Latest posts of: DoktorKopf

Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2]

on: September 05, 2015, 07:30:13 PM

Quote from: S3052 on September 05, 2015, 06:28:02 PM It was quite clear that the short term rally started. We clearly saw a triangle formation in our bitcoin forecast Your newsletter has only one suggested position at the moment (from Sept 2): "Get SHORT between 232 $ and 234 $ with a stoploss just above 240 $ and a target of 212 $."

on: March 02, 2015, 11:31:30 PM

Quote from: gentlemand on March 02, 2015, 11:18:58 PM Quote from: bassclef on March 02, 2015, 11:12:56 PM Yeah owning a boat is expensive as hell. Repairs, fuel, rent, winter storage, crew (if you have a yacht), taxes... you need a steady income for something like that, not a one-time Bitcoin cashout. Lotto winners and professional athletes/musicians who come from humble beginnings run into this problem all the time---they underestimate how expensive a "rich" lifestyle is. Not to mention you have family and friends who feel entitled to handouts coming out of the woodwork. You definitely have to be somewhat batty to go into large boat ownership unless you have major money to burn. It's a much better plan to butter up to a future BTC trillionaire, use one's masculine wiles to marry them and then sail away into the future with their gains. If it flies, floats or fucks... rent it.

on: December 08, 2014, 06:12:07 PM

Quote from: empowering on December 08, 2014, 06:00:09 PM Quote from: DoktorKopf on December 08, 2014, 05:48:22 PM The 0.05 aren't fees. I think they were test sends to make sure the address and all else was ok. After a couple of confirms the remainder was sent to the confirmed address to bring it (usually) to a round 5k. Doesn't explain why 5k when that wasn't the lot size. exactly, does not make sense.... it would seem to infer that there was coordination in the bidding, it would seem...otherwise it seems too symmetrical (everyone that won, happened to bid on a 2k lot and a 3k lot) Odd. Unless the coins are going to move again of course (2K to x and 3k to y) Unless multiple addresses belong to the same person/syndicate and the amounts have just been split, still does not explain why all to 5K amounts , (not even sure this is allowed to have winning lots sent to multiple addresses ,surely the gov would be like, yeah that is your job bucko?) It is odd about Draper and his 2K, either he/mirror are the non payers, or Draper/Mirror won more than one bid for 2K, or the coins are still yet to move again (?) But it makes no sense to send a test and then the full amount to an address that is still your own, only for it then to split it again. If the 0.05 was a test, surely these are likely to be a new owner's addresses.

on: December 08, 2014, 06:03:14 PM

Quote from: Fatman3001 on December 08, 2014, 05:57:06 PM Quote from: DoktorKopf on December 08, 2014, 05:48:22 PM The 0.05 aren't fees. I think they were test sends to make sure the address and all else was ok. After a couple of confirms the remainder was sent to the confirmed address to bring it (usually) to a round 5k. Doesn't explain why 5k when that wasn't the lot size. Maybe some bidders won several lots and that's how the buyers wanted them. Maybe, but that means all the successful bidders won a lot of 3k and a lot of 2k (except one lonely single 3k and an as yet unpaidfor 2k) which rather implies that "all the successful bidders" is a very small, if not the unity, number

on: December 08, 2014, 05:48:22 PM

The 0.05 aren't fees. I think they were test sends to make sure the address and all else was ok. After a couple of confirms the remainder was sent to the confirmed address to bring it (usually) to a round 5k. Doesn't explain why 5k when that wasn't the lot size.

on: July 31, 2013, 08:19:28 AM

rwWoV97xXug2sPtBcx1MAGteUYmRcNjtpK

on: July 30, 2013, 04:24:13 PM

Quote from: tuningup on July 29, 2013, 06:10:15 AM can you show us the picture of bitcoin miners? 16 credits?

on: July 30, 2013, 04:13:02 PM

Maybe.

on: July 30, 2013, 04:06:55 PM

>1

Pages: « 1 [2]