 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 »
|
I hope that CSW won't claim that he has exchanged that many emails with Sirius.
The person that talks with Sirius, the real Satoshi, is polite, technically savvy and respectful. CSW is arrogant, selfish and highly unlikely to have any technical knowledge regarding Bitcoin. Spot the differences  Well, we know that. I guess the judges also know these facts and even they know that he is not Satoshi. Even his lawyers know that they are working for nothing. They won't be able to prove anything with those fake documents. Yes, he is trying to be in the spotlight with those dramas. I cannot imagine how stupid a person could be. How many insults a person can take. The fun fact is, that his lawyer was saying that he attempted suicide because he wasn't able to prove that he was Satoshi. I don't think this stupid did something like that. These are just pure lies. We all know that. But this stupid has some money and want to waste. Suppose the real Satoshi appear in the Court and provide his evidence that Craig is fraud who is impersonating his Japanese pseudonym for defrauding investors the what Craig wright will do ? or If Craig Wright decides to contact the real Satoshi and repent his sin and convince real Satoshi to lend him a signed message from Genesis Block then how COPA is going prove that Craigs Wright is wrong ? The truth is COPA and Craig are mutually staging this case to a secret purpose which the real Satoshi knows the truth, but if Craig really repent and request the real Satoshi, he might forgive Craig and let him play the Bitcoin drama for more few years. |
|
|
|
|
Instead of ETF, I am thinking of BTF, which is Bitcoin Traded Fund.
If some one does not want to sell of their Bitcoin holding can legitimate issue BTF as Bitcoin derivatives and trade to raise fund to buy more Bitcoin. When buyer of BTF want to redeem the BTF then the BTF issuer can pay out the equivalent amount of profit share of their invested money under a contractual business and investment agreement.
This is what the future of Bitcoin will shape a new horizon in the EFT market place globally.
|
|
|
|
|
When you can buy Bitcoin then why do you need to buy Bitcoin ETF ? you need to explore it properly for good understanding. The ultimate truth is if you buy Bitcoin you can issue Bitcoin backed ETF and you can trade your ETF to any one who trust you and knows you.
Latter when they want to redeem the EFT to Bitcoin you will be legally liable to transfer equivalent amount of Bitcoin in exchange of your ETF. There after your ETF will become void. Bitcoin ETF is designed to raise fund for a short time for those who are Corporate Bitcoin Trading Platform or Exchange. but in reality any one can issue Bitcoin backed ETF, you do not need permission from any government. It is like gold, you can take your gold to Pawn Broker and get a collateral amounts of money. Latter you can pay it back and redeem your gold.
|
|
|
|
|
If Craig Wright confess and regret and and repent then Satoshi might forgive him. Why he is trying to be a pseudonym of of some one who invented the Bitcoin and Blockchain ? He just want to bank on some one else's intellectual property. Satoshi Nakamoto is watching every thing. He might file a case against Craig Wright soon for infringement of the Bitcoin White Paper Copyright and his stollen property BSV.
Satoshi Nakamoto created BSV on Google Platform in May 2007. Some one hijacked it from Satoshi Nakamoto and Craig Wright bought it from him in 2018. Craig Wright did not invented or Forked BSV. BSV is not stand for Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision but Bitcoin Security Version. BSV is a stollen Property. Those who buying BSV thinking it is the original Bitcoin will be in troubles.
|
|
|
|
|
How to Buy Bitcoin and Bitcoin ETF Peer-to-Peer ?
There are many people around the world want to know - How to Buy Bitcoin and Bitcoin ETF Over the Counter ?
If you want to Buy or Sell then you need to do a bit research on the Bitcoin and Bitcoin ETF Market.
Normally 1 BTC is divided to 100 units of 'ETF' . Each unit of ETF is backed by Bitcoin that is collateral to it. When you buy Bitcoin or BTC-ETF please buy from an authorised exchange or trusted seller or agent who you know.
|
|
|
|
Ooh, is 'Email #100' referring to that mysterious 2nd ever forum account that nowadays "does not exist"?
I don't think so... Sounds strange for a forum account to have "permissions". Usually, OS users have that, and since it's talking about ssh and Linux, chances are it's a user in the server that was hosting bitcoin.org. Then, in email #103, you can see Satoshi used that to install a file manager: Thanks, that worked, I got File Manager installed with SSH. I also uploaded a few themes into Drupal. I haven't thoroughly gone through all the available themes yet. Reading new Satoshi messages gives me chills. I thought every important email discussion was disclosed already. So basically Sirius was a CS student back then and Satoshi, seeing that Sirius was talented, decided to let him do the website and the FAQ? As I perceive it, Satoshi saw a young man who was thirsty for programming. He must have respected how Sirius recognized Bitcoin from the very beginning. I remember that most people were a little doubtful at first, looking at the mailing lists, forums. That wasn't the case with young Sirius.
So, as it appears out, Sirius was registered under the pseudonym "Trickstern" in an old, anarchist forum called "anti-state.com". Oh boy, conspiracy theories on Satoshi's identity will continue. Hi, Do you know what has happened to that, old anarchist forum called "anti-state.com ? Were you a member there ? I was looking for that forum for the last 10 years. Any information ? Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
Few question arises now,
1. Do you think that Justice Mellor will run another session of cross examination to Dr Craig Steven Wright ?
2. What will take place next week in the Court in this COPA -v Craig Wright Case ?
3. Is just Justice Mellor will re-read all the papers and make his judgement ?
4. After the final judgement, do you think there will appeal in the High Court or in the Supreme Court from either side who will be the loser ?
I think it will be a good reason for the Bitcoin Saga Drama, if the loser file an Appeal in the Higher Court.
5. What do you think it will happen ? Suppose Craig lost the case, and he will file an Appeal, will the High Court accept his Appeal ?
6. How about we forum members together find a solution to the problem between Crag and COPA Members ?
7. If our collaboration bring peace and sooth running of the Blockchain industry without Craig's corporate intervention , Do you not think that will be a better solution for both side ?
How about let Craig and Calvin and Mathew to go for a luxury holiday with 200 glamorous Concubinos for the next ten years to the forbidden Island in the Indian Ocean ? If they leave the Bitcoin Community for ten years that could be a good thing for the Bitcoin Community and for them as well, because
8. what they will do and achieve by accumulating billions of dollars like those fiat financial elites ?
9. Do they have heirs to pass on to their accumulated wealth as inheritance ?
10. Do you think they can take Bitcoin in a micro chip to heaven or hell when their times ends in this mortal planet Earth to buy Champaign and Prawn Cocktail there in the here after ?
You all are greedy MF506 agents to accumulate wealth but have forgotten the Bitcoin Manifesto.
So, I think it is time for a proper judgment by virtue of each person's performance accordingly. Justice Mellor will not be the real judge to justify this case of COPA -v- Craig Wright alone, the judgement or the outcome of this case has already been decided by the shadow board or group even before the case restart for hearing on the 5 February 2024. This was just a showcase for media attention.
|
|
|
|
If someone now files a criminal case against CSW then why not Mr franky1
why me..? well how about why not me, ill tell you why not a. i never touched BSV nor invested, nor conned, nor scammed, nor indoctrinated into his cult, nor been litigated against CSW, never cashed out the crap coins so i never been involved in anything to classify me as victim b. criminal charges work best if there is a victim to his criminality.. and that would be the COPA members as his frauds had caused direct costs and damages(stress and emotional assault, aswell as legal costs) which makes them best candidates to request criminal charges c. copa already have a funded legal team who are already researched on the crimes so can easily pass on the evidence separate topic Leezhamilton you seem too well researched in the buzzwords and names of the people involved for you to be a total dunce. i dont believe you met anyone involved. but you are just sucking-up, fake associating yourself into the drama, trying to make yourself feel relevant and also trying to show some subtle loyalty to CSW, maybe hoping for a pay-day? i assume you have other history in bitcoin via a different forum account or in some of CSW's shell companies.. and just made an alt to protect yourself from any legal pokes by just using a throw away account to evade any trouble via what you say. (EG fear of not wanting your real account/id associated with conversations about CSW) yet you have shown favouritisms to align yourself on the CSW defence side.. (though you try to hide your favouritisms occassionaly when you do mentin forgeries, you are more than still obvious in many ways favouring CSW) the whole sympathy of autism and trying to portray him as a victim of circumstance the whole silliness of "the only way to debunk CSW is for real satoshi to come forward".( is utter nonsense,) you are endlessly trying to suggest satoshi can, should, would and needs to come forward is nonsense. (unneeded nonsense) your endles narrative that if satoshi doesnt come forth then CSW should take over the name.. (stupid nonsense) your "charisma" "genius" words.. are complete suck-up nonsense.. i feel you are trying to get recruited by him and want him to continue being a scammer so you can get some scam payments for ass-kissing and to suggest criminally charging CSW adds more drama.. no it actually puts a final stop to it. EG there was alot of drama about FTX owner last year before criminal charges.. but as soon as criminal court happened, no one cares about him anymore. its done and dusted. once the sentance length is announced he is finito, out of the picture. gone. no longer a problem. game over people kept a side interest in FTX leading up to last years court stuff.. but now he is not even a whisper Wow franky1 you are fuming like a Cobra, but you are an interesting person an earlier bitcoin adopter or may be a developer, May I ask you, if you were there in 2009 and before, when one of the forum was in Source Forge ? You are utterly wrong in your assumption about myself. Do you know when Satoshi first created this Forum with SMF Server ? This Forum was created by the inventor of Bitcoin even before he choose his Japanese pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. He created two Bitcoin Talk Forums. Also he created a third one in his own persona Computer. Why do you worried about if the real Satoshi reveal his identity dash out Craig Wright for ever ? What is your problem ? If the real Satoshi decide to reveal himself, who can stop him, and why you are so much upset ? Do you think after Craig's Saga you can claim to be Satoshi ? welcome ! welcome ! franky1 you too can claim to be Satoshi. Are you one of them those who say ''we are all Satoshi.'' Please jump in the media, and proclaim yourself that you want to contest with Crag Wright. That will be good fun. I know Craig Wright more than any body knows him in the Bitcoin space. Knowing him does not mean I am working for him or want to be recruited by him. You speaking senesce, just be sure that we all are in the forum discussing and debating and sharing information. so we must respect each other and must not use wrong words. When for the first time I read your thread I wondered, still today I am wondering about your persona. You suggest every one tro learn Bitcoin and do some business. I appreciate your courage and times to teach Bitcoin Newbies. If you know Bitcoin very well then can you tell me who formulated the ECDSA for public key generation and why it was necessary ? And what are the deference between ECDSA and DSA ? Tell me please, It is Satoshi Nakamoto, Harrold Finney, James A Donald or Ray Dillinger, Gavin Bell, Peter Thatcher, Rishi Sunak, Danail Gergiev, Mark Karpeles or Robert Richards experimented the Secp256k1 to be the perfect curve for Bitcoin Public Key Generation ? You know about Bitcoin from 2012. so, what are you talking about buzzz word ? franky1, Please stop shouting at me. I might cry quietly, if you scream at me. You supposed to be analytical and reasonably polite in the forum. There is no logic to make allegation about any thing to any one if you are not sure about. If you challenged me I might get bitfury the Bitcoin Exchange and decide to twist the COPA -v- Craig Wright case. That will be a big problem for you Mr fraky1. As you want to silence Dr Craig Wright forever. |
|
|
|
I was reading every bit of news over the last two weeks. I was tempted to break the news about the facts without fiction, then I restrained myself thinking I must not interfere in the Bitcoin Drama. So I have nothing to say, but I do feel I must say something about franky1 who is a night owl in the Bitcoin forum watching every thing and making his efforts to create further Bitcoin drama, which he is suggesting someone to file a criminal case against Professor Faustus. Oh no ! - against Australian Computer Scientist, Cryptographer, Forensic Expert, Quantum Computational Architect, Reverend Pastor (Dr)3 Craig Steven Wright the businessman. Well, it seems the whole Bitcoin community leaders have flocked together with COPA to debunk his claim stating his claim is absolutely fraudulent. Lord Grabiner sated in his first statement that why the real Satoshi has not come forward ? And the COPA is not bringing the real Satoshi, Craig is a good Candidate for Satoshi Nakamoto. If someone now files a criminal case against CSW then why not Mr franky1 clearly states on what types of criminal charges will put him behind bar ? Now, the whole case is depending on one single judge, Lord Justice Mellor. This case is not under a juries' proceedings but it is a litigation to stop him from claiming to be the inventor of Bitcoin and the author of Bitcoin White Paper, which he definitely is not. But, how does someone out of the Bitcoin Community file a case against him ? Who will support him ? The Bitcoin Community has flocked together against one single man who has been licensed to play this Bitcoin drama from a few billionaires who has bet with millions of dollars because they think they could exploit the Blockchain Patent and use it to milk all the Bitcoin and Blockchain related companies and make billions. Now the truth must be revealed, Craig is a fraud, then who else's are fraud ? That facts also need to be unfolded. To prove Craig is an impersonator of Satoshi Nakamoto I think, only Satoshi Nakamoto can say it and prove it better than COPA. Until the real Satoshi is identified, Craig will continuously clam to be the Satoshi. So why is nobody helping the real Satoshi to reveal his identity ? If this case is designed by Craig and COPA members for mutual interests, how can you determine the truth ? In fact that could be the fact behind the whole setup. Many will think I am trying to create a conspiracy, then what if the real Satoshi has granted permission to Craig Wright to play this extreme form of Bitcoin drama for some other purpose ? What if the Fiat banking elites had hired Craig to play and claim the Bitcoin and Blockchain White Paper authorship for taking over Bitcoin, which is a disrupting catalytic phenomenon against Central Banks issued fiat currencies ? I understand that Craig has gone over the limit but he is a victim of autism by birth, he might claim to be the inventor of Windows Linux for Microsoft. I have met Craig's Mum in three ovations. I know his mum also got autism, which she got from her own mother, so genetically Craig is not fully a normal person. As he lied, in all his clams and forged all the documents and created all those fantasized degrees and Ph.D. Now, there is a hidden matter about Craig, which the Bitcoin Community does not know about but the real Satoshi Nakamoto knows. Now you might think, wow ! I , Leez Hamilton, how do I know him and his mum ? Also you might think I work for Craig Wright. No that is not the case. I know every individual in the Bitcoin community, Those who were the Bitcoin developers and early adopters. I exactly know the outcome of this case. The case has been orchestrated for some other mutual interest, I am fully aware of it. 164000 pages of Craig will not prove that he is the author of Bitcoin White Paper, Neither COPA can stop craig to file case against Bitcoin developers and Bitcoin exchanges those who are doing money laundering using Bitcoin. The charisma of Craig is his primary strength. He is a genius in his own right to become famous in the news media, I agree with franky1 that he might sell his story as a villain in the Bitcoin drama to some producers and bank on Bitcoin drama. Literally any one can claim to be the Bitcoin inventor Satoshi Nakamoto but an extraordinary claim requires extraordinary evidence. Who wants to be the New Satoshi ? Craig Wright and Stefan Mathews have fired Christen Ager-Hanssen the founder of Coingeek. Who knows he could be the next candidate to be the new Satoshi. Remember he is a commercial detective. Who else can be a good candidate for New Satoshi ? you can propose to one and back him or her up and let the bitcoin drama move into its next chapter. Grand Father of Satoshi Nakamoto https://ibb.co/287B6Zz |
|
|
|
The perfect ending for this trail will be if the real Satoshi Nakamoto could sign a message, saying.. "Craig wright is an imposter, I am the real Satoshi Nakamoto" ...but we know that will not happen. 🙄
This must obviously be done with the early bitcoins that was mined by him and not from some "fake" early coins that were ramdomly chosen.
You absolutely right, Satoshi I mean the real Satoshi, i he decide to come and challenge craig, then what is the point ? This case has nothing to do with the real man the i9nventor of Bitcoin Blockchain and the author of Bitcoin While Paper. He is a busy man. Of course he knows that Craig has infringed his Bitcoin White Paper but he is talking a bit time to challenge him on the ground of his intellectual property of Bitcoin White Paper. Not only that, Craig has stolen the BSV from Satoshi Nakamoto. BSV mean Bitcoin Security Version. Satoshi Nakamoto is the designer of the Bitcoin Logo and first he published it in Twitter. so, he wont allow Craig to use its the property of the real Satoshi Nakamoto. The Bitcoin account handle of your ''Kakmakr'' is also belong to Satoshi Nakamoto. He has given it to you for you you to use it. Now you know what I am speaking about ? Just relax and make money out his Bitcoin invention and leave Satoshi Nakamoto alone. If the real Satoshi sign a message will you be happy ? Then you will post, no it is not true, may be some one has stollen his Private Key, blaa blaaa blaaaaaa. Every body want to know who is Satoshi but no one is asking How is Satoshi ? you all are bunch greedy Gremlins. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9NpixdbriHA |
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin Blockchain - Blockbuster Mega Super Feature Movie
Budget: US 1.1 billion dollars.
Finally Six Movie Producers have come forward to produce a Mega Super Blockbuster Feature Movie based on a true story of the advent of Bitcoin Blockchain and the mystery of Satoshi Nakamoto. 10 investors have agreed to invest US$1.1 billion for the movie. Soon they will contact the Bitcoin community officially to assist and provide information regarding the Bitcoin Blockchain invention story. Anyone who provides any true information will get paid for their work.
If you think anything about the Bitcoin Blockchain invention story or you know anything about Satoshi Nakamoto you can start writing your informative information and the Movie Team will contact you. You will get paid according to the authenticity of your information. If you are an early adopter of Bitcoin and you were involved in Bitcoin Development with Satoshi Nakamoto you are welcome to come to this thread and comment or make suggestions. If your information sounds informative the Movie team will get InTouch with you. If you want to play a role in the movie or become a feature chapter writer please come forward.
In the first point, you can make suggestions on What could be the best name of the movie ? If your suggested name is accepted you will win a surprising amount of valued awards.
|
|
|
|
CSW admitted he hires ghost writers
CSW admitted he hires degree writer(editors)
CSW admitted he hires patent writers
so not a stretch of imagination to say he hires coder his imaginary v1 of bitcoin was wrote by his team and he just handed then a lego block and said "build it, but in code"
He has lied about ghost writer, he might now claim he did not write the White Paper by himself but a ghost writer has done it for him. This not true. Bitcoin White Paper was written by a British Economic Scientist. Who has embedded his identity secretly in the White Paper and also in the Genesis Block. There is no way craig will survive in this court proceeding. It is good for him to seek an exit from the Bitcoin Drama Stage. His recitation is finito. Satoshi Nakamoto is Emprato. Craig Wright is bugiardo. May be few other Bitcoin community leaders also dreaming to claim to be Satoshi Nakamoto now. What a Bitcoin Saga ! It is write to produce a Blockbuster Movie. No problema, I will invest US $1.1 Billion dollars to produce the best Blockbuster Tech Movie. we need 360 actors and actress to produce the mega movie. |
|
|
|
I will try get back on track to the daily updates, but if you want to listen to a concise recap of the trial so far I recommend listening to Part 2 of the Dr Bitcoin podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jJ3CoTfili4 - 22m 0 sec (the story of secret meetings to destroy satoshi ID in january 2011*) not only did craig trip himself on the date as it was after G.williams(person claimed to be in secret call) died months prior(aug 2010), but D.klieman was also in hospital at the time.. but there are other inconsistence too not mentioned but worth highlighting now on this forum for context going back through my own notes.. of al the snippets from different court cases over the years there are revelations from other court cases about how Dave Kliemen had accountant friends that done daves tax filings and none of the documents of daves spending or income or anything paperwork created to explain spending had anything to do with setting up anything to do with bitcoin* friends of daves also note how daves income was not sustainable*. even though (in CSW story) they meant to have had 1m coin at 2011 prices ($millions) so no proof of bitcoin involvement 2008-2011 moving onto 2011 .. CSW did contact dave pre feb 2011.. but it was about promising dave if they formed a partnership(W&K feb 2011) they could win grants which would fund daves living expenses and medical bills. as dave was poor and didnt have much of an income in 2011* CSW only worked with D.Kliemen on trying to win US Department of Defense grant applications (him trying to scam USGov) under the pretense of getting funding to then write software for the DoD.. dave had little to no coding skills.. nor did CSW so CSW had no code/product to offer the US DoD.. just an idea.. hoping the US DoD would believe and trust the pitch and award him a R&D grant so they can employ coders and take a cut for themselves as project managers, oops i mean "IT forensics Specialists" (*sidenote: those court revelations in previous cases prove they had no partnership pre 2011 and no stash of currency pre-2011) and when D.Klieman realised, due to US grant denial later on in 2011 as there was not even a software prototype to back up claims, DKlieman then cut off communication with CSW and didnt talk to him again. ever [insert 2 year gap of nothingness] CSW then only then tried contacting Dave in 2013 after CSW bought his first BTC in april 2013 and wanted to introduce bitcoin to dave in 2013(after april) to re-kindled a partnership, but got told of daves death of april 2013.. so CSW & dave did not write any software to track any russian transactions for the US DoD. nor have a secret meeting nor have anything to do with bitcoin pre 2013.. events of 2011 was just a 'info defense' scam of wanting US defence contract grants to fund the possibility of writing software for the US DoD(which he had no intention of writing as he just wanted a payday) CSW's game with US DoD and australian ATO was try to get government grants for R&D to produce stuff.. but then never produce an end product. try to get funding written off as a tax loss due to lack of productivity to then try to get a tax rebate on other spending that never produced results * separate note. the real satoshi was actually still communicating with people in the bitcoin community in 2011 so the real satoshi was not scorched earth ready to completely disapear.. unlike CSW version of events
as for the unsigned integer.. heres an explainer which anyone can learn in 20 seconds(apart from CSW which couldnt learn in decades) signed: the first bit of a 32bit binary length indicates if the next 31bits are positive or negative, allowing for binary to decimal conversion range of -2147483648 to +2147483647 unsigned: a 32bit binary length indicates all 32bits are positive allowing for binary to decimal conversion range of 0 to 4294967295 so its funny how CSW couldnt even say something as simple as this
as for the witness, family testimony the sister previously didnt hear of any bitcoin speak and instead thought CSW worked for nasa due to(scams of) government contract bids/applications(+friendship with dave who had a Nasa ID from previous work) she only thinks there is a japanese connection because CSW cosplayed as a ninja as a child.. hmm wow.. much proof, not.. You have explained so many thing here in your post. Why don't you go to the court and reveal first your identity then become the witness of the Third Party, the real inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain and the author of the Bitcoin White Paper ? It will be a good idea if you really challenge CSW in the court. If you do not like to reveal your own identity then you are here in the forum just typing like a bot and who knows you could be one of bot of the real Satoshi Nakamoto who is reading the news and thinking what is next ? May be Craig will claim to be the inventor Air Craft and also Microsoft Window and will sue to Bill Gate. Or perhaps he will claim to be the Jesus Christ or King of the Kangaroo Kingdom of Australia. He even does not know the country name Australia, where it came from ? How can he probably know about unsigned integer ? Craig has been hired and sponsored by a third party to play the Bitcoin drama. He is an extra ordinary actor, I think it is time for the real Satoshi to appear in the Court to ask the judge to throw out this case from hearing because this case actually is an orchestrated saga drama for a hidden objective. The real Satoshi knows about it and he might forgive Craig Wright if he just simply tell the truth and stop his crusade against the Bitcoin developers. If this case consciously goes like this it is distracting Bitcoin market development and progression, so I might have to pray to his Divine Holiness, Lord of God of the Mammon - Satoshi Nakamoto to come out of the Maze and reveal his identity to stop Craig Wright and all other faketoshis impersonating His Japanese Pseudonym. I think this will stop searching for Satoshi Nakamoto and thousands of reporters will be able save their precious times writing so many news articles. Stop writing news article of Craig Wright's false claim. He is not the real Satoshi Nakamoto. the real Satoshi Nakamoto is the Lord of the Golden Ring who is relaxing on his Peacock Throne and planning to resurrect the Kingdom of Ethiopia ( Utopia) on the entire globe, where Bitcoin will becomes the Commonworld single currency. -----------------------------------------------------------------x------------------------------------------------------------------- Actually Kingdom of Utopia has been founded on the 3 January 2009 and Bitcoin and Blockchain is the Decentralised Peoples Bank of the Commonworld. One World, One Single Currency and one Economy. Every governments must adopt the Bitcoin Blockchain to set free their governments from the democratic scapegoat of the plutocrats. ------------------------------------------------------------------x------------------------------------------------------------------- |
|
|
|
|
you do not need a Bitcoin Wallet to watch your bitcoin. you just watch your bitcoin in the Bitcoin explorer.
If you are thinking which wallet is good for creating secure Bitcoin Address ? then you can only Bitcoin Core to create offline Bitcoin address. but your private will be in your wallet hidden in a secret compartment but make sure you do not connect your computer with internet.
|
|
|
|
|
When CSW will be re cross examine again ?
Can any members of the public attend the court and provide any authentic
evidences to prove whether CSW is wrong or right in his claim ?
|
|
|
|
|
This is a very interesting debate. Many of you have commented according to your own understanding of Bitcoin Network and its incentives Bitcoin as Cryptocurrency or economic asset. Well, whether anything has changed or not depends on the periocular matter involved. As far as you can see if there are any major changes and alterations. As for my own assessment and comments, what I see in the Bitcoin community is war between two groups who are fighting each other to become the in-charged dictum papadom. What I mean by the two words dictum papadom is taking advantage by over taking others by dictatorial, unconventional and despotic exercise of power.
You can debate as you like and pinpoint the core changes which have taken place and debate on whether it is good for Bitcoin and its users ? As you know it is CSW over emphasizing the matter to convince people that BTC is not Bitcoin and BSV what he called 'Satoshi's Vision' is Bitcoin. Well, according to the Bitcoin White Paper which was written by the Inventor of Bitcoin that Bitcoin is an electronic cash system which is a decentralized digital financial service using an electronic coin known as Bitcoin. Bitcoin is a numerical economic value of a financial transaction. Which is a standard feature and the total amounts are limited to 21000000 units. Now the network maintenance and its further developments are respectively managed by the Bitcoin Core team. If Craig Wright tries to hijack the Bitcoin Core and impose his own unitary rules for Bitcoin, if he wins the case it will be a foggy dream for him. He has forgotten the slogan, 'Vires in Numberis'.
Even though the majority of people do not understand, what is the difference when they speak that Bitcoin is BTC ?
I must elaborate here, that BTC term the inventor used is not B, T and C as appeared in the word written for as Bitcoin but BTC stand for Bitcoin Trans Cash as BTC , Craig is not Satoshi neither he is the inventor of Bitcoin and Blockchain nor he is the author of Bitcoin. As he is boldly claiming and impregnating someone else's pseudonym and trying to hijack the Bitcoin for the second time claiming BSV is the original Bitcoin, and he is the inventor of it is a pathetically motivated intention. BSV is not Bitcoin Satoshi's Vision. BSV means Bitcoin Security Version. The inventor cloned it from the original Bitcoin Blockchain and he cloned it just after he mined 14 Blocks. Before cloning again and calling it Ethereum. No, Ethereum was not invented by Vitalik Buterin. He has been hired to work on it by someone else. So, as some of you think Bitcoin is no longer decentralized as before or Bitcoin is more decentralized now, is your own perception.
When the real Satoshi Nakamoto will return his holiday from Sirius (Σείριος) he will unveil the mystery of the secret Bitcoin Manifesto known as Bitcoin Magna Charta, that will provide proper understanding of Bitcoin White Paper and its true decentralized nature.
The Bitcoin White Paper only explains the technical aspect of the P2P Blockchain mechanism.
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin was never created to be friendly with any group of people or the government, it's a perfect warhead against the government, if the new hate comes it just makes Bitcoin a better digital currency, it's decentralized and their hate will make it look better.
It's only a fool that ignores the fact that the government will always hate what they can't control and that's after they tried to take it by force and they failed, let them do what they can, it still won't stop the fan boys from accumulating Bitcoin.
I do believe we have gone passed this now, they have no choice but to make some kind of law or move for transparency when people start using Bitcoin, because the only dirty talk about Bitcoin is moving of fund under the radar, which obviously the government will never like.
Actually Bitcoin is governments friendly project if you really analyse the facts. Governments has to borrow money from the central bank own by a group of financial elites. Governments supposed to print money and do the social developments. Government supposed to work for the best interest of the citizen in every matter but governments are scapegoats in the hands of elites. I do not called the managers of the elites any kind o governments. Elites select candidates and elect them in the office by defrauding by public by uncivilised system of political voting system system where party politics steal the vote from its citizen to legitimate the the governments. The financial feudal elites are the privileged class who controlled the government and steal money from the 99.95% by quantitative easing is an organised crime. Bitcoin has given back the financial sovereignty to the public this is whey they do not like bitcoin but exploiting the Blockchain. We must unite under the Bitcoin banner and establish our financial rights. |
|
|
|
|
If whether you think I am just making a joke to entertain you that is fine.
If you think I am trying to scam you then that you must provide evidences that
I am trying to scam you. Any way what so ever is your opinion, your opinion is merely your opinion.
Have I asked you to bet your money or Bitcoin against or for your betting on the this Bet ? No. Full Stop no.
Therefore, this is the facts, I am asking you to cast your opinion for betting. If your opinion is correct then I will be happy to publish the rules and who knows how many people will cast their opinion ?
There is the catch- I will invite all of you those who are casting their opinion to grand bloody Bitcoin Drama live and attend the conference may be in London, where the winning party of the COPA -v-Craig Wright will be invited to celebrate their victory. In that even, I will be happy to introduce the real mystery of Bitcoin Historical facts with proof-of-work plus an extraordinary evidence on my side that I am not a a scam. Of course all the scammers say that they are not scammers. Whatever you think of me is your opinion, opinion is opinion unless otherwise it provides sufficient evidences with rational codex for the opinion.
If I wanted this case to take on step further to a commercial betting then I could have done that in a different arrangement and operation, where every body who will participate in betting will bet their own money say $100 dollars, and if you win you will get 100 times or 1000 times returned. But as I do not believe in commercial betting so I just have published it as an open discussion and dialogue for casting your bet, who knows, no body know me here as I am a Newbie here in this forum, So, please be a bit simple and do not think I am promoting betting and commercialising Bitcoin betting for living. Betting is forbidden where you bet your money in expectation that you will win or lose your money.
So, I will publish the rules in a later date.
Thank you for your comments.
|
|
|
|
|
