BlitzPay Chrome Wallet is very nice!
I can't wait for the android and iOS versions!
Keep up the great work Blitz team.
|
|
|
i suppose there will be a swap ocupy coin -> blitz coin @bittrex?
the name and ticker will be changed this week!
|
|
|
Wish I would have held. Gonna keep my eye on it. Maybe get back in.
buy soon, don't wait too long ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
those poker chips are pretty sweet ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) i'll buy some
|
|
|
awesome comics ! fibreman is great
|
|
|
Awesome guys thanks for the update!
I think we might have another blockchain fork. After checking with clovis, my client is behind on blocks and my withdraw from bittrex hasn't gone through.
Be careful sending coins in the meantime everyone.
Any updates on this possible blockchain issue? Anyone else experiencing similar issues to xrobesx? i think everything is okay, and it was just my client.
|
|
|
I only got a couple of referrals just sending to close friends at this early stage who I know are into crypto so I only got 50 gems. That was a few days ago when I updated. But I thought airdrops we're going to be daily so I figured I would see small increases daily?
Maybe it's still the first part of the rewards is implemented which is the invitational system, the second and third part maybe not yet https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jJ-vn9WHcyt2vV4mz03LJFf3d6F3TSxJYEznFrycArg/edit#heading=h.d17rvfhp8dh2I was wondering if it's possible to implement a feature like Shapeshift which gives you the ability to changes currencies pretty much instantly without signing up to an exchange. This can be great for a simple in app swap from Gems to BTC and BTC to Gems https://shapeshift.ioI like the Shapeshift idea, but first they would need to add Gems to the site.
|
|
|
Awesome guys thanks for the update!
I think we might have another blockchain fork. After checking with clovis, my client is behind on blocks and my withdraw from bittrex hasn't gone through.
Be careful sending coins in the meantime everyone.
|
|
|
And of course, Getgems offers what facebook NEVER can, decentralization. Users rewarded to grow the network and get paid by advertisers. This is why Getgems is the best there is out there.
The only question is is the public smart enough to realize that or will the sheep continue to let facebook reap the rewards??
I was thinking about GetGems having a short advertisement, where 2 parties a girl and a boy are part of it. One of them goes to a coffeeshop where it accepts bitcoin and he/she realises that he forgot his wallet so he brings up GetGems and starts chatting with the other party and asks her if she can send him some money in 10 minutes and she sends him bitcoin showing the getgems wallet (maybe a glimpse of its earned gemz/referral or advertisement model. So he/she goes and buys a cup of coffee paying with bitcoin while another customer is amazed how that worked while holding fiat/change in his hands. With the GetGems outro 'Messaging that Pays'. Its a pretty short ad and something that hasn't done yet even in the bitcoin space and actually not that hard and the fact that it also supports bitcoin it will be well received. that sounds awesome! That really would be a great scenario to show the benefits of GetGems and Bitcoin.
|
|
|
Can't wait to see FibreLock implemented in Ocupy wallet!
I hope the multisig wallet error is sorted out soon. I wish I could claim that bounty.
|
|
|
Ocupy have just created a Slack Channel, please email me on cryptoprivacy@gmail.com to receive an invite. Also a channel has been created on Supernet Slack for Ocupy, email info@supernet.org to receive an invite. Thanks and hope to see you all there. glad to hear, look forward to being invited
|
|
|
nice work! just found out about ocupy.
You may wish you didn't. I had a friend of mine help the devs in return for some payment. Weeks later still no payment has been made.. These guys are jokes. I'd stay away if I were you. If you want more info bud just PM me. this is a great dev team, i'm sure thats not the case. Please PM them and I'm sure they'll sort it out. No need for FUD.
|
|
|
So there was a 19 btc worth of gemz buy at 0.000057, do you think he got himself a good deal?
Once iOS, QR-code (Pay & Receive) and additional multi-sig address link to account are up and running he'll or she'll be laughing his/her arse off at 57 even if BTC keeps its uptrend. What do u mean by multi-sig address link to account? Can you give an example using getgems? Well, as was suggested in earlier road map ideas, large GEMZ holders would probably not want to keep all GEMZ on the "HOT" address, the the dev team intends to allow for an additional address to be added, this address could be assiged as the address used in award calculation and other perks which are balance related. I'm not comfortable with just another counterparty address and would like this address to make use of counterwallet multi-sig functionality (once they get that to work at counterparty), so GetGems would have to be able to recognize balances on counterparty multi-sig format addresses. Is Counterparty really that weak? Seems to me it's a safe as any other bitcoin wallet possibly more. And my 'hot' wallet doesent seem that weak either. I would have to lose my phone and not know I lost it, and someone understand GEMS know my PIN number or my long address password, so if you don't have your password on your phone it's almost impossible to know your pin in a few attempts and I beleive it shuts down after a few? I'm not saying its weak(er) than other regular bitcoin addresses, but to weak for storage in my opinion. There is a reason multi-sig is gaining rapid ground and all wallets start working with it including counterwallet. It's pretty much already considered a standard in keeping any assets or alts safe. Problem right now is with counterwallet is that I can put GEMZ (or any asset) in a multi-sig address but can't get them out.. counterparty tech support is looking into that. offline armory wallets work well for me in the meantime. I've tried armory addresses a few weeks ago, then armory didn't recognize the unsigned transaction.. I've tried it again yesterday after your post and it now seems to work - to bad I need two signatures, the other addresses are counterwallet, multibit and or blockchain.info which are all still an no-go but now I'm half way there, thanks for the heads-up. no problem, I feel your concern about keeping the majority of my GEMZ in cold storage.
|
|
|
So there was a 19 btc worth of gemz buy at 0.000057, do you think he got himself a good deal?
Once iOS, QR-code (Pay & Receive) and additional multi-sig address link to account are up and running he'll or she'll be laughing his/her arse off at 57 even if BTC keeps its uptrend. What do u mean by multi-sig address link to account? Can you give an example using getgems? Well, as was suggested in earlier road map ideas, large GEMZ holders would probably not want to keep all GEMZ on the "HOT" address, the the dev team intends to allow for an additional address to be added, this address could be assiged as the address used in award calculation and other perks which are balance related. I'm not comfortable with just another counterparty address and would like this address to make use of counterwallet multi-sig functionality (once they get that to work at counterparty), so GetGems would have to be able to recognize balances on counterparty multi-sig format addresses. Is Counterparty really that weak? Seems to me it's a safe as any other bitcoin wallet possibly more. And my 'hot' wallet doesent seem that weak either. I would have to lose my phone and not know I lost it, and someone understand GEMS know my PIN number or my long address password, so if you don't have your password on your phone it's almost impossible to know your pin in a few attempts and I beleive it shuts down after a few? I'm not saying its weak(er) than other regular bitcoin addresses, but to weak for storage in my opinion. There is a reason multi-sig is gaining rapid ground and all wallets start working with it including counterwallet. It's pretty much already considered a standard in keeping any assets or alts safe. Problem right now is with counterwallet is that I can put GEMZ (or any asset) in a multi-sig address but can't get them out.. counterparty tech support is looking into that. offline armory wallets work well for me in the meantime.
|
|
|
The new wallet never makes it past "Initalising Tor Network..."
It just hangs and turns to not responding every single time.
Did you delete all of the files and folders in the application support folder except wallet.dat? every time
|
|
|
The new wallet never makes it past "Initalising Tor Network..."
It just hangs and turns to not responding every single time.
|
|
|
Last block generated 2015-02-27 22:27:29.
That was 17 hours ago. What's the dealio?
I noticed block explorers are catching up after some time @ocupydev proper block explorer is needed like https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ please consider it You think it's just the block explorer? I made a withdrawal from Bittrex this afternoon and hours later the tx ID they gave me is still not on the blockchain according to the block explorer, nor is the address to which I made the withdrawal (it's a fresh address from a fresh wallet.dat). The block explorer says block 150140 from almost 24 hours ago, yet my wallet client says it is on block 153506 and my coins still have not shown up. So my question is, am I on the right block? And if so, how might I go about getting my coins to show up in my wallet? Bittrex says the matter is out of their hands, as their OCUPY wallets are showing the same as the block explorer, that no blocks have been generated in almost 24 hours. Hi, One of our team are looking into this. All of our wallets are currently on 153510. But the blockexplorer and Bittrex Status page show 150140. Please PM me the TX ID my wallet shows up to block 150166 and says its up to date edit: now block 150255, but i've mined almost every block in the past hour
|
|
|
Gems Team, please update whatever it is you did before. I can't see the amount of GEMZ in my app wallet again. i believed this is due to another update on Telegram's side?
Thanks.
I'm pretty sure that's a counterparty issue. same problem for me, no worries though it should be fixed soon.
|
|
|
AHHH crap!! I got my 104 fibre stolen to FMCDHNonod5XL3T8HV2FBpnoR1zqyEePP8. What i the best way to keep my coins safe? and do i need a new wallet address if the hacker have my wallet?
Got 0.51660078 FIBRE left. that mother F
Got also my first bitcointalk account hacked my name was tokona.
The best way to keep them save would be to encrypt your wallet with FibreLock
|
|
|
got some of my withdrawals confirmed after submitting a ticket at polienex.... some not though[edit: another one completed]....and no answer to the ticket yet. @gemsteam and @gemscommunity: we should get some other altxchanges onboard just in case (for trading matters). Although I think that dex is the best alternative, realistically there should be centralized ones for the time being. What is a good one in your opinion? Bittrex?
Bittrex just started trading counterparty assets, SJCX now has a market. We should try to get GEMZ added as well
|
|
|
|