 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2]
|
Bitcoin is a QT, Bitcoin is art.As any piece of art, its beauty gets brighter and greater as you understand it. Unlike many contemporary art examples, Bitcoin's beauty can be experienced by most people. That's the main goal of its decentralized character. Bitcoin is art because the process of understanding it is entirely subjective, and it goes through several layers. This layers are only to be discovered if you are able to surrender your ego, and decide to submerge deep into the rabbit hole. Its surface traps you with your own greed being reflected, so at first you could see it as a speculative asset, or simply as magic internet money. But it is just a thin layer of what Bitcoin is underneath. Each new cicle Bitcoin has successfully proven that its value is real. Understanding this, requires the observer to question what is value, what is money, and how our system works. No art piece before Bitcoin have achieved this level of self reflection and awareness in a more effective and decentralized way. But there is more, as value is just one of those layers you could see if you decide to understand Bitcoin. When most people get to understand the layer of value, Bitcoin is already unveiling how it could be the solution for other problems that many though unsolvable. Since genesis block there were keys hidden into those other problems that Bitcoin could fix: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/FepmTreWYAY6Pao?format=jpg&name=4096x4096There is a correlation between economic crisis and wars. War has been though as a escape, as a perfect smokescreen, but each war only further deepens the hole. Bitcoin doesn't like war, as its price action has proven each time they succumb to their madness. Bitcoin is art because when you as a Bitcoiner realice this fact, you can't no longer be in support of war as it will affect your bags and your wealth. Bitcoin means of expression is through truth, and truth is tough. But again, this chicken and egg situation between war and economic crisis is just another layer, and the rabbit hole goes way deeper. Bitcoin is art because when you get to the point of understanding all this, you'll ask yourself if Bitcoin is some kind of magic; If it was created by aliens, or by an artificial intelligence. But the only real and logical explanation is that it was created by an artist. Bitcoin is such a powerful Graffiti on the central banks walls, that the artist haven't had the need to speak for years, as this art piece is strong from within, and it speaks loud and with eloquence. Bitcoin's expressiveness reach is now knocking on climate change doors, presenting itself and standing as a solution for the most crucial problem in humanity's history. All this, while most of Bitcoiners haven't even recognize it as a problem yet, Bitcoin is already solving it. But proposing itself as a solution for climate change is just another layer. Bitcoin is an ever evolving powerful work of art without any aesthetic limitations on what it can accomplish. The most ambitious and powerful global graffiti timechain. Bitcoin is freedom. Art is freedom. Bitcoin is art.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin is art. As any piece of art, its beauty gets brighter and greater as you understand it. Unlike many contemporary art examples, Bitcoin's beauty can be experienced by most people. that's the main goal of its decentralized character. Bitcoin is art because the process of understanding it is entirely subjective, and it goes through several layers. This layers are only to be discovered if you are able to surrender your ego, and decide to submerge into the rabbit hole. Its surface traps you with your own greed being reflected, so you could see it as a speculative asset, or magic internet money. But it is just a thin layer of what Bitcoin is underneath. Each new cicle Bitcoin has successfully proven that its value is real. Understanding this, requires the observer to question what is value, what is money, how our system works. No art piece before Bitcoin had achieve this level of self reflection and awareness in a more effective and decentralized way. But there is more, as value is just one of those layers you could see if you decide to understand Bitcoin. When most people get to understand the layer of value, Bitcoin is already unveiling how it could be the solution for other problems that many though unsolvable. Since genesis block there where keys hidden into those other problems that Bitcoin could fix:  There is a correlation between economic crisis and wars. War has been though as a escape, as a perfect smokescreen, but each war only deepens the hole. Bitcoin doesn't like wars, as its price has proven each time they succumb to their madness. Bitcoin is art because when you as a Bitcoiner realice this fact, you can't be in support of war as it will affect your bags. Bitcoin means of expression is trough truth, and truth is tough. But again, this chicken and egg situation between war and economic crisis is just another layer. And the rabbit hole goes way deeper. Bitcoin is art because when you get to understand all this, you'll ask yourself if Bitcoin is some kind of magic; If it was created by aliens, or an artificial intelligence. But the only real and logical explanation is that it was created by an artist. Bitcoin is such a powerful Graffiti on the central banks walls, that the artist haven't had the need to speak, as this art piece is strong from within, and it speaks loud and with eloquence. Bitcoin's expressiveness reach is now knocking on climate change doors, presenting itself and standing as a solution for the most crucial problem in humaniti's history. While most of Bitcoiners haven't even recognize it as a problem yet, Bitcoin is already solving it. But proposing itself as a solution for climate change is just another layer. Bitcoin is an ever evolving powerful art piece without any aesthetic limitations on what it could accomplish.The most ambitious global graffiti timechain.
|
|
|
|
Just another whale. World's first, and biggest HODLER. Relax. 
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a prize for keeping this forum without UI updates? Because that prize is mine and not theymos'. Stop bothering him with that topic.
Bitcoin has always been a cooperative group work with many people contributions crucial, specially in those early days. You should seek for them, ask them about FULL-RBF, and first seen rule. Hear those early addresses holders for advise.
12 years gone fast.
I'm not a threat for Bitcoin. FULL-RBF is.
|
|
|
|
|
What problem does Full-RBF solves, if we already had optional RBF?
#NoFullRBF
Do not download V24
If you're running V24, uninstall immediately.
|
|
|
|
|
There's a reason why they released Full-RBF in a market low.
There's a reason why Onesignature signed that message afterwards.
Onesignature is not self promoting, Full-RBF is an attack.
This is so frustrating. Open your eyes!
|
|
|
|
|
Being off-topic is not a concern when there's an important message to be delivered:
I'm trying to bring your attention upon this very delicate topic:
Full-RBF was deliberately included on Core V24.0 without reaching consensus.
It opens a door to centralization under Blockstream: Bitcoin is not Lightning. Lighting is a L2 solution for scalability of micropayments. Bitcoin L1 is the settlement layer.
Full-RBF solves NO problem: RBF already existed, there was no reason for Full-RBF to be deployed.
Full-RBF enables ANY transaction to be double spendable, any honest transaction could be replaced by a malicious higher fee one. This could result in censorship, seizure of funds by an state actor or theft.
#NoFullRBF
Do not download Bitcoin Core V24.0
If your are running V24.0 Uninstall immediately!
Security must not be compromised in favor of UX, Scalability, or any other reason unrelated to Bitcoin's value itself.
|
|
|
|
1. Let the author answer that question.
I am not sure regarding the point that you are making here. Are you trying to get an answer from a specific person? Do you consider that someone who presented a signed message from January 2009 potentially has a better answer to a substantive current event question, merely because s/he has potentially been in bitcoin longer, if that were to be given weight by the presentation of such signature? Are you trying to subtly suggest that such person who signed a January 2009 message might be satoshi or close to satoshi..? which also seems a wee bit ridiculous as Greg had already pointed out... or perhaps you are spreading misinformation by making insinuations and seeming appeals to authority? I'm trying to bring your attention upon this very delicate topic: Full-RBF was deliberately included on Core V24.0 without reaching consensus. It opens a door to centralization under Blockstream: Bitcoin is not Lightning. Lighting is a L2 solution for scalability of micropayments. Bitcoin L1 is the settlement layer. Full-RBF solves NO problem: RBF already existed, there was no reason for Full-RBF to be deployed. Full-RBF enables ANY transaction to be double spendable, any honest transaction could be replaced by a malicious higher fee one. This could result in censorship, seizure of funds by an state actor or theft. #NoFullRBF Do not download Bitcoin Core V24.0 If your are runing V24.0 Uninstall immediately! |
|
|
|
FULL-RBF Is an attack to Bitcoin's security, it makes every transaction double spendable.
1. Then why isn't that point clearly stated inside the signed message? 2. Should we just blindly follow instructions from an address for which we don't even know the owner? My guess is that most people here are able to make their own mind. 3. Zero-conf transactions are not secure. Confirmed ones are. It's that simple, and has always been. People not taking this into consideration do it at their own risk. (Although FullRBF indeed makes the risk bigger for unconfirmed txs, the previous statement remains true. I can understand that you don't agree with this, but this is not the place for debating it, and you didn't give any substancial argument.) 4. If you need fast and secure payments for small amounts, there's Lightning. Also, isn't FullRBF disabled by default (opt-in) in Core 0.24? I'm not sure about that one, though. I'm not necessarily defending FullRBF, I don't really mind. Just showing your lack of discernment. Anyway, that's off-topic since there's no clear link between the FullRBF controversy and the signed message. 1. Let the author answer that question. 2. That could be the reason why the author didn't signed as you proposed on #1. 3. I'm not saying 0-conf or any other type of transaction on the mempool are to be trusted as confirmed transactions. No one thinks they should. (Yes, Full-RBF is a threat) 4. Agree. It doesn't matter if it is disabled by default ir not. (I think it is) The point of this message here, is precisely for you and others to care. |
|
|
|
|
This message was signed to call your attention.
Do not download Bitcoin Core V24.0
If you're already running this version, please uninstall.
FULL-RBF Is an attack to Bitcoin's security, it makes every transaction double spendable.
|
|
|
|
|
Hello world!
#DontuseBitcoinCoreV24.0
|
|
|
|
|
