Bitcoin Forum
July 06, 2024, 10:44:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
21  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: "bitcoin is the most dangerous open source project ever created" on: May 15, 2011, 09:32:50 PM
Some people are just too afraid of freedom and change.
22  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: bitcoins open sourceness on: May 14, 2011, 09:29:28 PM
Simple answer would be to build it yourself if you want to.
But then you're still not guaranteed that the compiler you use is not generating something not in original code for you.

It's a pretty old issue, actually.

You can take it even further, say, if you bootstrap your own compiler and compile the source yourself, how can you be absolutely certain that there are no programmatic trapdoors left in your CPU microcode?
23  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: SkepsiDyne Integrated Node - A Bitcoin Mining Company on: May 14, 2011, 05:45:28 PM
Well, the asking price is set low, because not all shares from the IPO were sold. If this was a saturated market you could easily spend more that you thought just due to own negligence. Which is acceptable for me, because "buyer beware" and quoting Dogbert - "Idiots should not have money"
24  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Bitcoin Weekly Comes Alive on: May 14, 2011, 07:47:07 AM
Yay, I'm first to follow Cheesy
25  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Whole lot of trading happening over at GLBSE on: May 14, 2011, 07:42:37 AM
Heard nefario might have to write new cryptographic library for javascript if he's going to write a web version.

Pretty sure he could borrow from bitcoinjs.org, they are well on their way...
26  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Whole lot of trading happening over at GLBSE on: May 14, 2011, 07:01:11 AM
Client definitely needs REPL, to avoid typing in the key each friggin' time.

I'm trying to implement one in node.js, however node crypto itself has to be patched to support that...
27  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: bitcoind ubuntu troubleshooting, getting started on: May 14, 2011, 06:55:19 AM
try daemon=true
28  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: SkepsiDyne Integrated Node - A Bitcoin Mining Company on: May 14, 2011, 06:29:41 AM
Quote
buy:20@1500000000:SIN:1305343055

Ouch, someone just spent 300BTC instead of 15BTC if I'm reading this correctly...
29  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Call for translators. on: May 14, 2011, 12:11:48 AM
AlexZ. Спасибо, сделайте списком, а то ОП не разберётся что к чему.
30  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: WARNING! These forums are compromised. Beware of SRBLCHE on: May 13, 2011, 06:14:26 PM
SgtSpike: LOL'd
31  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Call for translators. on: May 13, 2011, 06:08:48 PM
Russian

Включить проброс портов с использованием UPnP.

Не зашифровывать личные ключи в кошельке.
Автоматически шифровать старые, не зашифрованные ключи.
Введите пароль чтобы зашифровать/расшифровать все адреса, созданные после.\nЕсли вы не хотите шифровать новые личные ключи - запустите приложение с ключём -nocrypt.\nВНИМАНИЕ: Если вы потеряете этот пароль, никто, включая разработчиков Bitcoin не сможет получить доступ к вашим биткойнам.
Пароль
Ошибка: Пожалуйста предоставьте пароль зашифровки/расшифровки кошелька.
Пожалуйста предоставьте текущий пароль расшифровки кошелька.
Процесс расшифровки кошелька завершился неудачей.
Введённый пароль расшифровки неправилен.
Вы запустили приложение с ключом -nocrypt, но кошелёк содержит зашифрованные ключи. Приложение будет завершено.
Хотите зашифровать оставшиеся не зашифрованными ключи в вашем кошельке? (Рекомендуется).\nВнимание: Старые версии клиентского приложения не смогут получить доступ к кошельку.
Создаю новые ключи, это займёт какое-то время...
Введите текущий пароль от кошелька.
32  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Portland bitcoin users? on: May 12, 2011, 11:34:12 PM
Obligatory Portland reference : http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1919
33  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: New OS install...where'd my wallet go? on: May 12, 2011, 04:08:56 AM
There used to be a blockchain torrent lying around. Maybe it's time to make a new one.
34  Local / Трейдеры / Re: btcex.com, вывод средств on: May 12, 2011, 04:04:21 AM
Freenode
35  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: block 123456 get on: May 12, 2011, 04:02:16 AM
For a true get it should contain a transaction for 0.123456 BTC Cheesy
36  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: SF Hackerspace: Noisebridge - A Bitcoin Rejection on: May 12, 2011, 03:59:21 AM
That guy said Bitcoin is a fail because it doesn't have a Federal Reserve and because it's similar in his mind to WoW gold.   Roll Eyes

AND he's an econ major!

No wonder US is in such financial shithole if all their economics majors are like this Smiley
37  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Ideas on distributed payment processing for merchants on: May 10, 2011, 10:14:18 PM
Yup. That is essentially my original post + NFC Smiley

I'll try to play around on the weekend to get some simple site going, that is able to keep a wallet and keep PGP keys for signing. Maybe based on bitcoinjs stuff.

About QR codes - it's not that bad. You scan one image with your phone, it'll automatically launch a needed app, based on MIME or something. You press 1 button. Another code appears on your screen. Merchant scans it and sees the money arriving. Pretty simple.
38  Other / CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware / Re: Ubuntu Natty Narwhal 11.04 Mining Guide / HOWTO on: May 10, 2011, 10:12:33 PM
Btw, instead of exporting your library path, it's probably better to add the config file for those paths to /etc/ld.so.conf.d, then they are applied globally to all accounts.
39  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Crytographic email or msging system? on: May 10, 2011, 10:04:44 PM
Emm, how about GPG? What's wrong with that system?
40  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The Bitcoin Debit/Gift Card? on: May 10, 2011, 09:59:17 PM
Hmm, it'll be very hard for them to introduce similar level of protective technologies as in modern banknotes. Printing money (in a sense of making the bills) is hard. All those security measures are quite costly. And duplicating a piece of paper is quite easy. Also, it looks like the process of spending those bills is quite involved. You can't get exact change in bitbills and you still need a computer to transfer money. So they are kinda redundant.

Basically strong cryptography and smart devices beat paper Smiley IMHO.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!