 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2]
|
|
You can't even keep your ideas straight. You just flip flop back and forth. It is so sad to see social ineptness in full force like this.
|
|
|
|
|
@cryptodevil I am not talking about scrypt.cc man. Just you in general. I don't know or Care what srcypt.cc is.... I care that you belittle, torture, cry, moan and bitch at total strangers about absolutely nothing. It is sad. Good luck in life. I pm'ed you to keep it out of this thread, but since you have a reading disorder I have to reply to you here.
|
|
|
|
Like I said, you can take what I have to say with a grain of salt, but that doc is DEFINITELY fake.
No need to discuss it further because this statement proves you have no idea what you are talking about or just a shill(new account and all) trying to subtly create doubt. Any photoshop expert will tell you that you can never be absolutely sure a low resolution image is real or fake(unless there is something glaringly impossible in the image). At most a document could be suspected as being doctored. We get it, you think the document is a forgery. In such a case I recommend Josh and GAW take legal action. I seriously doubt they will, being that doing so will force them to uncover all the other lies and they have enough worries as is with these departments investigating them. I also recommend Josh and GAW(whats left of them) to take legal action against me if they suspect that I am knowingly spreading false information. I am prepared to defend my reputation. I have stated multiple times I am for your cause. Just think it would be a better idea to base a better argument on something real, not fake. Sometimes the mind makes you see whatever you want to see, or however the saying goes. As for the shill comment, that is one reason why I am "newbie" here and said multiple times just stating a fact, take it as you will. I only created this account as I was trying to comment on an Antminer deal, check my history. I have been a long time lurker though. The shill card is pulled pretty heavy here, and pretty often. So, I'll take it I guess?? That is pretty similar to a tactic Hitler would use though. Shut down the threat with a smearing and class degrading swiftness to get others onboard, as opposed to look at something with an open mind. As I said a few times before, carry on. |
|
|
|
|
You proved my point again. if you look at your zoom in, the "@btc.com" has fill from another background(around the c, in the c and the o). That was missed in the pastework/white back fill. Zoom in on any other of the docs posted by inBitwetrust and you will see that anomaly doesnt exist in them. It only happens in a copy paste situation. NOT a document scan, copy, or color copy from original document.
Like I said, you can take what I have to say with a grain of salt, but that doc is DEFINITELY fake. Trust me, this thread would be WAY cooler with a real document. Can we get the original or the "page 2" of that doc, even if it is blacked out?
|
|
|
|
Ok I was going to point it out in the image here, but due to compression and obvious reasons will say this. Go to the source site. DL it and open it in your favorite Picture editor(paint works, lol) Zoom in specifically on the "In the mattter Search of" part and look at that pixelation of those letters vs the pixelation of the email addresses. Not only is the color wrong, but the pixel draw or the identical letters are filled differently.
I am not going to sit here and spew how "PRO" I am, But I am in the industry and that looks obviously, and poorly, PSed.
I did such and it looks perfectly fine. It is normal for such legal documents to use multiple fonts and would be quite understandable that the lawyers drawing up the document copy and pasted the email addresses in the warrant form and carried over the original font of the email addresses. That would mean he was released the Original document... not a copy. Copy machines use the same ink no matter what font. If he was sent a color document which would explain the variation, but still Black is Black. If that were the case of an original Document, that would lead to what I see as a bigger problem... A govt agency releasing personal documents to a public organization. But I have no experience there, that may be common practice. Thanks for posting those images. That backs up what im trying to say. See how the texture and color is the same throughout. So they are Copies. Our CF doc is either an original or a color copy doc which is next to never done. Why scan a BW doc in color? just seems weird. As I said, Carry on. |
|
|
|
Its finally happening. The wheels of justice move slowly but the day of reckoning is upon Josh and GAW.
LOL, I am a new member and will probably be ignored, But I stumbled across this thread and read it mostly. Doesn't that picture look ODDLY photoshopped. I am not arguing XPY is a scam or whatever, we all have our opinions but, really? A photoshopped GOVT doc? How can anyone take that serious? Besides that carry on!  New member or not, when you state something like that it helps to be more specific. Which part looks photoshopped to you? Ok I was going to point it out in the image here, but due to compression and obvious reasons will say this. Go to the source site. DL it and open it in your favorite Picture editor(paint works, lol) Zoom in specifically on the "In the mattter Search of" part and look at that pixelation of those letters vs the pixelation of the email addresses. Not only is the color wrong, but the pixel draw or the identical letters are filled differently. I am not going to sit here and spew how "PRO" I am, But I am in the industry and that looks obviously, and poorly, PSed. Just my .02, flame me if you want. I would love to see a Real doc. Don't know why they have to shop it. |
|
|
|
Its finally happening. The wheels of justice move slowly but the day of reckoning is upon Josh and GAW.
LOL, I am a new member and will probably be ignored, But I stumbled across this thread and read it mostly. Doesn't that picture look ODDLY photoshopped. I am not arguing XPY is a scam or whatever, we all have our opinions but, really? A photoshopped GOVT doc? How can anyone take that serious? Besides that carry on! |
|
|
|
ERRRRM, why is no one pointing out how bad the post office is?? So a letter is sent via a service that doesnt allow them to be traced and we are blaming bitcoin? Am i missing something here? Cash is still king, dont forget it. Cash still is used in more ransoms than the market cap of BTC for the next ten years. You can jump ship if you want too, just let me give you my wallet address first.  ill take em. |
|
|
|
|
I signed up just to state i would like two. i already contacted rita by email. my email is similar to my user name. i would also want two sc-bc2 kits with my order.
|
|
|
|
|
