I found a description in the readme at github. It looks like it isn't hi-pos:


That sounds pretty interesting. I might be glad I stumbled on this one tonight.

There is a way to solo cpu mine. But you need to find the right mining program for your OS. Then you just point the cpu miner at your own client if you have your conf file set up correctly. This is an X11 coin. There are several tutorials on the web.

The network hashes are already 11 GH/s. It's not worth frying your CPU unless you mine to a pool.

You need a CPU miner too. It depends on your OS as to which one you use.

By the way, nice launch devs, it's been smooth sailing from the start.

1. Why are you calling it "turbo stake" instead of "hi-POS"? What's the difference?
2. Why are there no pool operators on this? Where is everyone?
3. This is ninja? Why don't you say it in the ANN?

You can also try adding rescan=1 to the conf and restart. If you were staking on a fork, particularly during the hipos phase, you will have a ton of coins. It doesn't mean you lost many coins. The fork happened very near the end of hipos, so the balance you would have had mining on the correct fork wouldn't be too much bigger than not mining on it.

There does seem to be a fork out there. One of the biggest causes may be from early on when it was suggested to add a suprnova node to the conf. This suprnova node is not on the right chain. It's possible to fully sync the right chain by removing all addnode entries from the conf file. You have to delete all database info from your app dir after you quit your wallet and before you start again.

Fucking windows bullshit. I'm really sorry to hear that. Don't use your disk until you find that file.

The operator of themultipool.com needs to read this faq: https://www.nicehash.com/index.jsp?p=faq#faqb3

It's impossible to submit SHA256d hashes from nicehash right now. I think that is the reason.

I was going to put 9 hours of 5 TH/s and get paid in graph then donate the entire sum to the faucet. I'll try a different algo, but the pool operators need to address the pool difficulty issue for SHA256d.


[edit]

Because of the problem above, I'm mining about 24 hours of scrypt at 0.1 GH/s, payable in graph and will donate 100% of that to the faucet.


[edit 2]

I finally got on with SHA256d. We'll see how it goes.

The latter is your first post ever. You've caught knives on every coin judging from your posts. You either can't pick them, have terrible luck, or love to troll. I can't tell which from your post history. All I know is that they are all sad choices. 

Unless they were in on the flash mine, they wouldn't have been able to sell their dpos interest to cover the principle. The most they could recover is 25-30%. In terms of average price versus dpos rewards, they could sell at 8500 and break even. I don't know what mining costs were, but (1) I don't think they were much better than the average sales price and (2) miners usually sell early. This is long for them to hold because the dpos was not very high.

One thing I will agree with is that people like to get a jump on selling after a high interest period. This time, unless they are some of the lucky few who caught the dump to 7500 or mined very early, they probably lost some money.

They are dumping for a loss here in order to buy a coin that someone is dumping there. Sounds like a good plan. 

Bittrex: "This market is in danger of de-listing due to low trade volume and lack of user interest. It may be removed on May 22nd unless the average daily trade volume for the last 7 days exceeds 0.2 BTC."

Because of the roadmap, I've been following this coin since the the mining period. The only people who could dump to 6500 and still make money would be those who were in on the instamine. Anyone in on the instamine would be a dev. It's clear that these devs are good enough that they could simply make little releases and dump their bags on real support. They wouldn't have to be that good for a plan like that to work.

If that wasn't the devs, the dumpers lost money because that's an all time low for this coin on any exchange, even with dpos which could have bumped their holdings by maybe 25% at most. I don't think the devs would be dumb enough to dump themselves out of 10-20 BTC like that, but devs can be pretty dumb about trading, even when they hold the cards. They might have seen the lack of buy support after their paper wallet release and panicked to get out. We'll see if they come back and make more releases. One thing is certain: they will need to produce real tech to get this coin noticed. Paper wallets won't cut it. My guess is that they are not paper wallet devs, but I could be wrong.

Whatever you say, sport.

Yes. That's the problem. Somehow resolution of https://explorer.graphcoin.co/ works only intermittently for me and usually goes to the web wallet. I did click on the rich list when the explorer popped up once, but I got a 404. It looks like the server is ngix.

That looks very nice Dev. Most wallets that have integrated statistics are just webkit front-ends to an online resource that someone else put together. This looks quite professional.

Thanks for fixing the explorer link.





Where do you see a richlist? I believe the graph at bittrex is for bittrex accounts only. I could be wrong.



[edit]

It looks like there is a redirect problem with https://explorer.graphcoin.co/ . Sometimes it shows as a block explorer, but most times it shows as the wallet upon refresh. It's probably a server configuration issue dealing with vhosts.

Thanks for the update Dev.

Stake more coins total.

That's the link the OP gives for the block explorer. The OP should have the correct link.

Also, the wallet is called "explorer" in that link. It's confusing even if the OP were correct...which it isn't.

Why do you have to make an account to get to the block explorer?

That is an unnecessary barrier.

https://explorer.graphcoin.co/