Just read this thread for first time in a few days. Can assure you I am nothing to do with anonibet.  I have been playing there for a long time. The reason why I placed a lot of bets late on was because I wanted to try and win, and was lagging behind AnoniTips.  They don't need me to stick up for them, but I dont see how anonibet could be more transparent with how the contest was run, every bet had to be posted on a public thread.  Payment of the prize has also been received, as stated earlier in the thread.

We can both agree you have a glaring vulnerability with your online casino.

Michael,

I understand your point. However, the fact is you were alerted to "suspicious activity" and it's been 6 days now with nothing to further bolster those claims. So the "suspicious activity" alert to halt my withdrawal was based on nothing more than me simply winning. The actions of your company demonstrate that as a fact as there hasn't been any evidence to support otherwise. This is a huge turnoff to players if your third-party providers says, "STOP!...don't pay him!...he won a lot...that's impossible...must have cheated."

If a player could indeed cheat your system (however unlikely that may be), you would think that there would be evidence to support it aside from winning. I won a decent amount fast (without cheating) and that is unacceptable for you guys. But you guys were the ones who put the double-up feature in place. You guys were the ones who decided to allow up to 5 double-ups within a single game. I've been to many casinos where they limit the double to just 1, or put a cap on how much you can win before forcing you to collect the winnings (ie., can't double over 50 credits, etc..) or disable it altogether. If you don't like the risk you took by having your game allow 5 double-ups with no credit cap, then change it. It's gambling, sometimes you guys lose too you know.

I know the allegations of me cheating will not be backed up by proof because there wasn't any cheating. I think the community will also agree with my position that having 6 days go by and have no smoking gun is enough. Again, if a player was to cheat your system then I would think after 6 days of issuing the "Alert" there would be some evidence showing exactly what they were doing, etc... All we have is the fact that I won...which is somehow synonymous with cheating and/or suspicious activity.  

Think this could be the end of doge to be honest and any one who sells now is probably going to be better off doing it sooner rather than later.

The earlier investors get paid from the newer investors and as long as the cycle continues, everyone is happy. On the websites transaction page, it shows a running tab of how much each recent investor needs before he gets paid and which investors have been successfully paid back.
http://www.thebitcoinponzi.com/transactions


This seems like a fun game when there's enough players, the creator should implement it with other alt currencies like litecoin or dogecoin.