Bitcoin Forum
July 02, 2024, 06:51:57 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
21  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: how long should it take to show btc in my wallet after sending them? on: March 13, 2017, 06:09:40 PM
I'm confused.  You're talking about it as if you set a receiving address and used them to send?  If you click the send button on Blockchain and do as it says you shouldn't be thinking about what address you're sending from.  Are you sure you actually send these Bitcoins? Can you give the transaction ID so that we can check it?
22  Economy / Micro Earnings / Re: Faucet Rotator - Best Paying Faucets - Constantly updated! on: March 13, 2017, 06:06:31 PM
I'm skeptical.  I don't know a lot of faucets which genuinely pay out over 500 satoshi.  How do we know that all of these are legit?
23  Economy / Investor-based games / Re: Anonymous community «POKGO» on: March 13, 2017, 06:01:41 PM
So essentially, this is a giant Ponzi scheme which is open about its aims.  All you have to do is refer other people, which in turn refer more people, which in turn refer more people etc.

If you have to clarify "Bitcoin is the most popular international cryptocurrency" to the sort of people who are participating in this scheme, they should not be participating.
24  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Announcements (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] StalinCoin ☭ Hybrid PoW & PoS ☭ Free Wealth ☭ on: March 13, 2017, 05:54:34 PM
If this was really based upon Stalin's socialist views,
the 450 million pre-mine would be forcefully taken from the rich
owner and equally distributed to the people.

Please make a wallet for me, deposit my share, sell them for me and send me
the BTC. The talk of socialism has already made me too lazy to do it for myself.

TY - Let me know when my the BTC is ready. I will manage to get out
of bed long enough to get you my BTC address.
Pretty ironic how people created a coin depicting Stalin to make a profit from their 15% premine.  Quite funny really.
25  Economy / Economics / Re: Mining fees will eventually kill bitcoin on: March 13, 2017, 05:49:43 PM
Protip: Internal transactions are free, off-chain, and instant on LocalBitcoins exchange.
I don't think you understand the concept of transaction fees.  You still have to send your Bitcoin to LocalBitcoins and withdraw it, and as long as your Bitcoin is online it's never 100% safe as we learned with MtGox.

Bitcoin transactions shouldn't all be about exchanging it for fiat, otherwise Bitcoin would be pointless.
26  Economy / Economics / Re: Is it profitable to run a Bitcoin faucet in 2017 on: March 13, 2017, 05:42:43 PM
For me, its not profitable to run bitcoin faucet in 2017 because I think there will be no more people will be  interested on faucet because its very cheap and its wasting much time just by collecting mbtc or satoshi. But if you run a bitcoin faucet that makes attract to people maybe there are some but you didn't profitable but its up to you, we don't know what real happen.

You are 100% wrong. Everyday, thousands, if not tens of thousands of new users are being gained by Bitcoin. Many of these new users try to get their first Satoshis from the faucet sites. If you could maintain a faucet site properly, then you can earn decent amounts of money out of it.
Excuse me? where's the source of data and is it reliable? as far as I know that there are none of the methods until now that is proven to be relevant in order to gain the specific and real amount of new users every day.
Even we're now struggling to know the exact amount of bitcoin users around this planet.
You don't need a source of data to state an opinion.  They are right that a lot of new users get their first Bitcoins via faucets - the prospect of free money, no matter how small an amount, is an interesting concept and shows the purpose of Bitcoin as a payment system.  While it is true that faucets practically give dust, this won't stop thousands of people using them every day.
27  Bitcoin / Wallet software / Re: Unconfirmed transaction electrum wallet (jaxx) on: March 13, 2017, 05:38:14 PM
I'm surprised that you've bought as much as 0.24 despite being new, but anyway the fees on your transaction are 53 satoshi per byte - to get your transaction confirmed quickly you should send with fees of over 100 satoshi per byte as the network is under a lot of pressure right now.  With the 373 bytes of your transaction at 150 satoshi/byte it would be about 55,000 satoshi or $0.61.  There's not a lot you can do now that your transaction is sent, but you could try ViaBTC's (or anyone else's) transaction accelerator which will help try to get your transaction into the next few blocks.
28  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: How to know if a gambling site is a scam or not? on: March 12, 2017, 02:15:12 PM
Well most of the time you can stick to trusted sites that are mentioned a lot on this forum and that'll cover most of the games that you probably want to play since most of the major ones are provably fair.

When you need to check, you could ask about the specific site on the forum, or put in a small amount of Bitcoin (0.0001 or so) and fiddle around with it to see how often you get payouts.  Be careful though, there are some sites that pay for small amounts but not for larger ones.
29  Economy / Speculation / Re: EXPERT: Bitcoin has Been Infiltrated on: March 12, 2017, 02:05:15 PM
Im not sure if this is a joke? I stopped watching after her first sentence:

"Bitcoin has been infiltrated. That's why its performance has been so poor."

Classic cognitive bias case. You refuse to consume information that contradicts with your established belief system.
How condescending of you.  Sure, they should have watched the whole thing to form a genuine opinion, but it's hardly going to help a discussion to just question someone's view - instead, you could try presenting more information about your view so that they will hopefully take it into account.
30  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-03-12] Bitcoin’s Market Cap Percentage Continues To Shrink Due To Mounting on: March 12, 2017, 01:58:45 PM
But while its market cap percentage lowers the altcoin community will never settle on one.  There's huge amounts of competition between people who like Monero and people who like Dash, there's people who love or hate Ethereum, people who are loyal to Litecoin or even Dogecoin, and the list goes on.  Therefore even if the market cap of Bitcoin was below half, it would still be the dominant cryptocurrency. 

Still, the news is slightly unsettling.
31  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin/Blockhain is dead. on: March 12, 2017, 01:49:54 PM
There is no problem with bitcoin but with people, and as I am forced to use much higher fees I'll slowly migrate to alts.
Bitcoin won't fade away over night but if continues to perform this way people slowly turn to other coins.
We the users need to support it. I think it's an temporary issue which can be sought out in a short when the systematic approach takes place after the long time debate comes to an end. If we move to alts we too are indirectly supporting altcoins and making bitcoin degrade it's value.
Very much directly supporting altcoins, I would say.  Which is okay if Bitcoin is incapable of finding a solution.  The surge to altcoins won't happen though, because no one will settle on one specific coin and therefore the coins won't have proper usage.
32  Bitcoin / Mining speculation / Re: mining not profitable - why?? on: March 12, 2017, 01:10:53 PM
If mining is not profitable, and you never make an ROI, then it doesn't matter whether or not the price of Bitcoin goes up, because you would have been much better off earning your Bitcoin some other way - you could have worked for fiat and converted it or done something which would earn you more - frankly, even a signature campaign would probably earn you more than mining right now with a small investment.
33  Economy / Economics / Re: bitcoin benefit of saving for a long time? on: March 11, 2017, 10:57:03 AM
Bitcoin is naturally designed to be a deflationary currency, it's the same as any normal investment in that people buy it in the expectation of the price rising so they hold it until it does (or trade it, if they're clever/brave enough to handle the volatile market).
34  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Do you always missed the right time to sell/buy bitcoin? on: March 11, 2017, 10:40:37 AM
so true, I just missed time to sell bitcoin
It is really hard to predict what the price of the bitcoin is going to change, even when experts say that it is going to go up sometimes they are wrong, just like what happened in January when the price went from $1100$ to $700 in under a day, that is when we missed the time to sell and rebuy and people though that it was going to keep going up.
True, you can never really be exactly right with the time to sell except for one lucky trader.  What we are fairly sure of is that since the price is going to keep going up over time, our investment is safe.
35  Bitcoin / Press / Re: [2017-03-10]Let’s Be Real: Bitcoin is a Useless Investment on: March 11, 2017, 10:33:27 AM
Bitcoin is a great investment, because the value will continue going up in most situations.

A lot of investments only have the value which people give them rather than solely based on how useful it is, but Bitcoin is very useful.  It's going to become more popular.
36  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: LARGE FEE 1 BITCOIN on: March 11, 2017, 10:26:40 AM
I just sent from mistake an 1 usd transaction and added 1 bitcoin fee , I write an email to http://ghash.io/ to wait for an answer let's see what will happen next

https://blockchain.info/tx/51f0a018921a8ce8bd9ec5be8fbd146fb7c2e467905203277b255d3f11a89a09
I'm curious, exactly how did you end up creating this mistake? What wallet were you using?
According to some people posting here OP was using the Blockchain wallet, which is particularly weird since I've got warnings from Blockchain on fees that are even slightly too high.  I'm not sure how OP managed to make this mistake, it's not too easy to do.
37  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Bitcoin has no competition on: March 11, 2017, 10:07:51 AM
Depends what you regard as a competitor.  Among cryptocurrencies, Bitcoin has no competition.  But Bitcoin has several functions, and some of these are taken up by other things (such as gold).
38  Other / Politics & Society / Re: Negative effects of technology on: March 11, 2017, 09:52:46 AM
I think that in moderation, technology is a good thing.  I don't really agree that children just sit around on technology, I think that this is an exaggeration of the actual situation as young people are still genuine individuals and don't restrict themselves.
39  Economy / Services / Re: [PROMOTE YOUR BIZ]INSTAGRAM SHOUTOUTS|WIDE-VARIETY|CHEAP RATES[PROMOTE YOUR BIZ] on: March 10, 2017, 10:27:48 PM
How am I supposed to believe any of this information when you won't actually give the name of the account or use the forum correctly?

EDIT: ignore the forum bit, that was based on something I saw a minute ago
40  Economy / Speculation / Re: SegWit losing Bitcoin Unlimited winning -> Moon soon on: March 09, 2017, 09:00:48 PM
I think it's laughable that Core supporters won't stop whining about Roger Ver, as if he were really some kind of Bitcoin Boogeyman.

The fact that one side has to engage in personal attacks & smear campaigns against the other side is really, really telling.

It is a sign of weakness if you have to slander your opponent with blatant lies and exaggerations.

This is one thing I noticed a lot of coming from the Segwit side.  From previous experience in other situations similar to this, it doesn't paint a pretty picture of what they have to give to the public.
I think that doesn't necessarily say a lot about the actual people who are in favour of SegWit.  There will always be people on both sides of anything who are nasty about the other, but this doesn't say anything about what SegWit itself is actually presenting to the public or about the majority of SegWit/BU supporters.
Pages: « 1 [2] 3 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!