So, should icopress be banned for promoting mixers?
He promoted them when they were allowed, as did he did with Jambler. When they were no longer allowed here he stopped promoting them. Well, I also don't care because after all Icopress is one of the trusted members and manages campaigns successfully and reliably because all the weekly payments are paid well by him. |
|
|
|
|
So, should icopress be banned for promoting mixers? I don't think that will happen because famous members won't get banned easily. The rules here only apply to ordinary and low-ranking members.
This also happened to Jolly where he abused the trust system but was still considered a trusted member. I wonder, are many members afraid of jolly?
|
|
|
|
IMO @JollyGood instead of making a post and locking it, he could make a self moderated thread. It is clearly a very bad example he has set.
Anyone could take his example now (yes, even me) and open such a thread. what then? Yes, many accusations and no one can defend himself except to do the same. LOL
That's an example of a DT who people say has a good reputation and can be trusted, but who commits stupid and anti-critical actions. So, is there still trust in people like that? I know not all DTs are like that, but Jolly has abused a lot of trust system |
|
|
|
I can only see 3 reasons that people would want to have the red removed.
1) They are going to scam with the hopes that since it was an old account people would trust it more. In which case the trust should stay.
2) They want to sell the account. In which case the trust should stay.
3) They want to legitimately sell things that they have from years ago. In which case, they trust should stay since it's really not an obstacle since people can always use escrows.
-Dave
I think the only reason someone would want to remove the neg trust is so he can join the campaign |
|
|
|
|
Great find. Sorry, I know how you feel if your big findings are not seen by other members because your ranking is still small. Hopefully @nutildah or @lovesmayfamilis will have time to verify your findings. goodjob guys
|
|
|
|
PytagoraZ, it would be too dubious for you to call him a failure. Do you have a mirror? By the way, in your new account, don’t be so noticeable so as not to arouse Jolly’s suspicion, as happened with this account.
Although I'm sorry about what happened to you.
Alt account? Good advice, I don't have any at the moment. but maybe one day I will have it. lol This is clearly a bad action by Jolly. I agree it would have been better to keep the thread open. But it looks like you're just throwing dirt because JollyGood was the first one to call you out on your Trust Summary page. If you cared about BitcoinGirl.Club's case, you would have picked a different title. I don't care about reputation anymore, but what Jolly did was a bad act that influenced mass opinion with the aim of damaging Bitcoingirl's reputation. From what I learned about trust systems in your thread, trust systems are used to prevent someone from cheating other members of their money. I've never cheated anyone of money so I don't think I have anything to fear. With the neg trust that I have, I'm just here to discuss without any monetary reward behind it. I always like people who like to discuss even if they have different opinions, but Jolly is not the type of person who likes to discuss, maybe because his intellect is below average.  |
|
|
|
Bukan enggan ato ga mau diskusi disono gan, tapi karena ane hanya pengguna wallet strandart yang taunya cuma cara kirim dan terima bitcoin aja jadi bingung mo apa yang di bahas disono  |
|
|
|
As the price increases, we are seeing a lot of old accounts reawakening. Some of them are contacting me asking to remove old trust, as they are a new person, or they are changed.
I will not do this. Even if I could verify their claims, if you want the benefit of an aged account, you need to deal with the drawbacks as well.
Many old accounts have changed hands, I met several old bitcointalk members who had accounts from 2014 to 2016 and they have sold their accounts. Some of these accounts have received negative trust and some are still active today |
|
|
|
It would have been better for Jollygood to leave the thread unlocked. I do not expect a reputable member to do what he did.
I agree with this. I didn't quite understand why he created that thread and locked it. I think it would have been better to leave it open for discussion, although nothing prevents someone from creating a parallel thread in this section to discuss the topic (it won't be me, to avoid dramas). This is clearly a bad action by Jolly. I honestly wasn't surprised by his actions because I never thought he was a qualified and reputable member. Let's wait what reason he has for locking the thread, because he has locked it for 2 days. But I'm not sure he'll give a good reason, or even comment here because he usually only comments on threads where many members support him. As far as I know, only icopress really likes him and always gives him campaigns. It would have been better for Jollygood to leave the thread unlocked. I do not expect a reputable member to do what he did.
I agree with this. I didn't quite understand why he created that thread and locked it. I think it would have been better to leave it open for discussion, although nothing prevents someone from creating a parallel thread in this section to discuss the topic (it won't be me, to avoid dramas). The topic is quite pointless and I understand why it was locked immediately. I didn't see any accusations there, but only a statement that BitcoinGirl.Club was put on distrust by several members. It was a post created to direct the masses not to trust bitcoingirls. If the topic is useless then the op can delete it, but jolly deliberately left it alone and deliberately locked it because it aims to damage bitcoingirls' reputation, this is a reputation board so whatever is here is related to that. Do you understand? |
|
|
|
On the signature campaign that I am presently, someone came to accuse BitcoinGirl.Club and making reference to the locked topic. If the thread was not locked, it is possible that the discussion may or may not favour Jollygood. If it does not favour Jollygood, that person will not come to troll on the campaign thread. It would have been better for Jollygood to leave the thread unlocked. I do not expect a reputable member to do what he did.
Jollygood gave an example, the way to accuse someone is to create an accusation thread and lock it. Someone can copy what it does and then use it as a reference to provide negative tags |
|
|
|
Jollygood, accused someone and deliberately locked the thread so that he could influence other people and did not want to be debated on his statement. Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5493610.0So, he is nothing but a loser who only dares to express an opinion, but does not dare to argue, reason logically, and debate. Jollygood is nothing more than a narcissist who feels he is the truest, most valuable, and most trusted member. Even though it's easy to see other people's mistakes by looking at Ninjastic, he doesn't have any good posts so that's all he can do. Jolly, im back  , lets fight  |
|
|
|
Hi @RickDeckard, I withdrew from my participation in the pie contest. You can delete my entry, please and thank you Some of my notes:~ Some of the photos don't look like pie, they don't look like pastry shell with topping. Maybe the meaning of pie in many countries has different variations, And he has a lot of votes a: a dessert consisting of a filling (as of fruit or custard) in a pastry shell or topped with pastry or both ~ There are members who use trading accounts, I know this because I know the original owner.
I will not mess with your voting thread so there is no discussion about my statements and decisions in this thread. Thank You |
|
|
|
This is my mistake. komisariatku and I come from the same city and we meet occasionally. I used his laptop when I met at the cafe and read many threads there, I didn't realize I was replying using komisariatku account. He scolded me for this, if you want to give a tag, please give it to me and don't give it to komisariatku
But it didn't happen only once (not that it would make your story more belieavable) as it happened (at least) two times now. And even if it did happen again, why didn't you deleted the whole post since your wrote with the wrong acount instead just editing it? Anyway, you should have come with the better story or at least admit it instead coming with something as far fetched as this. What do I have to admit? komisariatku and I have very different posting patterns. The only thing that connected me and him were those two posts, and when everything was still fine, I met him several times and he was one of my mentors so I sometimes used his laptop when I met. That doesn't explain the lie about "never communicating with him in person."
Because I knew this would happen and it would be his fault. I'm not a good person who easily forgets his actions. So I chose not to deal with it. So sorry bro and please reply my message |
|
|
|
I see the theatre that PytagoraZ/komisariatku is trying to put on as ridiculous, as if they were two different people. In the end, as so often happens, the first thing we see is only the tip of the iceberg and it would not be surprising if the data that jokers10 has revealed ends up proving more.
What exactly do you want to convey? has no value at all, like your useless thread that you finally locked and you're angry because I don't agree with your thread. lol |
|
|
|
I already suspected that sooner or later this would happen. @pytagoraz, you told me that everything would be fine, it was your fault.
I'm so sorry, I'll try to explain to them. I sent you a message, please reply. Sorry because you must be very angry with me |
|
|
|
Great job as usual for you, nutildah. For some reason I have PytagoraZ on my ignore list, so I'm not surprised by this revelation that he's a cheater. For some reason I have PytagoraZ on my ignore list, so I'm not surprised by this revelation that he's a cheater. komisariatku is actually a name that doesn't ring a bell.
But very curious about people who have alts to cheat and forget which one they are typing with, I've seen it several times already. In the end they end up getting caught.
I've temporarily removed him from ignore and I see he comes up with the usual excuse: he's my brother/cousin/friend but we're not the same person.
It seems you don't like me because of my comments in your thread : https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5474406.msg63172302#msg63172302Are you angry because of my comment? |
|
|
|
|
This is my mistake. komisariatku and I come from the same city and we meet occasionally. I used his laptop when I met at the cafe and read many threads there, I didn't realize I was replying using komisariatku account. He scolded me for this, if you want to give a tag, please give it to me and don't give it to komisariatku
That's what actually happened and I apologize to komisariatku for my mistake
|
|
|
|
Sorry shasan, I think the interest will be too big for me if I extend it to 4 weeks. Please extend it for two weeks. Thank You
I am giving you 15 day's extension. The repayment will be 154$. Repayment my loan. Thank You  |
|
|
|
~snip~
You are quite active on this thread and the coloring and bolden texts makes it hard to miss your posts. It’s obvious you have a problem with the casino. I went through your scam accusation thread and I can’t find a good reason why you opened a scam accusation while admitting you cheated the system. What’s even more interesting was that there wasn’t a problem with your withdrawal being withheld, you just didn’t like the fact that you were caught exploiting bugs in the system at the time. Now that I do not share the same opinion as you, am I getting a retaliatory feedback because that seems to be your style. Yes, this seems strange. He seems to really hate blackjack.fun and this is not a good condition at all. Maybe it would be better for JackpotRacer to create its own thread and not interfere with the ANN thread, I feel sorry for the OP because their business is being disrupted. Or maybe JackpotRacer and OP can resolve the issue via PM or telegram. This is not an easy situation for OP as they also build their reputation through signature campaigns. |
|
|
|
I observed that the reason why some active members became inactive in the forum is as result of lacks of campaigns, I don't know if anyone have noticed that, I don't want to call names of people who has reduce their activity in the forum based their not in campaign...it means that many users will silent forum if signature campaign is not on forum, these is my little observations.
Maybe, but I'm sure this forum will still be alive even if there is no signature campaign. Apart from campaigns, there may be other reasons why members become inactive, such as because they are busy in the realife or other things. Active or not is a choice and we cannot prohibit it. However, I also agree that one of the reasons members become inactive could be because they don't participate in the campaign |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
