 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
Which pool will have the honor of finding the first new block ?! :-)
Congrat HCM |
|
|
|
Hmm, hitting F5 doesn't help  |
|
|
|
I'll donate 2000 NLG per day to anyone that close the longest gap.
Exceptions:
- The closed gap must be at least 60 minutes
- That address hasn't received a blockreward in previous 15 blocks where the time to find was less than a minute.
Yesterday September 24, the longest block to find took 144 minutes. The block in question was 122342 and was found by Gf7wGA. Thanks for stepping in Gf7wGA. Because you also found block 122340 in only 18 seconds, you've got your share. Therefore, no bonus this time. |
|
|
|
After 2 days where the longest confirmation time per day was around 20 minutes, it climbed up to 67 minutes on September 21 and 51 minutes on September 22. Markanth, thank you for the stats: http://nlgstats.iblogger.org/I thank all the miners who searched during the hard times (high diff and low hashrate). Keep on mining! Hopefully the confirmation time will be more stable after the update. Especially, I like to express my respect to the following blockfinders: September 21, GNDA5M who found block 121275. Thanks for supporting the network. I payed 2000 Guldencoin to you in block 122621. September 22, GMnaaM and GaVgch for the search on block 122096. Although the longest gap was just a little under 60 minutes, I reward the effort with 2000 Guldencoin also. The payment appeared in block 122649. |
|
|
|
Excellent work Mark! Do we get updates now and then?
I have set aside 20K NLG to support mining the 'hard blocks' for 10 days. I hope it's enough until the conformation time is more stable.
I'll donate 2000 NLG per day to anyone that close the longest gap.
Exceptions:
- The closed gap must be at least 60 minutes
- That address hasn't received a blockreward in previous 15 blocks where the time to find was less than a minute.
I presume pooladmins will distribute it after taking the normal pool fee. They may give it to the block finder or distribute it under the contributors or a combination of that.
Let's start with sept 16:
GgiTmq thank you for finding block 118414. You helped the Guldencoin network a lot. I donate 2000 NLG for that.
GLgBPz, GKaP57 and Gcpzph thank you for finding block 119148. You did a great job. Pro ratio I donate 42.69012692, 1957.30987306 and 0.00000002 NLG.
Very cool of you to reward the ones solving the hard blocks! Instead of posting the table you requested here it will be uploaded daily to http://nlgstats.iblogger.org (free webhost with ftp) --Mark It looks like the workaround measures have a positive effect on the longest confirmation time for now, although GfWGA still takes around 90% of generated new coins. +--------------------------------------------------+---------------------------------+ | NLG blocks mined per day | longest block gap of the day | +---------+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+---------------------+ | date | total # | Gf7wGA # | Gf7wGA % | block | gap | +---------+---------+-------------+-------------+-----------+---------------------+ | Sept 16 | 572 | 542 | 94.76% | 118414 | 278 minutes | | Sept 17 | 543 | 505 | 93.00% | 119148 | 103 minutes | | Sept 18 | 585 | 553 | 94.53% | 119477 | 110 minutes | | Sept 19 | 580 | 543 | 93.62% | 120445 | 18 minutes | | Sept 20 | 593 | 508 | 85.67% | 121096 | 24 minutes | |
|
|
|
Nice. See no mistake here. My results were about the same in the post on September 08, 2014, 11:22:02 AM. I screen scraped the data from the chainexplorer with timezone +2.00 and calculated the % against the average found blocks per day. You took the actual found blocks to calculate the %. That's more accurate. I like to have a site like https://blockchain.info/pools. And ... a charts with the longest time between blocks per day. I'm willing to donate to the one that finds that block. Added a few additional SQL queries to the report. Let me know if this is what you're looking for. Cheers --Mark +------------------------------------------+-------------------------------+
| NLG blocks mined per day | longest block gap of the day |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-------------------+
| date | total # | Gf7wGA # | Gf7wGA % | block | gap |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-------------------+
| Sept 01 | 573 | 333 | 58.12% | 110053 | 37 minutes |
| Sept 02 | 616 | 429 | 69.64% | 110424 | 37 minutes |
| Sept 03 | 604 | 448 | 74.17% | 111317 | 44 minutes |
| Sept 04 | 577 | 503 | 87.18% | 111860 | 50 minutes |
| Sept 05 | 595 | 517 | 86.89% | 112528 | 147 minutes |
| Sept 06 | 526 | 473 | 89.92% | 112672 | 153 minutes |
| Sept 07 | 593 | 518 | 87.35% | 113430 | 81 minutes |
| Sept 08 | 572 | 485 | 84.79% | 114282 | 79 minutes |
| Sept 09 | 574 | 443 | 77.18% | 114427 | 43 minutes |
| Sept 10 | 597 | 536 | 89.78% | 115055 | 111 minutes |
| Sept 11 | 552 | 444 | 80.43% | 115997 | 77 minutes |
| Sept 12 | 596 | 480 | 80.54% | 116501 | 64 minutes |
| Sept 13 | 524 | 450 | 85.88% | 116956 | 151 minutes |
| Sept 14 | 603 | 511 | 84.74% | 117684 | 107 minutes |
| Sept 15 | 589 | 555 | 94.23% | 117701 | 143 minutes |
| Sept 16 | 572 | 542 | 94.76% | 118414 | 278 minutes |
| Sept 17 | 543 | 505 | 93.00% | 119148 | 103 minutes |
| Sept 18 | 87 | 85 | 97.70% | 119446 | 10 minutes |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-------------------+
Excellent work Mark! Do we get updates now and then? I have set aside 20K NLG to support mining the 'hard blocks' for 10 days. I hope it's enough until the conformation time is more stable. I'll donate 2000 NLG per day to anyone that close the longest gap. Exceptions: - The closed gap must be at least 60 minutes - That address hasn't received a blockreward in previous 15 blocks where the time to find was less than a minute. I presume pooladmins will distribute it after taking the normal pool fee. They may give it to the block finder or distribute it under the contributors or a combination of that. Let's start with sept 16: GgiTmq thank you for finding block 118414. You helped the Guldencoin network a lot. I donate 2000 NLG for that. GLgBPz, GKaP57 and Gcpzph thank you for finding block 119148. You did a great job. Pro ratio I donate 42.69012692, 1957.30987306 and 0.00000002 NLG. On behalf of the team and community I just want to say a big thanks to you CIG. This is why we most likely have the best community as so many people are putting there hands up to help push Guldencoin forward. I will also contribute if needed, just send me a PM if the 20k runs out before we implement the new algo change. Thanx for your offer. Sadly, our funds are limited. If we run dry, I''ll send a PM. Indeed, the community is great. So is the Guldencoin. It's our favorite altcoin now. I'm a member of a Cryptocurrency Investment Group. We decided that our donations are a good investment. Keeping the miners happy is important. I know the team will not overreact and will think things thoroughly. We hope it will relieve the team a bit, so they can focus on a more permanent solution. Keep up the good work! |
|
|
|
Very cool of you to reward the ones solving the hard blocks! Instead of posting the table you requested here it will be uploaded daily to http://nlgstats.iblogger.org (free webhost with ftp) --Mark Dear tomato @hardcoreminers, Thanx for the persistence in your search. You've found block 119477! http://nlg.hardcoreminers.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=round&height=119477Because I don't know your address, I pay the reward of 2000 NLG to the pool. The pooladmin may decide how it will be spread. Will you let me know if you received a part of the bonus? |
|
|
|
Terk just PM'd me and he has decreased the NLG hashrate on CleverMining even further. It is now 50% less than it was yesterday.
While I'm usually a strong opponent of multipools, I have to say that I really respect Terk for being this cooperative and responsible. If I ever pull my miners from CripToe, I know where they'll land.
-Fuse
I agree, that's cooperative and responsible. To all other miners: Keep up mining please! |
|
|
|
Nice. See no mistake here. My results were about the same in the post on September 08, 2014, 11:22:02 AM. I screen scraped the data from the chainexplorer with timezone +2.00 and calculated the % against the average found blocks per day. You took the actual found blocks to calculate the %. That's more accurate. I like to have a site like https://blockchain.info/pools. And ... a charts with the longest time between blocks per day. I'm willing to donate to the one that finds that block. Added a few additional SQL queries to the report. Let me know if this is what you're looking for. Cheers --Mark +------------------------------------------+-------------------------------+
| NLG blocks mined per day | longest block gap of the day |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-------------------+
| date | total # | Gf7wGA # | Gf7wGA % | block | gap |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-------------------+
| Sept 01 | 573 | 333 | 58.12% | 110053 | 37 minutes |
| Sept 02 | 616 | 429 | 69.64% | 110424 | 37 minutes |
| Sept 03 | 604 | 448 | 74.17% | 111317 | 44 minutes |
| Sept 04 | 577 | 503 | 87.18% | 111860 | 50 minutes |
| Sept 05 | 595 | 517 | 86.89% | 112528 | 147 minutes |
| Sept 06 | 526 | 473 | 89.92% | 112672 | 153 minutes |
| Sept 07 | 593 | 518 | 87.35% | 113430 | 81 minutes |
| Sept 08 | 572 | 485 | 84.79% | 114282 | 79 minutes |
| Sept 09 | 574 | 443 | 77.18% | 114427 | 43 minutes |
| Sept 10 | 597 | 536 | 89.78% | 115055 | 111 minutes |
| Sept 11 | 552 | 444 | 80.43% | 115997 | 77 minutes |
| Sept 12 | 596 | 480 | 80.54% | 116501 | 64 minutes |
| Sept 13 | 524 | 450 | 85.88% | 116956 | 151 minutes |
| Sept 14 | 603 | 511 | 84.74% | 117684 | 107 minutes |
| Sept 15 | 589 | 555 | 94.23% | 117701 | 143 minutes |
| Sept 16 | 572 | 542 | 94.76% | 118414 | 278 minutes |
| Sept 17 | 543 | 505 | 93.00% | 119148 | 103 minutes |
| Sept 18 | 87 | 85 | 97.70% | 119446 | 10 minutes |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+-----------+-------------------+
Excellent work Mark! Do we get updates now and then? I have set aside 20K NLG to support mining the 'hard blocks' for 10 days. I hope it's enough until the conformation time is more stable. I'll donate 2000 NLG per day to anyone that close the longest gap. Exceptions: - The closed gap must be at least 60 minutes - That address hasn't received a blockreward in previous 15 blocks where the time to find was less than a minute. I presume pooladmins will distribute it after taking the normal pool fee. They may give it to the block finder or distribute it under the contributors or a combination of that. Let's start with sept 16: GgiTmq thank you for finding block 118414. You helped the Guldencoin network a lot. I donate 2000 NLG for that. GLgBPz, GKaP57 and Gcpzph thank you for finding block 119148. You did a great job. Pro ratio I donate 42.69012692, 1957.30987306 and 0.00000002 NLG. |
|
|
|
First off, I'd like to reiterate the appreciation others have directed to Fuse for reaching out to Terk, and to Terk for adjusting clevermining's algorithms. It's nice to see changes were made with both cleverminng's and Guldencoin's best interests in mind. Hopefully no more 4+ hour gaps in the blockchain. I ran a few queries against the Abe database to see what % of newly created NLG blocks were being mined by Gf7wGA. The results are cut and paste below. I found them interesting so figured I'd share. Disclaimer: I'm not a developer and still figuring out Abe's schema, so take these results with a few grains of salt. I did manually check the Sept 17 results against explorer.guldencoin.com and the numbers matched up. --Mark +------------------------------------------+
| NLG blocks per day |
+---------+---------+----------------------+
| date | total # | Gf7wGA # | Gf7wGA % |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+
| Aug 15 | 582 | 0 | 0% |
| Aug 16 | 571 | 0 | 0% |
| Aug 17 | 596 | 107 | 17.95% |
| Aug 18 | 567 | 350 | 61.73% |
| Aug 19 | 578 | 385 | 66.61% |
| Aug 20 | 583 | 320 | 54.89% |
| Aug 21 | 598 | 312 | 52.17% |
| Aug 22 | 569 | 380 | 66.78% |
| Aug 23 | 577 | 398 | 68.98% |
| Aug 24 | 557 | 362 | 64.99% |
| Aug 25 | 585 | 387 | 66.15% |
| Aug 26 | 568 | 371 | 65.32% |
| Aug 27 | 576 | 356 | 61.81% |
| Aug 28 | 582 | 369 | 63.40% |
| Aug 29 | 570 | 367 | 64.39% |
| Aug 30 | 577 | 366 | 63.43% |
| Aug 31 | 581 | 367 | 63.17% |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+
| Sept 01 | 573 | 333 | 58.12% |
| Sept 02 | 616 | 429 | 69.64% |
| Sept 03 | 604 | 448 | 74.17% |
| Sept 04 | 577 | 503 | 87.18% |
| Sept 05 | 595 | 517 | 86.89% |
| Sept 06 | 526 | 473 | 89.92% |
| Sept 07 | 593 | 518 | 87.35% |
| Sept 08 | 572 | 485 | 84.79% |
| Sept 09 | 574 | 443 | 77.18% |
| Sept 10 | 597 | 536 | 89.78% |
| Sept 11 | 552 | 444 | 80.43% |
| Sept 12 | 596 | 480 | 80.54% |
| Sept 13 | 524 | 450 | 85.88% |
| Sept 14 | 603 | 511 | 84.74% |
| Sept 15 | 589 | 555 | 94.23% |
| Sept 16 | 572 | 542 | 94.76% |
| Sept 17 | 63 | 55 | 87.30% |
+---------+---------+-----------+----------+
Nice. See no mistake here. My results were about the same in the post on September 08, 2014, 11:22:02 AM. I screen scraped the data from the chainexplorer with timezone +2.00 and calculated the % against the average found blocks per day. You took the actual found blocks to calculate the %. That's more accurate. I like to have a site like https://blockchain.info/pools. And ... a charts with the longest time between blocks per day. I'm willing to donate to the one that finds that block. |
|
|
|
PS: I'm fairly confident I got this right, but someone feel free to double check me.. i only got into crypto a few months ago so maybe I'm misinterpreting what these logs represent.
Crawled through some numbers again. Yeah markanth is definitely right: Gf7 is Clevermind! Gf7w (tag Clevermind) deposits the coins on Bittrex GQsU I can see is its Bittrex because GQsQ appeared as an input in some of my withdraws from Bittrex. |
|
|
|
If anyone is interested in buying some NLG with LTC, let me know. I'd like to diversify a little more, and I don't want to drop the prices on the exchanges and deal with the trading fees.
Possibly interested in trading 100k-150k if the price is right. PM me if you're interested.
-Fuse
There are some on Bluetrade @0.0008LTC. It matches the recent trade history so you won't disturb the market. The tradingfee @Bluetrade is 0.25%. That's fair. |
|
|
|
So a switching pool and not one individual getting 9 million coins. The coins would be shared by all using that pool/s just like a normal pool?
In a switchingpool the NLG (or other mined altcoins) are not spread under the miners. The payout is in BTC. Did you see Lucjver en Kloink left Hardcoreminers last night for a while? Lucjver is back again now (respect). If that happens 1 hard block can take more than 1 hour to find. And 3 hard blocks must be mined before the diff is adjusted. No wonder people complain it takes to long for transactions to complete. In the meantime till the problem is less a problem: can we introduce a bonus for the finder of the hardest block/day? |
|
|
|
@markanth: Your help is appreciated.
The fact that there is in total 8M+ NLG received on Gf7 and not kwowing the intensions is scary isn't it? I can't query the blockchain at the moment for the accurate received NLG. If there is another Gd adress it's even more scary. BTW I have no problem with honestly mined coins.
@CIG: I pointed cgminer at clevermining.com and logged for a few hours.. seems to correlate 100% to Gf7wGAwJGDLfoHcNCRLKZqpk2EQU5ixA6c. see the activity log snippet below (i filtered out a lot of the garbage). The highlighted hashes and difficulty match up to the guldencoin blocks 114389 to 114397. Clevermining switches to NLG and keeps mining NLG until crossing a high difficulty threshold. With 120 GH of hashing power available they can churn through blocks like butter.. then switch off to something else, leaving the hardcoremining pool and others stuck mining the more difficult blocks. I can see why honest miners would get discouraged mining NLG. The only bright spot (for traders at least?) is the coins are likely dumped onto the market for BTC on a regular basis as clevermining has BTC payouts to make.. which I guess is a good thing as waterloo suggests?.. cheers --Mark PS: I'm fairly confident I got this right, but someone feel free to double check me.. i only got into crypto a few months ago so maybe I'm misinterpreting what these logs represent. [2014-09-09 03:18:34] New block: bdf110b6ed0742c9be99ce5b7a846fbe1b655345d72a07bd4d34bad3d0c4b95b... diff 1.04K [2014-09-09 03:18:44] New block: 0b7f5e13ed17539db79950388804a7f74bd50276ef508b15fbc4fe908ed91679... diff 1.18K [2014-09-09 03:18:54] New block: 00000000002064c64e9192a0cca9c90a4fd75a31b9113ccddfa40af6fdd6fe0a... diff 578 [2014-09-09 03:19:56] New block: d1a0342942bae2b24836a3d88bf1f2f3481010f8a57a111380e4956272dd5eb3... diff 484
[2014-09-09 03:20:04] New block: 3495c4d44fde97cb57d9f0286ec330be4b2df0d560e7d3f352fc8743615d6b90... diff 487
[2014-09-09 03:20:07] New block: c37b75429e160e663a7281c76a70a29ca19c95b0e2c8ed23cfa3aca2a851e6cc... diff 488
[2014-09-09 03:20:13] New block: 62e10980608630602ad608e64dd12cf050c6d5faba59959e70afcab49c3c017b... diff 491
[2014-09-09 03:20:47] New block: 5847dda9ca3f2ae47e49069e248fb99086803671bd905e446da3c7f744871804... diff 489
[2014-09-09 03:21:40] New block: f68bfd72427ca6957cdceba74e271bae2bfd285e23d6c63af3e3bdf8c3748092... diff 491
[2014-09-09 03:22:12] New block: 38807a39c5636287dd82db21d65ce6ef582a0d833388c8183b075bb0146a0628... diff 492 [2014-09-09 03:22:42] New block: b16bde9360ab9e530c1ee4cfe841b81b6efc14f752b603bf76da245d2bebe089... diff 26 [2014-09-09 03:22:45] New block: 4dd83b30ce6fb71c3fe295242bf02c0566891ea6198479653ee3159570a7ef9b... diff 24 [2014-09-09 03:22:46] New block: a7f0ac54fc70dd82cbcfa747929de7120928a718c70d575809b4f613dc6ecf4a... diff 22 [2014-09-09 03:22:46] New block: e0ddaf56c729cc5ff0a89a8d3d5ef8e0a799cd440a5d3fcfb8a45ad2bfe128ab... diff 20 [2014-09-09 03:22:49] New block: e63634cb74c246557006be2cf65d7dd6171265ab95644bc58fe210a0c9819331... diff 19 [2014-09-09 03:22:51] New block: 46b062d916c1fb999e7331f9b2652c7ff615b0647c9f0961df63adc9f1f6df5a... diff 17 [2014-09-09 03:22:51] New block: 79a7fea4a3f116d0d11637ca3a9b5908b88daef2f45c1f4c630a6d15fcd2d586... diff 16 [2014-09-09 03:22:52] New block: bd4933f450b940761b8011e2cb975bb1b7dceb776574e713e04d3ec14798a7e9... diff 15 [2014-09-09 03:22:53] New block: 0c8ab6b4d8aae11cf949bb7df0ae9a10f19f097b06a4de99ed3631b0703d2c84... diff 492 [2014-09-09 03:22:56] New block: fab7f75978b4efd724915cd1f5f603d6333edbd8219fde20c493563fda1b5343... diff 12 [2014-09-09 03:22:56] New block: e02cb1e2ee80c29c07487dbfb61aa758b5c52dce7f282b01811e3f1ca26a47f9... diff 11 [2014-09-09 03:23:00] New block: a78577949cc102827e43476e21661e0506285a738a3bc7fa17e13b057dca68a1... diff 543 [2014-09-09 03:23:02] New block: be29a6c639eba7132cf8bc877cd57035e6112d382073b4dc7da526b9e53c9625... diff 578 [2014-09-09 03:23:11] New block: 99a2742a499be3946fb2ec2b4e24a767a4b863dab48a6c36deed96b9f5e9f72d... diff 37 [2014-09-09 03:23:13] New block: acaccf3ab3652c3b87f8cee31f60972ac9fbe0c2ef176a58e4634bda4326c296... diff 40 Thank you! A switching pool like Clevermind could be it. I'm not 100% convinced right now it's Clevermind. Could be Zencloud or many more out there. Block 114397 has timestamp 2014-09-09 05:22:51 +0200. https://explorer.guldencoin.com/#/block/a78577949cc102827e43476e21661e0506285a738a3bc7fa17e13b057dca68a1It correspondates on timestamp to [2014-09-09 03:22:51] New block: 46b062d916c1fb999e7331f9b2652c7ff615b0647c9f0961df63adc9f1f6df5a... diff 17 [2014-09-09 03:22:51] New block: 79a7fea4a3f116d0d11637ca3a9b5908b88daef2f45c1f4c630a6d15fcd2d586... diff 16 Total received by Gf7 now 8964020.49560005 NLG. Last block found while typing 114455 2014-09-09 08:14:40 +0200 https://explorer.guldencoin.com/#/transaction/7b8e6236bc85184f3dac3c313267aa32073ddbc7827151c225d0adb6b07a904aLast send is block 14448 2014-09-09 08:10:10 +0200. Output is GQsU. It's distributed from there and I'm loosing the trail. I can go deeper, but not today. |
|
|
|
@markanth: Your help is appreciated. The fact that there is in total 8M+ NLG received on Gf7 and not kwowing the intensions is scary isn't it? I can't query the blockchain at the moment for the accurate received NLG. If there is another Gd adress it's even more scary. BTW I have no problem with honestly mined coins. Is Gf7 Lucjver? If so, I can tell you that he has a considerable amount of hashpower. He hops on my TAG pool from time to time, and totally dominates the TAG network. He was one of the first people I ever saw on a pool with that amount of scrypt hashing power. So much so that the first time he hopped on my TAG pool, I started checking logs because I thought the numbers were jacked up.
-Fuse
I don't think so. Lucjver is mining at a more constant rate as far as I have seen. What do u call constant? I've seen him go from 50MH to 350 and currently he's at 1000mh. On hardcore there's also another player now 'Kloink' with 1200MH Constant in that he is always mining. Lucjver is always mining something. He may move hashpower around, but he sticks to his core coins. Even coins like TAG that are not profitable but were/are a decent prospect. I could reach out to him and see if he'll join our discussion... even if it is to just share his setup. I'd love to see what he's working with. -Fuse Exactly. Respect for Lucjver. He's mining the hard blocks! Kloink is not a guy to worry about. He's also mining hard blocks and is not even in the top 25 at http://nlg.hardcoreminers.com/index.php?page=statistics&action=blockfinder. For those who doubt what the problem is with dishonestly gathered coins: it's market disruptive. The coins can be dumped if the 'owner' was able to get them to cheap. If you'd payed a fair price, you would think twice before selling to low. |
|
|
|
@markanth: Your help is appreciated. The fact that there is in total 8M+ NLG received on Gf7 and not kwowing the intensions is scary isn't it? I can't query the blockchain at the moment for the accurate received NLG. If there is another Gd adress it's even more scary. BTW I have no problem with honestly mined coins. Is Gf7 Lucjver? If so, I can tell you that he has a considerable amount of hashpower. He hops on my TAG pool from time to time, and totally dominates the TAG network. He was one of the first people I ever saw on a pool with that amount of scrypt hashing power. So much so that the first time he hopped on my TAG pool, I started checking logs because I thought the numbers were jacked up.
-Fuse
I don't think so. Lucjver is mining at a more constant rate as far as I have seen. |
|
|
|
If this is about 1000 blockreward all the time it is strange.
Open the blocks and you'll see it's truly the blockreward (with sometimes the tiny fees). Balance 137000.50700000
It is automated transactionscript or something? He transfers tiny bits all the time, nothing to do with blockfind, I suppose. This address is associated with a tradingrobot script maybe?
Likely a script, that monitors the diff and maybe renting power on Nicehash. I see on Nicehash a script execute pending orders (17GH) at the lowest price. |
|
|
|
Problem around hash spread is getting worse last days.
Actual figures:
Date NLG Received by Gf7wGA Blocks found % of 576000
2014-09-01 336.000,26530000 336000 58,3%
2014-09-02 412.002,55330000 412000 71,5%
2014-09-03 461.001,62930000 461000 80,0%
2014-09-04 474.000,98565000 474000 82,3%
2014-09-05 497.001,14100000 497000 86,3%
2014-09-06 477.001,76475005 477000 82,8%
2014-09-07 518.001,02310000 518000 89,9%
Apart from a possible 51% attack, there's another problem: you see that other miners quit because Gf7wGA cheats by mining only at low diff.
Not correct. Coins recieved by Gf7wGA is not blockfind x blockreward (1000). He recieves about 39.000 NLG a day atm according to stats of hardcoreminers. If he finds a block (and he finds the most), the blockreward of 1000 NLG is spread over all miners according to % hashpower contributed. Adress of Hardcoreminingpool is GNDA5MZWcm4AjLtNuEmYpgH8qsxo4vrnY8 see blockchain Last block found by lucjver 113993. So I'm not talking about hardcoremining but Gf7wGAwJGDLfoHcNCRLKZqpk2EQU5ixA6c Blocks found should be /1000, but the % stays the same. |
|
|
|
|
