Today’s red day on many crypto-tokens. But I thinks it’s great. And here is why:

1) There are simple none of market asset that can grow all the time. It’s healthy to sometime cut off some lard from the main body.
2) It’s giving opportunity to buy tokens cheaper. No joke. Buy low, sell high.
3) It’s shows us that it’s not just a blob of assets. While eventually everything (even fiat) is going to crash corrections in a sigh if healthy market.

Don’t panic, have no fear. Invest in proper ICO and tokens and everything is going to be fine.

As long as there is no single standard for entering the ICO, the existence of a contract is rather indicative of the seriousness of the team and the create and develop business within the framework of new technologies, rather than using this new boom only as a form of fund-raising. When you’re going to buy a house you are not just listening to how beautifully the seller sings. In the absence of a material analogue of the product offered for sale, it’ll be logical to evaluate it from the point of view of digital guarantees (by analogy with the contract of sale for a house). So in our case, if the team does not have a contract describing the actions of the team at the time and after the fundraising - they do not have this very contract with which they come to you as a buyer; How can I trust my team with this money?

If you think that the contract can be written after fundraising - it's illogical, because the team needs a working model with a prototype, in order to convince investors of the seriousness of their intentions. Situations that will soon happen everywhere - the collapse of projects and the departure into nonexistence - is just the result of the relaxed attitude of investors to the guarantees of the teams. It is a mistake to assume that the risks of entering the ICO are completely the prerogative of the investor. Teams have the same responsibility as investors, if not large

My advice is the following: do not invest in projects that do not have clear, prescribed contracts. This, it is proved by statistics, always ends badly. Evaluation of ICO, contract writing and orientation in crypto-currencies is a difficult, but not impossible task.

https://ins.world/

The code that we can see after following the GitHub link is weird. It does not revive ETH as payment method. After trying to pay for tokens, I was welcomed by simple wallet. Well, dream came true, again. I hope it's just a mistake and will be fixed in a shortest amount of time. If not – scam. ins.world

https://www.tokendesk.io/
The project aggregator of ICO’s goes on ICO - but the verdict is scum, because of reason that payments are accepted on the wallet and not on the contract.

Thank you for advice.

Thank you for reply! We'll keep an eye on your project.

And meanwhile, another review.

https://fortknoxster.com
Web-site is looking quite unpresentable, and to add insult to injury – there are no GitHub link to review the code. Big “No-no”.

https://www.saavcoin.com/
Another horrible looking website with no GitHub link. No means to verify code and contract – no advices to invest in this project.

https://swissborg.com/en/

Before the sales begin, we have the opportunity to review code of the prototype. It could be better. Just a pack of standard functions and nothing more. Of course, there is a possibility that cherry on top will be added right before sales but for now – quite a dull project overall. 

https://tokensale.gizer.io/

Project has a spelled out terms for early investors, has soft and hard cap and token-burn. There are no terms for bounty and team, no escrow and no freeze. 50\50, but i'll put this project in a scam pile. 

Another day, another review.

https://swisstok.io
Site contains one interesting detail – pre-sale is going to be over after 21 day and they still didn’t add “buy” button. I smell a bit of a scam already. Even after signing in you will receive only an invite to a sales, nothing more.

https://paytailor.com
Site does not contain “sale” button. It’ll only going to be found under the heading. As result we are shown a wallet, on which we should drop our coins. What does the team hopes for? I don’t know. It’s clearly a scam. Don’t give them money. 

http://gigagiving.com/ICO
Despite the fact that this project has git-hub link and did found collection in the right way, it has some red flags. First – tokens are going to be out at once. All of them. No burning function. No spelled out terms for the team; no bounties, no hard and softcaps. No freeze and escrow. Scam through and through. 

https://razoom.org
Project is claiming to combine AI and smart-contracts in ETH. And even after this bold claims they still collecting found on the wallet. Maybe hoping to lure some naive soul to their nets. Eh. C’mon, guys. At least do some efforts into fooling us. Scam.   

We open paid consultations on an exit on stock exchanges.

Bitfinex.com
Poloniex.com
Litebit.eu
Liqui.io
Indx.ru
Cryptomate.co.uk
UpbitExchange.com
Cex.io
Livecon.net
Etherdelta.com
Dsx.uk
Therocktraiding.com
Shapeshift.io
Virtualworldland.com
Zaif.jp
Merkatox.com
Lykke.com
Bitshares.openledger.info
Kukoin.com
Novaexchange.com
livecoin.net

Contact Us ... contacts@smartcontract.life

Scam ICO Alert Auctus, DMarket.
Video review on the SCAM from the developer of smart contracts.

https://youtu.be/ZdHnVY0JgU0

Таже проблема. Как сейчас хранить QTUM.
Скачивать QTUM Core и держать полную ноду - так себе решение.

Это онлайн кошелек. Приватные лючи хранятся на серврверах.
Мне кажется не очень надежно.

Какие есть альтернативы для хранения Ripple, XRP

We are a team of Blockchain developers with experience in Ethereum, Bitcoin, Hyperledger, writing smart contracts and launching ICO.

We have already launched more than 15 ICO, have developed several projects in Blockchain, here are some of them - the Stock Exchange, The market on the block, some of my tokens / coins were also registered and placed on the stock exchange. We also created an asset registry platform.

Projects built by us:
https://github.com/cromlehg/


How we work

Economy
Professional consulting in the terms of the volume and structure of the issue, the value of the token, the economic model and ownership structure.

Development
Technical design and implementation of the contract based on the ERC20 standard. We use the packages Solidity Token Contracts Ownable, StandardToken, StandardERC20, SafeMath, StandardToken.

Testing
After the development, the contract is placed in a test environment. Independent executors perform the search for vulnerabilities. We incur the expenses.


Payment

The standard contract for pre-ICO and ICO goes from 10-12 EHT.

Audit of smart contracts goes from 2 ETH.
For each vulnerability found there are fees in amount of 1 ETH.

20% is prepaid in Fiat, 80% is mortgaged in code of the contract
and we receive after the ICO.

With the current load, calendar up to 2 weeks.

For any questions, please write to the contacts@ethereumstudio.pro

https://ico.guts.tickets/
You have a strange project. Those wishing to contribute to the project put in line. The code on the Github is missing. There may be a contract, but there is no access to it.

I want to share another advice, which is not directly connected to the topic of smart contracts. At least on the face of it.
It is not that simple, to start ICO.  The team that goes to the ICO should have at least the code on the GitHab - something I repeatedly warned about in my recommendations. Any statements on the site without the presence of the code on the GitHab are a direct indicator of the scam.

https://auctus.org/
The project is solid from the developer standpoint. Has contracts, has a working prototype. The only thing that missing is an escrow - but I admit that in this context this is not the biggest mistake.

http://armorceramics.co
The site indicates the beginning of sales, but clicking on the button moves to an empty block. Perhaps this is the error of the web programmer - but first red flag is on. The page on HitHab is in development.
My conclusion: if you are trying to be real, then you should take a bigger test. SCAM.

https://playkey.io
The project takes funds for a contract in which there is only one token for all stages of sale and bonuses for early investors from our list. There are no conditions for the team, bounty, no soft and hard caps, no escrow and freezes. With such a grandiose project, getting out such an unfinished product is unacceptable from our standpoint.
According to our standard – it’s a SCAM.

https://lcd.lucyd.co
This project will receive a e-wallet payments and it’s a biggest scam-factor. To be frank, project is not innovative one bit. Founders just lazy to prove their own idea in front on investor’s board and trying to cut a quick cash. Do you really want this? Nope. Because it is scam.

http://ico.b2b-gbs.com
They managed to be cheap, even using free hosting. Nothing to say – SCAM. Another bag of dust.

I’ve been asked quite frequently about not-scam projects. This bunch was tested by my only by smart-contract standards.
https://auctus.org
https://cashaa.com
https://covesting.io
https://goldminecoin.io

These projects are all different in regard of directions, but they are all the same, as to responsibly approaching to the safety of investors' money.

If XYZ is ERC20 tokens just send it to your ethereum address. Try to send a couple of pieces at the beginning.

Hello, dear investors and everyone who reads this.
Being a developer of smart contracts, I cannot stand aside of the current lawlessness in the ICO market.
Out of every 100 projects 99 is a fraud, or a scam, as we used to call it.
Please, read the following advices as a guide to verification of every ICO:
1. At the start of pre-ICO team should have a contract for automatic assets transfer, that contains a written set of rules for early investors – not on towel, not in the speaking form, but written in the smart-contract.  Otherwise, collected assets can just fall in the pockets of founders, or they can change rules of the game in the middle of act – there are many examples.
2. The contract for pre-ICO should be a part of a bigger contract on ICO and do not be different tokens – it is unsafe form a standpoint of vulnerability and withdrawal of funds.
3. The contract for pre-ICO, and then on ICO should have a lower and upper barrier - if it does not – the team does not know what it wants - just a scam.
4. The contract for ICO should have escrow of the funds, received as a result of placement - it can be a frieze or multiSig with a voting condition. This will give you a guarantee against the expenditure of funds earlier than the team completed the previous stage.
5. The contract should have indisputable return of funds condition, in case of not reaching the lower limit of the collected pool. It is in the contract and not in the white book, if it is not – move on, it’s just a scum.
6. All contracts must be posted on GitHub, this will enable third-party developers to check the contract for the vulnerability, if the team has not taken care and before the ICO has not posted a bounty on the vulnerability.
7. The contract must specify the conditions for the team and for the bounty’s for vulnerability.
8. The contract must specify the conditions for not traded tokens - with clearly defined deadlines.

This post is about having a standard. Everything in the end should have a standard - and together we can achieve it. If you do not invest in teams that do not adhere to basic security standards - they just won’t be able to steal your money.

I hope for a dialogue and a healthy discussion.

пока решил просто увести с Bitfinex на кракен.
На всякий случай.

https://github.com/qtumproject/qtum/releases


Кто знает как вообще обстаят дела. И посоветуйте нормальный кошелек под него.
не хочется держать у себя полную ноду.

хороший сигнла будет - если пару дней будет поджимать под хай ... тогда можно пробовать

все круто но покупать биток у хая да еще и по 7к както очень стремно