I have now entered init-seed --force at Terminal. In the middle is now something with Error
Error: unknown command "init-seed" for "C:\\Users\\...................
Are you trying to introduce the command in a Terminal of Windows or in the Terminal of the Sia-UI? What I meant is using the Terminal included in the UI: there is a tab in the left side of the UI that says "Terminal" use the command "wallet init-seed --force" there and if a prompt pops up asking you for a seed or password, use the recovery seed
|
|
|
So, I have tried it now. I entered all words. It does not work. It stands there...
Wallet Locked
Enter your wallet password to unlock the wallet.
Unlock error when calling /wallet/unlock: provided encryption key is incorrect
Check that you are introducing 29 words, with a single space between them, no missing words, no extra spaces or line breaks. Check all the words make sense in English. Also, it is possible during your attempts you created a new wallet, so Sia is expecting you to introduce the new seed, not the old one. If that is the case you need to delete the current wallet and initialize a new one with the seed you have. For this, go to the Terminal tab of the UI and type . Anytime it prompts you for a password, introduce your recovery seed. what is your telegram ?
Sia does not have any official Telegram group. If you find one claiming to be the official, it is a scam, most probably a fake pump&dump group.
|
|
|
Hi, I want to try my luck here once. I hope someone of you can help me. I'm from Germany. In Germany in the forum nobody knows or nobody is there. Can someone tell me how to restore my Sia Ui Wallet? What exactly do I have to do? What do I have to enter where? If possible please explain exactly. I do not have much experience with the Sia Wallet yet or generally with crypto currencies. I'm only a short time. Sorry for my not so good english Nothing works at the moment. The wallet no longer accepts my password. I can not log in anymore. I think it wanted to create a new Sia Wallet. I broke it off. Now he does not recognize my old one anymore ... Looks like that accidentally you or the software deleted the wallet folder. It is not an issue as long as you keep the recovery seed (the sequence of 29 words). After loading Sia, whenever it asks you for a password, type the seed. Afterwards you can create a new custom password. But in general remember that: - Password: only valid for your local machine - Recovery seed: valid in any computer on any future time. Forever
|
|
|
So is Sia-Tech still saying around the 1st of June 2018, for the miners to ship? Or has anything changed? trying to stay more in the loop! (I've 5 of these 'hopefully not' doorstops in the wind) brad The last that I read a couple of days ago, the chips manufacturer have sent them already the chips. They are functional (that's good) but they are still testing their final specifications. I am guessing they will publish an update soon. But considering there is an arms race between Obelisk and Bitmain, I won't be surprised if they decide to hide the final shipping date and specifications until the very moment they start shipping to keep the strategic advantage over Bitmain (I am sure they in turn have a "A3+" model on works aimed just to damage Obelisk) If you want to stay in the loop I would recommend you joining the Discord of Obelisk: https://discord.gg/zt9JznT
|
|
|
ok thanks but why is the first post not up to date ?? Because Bitcointalk is not an official community channel anymore and so the core devs do not post here anymore. Check instead on Discord, Reddit, Twitter, Facebook or the official Forum. any announcements?
You can check weekly updates on the official @SiaTechHQ account on Twitter or on the new Sia-TV Youtbe channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCYtlUu6bUghAca0ADmlxCKw
|
|
|
the last windows wallet is 1.1.1 right? i had to reinstall and resyn but the blockchain says synchronized but with 135019 No, the last version is 1.3.2. Download it here: https://sia.tech/get-startedYou are stuck in an old block (we are currently at #148565) because your software is incompatible with the two hard forks that happened in the last months. and why the hell when i put my seed, the wallet is so slow to open and it use mostly 4gigas of memory ??
Instant wallet unlock is a feature that was introduced, iirc, in 1.2.0 1 year ago (but first unlock will always take longer as it scans the blockchain). Damm it, update that wallet, LOL
|
|
|
what is the best pool for siacoin mining with antminer a3 ?
You can check the pools in Sia here and even find the configuration parameters for A3's here: https://www.siastats.info/pools_listBoth Luxor and Siamining are community-driven pools, what makes them recommendable. However, Siamining currently holds more than 50% of the hashrate so people should spread among other pools to preserve decentralization. Luxor is probably a great option, as they are Sia code contributors, and in top of that, part of their earnings are donated to Core developers. Currently they have 0.3% fees (all a donation to core devs) and they are experiencing awesome luck finding blocks recently, what makes them very attractive economically too.
|
|
|
Good someone knows why the SC do not reach Poloniex. I'm waiting of my TX to be credited on Polo for over 2 months after this issue I have withdraw all SC from this exchange to the main SiaCoin PC wallet now they are safe Do not tell me that, those were all my savings, because the SiaCoin team allows poloniex to harm the followers of their project, they have to take this problem with poloniex and give it a quick solution, because if they continue like this they will lose a lot of credibility. The dev team does not "allow" or can "prohibit" no exchange to trade Siacoins. The whole software is open-source, so any exchange (good or bad, legit or scam) can open trading pairs without requesting permission and they can't be banned either if they misbehave. Poloniex has a long dark history of Sia users that have lost transactions and tickets that needed months to be addressed (or were not addressed at all). Moreover, in the past they did not contacted the Sia dev team when they had problems or answered the team's communications attempts. For all these reasons, in July of last year Poloniex was dropped from the list of officially recommended exchanges. Apparently, since the acquisition of Poloniex by Circle things are changing and now Poloniex team is working closely with the dev team to address issues. With this, I am not trying to recommend you to use Poloniex at all, I am just presenting you what happened in the past and the current situation, in top of trying to explain why the Sia team has no responsibility or control over bad or rouge exchanges (as the software is open-sourced and any exchange can take it and make a wallet)
|
|
|
How long does syncing take?
The blockchain is currently 10GB big ( https://www.siastats.info/blockchain_size) To fully sync, it will require a few hours (less than 10) if you are using a SSD disk (not mechanical) or 2-3 days if you are using a HDD (spinning mechanical disks)
|
|
|
Hello! What is the distribution of remuneration for the provision of space on your hard drive?
You setup your own pricing. However, as it is a competitive marketplace, you'll want to stay around the average prices to get file contracts. You can check the pricing of the the top 100 hosts (in score terms) in the second table of this page: https://siastats.info/hosts_networkHello, I do not know if it's the right place ...But anybody knows when sia wallet will be ok on Poloniex or nobody cares?
Two weeks ago the software version 1.3.2 was released, including a wallet fix aimed to exchanges. So right now Poloniex just have to update. Apparently, the Circle team (the company that recently purchased Poloniex) is handling the testing and update of their wallets. They should be back online very soon For those running the sia backbone for storage, how it exists now, how is the interface? Is it working ok?
Anything of note coming to help you guys with this process soon?
Just lurking, not running any of this, just wondering if the interface has improved to at least
toss any comments of note to us NOT doing any of this...just seeing how this part of sia-tech's plan is working (or not so much)
brad
Hi, i run a host for now o er a year. Works without issues. I've been running two host machines for a year too without any special issue. You might like the UI or not, but it works. Moreover, most of the hosts don't even use the UI for hosting and just rely in the Daemon, the Command Line Interface, as it is not so difficult to use (you are going to use 5 commands or less all the time) and consumes much less computer resources.
|
|
|
the actual development coming from nebulous i don't see the justification issuing 100s billions of coins
No one is "issuing" 100s of billions of coins. Siacoins are produced purely by PoW mining, so new coins are held by miners, not by developers (they are not "issued" by the developers like in other coins). Nebulous actually controls less than 1% of the total circulation. By no means the coins in circulation are in the order of 100s of billions. Currently 32 billions are in circulation, and the supply will not reach 100 billions not even in 50 years: https://siastats.info/supply_inflationalso liability of copyright holders my see a way to bring suit in certain jurisdictions?
This has been largely discussed in the past: hosts are not liable of the contents they hold in their disks. It is like trying to accuse Amazon or Azure because their servers were holding a website with links to illegal content instead of accusing the proper website. From the Wiki: Can I be held liable for user's files if they store illegal content?
In the United States; hosts are considered safe from user submitted content under section 512 of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. Storage providers, websites and ISPs (Internet Service Providers) are considered protected under 230(c)(1) of the Communications Decency Act. No cases in the US have specifically accused websites of CP. Section 230©(1) is considered a “safe harbor” but has never been tried in a court of law.
In the European union; hosts may be protected by Directive 2000/31/EC as long as they meet certain criteria.
|
|
|
One factor in my decision to sell was the fact that Sia issued Siafunds, which are indivisible, and very expensive - $10-15K each! Owners of Siafunds get a cut of the profits of the storage suppliers (a reward for the risk of owning them, we're told), and the suppliers get - and I quote from the white paper - a "brutal free market" (potentially no reward!). Also, Siacoin was not intended to be used as a speculative investment. The whole thing feels like Sia are doing this for themselves and their wealthy mates, and the rest of us can just go to hell. And, with the price plummeting so fast now, maybe Hell will be the next stop. One small note: SiaFunds are not being "issued". All the 10.000 SiaFunds were originated on the genesis of the blockchain, 3 years ago. About 1200 were sold originally to investors to fundraise the project, and the remaining 8800 were held by Nebulous Inc. as an incentive to align the interests of the developing team with the growth of the network (SF dividends depend on the usage of the storage network). No new SiaFunds are being issued this time: it is simply Nebulous Inc. (core developers) selling 750SF of their stack of 8800 to increase the funding of the team. This will be very positive for the whole Sia sphere, as with those funds they'll be able to pay more developers to push ahead the roadmap and pay other stuff like marketing campaigns once the network is production-ready. Moreover, the beauty of SiaFunds is that the investors buying them become contributors/partners: They'll only get dividends if they help pushing the adoption of the storage network, so these investors will really promote the long-term organic growth of Sia and not short-term pump schemes like traditional "investors" of coins.
|
|
|
I have something weird going on with my wallet. I noticed 2 days ago there was a -0.088 SC withdraw. I know its a tiny amount, but there is there any reason this would happen?
Those small transactions are just wallet auto-defragmentation: you might have multiple addresses containing balances and the wallet merges them into a single address to facilitate future expending. Each time the wallet defragmentates, is a transaction in the network, and those -0.088SC are the fees for that transaction. Have not kept track ..but does anyone know if Sia-Tech folk are "on track" with the 'decentralized storage' aspect of Siacoin ...that HOPEFULLY will be available
WHEN their obelisk miners hit in June? (I think it is June now?) ....gonna really suck to have a mess of obelisks with the biitmain units sitting about pumping out
siacoin...without this network....(remember the ASIC's in 2013 knc titans.that did scrypt-n coins (think there were 12) ASIC resistant....they destroyed the value
of all the coins in a week. (viacoin moved protocols..I think it was viacoin) and destroyed all value of those coins in a week....bye, bye scrypt-N..)
sh*t happens
anyway, any info on above?
The storage network has been working since day 1 of the blockchain, for the last 2 years and half. Currently it consists on more than 4 Petabytes across almost 900 hosts in 58 countries ( https://www.siastats.info/hosts_network). Core developers keep working on improving the protocol and the client. For instance version 1.3.1 released 2 months ago increased the upload speeds to more than 50Mbps and version 1.3.2, that will be released in a few days, will improve the downloads speed and reliability: beta testers are reporting consistently average download speeds above 50Mbps too. The release date of Obelisks will be June or before. There are good chances they can be delivered sooner than expected, but there is not yet official confirmations on this I don't see your point about the effect of ASICs being responsible of downtrends in the coin price: on every coin where ASICs have been deployed (Scrypt coins like Litecoin, Dash...) the coin price has increased in the end, probably because the increased security provides confidence in the network, and because the cost of the hardware gets tied to the value of the mined coins
|
|
|
I wonder if there have been coins and features that have been done lately and is there a way to track the amount of storage that is being used on the Sia network?
In top of what the official Sia website shows, you can also track multiple statistics and metrics about Sia in https://siastats.infobitcoin cost 6k, and Cia 400 sat. bitcoin rose from 6000 to 11500. And Sia fell to 170 sat. where is the connection Sia grows in technology, but why does it fall? If you are around the world of cryptos for long enough, you will learn that whenever the Bitcoin is bullish, most of the rest of altcoins drop their value. If you want to but Bitcoins, you need to sell the alts you own, is that simple. If you look at the Siacoin/Dollar conversion rates, they have been stable at 2 cents over the last 2 weeks. Siacoin value is not falling (or not so bad, at least): it is the Bitcoin rallying up. If you care more about the BTC value of your coins instead of the USD value of them, hold Bitcoins instead of altcoins...
|
|
|
China and Boston scammers dumping this pennystock SIA horseshit back to 50 satoshi ~ weee LOL ===> "The SiaCoin team has confirmed there is a bug in the wallet and that they are working on a patch. Deposits and withdrawals will remain disabled until this patch is implemented and tested." It is hilarious that an account with a negative trust of -4 yells scam and immediately 2 accounts quote him and say "yes, it is true" explaining something unrelated afterwards. Your past in bitcointalk.com speaks louder than you, scammer Look at the course! He speaks for himself! he falls and bitcoins do not affect how. bitcoin grows, Sia falls what here to explain? why why and why again does it fall? Where is the explanation for this !? Sometimes markets rise. Sometimes markets fall. It is what happens every day on every coin, asset and stock exchange. Traditionally when BTC rises, most of the rest of altcoins fall. Nothing misterious here: the amount invested in cryptos by traders is what it is, and if a trader wants to buy BTC, he will need to sell his altcoins. You can be sad or unsettled because the price is not the one you want. But claiming that a fall in price is due to a scam like that user said, or you quoted and said he was right, is simply FUD and it is out of place in this forum unless you have proofs to sustain that. If you need a hint of what is going on, check the rest of Alts: similar trends. Check Bitcoin: opposite trend
|
|
|
China and Boston scammers dumping this pennystock SIA horseshit back to 50 satoshi ~ weee LOL ===> "The SiaCoin team has confirmed there is a bug in the wallet and that they are working on a patch. Deposits and withdrawals will remain disabled until this patch is implemented and tested." It is hilarious that an account with a negative trust of -4 yells scam and immediately 2 accounts quote him and say "yes, it is true" explaining something unrelated afterwards. Your past in bitcointalk.com speaks louder than you, scammer
|
|
|
Is SIA team still active and any new releases coming up?
Of course the development is active. It is open-source and you can check the coding activity in GitHub: https://github.com/NebulousLabs/Sia/pulse In the last 7 days, 7 pull requests were merged, 4 were opened and 11 issues were closed. The Release Candidate 2 of the future version 1.3.2 was released to beta testers this week. Most probably the general release of 1.3.2 will take place in 1-2 weeks. The biggest features of this release are a huge revamp in the file downloads speed and reliability, cheaper contract formation fees and scalability for the wallet, so exchanges don't have more issues in the future (Poloniex issues should be solved as soon as they apply the update).
|
|
|
|