|
looks like we're no longer a secret. hashes are starting to jump!
|
|
|
|
|
We are multipool resistant right now but once we hit a flat rate of 1000/block we aren't going to be anymore. What do you guys think is the best option to remain mulyipool resistant?
|
|
|
|
We added it for two reasons we wanted more Sha256 coins and I like the game addition concept.
Why not a scrypt-jane coin like microcoin. I don't think you have any scrypt-jane coin |
|
|
|
|
Cryptsy is getting over crowded with shitcoins what coins do you think should be delisted and why? I'll start the list
1. Americancoin: No network support, No development, No marketing
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
|
|
|
|
The goal was to get the coin trading against both ltc and btc but the owner of the exchange decided he doesn't want same coins in both markets. Almost every coin on cryptsy is paired against btc and ltc, so idk what your talking about when you say its a dying coin if its traded in both markets. If you guys want it traded against btc then why don't you try to have a community vote and tell the owner of the exchange. This coin is young anyway, look how long quark was on the market before it exploded and it was instamine crap. So imagine the levels we could hit in 6 months
Way to re-write history. The guy said he was only going to put up one pairing on the exchange. You selfishly voted for an LTC/MRC pairing because you personally owned LTC and wanted to trade for it and the guy listened to you for some reason. There's no reason to have an LTC pairing instead of BTC pairing. It needs to be changed back to BTC/MRC ASAP. Coins that are both ASIC and multipool resistant are capable of replacing LTC entirely. It's outrageous even suggesting such a pairing as the initial trade medium on an exchange. just shut it already I did want it traded against litecoin yes but I wanted placed against both markets just like cryptsy does. And if you only knew you stand a way better chance profiting from LTC than Bitcoin at this moment I would rather own 1000LTC that goes to $100 then own 10btc that goes to $2k. Why cant you guys just be like Halibit and I and hold your coinage it seems the only ppl complaining are the ones trying to dump their micro. This is not a shitcoin be patient buy more, mine more, reap the rewards later. |
|
|
|
The goal was to get the coin trading against both ltc and btc but the owner of the exchange decided he doesn't want same coins in both markets. Almost every coin on cryptsy is paired against btc and ltc, so idk what your talking about when you say its a dying coin if its traded in both markets. If you guys want it traded against btc then why don't you try to have a community vote and tell the owner of the exchange
I dont understand anything against LTC at all.. what is the point? It is only good for someone catching arbs in ltc - shit X btc - shit.. no other reason for it.. and if coin is not even worth of 1 satoshi, then it is utterly shit.. ppl want btc to become currency and how will they deal with things that are cheaper than 1 satoshi?  Netcoin opened up against XPM was worth .00003xpm and the price rocked all the way to .000047btc, so I'm not concerned if the price is worth less than 1 satoshi right now because this coin is superior to doge, net and all those other instamined coins, and will see success for sure. Why don't you look at it as a buyers opportunity? Personally im not buying right now because I can mine more paying for the electricity then buying on an exchange but once mining becomes more expensive then buying on an exchange I'll probably reverse rolls and start buying micro with btc |
|
|
|
^ join mcr.blocksolved.com they have the best pool. I mine about 1.6-1.8M/day with 4-5mhs/s. I noticed on minersbest and nut pool I get atleast 200-300k less coins per/day. I use radeon 7950's
Yeah look at the variation in coins generated per day for the same hashrate: Nut:  Blocksolved:  I've been mining since the start on Nut - would be disappointing to find out I've only got half the possible earnings - hopefully it's just a calculation thing - I'll have to test both pools for actual earnings... Well I have been mining this since block 1, tried all 3 pools and I know mrc.blocksolved has worked the best for me. I had a hire payout with 80mh/s on the mrc.blockedsolve pool than 120mh/s at minerbest pool.. I don't know why it worked out that way but im sticking with them |
|
|
|
|
The goal was to get the coin trading against both ltc and btc but the owner of the exchange decided he doesn't want same coins in both markets. Almost every coin on cryptsy is paired against btc and ltc, so idk what your talking about when you say its a dying coin if its traded in both markets. If you guys want it traded against btc then why don't you try to have a community vote and tell the owner of the exchange. This coin is young anyway, look how long quark was on the market before it exploded and it was instamine crap. So imagine the levels we could hit in 6 months
|
|
|
|
^ join mcr.blocksolved.com they have the best pool. I mine about 1.6-1.8M/day with 4-5mhs/s. I noticed on minersbest and nut pool I get atleast 200-300k less coins per/day. I use radeon 7950's
So Mr V is number 4, Halibit is top dog :-) Stay clear of http://mrc.idcray.com:8888ha I'm ranked 9 on my pool only because whales haven't come yet. Theres so many coins now days I don't think they know what to mine. |
|
|
|
|
^ join mcr.blocksolved.com they have the best pool. I mine about 1.6-1.8M/day with 4-5mhs/s. I noticed on minersbest and nut pool I get atleast 200-300k less coins per/day. I use radeon 7950's
|
|
|
|
WTS 10,000,000 MRC for 1 BTC or 40 LTC. Will sell in halves (5M for .5BTC/20LTC) but no smaller trades. Cheers
There going for 1M/1LTC on the exchange and that's on the high end. Some miners are mining 15Million/day with 12mh/s scrypt rigs. 15ltc/day with 12mh/s is impossible mining LTC. Based on your price a 12mh/s rig would be mining 75ltc/day. Moral of the story your price is 5x over market value especially considering the block rewards are elevating to 160k/block. I know I shouldn't feed 'em but these numbers are rubbish. I have a rig (5x280x) which does give or take 4mh/s for scrypt. That pulls ~1.5M MRC a day. Thus a 12mh/s 'scrypt' rig mining scrypt-jane at the current difficulty and nfactor would pull in around 4.5M a day. Not 15M. It seems there is 0.042 million available at 'market price'. I could inflate 'market price' 10x with less than 100 bucks lol.  If you're not interested that's fine & go about your business, but don't try to dissuade other potential buyers / keep the price depressed for your own motives. Funny how you only show the sell order side and not what buyers are actually bidding, but anyway I said 12mh/s scrypt with scrypt-jane that would amount to 24mh/s fool. Check the pools ppl are mining 10-15M/day with 24mh/s which is really a 12mh/s scrypt. You could inflate the price but you'd be the only one buying high. ohh and in the market place there was a sell 50M for 1.5btc much better then your 10M for 1btc |
|
|
|
WTS 10,000,000 MRC for 1 BTC or 40 LTC. Will sell in halves (5M for .5BTC/20LTC) but no smaller trades. Cheers
There going for 1M/1LTC on the exchange and that's on the high end. Some miners are mining 15Million/day with 12mh/s scrypt rigs. 15ltc/day with 12mh/s is impossible mining LTC. Based on your price a 12mh/s rig would be mining 75ltc/day. Moral of the story your price is 5x over market value especially considering the block rewards are elevating to 160k/block. |
|
|
|
Looks like network diff is rise 30% till lastday.
That sucks lol now im mining less and I don't have a lot of hashing power lol |
|
|
|
|
I placed my bid a 0.00000021ltc if profit miners ever get a hold of this coin they are going to dump it to hell.
|
|
|
|
|
couldn't come up with a unique name of your own. theres like 3 netcoins already
|
|
|
|
|
yes it was instamined but it was on the market for months cheap for everyone. Who would have know a coin with a horrible ass name would hit it big
|
|
|
|
|
I keep getting logged out are you getting ddos
|
|
|
|
|
Intsa-mined crap that's why
|
|
|
|
Is the SSL okay for everyone? I saw it once just after I did a bit of an overhaul to address the lag--not unexpected--but I haven't been able to get it back, so I assume it's okay now. It wasn't any kind of security breach, just SSL being finicky about domains.
I'm still not seeing the https/ but the cite is working just fine |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
