one more person's mistake that resulted in everything being affected, because after this there will definitely be those who say that krypto is a tool for criminals and a money laundering tool
and again monero continues to be a target, but this is not surprising because by its very nature Monero is a secure, private and untraceable currency system. and this is an opportunity for people who are not responsible for carrying out their actions but this is certainly a new weapon for fuders and anti-crypto to attack

talking about Bernard Madoff running a ponzi scheme actually this goes awry because on the other hand what he does is wrong and makes people follow the way he works in the ponzi scheme so that bad-minded people will follow it to get money in an instant way even though that way is dirty.
On the other hand, this actually can't be blamed on everything in crypto because basically those who do that are unscrupulous and it's only a handful of people who run it so we can't and don't need to judge everyone in this scope. because an action like this is the same as making an article but in it there are several sentence errors and what is deleted is that the article does not replace some of the wrong sentences.
and this of course harms many parties when only some people are wrong, but everyone must be affected.

what I need to emphasize here is to read more about information or all forms related to bitcoin because basically everyone's weakness is that they are too lazy to read or find information about something but they want to profit from it. this is in line with bitcoin, many people want to take advantage here but they do not understand the system and do not learn what the risks are when they are here so they become wrong in taking action and experience losses. and from this psychologically they think that bitcoin will harm them and are too afraid to approach it.
try to improve literacy because this will at least be useful for you in adding to the insight you have here, so you will not regret doing something like this and both your investment and trade will not be in vain

Of course, this is very difficult to realize because there are still many people who have not obeyed the rules and are not aware of the dangers that lurk as a result of this pandemic, even though there have been so many casualties.
and this is a problem that cannot be just discussed because there must be firm action from the government and people who are already aware of the dangers of this pandemic so that those who are still not aware can understand more about the virus that is attacking now.
In addition, healthy living factors must be used as a reference and plan for future life starting from now

Wait a minute, I don't know what you mean by cases involving Monero as well as the government because what I do know is that Monero has been in the spotlight because of cases of Telegram users using XMR to buy illegal pornographic material – many of which involved minors so they were delisted from several exchange.
did I miss the information or am I wrong please explain more about this

some of the specs you say sound pretty good but do you think it's just that simple? I think the government has thought about this carefully and of course they have prepared a strategy not to let this happen.
and when the government is not in a country, will the country be okay? I don't think so because there will be no balance to manage a government and everyone will have the nature to be a ruler and that will not be good it could even be very chaotic

I think the questionnaire that must be asked for a survey like this should be a rhetorical questioner and not an opinion because basically if you do a survey but use opinions with a small sample, it will definitely bring up some opinions which will be very confusing for researchers to narrow down the results of the answers from the survey. .
This is different from rhetorical questions which only need to answer yes or no and this will make it easier for researchers to conclude the survey results.
why a rhetorical question? it is very clear that if the sample needed by the researcher, for example there are 100 people, the results will definitely answer between yes and no, it will be easier to differ from a questionnaire that uses opinions, at least the researcher will get 100 opinions and it will be very difficult to conclude and need additional questions that can make research becomes out of sync and takes a long time

will be okay? I don't think so because you forgot that bitcoin is the benchmark of altcoins even though not all coins are connected to bitcoin but that doesn't reduce the essence of bitcoin as a coin that is the benchmark of other coins.
and if bitcoin disappears it will certainly be a shock for altcoins because in essence if the core is lost then those who follow it will also become extinct and this is not a good thing.
and I always remember the words of Barry Silbert, CEO and founder of Digital Currency Group and Grayscale Investments who said that "besides bitcoin, I don't believe in most digital tokens and believe most of their prices will go to zero".
and from this alone it is clear if we look roughly at Barry Silbert saying apart from Bitcoin, the majority of cryptocurrencies will go down and eventually become worthless.

Speculation is a very natural thing when you are here because it is only a prediction that will happen but of course that speculation must be accompanied by research and observations made so that the speculation that is said can be properly accounted for.
if you just say bitcoin will go up without research, everything can even be a child, but without research, everything will be meaningless.
bitcoin will go up and what we need is patience regardless of when and to what extent only time answer it

what is certain is that as long as there are still many supporters when he tweets anything, his supporters will definitely be followed and it is possible that this will work even though he has to do it extra and his supporters must be prepared to experience similar events like a few months ago. apart from that I don't really care with this if he wants it then go ahead and if not then it doesn't really matter to me because I have my own calculations and not too hype with the fuss he makes even though it is still using it for my personal gain

the dominance and positive trend is slowly starting to return and this brings fresh air to altcoins because this is very influential for altcoins, one of which is eth which rose 4.68% to $2,580, it was eth which was at the beginning of this august and my current resistance feeling will be strong enough for eth to stay awake Eth is up about 10% over the past week and rallied almost 30% after holding support at $1,720 and I'm pretty sure it will continue to creep up now that the negative news is slowly fading aside that's great news coming continuously for the past few weeks

When it comes to decentralization in crypto, it is actually very difficult for the government to interfere in this matter but in connection with regulations, it will be very possible for the government to regulate it because we all know that a country must have various regulations including in crypto and this will seriously injure the system. decentralization itself. because regulations play a very vital role here and we can't do anything when the government regulations are published

I don't think so because a project is seen as a project as well as a white paper and where will the future take the project, even though the people behind the project can also be counted well, but if the project is not clear why should we participate in the hype . yes indeed there are many Elon supporters and maybe for beginners, they will immediately buy without thinking first. but I don't want to be like that because basically everything has a roadmap, everything has a whitepaper and I have to study it first before deciding whether the project is good or not

nothing is certain from the interview because it is only speculative and talks about observations made by himself and that is just an ordinary opinion.
but this is very good for us to look at because things like this we are between believing or not, because believing too much in this is not a good thing to do and not believing is also not recommended.
  Be neutral and make observations with this too because it is important so that you don't miss out if the statement he gives is true and don't regret if the statement he gives is wrong.

it is clear that banks are basically under the control of the government.
it's true it would be great if banks could work with crypto but politics isn't that easy my friend. when an agency is shaded by the government, they will automatically use the rules in accordance with what the government proposes regardless of whether it's good or not because of course the government also doesn't want to lose from this.
and if banks cooperate with crypto, automatic dominance and government monopoly will be a little more difficult because their control will not be strong anymore because crypto is very difficult to control

Actually, if we talk about this, I don't agree with saying that China is two steps ahead of the others. If we say that it is more advanced than other countries, of course, they will not be in second place at this time, they will definitely be the first.
but indeed China's strategy is very good both in terms of technology and the economy. Since the late 1970s the Chinese government has made various efforts to improve its economy. This included making aggressive central planning, taking advantage of the advantages of cheap labor, devaluing the currency, and developing a strong factory system to spread its products around the world.
so here if you look at the strategy they apply it will make sense when they ban bitcoin mining for the sake of advancing their project (CDBC). although this is very hated by people who adopt bitcoin (I am one of them) but they stick with their stance and strategy and I am quite amazed by that kind of thinking

Wait a minute, I don't think it's ethical to compare a high utility coin to a meme coin that only uses pumps and dumps.
it's true if you look at crypto it's very hard to guess it's true but this is different meme coins are pumped in such a way that it reaches there and I don't think we can compare these two coins

The economic financial crisis with the crypto market crash that is happening right now are two different things and there is no correlation between the two. because we know that cryptos like bitcoin and altcoins are not integrated with economic problems directly and indirectly this will not be a cause or obstacle in the economy.
I understand better when the current crisis is caused by a pandemic that has occurred for 2 years now and is still continuing which causes at least losses in almost all sectors.

this is the importance of friend experience. because I also feel the same way and indeed 2018 is a turning point to solidify my thinking, as long as we are still able to hold on and as long as we don't lack anything in our daily lives then I suggest to hold on even longer until your target can be achieved.
but if your target has been achieved why are you still holding on because you have won in the hodling unless you change your target by adding more loads and becoming hodlers again

depends on what you do with the research you make, but in theory actually if you look at the corrections that have occurred over the past few weeks you lose momentum at that time. but to buy right now it's not really a problem because if you look at market developments I think bitcoin will continue to have a positive trend and hopefully before this year ends btc will be back to normal and reach its ath