 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
|
I've never seen that much shameless bullshit in a release changelog.
At least he's working on it. |
|
|
|
|
You think your posts have been unbiased do you?
|
|
|
|
Cut your losses? Hasn't SC been on the way up, while BTC on the way down these last few days?
If you watched the entire chart of solidcoins 0.011 is the resistance level it was at before it crashed when bitparking took their exchange offline. Let's see if it can break 0.011 and go to its old recent high of 0.015 and stay there. Yes when I made this post the price was 0.011 btc and then it plunged to 0.001 on the exchanges (not bitparking but the rest). So yes I called it correctly. Your point? EDIT: Look at when I posted this and what the price was when I posted it. Then look what happened to the price after that and how it moved. I'd think if it doesn't fork it will hit at least 0.015. As for "staying there", well, BTC isn't steady itself so I can't say. People, including yourself and Coinhunter, have been spending a lot of energy to make it look bad, and they can't keep it up forever. So maybe it'll do alright. |
|
|
|
|
Cut your losses? Hasn't SC been on the way up, while BTC on the way down these last few days?
|
|
|
|
At least all the shit flinging has helped BTC.  |
|
|
|
|
I was talking about your donation of negative 1050 to help the SC crew.
|
|
|
|
I think people should move on from solidcoin.
Why the sudden change of heart? |
|
|
|
Hilarious! Smoothie, I'm so glad you never got into making useless shit posts like everyone else. This is classic stuff.  |
|
|
|
|
Nice! Any chance you'll trade SC for non-cryptocurrencies in the future? Is the fee charged on both ends of the trade or just one?
|
|
|
|
|
Well, the SC crowd tried doing things on this board, like the logo design, and you guys made a circus out of it. It was difficult to wade through the piles of shit to find actual, on topic posts. I'm just guessing here, but I'd say 5 asshole posts for each real post. So they have no choice but to delete nasty posts there. They don't want it turning into another troll-fest. We all know he's got an ego, but don't call it a cult because they delete your trolling on their board.
|
|
|
|
|
I'm not sure why you guys defend him, he really is a perfect asshole to even to people who support SC. I loved this line today:
"...So stick around, perhaps lose the condescending "I know better" tone and you may do well with this" -RealSolid in response to Bitcoinporn's advice to lay low for a bit
lol.. Who talks like that? Like Bitcoinporn is the condescending one. He did the same thing to me yesterday when I said he should reconsider the open lisence. At first I thought trolls were just picking on him, but he treats people with no respect. Why defend him?
|
|
|
|
I think we should rename SolidCoin if we go through with this. There's going to be all kinds of confusion, and CoinHunter is right that people will come across his site first on Google for now. I vote for Space Credits. I've posted this before, but I think it might be good for publicity. 'Space Credits' sound familiar to most people, especially geeks who'll be earlier adopters. The other reason is media attention helps the popularity of coins: Space credits could be an ideal outside currency to the new Starwars mmo. From what I've read it's a WOW killer, and these coins are ideal for trading in games. My buddies and I already use small amounts in minecraft.  |
|
|
|
|
If you think he can be reasoned with, go back to the SC boards and try to make SC better instead of coming here and protesting the open source version.
|
|
|
|
Not the way the rhetoric is going with these tards, and they don't care about an alternate coin, they are f'ing lying in the first place that Coinhunter is their only issue, they were bitching from the get-go, smoothie wishes he made more that 32 BTC off his early coins, wolftaur is just retaurded, Artforz is a just a dumbass who hurt a lot of people yet he is championed by the douche bags around here as some kind of hero.
It's a scam in the basis of this work is a lie, it isn't even about Coinhunter, just now that these fucks have villianized him this is their claim but go back and read the history of the posts, then go back and look at the history of the IxCoin posts ... you see a STARTLING resemblance in both. These dumbasses have to be in control of the whole sha-bang.
I don't disagree some things Coinhunter said shouldn't have been said... the whole solid coin here when bitcoin fails article, I didn't publicize it, at that time I could see both in existence, but my experiences with these retarded people out here is changing my mind. A good community would police it's own, and there have been and still are people in the true solid coin community speaking out against the license changes, and the article on solidcoin.info .... bitcoin on the other hand, that community is just a bunch of fucks in the middle of a massive circle jerk.
I don't think you can group everyone here together like that, there's trolls on every board. People seemed generally more interested in SC before the immature propaganda site went up. None of those trolls went to the lengths of making an anti SC website, that I know of. He's villainized himself. If he'd ignored the trolls and treated everyone else with respect it would be doing much better. The mining guild I was in and 2 of the three exchanges I used shut down. I read the way CoinHunter chatted with Gavin, who hasn't done anything to him. CH didn't invent Bitcoin, but he used the source then shit on everyone who worked on it. Are you seriously going to argue that we should leave that guy in charge? He doesn't know how to respect others, he's a PR nightmare for both BTC and SC, and he can't be reasoned with. |
|
|
|
Who are you kidding? They are a bunch of ass hats ... I once believed somewhat their way toward what was going on with IxCoin, then the fucktards go and make I0Coin, now they are doing the same shit here.... the real scammers are these douchebags, maybe they felt they missed the window or they are jealous, whatever, your all a bunch of lame fucks and cryptocurrency will suffer as a whole because of this community, if this is the public face of bitcoin it won't be long for the world.
Can you explain to me how the open source chain is a scam? It sounds like mined SCs are still good in it. |
|
|
|
Isn't it funny how "poor" SolidCoin is yet we have people writing open source clients for it, wanting to try to take control of it. If it was worthless they wouldn't want to, something to consider for the sane minds reading this thread.  You: -Had some good ideas -Created a currency who's success depends on more than 50% of users supporting it -Seemingly pissed off more than 50% in all different ways What did you think was going to happen? I don't see you as a victim to trolls anymore, you have some control over this. If you issued a sincere apology to the BTC community, the exchanges and guild operators, take down the hateful btc bullshit from your site, make your project truly open source again (according to standards), stop telling people to f*ck off if they don't like it and people will have less reason to create another SC chain. |
|
|
|
|
There's been lots of hate going around on both sides. If people could put their emotions aside for a bit there might more constructive conversations that would help both currencies more. Chanting "BTC sux" and "SC is dead" over and over doesn't seem to be helping. SC's in trouble and BTC is down to 7.40, makes you wonder if it's connected to the negativity around here...
|
|
|
|
|
In the end, a new chain will mess people over who mined and invested, keeping an open source version doesn't. By messing over people who've mined and invested you are strengthening the arguement that cryptocurrencies are a scam, and that's not good for anyone. If you want a new chain to mine, IX, IO and SC are all still fairly new.
|
|
|
|
I don't think another fork is going to help things, plus you'll cause more problems for miners than anyone else if you do that.
It's good for miners to have choices in what coin they mine. If you start another blockchain that's an open source version of Solidcoin, you'll essentially replace Solidcoin leaving the same number of options. |
|
|
|
|
I don't think another fork is going to help things, plus you'll cause more problems for miners than anyone else if you do that.
|
|
|
|
|
