US dollar vs gold - overvalued 40% compared to other fiats

US dollar vs video games - 40% overvaluation vs Argentine peso

You're basically looking at the very definition of a Ponzi scam when people think the price going sideways is considered abnormal and that something is wrong if the price is not always going up 24/7.

Talk about the epitome of self-righteous retards.  Since transaction validators are designed to centralize and tokens are non-fungible, and it's not even possible to create a decentralized digital shitcoin in the first place (distributed!=decentralized), it's impossible for the endgame evolution of any non-fungible shitcoin to be anything besides a permissioned ledger, Chinese social credit score, surveillance system that empowers the state.

Ted Kaczynski was right, and you are both wrong and fucking stupid at the same time, not to mention a self-righteous jackass pretending to be the greater good when you're in fact evil incarnate by promoting this garbage and trying to trick other people into using it instead of real decentralized money like physical metals.  Since you have the intellect of a small, retarded child, let me make it REALLY FUCKING SIMPLE for you:

Non-fungible token with designed to centralize chokepoint transaction validators = always dystopia, always permissioned ledger in the end, always empowers the state (aka Bitcoin)

Fungible tokens without designed to centralize chokepoint validators = disempowers the state (aka physical metals, a crypto equivalent does not exist because it's impossible to create)

There's a lot of Ethereum tards posting on Twitter now claiming that money is "a social construct".  Yea...no.  If you claim money is a social construct, all you're doing is promoting the legitimacy of things like the Jewish Federal Reserve note.  Money is not a social construct.  Currencies are a social construct, but not money, which is required to be a physical commodity resource.  Resources are not social constructs.  They achieve value through merit of their own usefulness and not just opinion or deception.

Currencies are worthless confidence game scams (Ethereum, Federal Reserve note, Bitcoin) which seek to achieve relevance through this 'social construct' side channel attack.  The attack occasionally works temporarily, but always implodes back to zero on a long enough timeline.  In a tri-metal system of gold, silver, and copper in the present day, free of manipulation and deception, it's possible, or even probable, the market caps of silver and copper might evolve to be higher than that of gold due to offering higher utility as resources.

In the old days, a similar effect seemed to happen with silver constantly encroaching upon gold's value until it was manipulated back down.  For instance, silver had higher liquidity than gold because it was used more in day to day use, and since it's easier to buy a loaf of bread with smaller denomination silver than large denomination gold, silver actually had more utility in this manner.  If you bring an ounce of gold to the baker and he can't make change, it's utility is effectively zero.  Fast forward to today and there are now several workarounds to the divisbility issue, but both silver and copper's intrinsic commodity usefulness has blown way past gold, so it's possible their monetary market caps could also reflect that in the future.

Anonymint knows what he's posting is complete bullshit because you can't have a sky high Bitcoin price without mining cost of production expanding by orders of magnitude to match it.  If we go by the same metrics as the last pump and dump scam hitting around $20k with $3k cost of production, for Anonymint's "$1 million Bitcoin" claim after just a single halving, you would need the equivalent of $150,000 cost of production to facilitate the same pump and dump scam to $1 million.

Current cost of production would be around $6k after one more halving, so mining would need to increase by 25x.  Such a mining expansion number is laughable with the amount of power Bitcoin already uses.  Even doubling the current amount of mining would be sketchy.  If you look at any mining capex chart, the chart looks like a baseball that has been thrown and has already hit the top of it's arc and flatlined for a long time with no signs of going anywhere, because Bitcoin mining is already a giant bubble of football stadiums full of ASICs using more power than entire countries in the first place.

I been sailing the Bitcoin seas for many a year, spending me days spreading terror and fear.  Now it's time to acquire tons of gold and silver galore, and disregard posts from Lauda the whore.

Jbreher, fuck off with your tiny Bitcoin blocks.  We already have unlimited blocks and built-in pruning in physical silver.

Gavin in 2019, shilling for Coinbase and Ethereum lol (is this a paid ad?):

I was all-in on Bitcoin at $200 and viewed it strictly as gambling.  The fact you're all-in on Bitcoin at $8500 and view it as not gambling is laughable.  I know most of you are complete fools and have brainwashed yourselves into thinking the price can only go up and never down, but the fact that the price was MUCH MUCH lower just very recently means it can collapse back down there again, especially considering almost all of it's upward movement was fraud and manipulation by a single entity on Bitfinex along with their Tether scams and other BS.

No, it is not impossible that the price could collapse to 1/10th of what it is now again in the same way it was artificially manipulated upwards.  Lots of Chinese communist miners go bankrupt, but there's nothing in the protocol that says Chinese communists are too big to fail. Yes, it will also cause a chain freeze and Luke Jr will crawl out of his basement saying he needs to hardfork Bitcoin exposing the entire thing as a centrally administered, non-autonomous scam, but that's what I've been telling you people it is for years.  Looks like shitters will learn physical metals are the base of Exter's Pyramid soon and not imaginary, valueless timestamps:

Even if Bitcoin had some type of fundamentals - it doesnt, transaction validators are designed to centralize, has built-in, rent seeking middlemen, is non-fungible, and doesn't remove counterparty risk, so a permissioned ledger by default - and even if the price wasn't a giant manipulation fraud bubble originating from a single entity on Bitfinex, I don't give a flying fuck what 'asset' it is, there's no way in hell I would be all-in on something that's currently $8500 and was only $200 a couple years ago.  

That's like being a retail sucker lining up to buy Peloton IPO for the scammers that originated it to get infinite profits and leave you holding the bag.  This is why even if Bitcoin is a carefully crafted government scheme to try and fool retards into adopting a cashless society slavery system where everything they do is tracked in real-time like cattle instead of using physical metals, the simple fact that they pumped it from nothing to infinity in such a short timespan will make it so everyone will view it as a laughable pump and dump scam, an enormous risk, and refuse to touch it.

Terminator game that came out today looks good:

What a joke of a world. JP Morgan blow-off top for no reason as banking profits collapse (besides graft from govt):



But who do they actually sell this trash to?  What good is a price with no liquidity?  Are pensions being forced to auto-buy this shit?  Or is the plan:  attempt pump and dump, no buyers, everything implodes, demand bailout at top dollar pump and dump rate.

Do this:

Well, I'm not a woman so I wouldn't attempt to poison the tree in it's sleep.  Like the famous German philosopher - Adolph Hitler - I would launch a swift, Blitzkrieg attack and tackle the tree with brute force.

Hmm, which to pick.

Roundup - causes cancer

Organic, natural insecticide Neem oil - causes impotency if ingested, but will simultaneously cure scabies