Show Posts
|
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
|
I think xtraelv might be trying to help, but he is acting more like a spammer with his crazy large fonts and brightly colored text. I will sum up the only valid part of xtraelv and a few others' arguments in a nutshell. Anyone claiming MoneroV with their private keys should take the liberty of moving their Monero to another wallet before entering the private keys into the MoneroV wallet. There, now there is no chance of losing your Monero. Potential problem solved. So what if MoneroV turns out to be a scam? As long as you take the appropriate security precautions, you will not lose anything. Also, don't forget to make backups! Can people please stop freaking out now?
|
|
|
Blazin, if you stop the daemon and restart, it will probably connect to some different peers who may have more of the chain downloaded. It took me like 4 days to sync the first time, but my balance was wrong. I deleted the db file, re-imported my wallet a different way, and then re-synced (with different peers), and it only took a day the second time.
I tried that several times today. Unfortunately, it didn't help. Thanks for trying though. I did some research today and found out that lowering the block sync size sometimes helps with sync issues. This can especially be true for people with slow internet. I was getting a lot of SYNCHRONIZATION started messages in Monerovd and very few updates on my sync progress. Apparently SYNCHRONIZATION started can indicate that the current block download timed out and was restarted. My internet is relatively slow, so that might explain the problem I was having. The default block sync size is 20, which already seems small enough to me. I didn't think it would help, but using --block-sync-size 10 actually made a huge difference! I'm syncing much faster now.
|
|
|
Wow, xtraelv is pulling quite the stunt. Honestly, how is behavior like that allowed? On a slightly different topic, my MoneroV blockchain sync got much faster somehow. The sync progress suddenly went up by 4% last night. Now I have 1540448/1570171 blocks. That's 98%, which is really something when I've been stuck at 93-94% for the last two days.
|
|
|
There definitely is not a miner in monerovd.exe. Mine rarely uses more than 0.2% CPU.
Anyway, I have finally synced 93% of the blockchain. It took 4 days to get to this point. I have my suspicions that I am being throttled by my ISP, since my 15 mbps connection slows to a crawl even though monerovd rarely uses more than 1-2 mbps. This happens when syncing blockchains for other coins as well, so it isn't just MoneroV.
|
|
|
Thanks for that. I can finally see my XMV balance! My wallet will not finish syncing the blockchain for another week, so I'll be using that node in the meantime.
|
|
|
found it, but the seed from mymonero wallet only 13 word. it want more seed. 24-25 word seed
Oh... you didn't say you were using Mymonero.com. I assumed you were using the official XMR and XMV wallets on your PC. Go to Account>Account Details on Mymonero.com and get your keys and address. Run monerov-wallet-cli --generate-from-keys yourwalletfile You will want to replace "yourwalletfile" with the filename you want the wallet to have. Anyway, the CLI wallet will ask you for your address and keys. That should work (theoretically).
|
|
|
How can i claim my XMV from XMR wallet? I use CLI version. The GUI version is not work on my windows What is the command to import the XMR wallet to XMV wallet?
Run this. monerov-wallet-cli --restore-deterministic-wallet It will ask you to choose a filename and a password for your new wallet first. Then, it will ask for your wallet seed. Enter the seed from your XMR wallet, and you will be good to go.
|
|
|
15 million XMV premined for the 2 devs! Talk about money grab..
Wow, that is just ridiculous. It is a common trend with a lot of new cryptocurrencies. It really bothers me how often this sort of thing happens.
|
|
|
So... my wallet sync slowed to a crawl today. I was getting 5-7 mbps, which was already slow. Now I'm lucky to get 1 mbps. This is just painful. People like me and xoplo82 would probably benefit from remote nodes. I will still attempt to download the full MoneroV blockchain, of course. It will just be a long time before I can use it, unfortunately.
|
|
|
I started syncing the MoneroV wallet last night. I still have a ways to go, thanks to my sluggish ISP. So has anybody received their air drop? I obviously don't know if I got mine yet. I'm at like 98% synced and nothing yet either. we shall see and update as we get there... s2018-05-10 00:30:29.463 [P2P0] INFO global src/cryptonote_protocol/cryptonote_protocol_handler.inl:1167 [1;33m[139.193.154.oooo:54502 INC] Synced 1529403/1566077[0m Yep. Looks like we'll just have to play the waiting game for a bit longer. You're further along than I am, that's for sure. I'm lucky to be at 81% right now. 1279908/1566077
|
|
|
I started syncing the MoneroV wallet last night. I still have a ways to go, thanks to my sluggish ISP. So has anybody received their air drop? I obviously don't know if I got mine yet.
|
|
|
Would you point me to the right direction to get nVidia miner?
The probem is finding the nVidia miner that produces the proper hashrate is almost impossible. I have spent over a month and played around with 5 or 6 miners and can never get more than 70% of what others get on my GTX 1070 (I only get 714 while most coin calculators claim i should get 1100)
You may want to try ccminer-alexis-1.0 with the -i 16.5 argument. I hear it is supposed to get good hash rates on the 1070 and 1070 Ti with that setting. You can find a copy of it here: http://cryptomining-blog.com/tag/ccminer-alexis-1-0/I'm also inclined to agree with Nitrobg on the possibility of a hardware issue if you can't get a better hash rate. Another thing to keep in mind is that your graphics card may simply be slower. Not all graphics cards are equal. You could attempt to get a replacement for your graphics card through RMA, just to be sure that there is nothing wrong. I'm not sure it would be worth the lost profit, though.
|
|
|
Try disabling hardware acceleration in Firefox - it might help to keep the hashrate consistent. You could also lower the intensity at the cost of some hashrate - check the readme for instructions on that. Out of curiosity, does it do the same thing if you use Chrome, Edge, or (shudder) Internet Explorer?
I followed your suggestion and disabled hardware acceleration in Firefox. That seemed to fix the issue. I also tried Chrome, Edge, and IE. Those browsers caused small fluctuations, just not a nearly permanent drop like Firefox did when hardware acceleration was still enabled. Thanks for the tip.
|
|
|
I apologize if the following files are part of the program. IF they are please let me know and I will leave them in when I extract the files. I downloaded this am from MEGA. My computer says the following are potential threats to my computer. Again, I am not sure if they are or not. Please let me know. AND no, I don't think you would put something in your program that would be a virus or Trojan.
Trojan:Win32/Coinminer!bit HackTool:Win64/BCoinMine!rfn HackTool:Win32/Wpakill!rfn
Thank you Penny
That's perfectly normal. Unfortunately, antivirus software almost always freaks out about mining software. Sry i was talking about Cryptonight algorithm. I had that 1700/2000+ on Cryptonight with my vega64 not on Neoscrypt.
I've switched over to the Adrenaline 18.3.1 drivers since my last post. My Vega 64 is achieving 2 MH on average with Neoscrypt now! I just have to restart the miner whenever I open Firefox, because the speed drops to 1.95 MH for some reason. Weird. I'm using stock settings with these changes: -5% core clock, auto voltage 975 MHz memory clock, auto voltage 3600 RPM fan speeds +10% power limit
|
|
|
Screen plugged into vega64 ? I had 1700 till i used iGPU, after that i had 2000+
Oh... so I have to run the Vega 64 headless to get the full hash rate on Neoscrypt? I don't have an iGPU and I don't feel like buying a secondary GPU. This is also my gaming PC and not my devoted mining rig, so running headless is not realistic. Well, thanks for pointing out the problem. Too bad there isn't much I can do.
|
|
|
So... I'm having a hard time achieving more than 1.7 MH with my Vega 64 on the current blockchain driver on Windows 10. It doesn't matter if I use stock settings or the settings other people are using here. I've also done some experimenting with settings myself. No luck. Is there something I'm missing here?
|
|
|
I have some weird problems with Vega. I had 3 of them running on a rig but couldn't get the blockchain driver working. I clean-installed everything and then the driver finally got detected by Cast-XMR. However, power usage was through the roof and before I managed to get the powerplay mods installed, the PSU got overloaded and somehow damaged the setup when it shut down. Couldn't get the stuff running again but found no faulty components when trying them separately in other systems either...
So I moved the 3 amigos into another system and repeated the procedure. Started with 2 cards and this time, I applied powerplay. Now blockchain driver is recognized by Cast-XMR. Hashrate is around 1000 per card regardless of how much fiddling and toggling with devices or HBMC I try. Hashrate for DaggerHashimoto is a steady 44.1 so blockchain driver is definitely in use.
When I try dual mining, I get an instant hard crash no matter the settings with clocks and voltage.
When I connected the third card, the entire system bugged out and wouldn't even post. Had to tear out all GPUs and reset BIOS. Hard to see what that has to do with the driver but I previously had all the cards running in this machine with newer drivers.
The question is why CAST-XMR gets such bad performance. I got better without the blockchain driver.
Personally, I could never get the PowerPlay modifications to work in the Windows registry. They always caused terrible hash rates on my Vega 64. (I think it is also because my Vega 64 does not overclock or undervolt well.) I ended up using Display Driver Uninstaller in safe mode to remove my AMD blockchain drivers and all of the registry modifications. After restarting my PC, I reinstalled the blockchain drivers. I did not apply any SoftPowerPlay modifications or use OverdriveNTool. In your case, HansHagberg, you probably should just disable crossfire and avoid any other registry modifications. R0mi mentioned how to disable crossfire in post #302 above. I enabled HBCC and set the slider to the max 16GB my system had available. I experimented a little with grandalph3000's (a.k.a. glph3k) recommended settings in Wattman. For my Vega 64, setting the core clock to -10.5%, setting the memory clock to 1025 MHz, and setting the power level to -15% was the best option. (-20% power or lower made my system crash.) Those settings got my Vega 64 to 1900 H/s in CastXMR. I hope it helps, HansHagberg!
|
|
|
I just got a 7870 for my rig for cheap. My 1050/1485 OC is turning out to work nicely on it and my R9 270. The 7870's stock core clock was 1100 Mhz, but lowering it to 1050 actually raised the hash rate. Boosting the memory clock from the stock 1200 MHz to 1485 made an even bigger difference. I didn't even have to touch the voltages. GPU GPU's MODEL NAME: Gigabyte Radeon 7870 GHz Edition VRAM: 2GB GDDR5 CORE/MEMORY CLOCK: 1050/1485 HASHRATE: 190 h/s MINER SOFTWARE: CLAYMORE'S ZCASH AMD GPU MINER V12.5 OS: Ubuntu 15.04 TDP(OPTIONAL): 175W
|
|
|
Ok, so here are the specs for my secondary mining rig. It was my gaming PC before I upgraded. Why sell it when I can mine with it? GPU GPU's MODEL NAME: MSI R9 270 Gaming 2G VRAM: 2GB GDDR5 CORE/MEMORY CLOCK: 1050/1485 HASHRATE: 190 h/s MINER SOFTWARE: CLAYMORE'S ZCASH AMD GPU MINER V12.5 OS: Ubuntu 15.04 TDP(OPTIONAL): 150W Edit: Removed irrelevant CPU cryptonight hash rate. This is supposed to be for equihash benchmarks. Silly me.
|
|
|
So... you got everything to work?
|
|
|
|