit goals of which are to develop non-invasive or minimally-invasive injectable nanoparticle BCIs, a.k.a. "Neural Laces", for disabled soldiers to control prosthetics, or for supersoldiers to control drones, and so forth.

https://www.darpa.mil/news-events/2019-05-20

The vaccine has been found by independent researchers to contain unknown nanoparticles.

https://www.orwell.city/2021/06/la-quinta-columna-5G-graphene-oxide-and-neuro-rights.html

Even though I marked that particular section of the letter as speculative, and it is, it is certainly the case that all of these things, taken together, constitute more than enough circumstantial evidence to, at the very least, raise the alarm.
Pages: « 1 [2]
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!