 Show Posts
|
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 4 5 »
|
Guys just ignore BCX. All this attention is just what he craves.
I doubt he could DDOS his way into a wet paper bag.
Generally I've found in life, the people that give it all the mouth are all hot air. It's the ones who don't give any warnings are the ones you want to watch.
Your post was clear motivation for him.  |
|
|
|
So is this possible? And if so what will happen to the ltc block chain?
Sure it's possible, it's only between 400-600 gpus required. And thats not impossible to get ahold of. What will happen? People won't trust it anymore so they will sell and abandon it. Thats what will happen. Yes, it's possible. Not even bitcoin is immune from 51% attacks. Though with bitcoin it's much harder, but then someone with an ASIC can attack it if they wanted to. Satoshi did say that people would not try to 51% bitcoin, because if they had that much hash power, they would earn more money by mining it normally than by attacking it. This is true with Litecoin right now. If BCX used his hashpower to mine Litecoin, he would make more money than to try to do a double spend with a 51% attack. If BCX is just going to fork the chain for 24 hours. Then what would happen is that all transactions within that 24 hours period would be reverted. And those transactions will then be replayed on the new forked chain if they are still applicable. If they cannot be replayed, then a double spend will happen. (Reminds me when I did a "git rebase" on the litecoin code just a few days ago and ran into a ton of merge conflicts.) Normally, only the attacker would be able to double spend his coins. Since no one else is aware of the attack and would be able to muck with his transactions to double spend them. But the double spend by the attacker will have ripple effects that would potentially invalidate a lot of other transactions. I think Litecoin needs some 51% protection right now. Oh wait... |
|
|
|
wow what a fucking hero "someone in a shoutbox pissed me off, so now I am going out of my way to fuck over peoples good work"
some "community" we have.....
Yeah, funny how his shenanigans don't work on Bitcoin. I wonder why...I have way too many BTC and have been mining BTC since August of 2010, that's why. You didn't have to become a doctor to bring in big bucks. |
|
|
|
wow what a fucking hero "someone in a shoutbox pissed me off, so now I am going out of my way to fuck over peoples good work"
some "community" we have.....
Yeah, funny how his shenanigans don't work on Bitcoin. I wonder why... |
|
|
|
Honestly, your posts really sound like CoinHunter. If you are not a sockpuppet, you must be a long lost twin.
You wouldn't believe how funny your reply is to me. Of course, you would need to know I'm not CoinHunter to comprehend it. for someone who hasnt posted for over a month ur awfully chatty tonight eh lol I plan to keep this account active for all alt-cryptocurrencies entertainment-related discussions. |
|
|
|
Honestly, your posts really sound like CoinHunter. If you are not a sockpuppet, you must be a long lost twin.
You wouldn't believe how funny your reply is to me. Of course, you would need to know I'm not CoinHunter to comprehend it. |
|
|
|
@Coblee
This isn't personal at all but your fellow miners over at BTC-E are taking on some serious Solidcoin type attitudes.
The challenge has a been made and apparently support over there was with them on it, in making a challenge that I couldn't 51% LTC.
Nothing like that to give me reason to resurrect some serious GPU hashpower, build up some EC2's (keep in mind even Coinhunter verfied I had over 700 EC2's running at the SC2 launch), connect up with some botnetter friends and bring some BTC out of USB deep freeze for fees... LOL....
This is fair warning to all.
Challenge accepted.
~BCX~
Seriously? Most of the guys chatting on BTC-E have been in Cryto like a week, tops. They are kids mouthing off asking questions like, "Can I get BFL ASIC to mine LTC?" or other such nonsense. Although it once was a good place to talk about the market, it's recently been inundated with a bunch of amateurs whining about how they can't get rich off of .002 BTC. I understand you're angry but there are a lot of us in LTC that aren't the whinny bitches from the BTC-E chatroom who are working hard at LTC and trying to make something valuable. Don't let a buch of jerks push you over the edge, because really the same kids who are pissing you off, don't have anything to lose by the destruction of LTC. You 51% it, they'll lose their $1 shrug their shoulders and go outside to play in the backyard. I think if you have that much GPU power it would be a more effective to add to the network, blow the difficulty through the roof and kick all the kids out. That way you have the best of both worlds- you screw the noobs from the chatroom by making it impossible for them to mine on their Asus EEE PC's, you support a real project that people really do care about (you say it's not personal at Coblee, but then why destroy something he, and many others, have worked so hard on?) and you can then mine a crapload of coins, dump them on the market, crash the price and walk away with a little treasure chest of BTC. It's really the best of all worlds, you'll screw the difficulty, crash the price, f*ck the noobs, prove that you have access to the power, and you don't have to destroy all our hard work all in one go. Please? +1 BCX, those "fellow miners" on BTC-e are probably SC cultists trying to rile you up. I'm surprised you let them get to you. If you are really going to attack Litecoin because of that, then I will lose all respect for you. You did help me fend off some attacks when Litecoin launched. IIRC, you told me that you thought Litecoin was a fair currency and you didn't want to see it destroyed by those SC scumbags. Has that changed? Why would you try to destroy something you helped protect early on? But whatever. Do what you feel like you must do. If you didn't do it, someone else might come along and try it. At least you gave us fair warning. You go state one thing about SolidCoin, then they show their hatred towards it. The "attitude" is typical teenage behavior. Since most of the Litecoin demographic are mostly teens (who didn't catch the Bitcoin train), you can expect the attitude. Also, its not a good idea to let teenagers run your Litecoin economy. It's Bitcoin-website-cracking amateur hour all over again. |
|
|
|
@coblee
i_rape is Coinhunter
It would take a thousand hammers to get through your thick skull for you to realize I'm not CoinHunter. Sadly I'm out of my hammer-buying quota for this month, they "claim"* the manufacturer can't keep up. *SEE WHAT I DID THERE?! |
|
|
|
I probably shouldn't waste my time responding to a 53-post noob, raper of bitcoin, and socketpuppet of CoinHunter.
You just did. In any case, I have plausible deniability for any of those crazy claims. I wouldn't tattoo my name on your "socketpuppet" (LOL) list on your forehead just yet. Oh, and coblee resorting to personal attacks?!?!?!?!? RUN TO THE HILLS!!!!!!11!! |
|
|
|
What does coblee have to say....
My premines are 290 days old. Just kidding! I would rather BCX not attack Litecoin. Some troll on the BTC-e chat does not represent all of Litecoin. It's silly to attack the coin based on that. I think BCX is just saying this to get a reaction out of people. And she got what she wanted.  |
|
|
|
I would be a scammer if I made a promise and didn't deliver, I will. |
|
|
|
@Coblee
This isn't personal at all but your fellow miners over at BTC-E are taking on some serious Solidcoin type attitudes.
The challenge has a been made and apparently support over there was with them on it, in making a challenge that I couldn't 51% LTC.
Nothing like that to give me reason to resurrect some serious GPU hashpower, build up some EC2's (keep in mind even Coinhunter verfied I had over 700 EC2's running at the SC2 launch), connect up with some botnetter friends and bring some BTC out of USB deep freeze for fees... LOL....
This is fair warning to all.
Challenge accepted.
~BCX~
Seriously? Most of the guys chatting on BTC-E have been in Cryto like a week, tops. They are kids mouthing off asking questions like, "Can I get BFL ASIC to mine LTC?" or other such nonsense. Although it once was a good place to talk about the market, it's recently been inundated with a bunch of amateurs whining about how they can't get rich off of .002 BTC. I understand you're angry but there are a lot of us in LTC that aren't the whinny bitches from the BTC-E chatroom who are working hard at LTC and trying to make something valuable. Don't let a buch of jerks push you over the edge, because really the same kids who are pissing you off, don't have anything to lose by the destruction of LTC. You 51% it, they'll lose their $1 shrug their shoulders and go outside to play in the backyard. I think if you have that much GPU power it would be a more effective to add to the network, blow the difficulty through the roof and kick all the kids out. That way you have the best of both worlds- you screw the noobs from the chatroom by making it impossible for them to mine on their Asus EEE PC's, you support a real project that people really do care about (you say it's not personal at Coblee, but then why destroy something he, and many others, have worked so hard on?) and you can then mine a crapload of coins, dump them on the market, crash the price and walk away with a little treasure chest of BTC. It's really the best of all worlds, you'll screw the difficulty, crash the price, f*ck the noobs, prove that you have access to the power, and you don't have to destroy all our hard work all in one go. Please? A few bad apples spoil the whole bunch. Those are the kids who missed out on the Bitcoin wealth train. They're happy enough to have 100 of a useless coin. "Oh shiny! I heard Litecoin is to Bitcoin as silver is to gold. I'm SOLD." |
|
|
|
Of course I hope you fail and lose tons of money.
Yes, if he ever fails, he will lose income from time his rigs aren't mining Bitcoin. He probably makes a living mining Bitcoin and will be unable to pay his monthly expenses if the attack ever fails. Prepare to see him on the streets. |
|
|
|
30,000 Litecoins are being made each day. It requires 180 BTC being pumped into the economy to support it long-term. 864721.59456702 are up for sale on BTC-E. Who is going to buy that? The non-miners. They will continue to be delusional until they face reality. Also, this is once-in-a-lifetime entertainment you're giving to the pro-Bitcoin community. |
|
|
|
Hey Coinhunter,
Place some SC on me, it might be the first time you ever made money on Solidcoin!
~BCX~
Give or take, I'm not CoinHunter. I did made out with some nice Litecoin mining profits though. |
|
|
|
I wouldn't worry about anything. There are checkpoints built into LTC to roll back to even if the chain gets forked. Nothing is going to happen.
I wish there was a facepalm face I could slap onto this post. He could make some nice money on BTC-E. DO IT. |
|
|
|
Reporting news 3 days after it was disclosed to the public = 100% troll.
Its like me making a thread about Bitcoin hitting $2 today when it happened a few months ago.
u still mad tho
Yeah I fucking am. I panic sold my Bitcoins at $2 at that time. |
|
|
|
|
Reporting news 3 days after it was disclosed to the public = 100% troll.
Its like me making a thread about Bitcoin hitting $2 today when it happened a few months ago.
|
|
|
|
Using firefox:
go to PM inbox (tab1)
open new tab with bitcointalk (tab2)
logout in tab 2
go to tab 1, refresh page
you'll see warning+password prompt in tab 1
login again in tab 2
go back to tab 1, clock "home" link
watch url field, it will include PHPSESSID=aabbccddee112233445566778899
Feels like a potential security risk to me, might be hard to exploit but anyway...
Also, can anyone reproduce this, I've only tried on one computer, otherwise it might not be a problem.
Hi, this is not an security issue. The easiest way to replicate this is to disable cookies, which then the forum software tries to have your session id stored through a query string to maintain a stateful browsing experience. If you have cookies enabled, the session id will be stored in the header "Cookie" which gets passed every request you make. From a security standpoint, this makes no difference as the session id is passed either way, whether you do or do not have cookies enabled. Plus, your connection to the forum is encrypted, improbable for a man in the middle attack to steal your session id and login as you. |
|
|
|
|
