There´s no extra costs or fees when paying with btc -debit card, only 1usd mothly maintenance fee. So far it has been working everywhere just like regular visa (debit) card. If you withdrawal cash from atm, then there is a few euro/usd fee but i personally rarely need any cash nowadays. Sure there are usually some fees when buying btc (to "load" card.) I can change euro to btc without any fees, so i only pay 1usd/month to use my btc card
      I still have some coins i have bought with lower price than it is today, so i like to think it´s sort of free groceries for me But the main reason to use btc is to support btc economy.

Any suggestion place to buy Jacket with BTC guys?
It would be good if ebay and amazon accept bitcoin as their payment. I still looking for trusted place to buy jacket with cool design.

Nowadays i do almost all of my groceries and other smaller purchases with bitcoin debit card. I can pay everything exept gasoline from automated gas stations by BTC. I´m also considering to have (part of) my salary and pay all of my bills by bitcoin. I just need to make sure i buy same amount or more BTC than i spend them monthly

Yes. I spend them in an instant.
I don't have enough money that's why there is no choice.

Actively as in day to day basis?

I don't really, I like to save it up for investments that I most likely will be making in the future

I like to watch it all grow

i spend bitcoins around twice a month as i am more in a saving mode right now. but what exactly do you consider "actively spending"? each day a few times or just a few times per week.

Maybe not necessarily daily, but i mean like every so often, like for me its feeling like once or twice every 2 weeks maybe.

I still think saving them is important, but im part of the spending team so hopefully a few more merchants are encouraged to accept it.

Im actually quite surprised at how even the opinions have been throughout this topic (and reflected in the poll) i think this is good.

whitslack:

There is a schism coming in Bitcoin, due to bureaucratic overreach such as we're now seeing from NYDFS. This schism will not manifest as a fork in the block chain, but we are going to see two classes of bitcoins emerge, differing only in color. We'll have white bitcoins and black bitcoins. Both will exist on the same block chain and will move on the same P2P network, but they won't be interchangeable.
The "white" bitcoins will be those held at addresses for which personally identifying information has been registered in a state-mandated database. Bitcoins held at licensed depository institutions will be white bitcoins, as will all bitcoins moving through licensed payment processors (e.g., BitPay, Coinbase, etc.).

The "black" bitcoins will be all the rest — those held at addresses for which no identity information has been entered into the state's registry. Almost all bitcoins today are black bitcoins, but this will change. There will be incentives for converting black bitcoins into white bitcoins. The opposite conversion will be illegal.
What do I mean by converting? Well, converting black bitcoins into white bitcoins will be easy: just register your bitcoin addresses with the state, either by directly submitting your addresses and identifying information to the government or by importing your private keys into your account at a licensed depository institution.
Converting back the other way (from white bitcoins to black) will be tricky at best and practically impossible for most. The catch is that white-market businesses will be forbidden by law from receiving black bitcoins and from sending white bitcoins to unregistered addresses. Since the block chain is public, the regulators will be able to monitor for violations of this law and will prosecute companies and individuals who break it.
What this means is that there will be two incompatible classes of bitcoins. White-market businesses will not be able to accept black bitcoins; they'll be required to bounce any received black bitcoins back to the sender. Also, they will not be allowed to send bitcoins to unregistered addresses.
Black-market businesses and individuals (i.e., those operating outside the law — not necessarily immorally) will not be able to trade with white-market businesses and individuals. This will cut them off from a large part of the market. They will be under a strong incentive to convert their black bitcoins to white (necessarily paying any taxes due at the time of registration), just so they can do business in the white market.

Once a black bitcoin is converted to white, making it black again won't be legally possible. For this reason, the supply of white bitcoins will grow, and the supply of black bitcoins will shrink. As long as the demand for black bitcoins (for purposes such as use on anonymous online marketplaces) remains strong, there will develop a disparity in price between white bitcoins and black bitcoins. Black bitcoins will have fewer everyday uses but will become much more highly valued than white bitcoins. Black bitcoins will be the only bitcoins with which anonymous transactions will be possible.
The only way for white bitcoins to become black bitcoins will be through theft from white-market institutions. Regulators will shut down such an institution upon observing the theft (which will appear as a movement of bitcoins from registered addresses to unregistered addresses), but in many cases the theft itself would have doomed the institution to failure anyway.

There will be a great incentive for criminals to steal white bitcoins (thereby converting them into black bitcoins) because black bitcoins will be worth so much more. It'll be like an instant multiplier on whatever the thieves can take. Of course, subsequently converting the black bitcoins back into white bitcoins will incur a tax, which will sap the added value back out of them, but if the thieves are smart, they will trade the stolen (black) bitcoins for goods and services on the black market where they can get the most bang for their bit.
TL;DR: If you have the option, don't register your bitcoins. Keep your bitcoins "black." They'll be worth more in the future than if you color them white.

This is exactly why BTC has good chances of being popular!
People do what is more easy, if using Bitcoin is easier/faster than other payment methods. People will be more inclined to use it.
This is why I believe in Bitcoin.

Yes I do, I think that if we do not spend bitcoin stores will never accept it and it will never become mainstream. I do not know how holders are expecting bitcoin to reach massive adoption while they are not moving it, I would love if bitcoin never reached the big price a lot of people is waiting for...

About the first question I haven't told (or better write) that my behavior is the behavior to be followed or it is bad or good for bitcoin. I must accept that don't use bitcoin is not good for it. But I have not money excessively to spent in vain buying bitcoin only to buy something that can be bought with fiat money. Because all the transaction have fee (you know very well this) and never, something who cost 20 us dollar, can be bought with bitcoin with the same price. The fee in buying bitcoin are not few and buying bitcoin to use it for buying something that cost 20 us dollar, with bitcoin will cost for sure more than 20 us dollar because, as I told above and I you know very well in the price with bitcoin are even the fees of the bought of bitcoin.

As for the second question have no meaning to write something about your "explanations" (without any meaning) because the quoted last your sentence is very clear. I have something only for the "lol". The use of this slang (always if you know its meaning) it is one way to go out of the embarrassment situation in which you find yourself after reading my explanation or something that you use when you understand the meaning of something wrote by you that make you to cry (like it is your last sentence)?

A little different the title with the end of your main post. Normally the end of post finalize the title but your's ask another thing. I will try to answer to both questions.

As for the first one (the title) my answer is no, I never use my bitcoin except when I think that their use can bring me other bitcoins. Only in those cases I use bitcoin. Not in any other way or case. Why? Because I think that bitcoin is to valuable to buy the everyday things or even every other kind of things that normally can be bought with my local currency.

Now the final sentence of your posts. According to me you think wrong. Why a merchant must accept only bitcoin in him's store when can use and accept all the kind of money that bring him revenue? I agree that bitcoin must be absolutely between those but why the only? For me and you (who like bitcoin and want to see the use of it everything) this can be good because maybe this can force the people to buy bitcoin if want to buy something that can be found only at him's store. But a merchant don't use this kind of logic in him's activity because if yes, probably will bankrupt. He want profit and use every possible way to have this. And every possible way is not to accept only bitcoin.

Then another thing. I think that people must want bitcoin because they will like it and not because they will be forced to use it (like in the above case if the merchant which must accept only bitcoin). The force of them to buy bitcoin in order to have something they want from the above merchant may have the opposite of we want. The hate of it. It is one thing to have bitcoin or to approach to bitcoin naturally and another thing to force the people to go to it. The second way is risky and I think that can be even wrong.