Lol. Check my more recent posts. You know as well as I do I sold my shares in AM a week ago for a twenty percent profit. Using false information to forward your own agenda just shows how weak your argument is.

And FYI, I brought DRK @ 0.014 and sold at 0.043, then got into XC @ 0.003 and rode the wave up to 0.0045. So yeah, nursing a huge hangover today and will do to again tomorrow, But not for the reasons you expect.

Enjoy.

~95% of these unregulated securities have lost money for investors--through theft, exchange closures, theft and exchange closures, honest incompetence, honest incompetence and exchange closures... the reasons are irrelevant.  Therefore, I'd hazard a guess that ~95% of said investors could have used some help, no?

There's a small chance that said intrepid investors and finance aficionados intended to lose money, (perhaps to get back at Teh Man [see: Daddy Issues] or some humiliation/sub/SnM fetish, don't know, don't judge), but, unless these fora are breeding grounds of social deviance, I'd say we're still close to 90%.

But you're not one of those 95%.
No.
You're different.
Happy investin'

On a side note, holy fucking shit. I'm not going to go into this now but holy fucking shit.

Should be a very prosperous week

Pretty strange a retired daytrader is not remembering the very early bitcoin days. Why exactly did u retire? ^^

Blockchain 2.0? I'm assuming this is the decentralised application platform?

Hey guys,

As a future investor. Serious question. I'm not trying to promote any sort of arguement or debate, this is a one sided question and I'd just like a straight answer.

Why is XC technologically superior to DRK? The more detailed answer the better.

Thanks.

Hey guys,

As a future investor. Serious question. I'm not trying to promote any sort of arguement or debate, this is a one sided question and I'd just like a straight answer.

Why is XC technologically superior to DRK? The more detailed answer the better.

Thanks.

more technical details on XC coin,just organize the dev's post:


For those looking for some more details... check out the link, our design incorporates some of the features from dual path paradigm concepts, although we are advancing this concept to be multi-path paradigm, and we will implement on top of tor to provide a high level of anonymity

http://eprint.iacr.org/2009/385.pdf
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdf


The principles for this concept come from a design that I originally leveraged back in 2005,[multi-path paradigm] the system still runs to do this day handling 50k to 100k users per day


also the infrastructure for this will support numerous other applications, such as encrypted messaging, P2P exchange..etc granted we can only develop new features so fast, but we are putting the foundation for a multi-use, multi-purpose platform

one the of the details we are still working out is the autonomous "supernode" function and best methods to prevent bad-actors.. We have implemented PKI and will leverage that as part of entire solution

DRK didn't "invent" supernodes or the concept, and while some of concepts are similar and/or overlap, we are on a different path than DRK and as we refine the platform, it will be clear why our design, implementation and infrastructure is superior as we will have autonomous supernodes using PKI that can scale up and out to become a distributed anonymous application platform


This is why the multi-path paradigm network I built back in 2005 still functions to do this day and scaled up to meet the demands of 2014... think back to 2005, granted we had the internet, but not the mobile technology - and that is a key part of my background is mobility that will be leveraged in the android anonymous POS wallet

I forgot the other PDF that also reflects some key concepts in our design, take note of the dual-path communications, XC will use multi-path



http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1208/1208.3022.pdf



These are shown as reference material purposes only


Compiling the last build of the night... I will be uploading shortly.  The good news is that the features outlined in the visio are fully implemented and 100% functional as designed.  The bad news is I'm exhausted and was not able to update the QT side so you will need to use the console via the debug option on this windows release.

the command is

sendfrommixer <account> <X11address> <# of XC>


so example


sendfrommixer "" <X11Address> 1



if you have multiple accounts with labels, put the label inside ""

Limit your transactions to 1 XC or less for this current phase

This is beta software, please exercise caution

stupid question.....what is <account> ?


so when you create a new address in your wallet, you can give a label, by default the first account has no label so you would use ""

but if you make a separate account just for this, you can enter a label during creation and then use "my_label"   (quotes needed) with the command

No, mixing is only part of it, XC now contains a completely new transaction protocol layer that is encrypted and will be leveraged as a platform for all sorts of concepts.... and it will leverage multi-path paradigm topology (which again is a custom developed concept based on dual-path paradigm)

So mixing is just the first application to run on top of this new protocol........


I wanted to provide some more answers about the decentralized anonymous solution and how it will work


- 100XC to 1000XC's Required (#'s still being vetted)

- Any client having the required XC's can enable xnode option (windows, mac & linux wallets)

- xnodes will charge a fee which will be deducted from the transaction and kept in the local wallet << incentive based >>

- no masternode or supernode required to communicate xnodes to clients

- fully decentralized


Hope that answers all the questions, the majority of the code is already in the wallet and I expect a release supporting these features as outlined above to be available for testing in 3 weeks or less

Thanks.

Retired day trader here though. Definitely not new.

Good luck with that.

http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/v2/pair/xc/btc/poloniex/10-days

I've been waiting to buy in, will wait till it gets to 0.001. You can thank me later for the headsup.

I don't think you know what trolling is. Calling out all the people who've come to another post to hype XC, and letting them know that XC is on a much bigger bubble than DRK was, that's not trolling. That's telling trolls the truth.

XC is near the top of a bubble allot bigger than DRKs was. The only people getting into XC are the panic sellers and the panic buyers, none of these 'big players' you think you understand.

Exactly. First mover advantage is huge. XC missed the boat. All the articles in all the major websites are talking about darkcoin as the anonymous coin, not XC. XC will have to be three times the coin darkcoin is to make a name for itself now, and I don't see that happening.

It's funny, I'm pretty sure all the panic sellers who have sold DRK went to buy XC and are now here hyping it to protect their investment and to validate their choice. Seriously, if you believe XC is such a good coin why do you need to come to its bigger brother and brag?

Are there people in the XC thread bragging about DRK? Nope. In the same reason bitcoin supporters don't go over to litecointalk to tell them about how much better bitcoin is.

Surprised you are saying these things, Evan is a one man band and I have faith XC is doing some interesting things and is worthy competition which has to be good.. To dismiss the coin like that is childish...