I offer to tighten the rules, and if the team, or bounty Manager, will spread projects on which there are no such things as a whitepaper and a team, then such companies are immediately marked in the trust as negative, and the opening of the flag is considered.
I not really sure who's the main purpose of this suggestion for, whether is it for the forum or the community itself (BM and hunters) but somehow I disagree with giving negative trust when they decide to not reveal the whole teams behind the project meanwhile there is some of group keep develop the project seriously while they are staying in anonymously. Well, I'm not against that most anonymous projects are suspicious enough since there are more chances of it being an exit scam, that's why you need to always keep an eye on such kind of project when you invest in it. About the team Yes, there were some companies that did not want to disclose their identities and showed good results, but in this case it would be good to put forward the requirements of a full-fledged site with a roadmap, with all the data and whitepaper, and if you look at the current companies, many of the site consists only of "buy tokens" or "connect wallets and swap" and all the site is created as soon as possible |
|
|
|
I agree with your idea and further there should be a provision of having an escrow and option to get paid in btc eth and stable coin as part of the payment so only serious projects and dubious one can be distinguished easily
On account of the escrow funds then I difficult situation, very few people will agree, many companies are just starting development, and they have only their own tokens which they produce, and only them can pay, and these proposals think podtolknut of the company and managers, to take or not to release the bounty if there are no criteria, maybe even as an option to those engaged particular person to whom you are sending for consideration whether there is a whitepaper and team or not, and then goes to the forum |
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone, many people may have noticed that recently quite a lot of bounty and airdrop companies of a dubious nature have been placed, if during the ICO companies adhered to the rules of having a whitepaper team descriptions, then in the defi era many simply ignore these rules, thereby exposing investors to the risk of losing funds, as the company's analysis becomes harder!
I offer to tighten the rules, and if the team, or bounty Manager, will spread projects on which there are no such things as a whitepaper and a team, then such companies are immediately marked in the trust as negative, and the opening of the flag is considered.
I think it will be a little safer for investors, and bounty hunters, investors will save their money, and hunters time !
As for the airdrop itself, it would be good to create a separate branch such as the bounty, and I would also like to prohibit users with the status of "novice" to create topics in the branches "bounty" and "airdrop" as scammers spam the branch creating new users
|
|
|
|
what a stubborn swindler, every day I mark 2 new accounts and report them  |
|
|
|
marked and opened the flag to beware, please support, such scammers should be removed immediately) |
|
|
|
He was a success in the Scam deleted all branches, deleted telegram chat, cleaned everything, a so claimed that he is not a Scam artist |
|
|
|
_snip_
You're right, he changed the withdrawal address to random. Just tried to request deposit on the 1st account 40 times and always generate new addresses and do the same for the 2nd account and both of them don't have the same address. But he forgot that the privkey should also change every time it generates a new address so it won't be too suspicious.  I just realized there is a joke exchange account that provides up to 40 deposit addresses with one privkey. Haha Oops, he just launched an airdrop program using another account. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5287075And yet so rudely and impudently trying to deceive that it's all slander in his direction |
|
|
|
As long as people like you make their conclusions without proof,and others listen to their words.Cryptocurrency will have no future.You will not let the community know if the project is good or not.You’d better talk about projects that promise millions of dollars and you are happy to wear a signature and advertises,and then just write that you spent time
It is your right to freedom of speech
But,before evaluating projects,you really need to get proof that it is Scam,and you cannot find out whether the project will be scam or not
I can assume that after you saw this topic, then you either corrected or temporarily changed it, realizing that IT REALLY WAS, or do you think that many people are just stupid and it all seemed to them? I personally also checked my addresses, and they matched the address of the topic's author, or do you think I'm an idiot and can't compare the address? I'm sure you noticed all this too, but instead of apologizing and saying that everything is fixed, you start being rude, this is not good! These actions already show that you are not trusted!! How long does the project run? If there is a technical development of the project,then Scam? Or maybe if the project is temporarily not functioning,too, Scam? I repeat once again,this is a new project and it must improve.There is no work on the project,no future for the project Write what you want,for adequate people your words are empty.They will observe the projects and eventually understand who is Scam and who is not Good luck this is a gross, unacceptable mistake that led you to such results, and instead of solving it calmly, you only aggravated your situation, as I understand you really noticed this error, but did not admit it immediately, and began to accuse that you are slandered ! I am sure that almost everyone who saw this topic immediately checked their addresses with the address that is specified in the topic, and NO one will just write something that matches, and now I can only wish you good luck in your promotion with this behavior ! |
|
|
|
As long as people like you make their conclusions without proof,and others listen to their words.Cryptocurrency will have no future.You will not let the community know if the project is good or not.You’d better talk about projects that promise millions of dollars and you are happy to wear a signature and advertises,and then just write that you spent time
It is your right to freedom of speech
But,before evaluating projects,you really need to get proof that it is Scam,and you cannot find out whether the project will be scam or not
I can assume that after you saw this topic, then you either corrected or temporarily changed it, realizing that IT REALLY WAS, or do you think that many people are just stupid and it all seemed to them? I personally also checked my addresses, and they matched the address of the topic's author, or do you think I'm an idiot and can't compare the address? I'm sure you noticed all this too, but instead of apologizing and saying that everything is fixed, you start being rude, this is not good! These actions already show that you are not trusted!! |
|
|
|
WARNING THIS PROJECT IS A SCAM !! STOP ADVERTISING THIS COMPANY PUTTING OTHER PEOPLE IN DANGER ! Are you sure? Maybe you need to register 2 accounts and check addresses? Where you can see danger? This project give free tokens and pay every Sunday or can you register 2 accounts yourself and take a look ? all information is checked more than once, and go to the topic and answer there Already register and I not see same addresses.I have various addresses go here and answer there, there is not a single answer from you |
|
|
|
WARNING THIS PROJECT IS A SCAM !! STOP ADVERTISING THIS COMPANY PUTTING OTHER PEOPLE IN DANGER ! Are you sure? Maybe you need to register 2 accounts and check addresses? Where you can see danger? This project give free tokens and pay every Sunday or can you register 2 accounts yourself and take a look ? all information is checked more than once, and go to the topic and answer there |
|
|
|
WARNING THIS PROJECT IS A SCAM !! STOP ADVERTISING THIS COMPANY PUTTING OTHER PEOPLE IN DANGER ! |
|
|
|
|
I didn't get it right, but do you pay for 1 video as well as for a tweet on Twitter?
|
|
|
|
|
That everyone saw the red trust, after I published the topic, and opened the flag, I waited a week or so, and wrote in the group, the answer was cool, almost everyone began to defend them with the words " and what is plagiarism? Many projects use plagiarism, etc." that is, EVERYTHING is ABSOLUTELY the SAME, they do not understand that they are paid a penny, they are lured out, thanks to them, larger amounts from other people, this is sad..
unfortunately, many people are stupid and blind, chasing a couple of pennies, they can miss out on a lot more, not thinking about their reputation, not realizing that it can bring much more profit by earning it, but they are blinded by these pennies,
|
|
|
|
|
Forum name: shef198911
Forum Rank: member
Telegram username: @shef198911
Free TON Forum username: shef198911
TON Surf Address: 0:43f4062a4f94ae9085bea8600313230231626ba715caa7f7bf36c7f2df75de77
Wear Appropriate Signature: Y
Wear Personal Text: Y
Wear Avatar: Y/N
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
