I do, I'm using both paid and free services.
"But if you are a winner, why are you selling t?! Win by yourself!". I read a lot of stataments like this. IMO people in crypto have the wrong attitude to paid tipsters. In the fiat world, almost all bookies are soft bookies blocking any winning players. There are very good tipsters who are selling their tips as an additional source of income. BUT (huge but) a good tipster need to have a proven stat, average odds, not using any martingale bulls** and so on.
|
|
|
IMO Wales will win with 1-2 goals difference, but I'm expecting a goal from Hungary. I'm betting: Wales vs Hungary Both To Score/Winner - Wales @ 4.1 Germany should be O1.5 for sure, but I'm not so confident about Scotland to win. Good luck with your combo Thank you. I do hope none of the selection go wrong however I have this experience all the time that in my multi selection I am too close to win and one team will cause the lose ultimately. Hopefully it will not repeat today as well 😜 It's already done with 2.90 odd. Congrats for your win! I'm missing a goal from Hungary to hit this @ 4.1... next time. The Germans crushed N. Ireland and Scotland scored in 90+ for you. It was exciting to watch
|
|
|
It's not the first phone coin at all. Electroneum is 2 years old now.
IMO it's not worth at all - to mine. I prefer to keep my phone 'clean'. And the phone's price is close to a mid-level desktop miner (P30 Pro). Maybe will worth just to buy some small amount, in case it becomes at least successful as Electroneum.
|
|
|
I have a treble combining Wales, Scotland and Germany vs Northern Ireland.
Wales and Scotland to win and in the Germany vs Northern Ireland match I have over 1.5 goals. I wanted to have Belgium and Netherlands in my selections but the odd for these two teams are so annoying that I decided not to go with them LOL
IMO Wales will win with 1-2 goals difference, but I'm expecting a goal from Hungary. I'm betting: Wales vs Hungary Both To Score/Winner - Wales @ 4.1 Germany should be O1.5 for sure, but I'm not so confident about Scotland to win. Good luck with your combo
|
|
|
IMO it's not a myth. It's more likely people are not ready for.
Centralization creates volume, liquidity and so on. Not only on exchanges but in any market. That's why you have a middle-man in almost every business who makes centralization and then liquidity. At food markets, at crypto exchanges, at fiat currency exchanges, etc.
Platform evolves and we are witnessing more and more useful DApps. IMO DPapps are the 'true' future and I'm investing every free resources in it.
|
|
|
I've noticed that you are offering deposit bonuses again. Please make some clarifications: 1. 1st deposit bonus requires simply an x40 turnover or there are any additional conditions like max bet size, etc. 2. Do you plan to implement KYC for the dice site?! P. 22 of your terms:
|
|
|
Already bought some but not because of any graphs. I'm not a fan of technical analysis on such speculative markets like cryptos.
My bought was because IMO DApps will eventually move over centralized Apps and TRX (with EOS) are the strongest players on this relatively new market.
|
|
|
The site has a modern look and I like it. It's fast.
Noticed few bugs:
1) Bitcoin Cash is showing Bitcoin sites. 2) Peercoin is empty, and Cryptogames are accepting it a few months ago when I was playing there. 3) BlackCoin, Cardano (ADA) & Nano are empty too...
Nice looking site with few other minor bugs. It would be nice to see other modern sites like Wolfbet, Roobet, etc...
|
|
|
I am not comparing sport betting odds between two gambling websites. I am comparing the odds between two selections that are exactly same as each other in one website. Here is an example from Turkey vs Iceland match which be held on November 14. (Odds are taken from sportsbet.io)
0-0: 9.40 under 0.5: 10.89 Exact goals=0: 10 which team to score=none: 11
Turkey exact goals=0: 4.50 Iceland Clean sheet: 4.40
Iceland exact goals=0: 2.24 Turkey clean sheet: 2.33
Any team to win=No: 3.50 Draw: 3.70
Turkey to win=No: 2.03 Double chance=Draw or Iceland=1.95
Why the odds are different for selections that are completely same as each other?
I guess most people don't understand what you are asking at all... This is because bookies need to balance their Odds/Books. Here is some info on the topic: https://www.soccerwidow.com/football-gambling/betting-knowledge/value-betting-academy/odds-calculation-en/how-do-bookmakers-tick/https://www.onlinebetting.org.uk/betting-guides/how-do-bookmakers-set-odds-and-make-money.htmlLet's assume that all OP examples have the same starting odds. Like 11. 0-0: 11 under 0.5: 11 Exact goals=0: 11 which team to score=none: 11 Now, when somebody places a bet, the bookie needs to balance. Because of a sloppy software, using an external liquidity provider, not properly connecting markets with the same outcome, or any other reason, you see this: 0-0: 9.40 under 0.5: 10.89 Exact goals=0: 10 which team to score=none: 11 The best you can do it just to take the best odds
|
|
|
Announced like this
"In this month, we will be having a free bet on a minute just stay tuned for we will hit it randomly and it will be made only 3times as a whole"
NOPE. I'm not going blind for a restless month.
But if they announce something like "$1000 in free bets for anybody, within a certain minute in the next month". Yep. It's worth it. Especially when I have friends across all time zones...
|
|
|
Dani Olmo scored on his Spain debut yesterday. Keep an eye on that one, he plays for Dinamo Zagreb in Croatian league. Dinamo produced some true football superstars and Olmo is probably next, the fact that he received the call to the national team while playing in such a weak league is a sign of his quality.
Yes he is, and this is the right way to make selections for the national team Not a common practice in our country, unfortunately... we have seen generations of players who never got their chance to play for the national team, guided by the corrupted football federation (CFF) - cause “C” is not for Croatia, but for Corruption It's not that bad. You need to see corruption levels in Romania and Bulgaria. But they ruined the beautiful Krk with EU money. I remember what was ~8-10 years ago and what is now. You can see 10+ motors/cars on every pedestrian-only area in an hour. Anyway, I won most of my previous qualification bets and today I have the courage to go after big odds again Croatia vs Slovakia Both teams to score & O2,5 @ 2.65
|
|
|
Kosovo ML @4/1 right now can't resist, I'll take it, Kosovo are not a bad team, and they'll definitely put up a good fight against Czech Republic. I'll parlay that with Turkey vs Iceland - BTTS and England to score in both halves, which give me total odds @15.5. Wish me luck!! Turkey - Iceland Iceland Total Over 0.5 @1.67
This is the last chance for Iceland to get into the qualifying spot If they will achieve that, Idk, but, one goal will score fore sure
Iceland needs to win no matter what to qualify, while Turkey only need a draw. I think it's very likely that we'll see some goals from both teams tonight. Best of luck! Now it's even 5/1 to Kosovo... but I will skip it. Kosovo may be one of the power surprises this year, still, the Czech team is much stronger. I will play it BTTS & O2.5 @ 2.25. Odds may be much lower than a clear Kosovo win, but it's much safer.
|
|
|
I just test it and I like it. Bybit currently has 35% of the Bitmex volume on BTC and nearly 50% on the ETH/USD which is very good!
Sorry, how do you count? And what do you think all orders are real? Many equal orders can say more than any investigations Well, numbers are from their own sites. At least what Bitmex & Bybit are giving... Are the numbers manipulated, it's another story. Current Bitmex @ BTC: 24H Volume 1,383,153,078 USD Open Interest 821,992,112 USD Current Bybit @ BTC: 24hr Volume 470,111,901 Contracts Open Interest 172,149,044 Contract Value 1 USD
|
|
|
I just test it and I like it. Bybit currently has 35% of the Bitmex volume on BTC and nearly 50% on the ETH/USD which is very good!
Does anybody know do Bybit become 'unresponsive' like Bitmex on a sudden price movements? I'm talking about those moments where the Bitmex API is returning "Busy" and you can't even cancel your orders.
|
|
|
I may experiment with a little Monero mining after they switch to a more CPU friendly algo, but that's all.
Decided for me that ASIC games are not for me. I don't know how regular people, paying regular electricity costs, still manage to compete with the big farms...
|
|
|
Referral program Refer other people to our casino and get bonuses when they sign up, play games or make deposits.you receive 0.05$ per sign up you refer and 20% with deposits Usually, provably fair sites are paying their referrals on a wagered amount. On the other side, you are promising !20% from deposits. How can you afford this?! With 0.5% the user needs to make x40 turnover just to cover your referral expenses! The last site with 0.5% HE (Safedice) doesn't exped up well. I wish you better luck
|
|
|
Tonight I'm going after another goal surprise:
APOEL vs Qarabag
betting
Both teams to score & O2,5 @ 2.65
Your thoughts?
|
|
|
I see it now that it was the reason why Tezos is skyrocketing today. The price has moved so quick as this news pop up. I remember someone who became wealthy with Ethereum and he suggested that he's picking up Tezos and waiting for it to pump.
I guess that guy has picked a decent coin and knows what he's doing.
Yep, it's close to +40% today because of CoinBase. Currently, the Coinbase staking program is only for Tezos and they are promising ~5% which is not bad. But I expect a dump in a 2-3 days after the initial FOMO and hype.
|
|
|
Zenit surprised me badly ending the first-half with only 35% ball possession and just a single corner...
Let's try again another game where I'm expecting aggressive plays tonights:
Borussia Dortmund - Internazionale
Over 5 corners 1st half @ 2.14
and
Both teams to score & O2,5 @ 2.32
|
|
|
category "will be offering"
What do you mean? I meant - I'm no longer biting on paper projects. Until I see it working or at least MVP, it's just FOMO and I'm staying away. Not for Stakenet specifically, more like a general rule I'm following after 2017.
|
|
|
|