Going to keep the minimums the same for now.
The game will start 30 minutes after the end of this one... there will be a timer.
|
|
|
It's really early to call it, but I agree on it feeling like that.
I thought it was a good idea, but now that I can see how it plays out, I'm not sure. We're all afraid to put anything in, since most of us missed the boat. I put in a tiny amount anyway, assuming I'll lose it, but I still won. Others are probably thinking the same thing. For those of you not wanting to play, just try a tiny amount, you might be surprised. If the goal is to reduce the volume, to discourage people putting in the max deposit, this might do that.
Ok we can try with 50K max .... and known start times... the ads are running so there is alot of new people coming
|
|
|
It would be nice to have some kind of time window for when the round will start so I'm not just mashing F5 all day. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Just started!
|
|
|
err if my deposit shows up in the address but not on the players list have I lost my ltc?
And again we apologize for the inconvenience. We tried to improve the game with limits changing and that is what caused a bug. Luckily it is all verifiable by bloc chain so your deposit is safe in its original order and there is plenty of time to get paid.
|
|
|
err if my deposit shows up in the address but not on the players list have I lost my ltc?
Had a freak bug due to limits changed.... thanks for bring it up all fixed! The power of the BLOCKCHAIN!
|
|
|
whats the most anyone has lost at your site...thanks
I think when we had higher limit of 500K someone might have lost that. Y do you ask?
|
|
|
Hm... I have not thought of random start times and end times... not sure that would work
|
|
|
Whats with #41-#51 getting paid while #14-#40 don't?
Paid last 10 shibes out of own pocket because one greedy shibe with 200K held up the line! Also trying random starts with little warning to see if it will change dynamics a bit!
|
|
|
I'm not positive I understand, but if you're pointing at a transaction in the blockchain that won, but appears to be late, then I can answer that one. The time you see on dogechain is when it makes it into the blockchain, ponzidoge works off the time the transaction is seen on the network (0 confirmations). I say that because when the round starts, a few second later and you'll see a whole buch of deposits, there's no way it is checking the blockchain if it sees things that quickly.
Thanks for answering this! Thats exactly right!
|
|
|
Here is a bump for you... thanks for ripping the text and tables from our site and using our language. I am flattered...
Not close enough to being as good though! Don't accept cheap imitation... play the original ... in the sig!
|
|
|
Ok, cool, will be participating. Also if anyone wants to play using Doge, see my sig ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Wow so the imitations keep coming! I am flattered!
|
|
|
Thanks for troubleshooting it, I think I can improve the clock a bit then. Just give seconds left to the countdown timer... would probably be alot more reliable.
|
|
|
doge started 10 seconds early again. It was spot on for 2 rounds after I reported it before, but after that they start up early. sometimes 10 seconds, sometimes 15. I keep reloading at the 1 minute mark so I haven't been screwed because of it, but I'm just reporting it.
Yep so the problem seems to be on client side because of javascript browser ... countdown implementation. Will try to see if possible to send clock time directly to client over socket or something like that.
|
|
|
Strange problem... because we use server time and give it to Javascript to display.
I thought it was cloudflare caching so we disable javascript caching.
Not really sure what it is ... will investigate. For sure the issue is with java-script processing and it can be on your browser.
Also, Can you post the link to the the bitcointalk litecoin thread in /r/litecoin
I think the 14 day long ponzo with low limits has high potential!
|
|
|
It sure served as a good learning experience, so you have ideas ready to go if ponzidoge gets the same problems when that eventually fades. It boosts confidence if you state you will cancel rounds if there's not much activity, then nobody feels like they might be the only "investor" and just automatically lose.
PonziDoge Doge is rocking like usual so we are going to keep rocking it like it was! Why fix something that is working good! Starts tommorow @ http://ponzidoge.comLitecoin Ponzi News ( http://ltcponzi.com ) We lowered the maximum deposit to 3LTC and the returns to 110%. This way out of 100 equal players 85 will win! We are also going to run the LTC for 14days just to give everyone a fair shot! Lets hope it works! If the game is under 5 players in first 5 minutes we cancel it and refund everybody minus the transaction fee which is .001.
|
|
|
how about if the round doesnt get 30 players then you pay them out to 100% from the 5%/+30/too late pool.
and ditch the 200% at the end, unless it never comes out of the general pool.
Hey thanks for the input. Not sure what this means "100% from the 5%/+30/too late pool." If the game is under 5 players we cancel it and refund everybody minus the transaction fee which is .001. What we did is lower the minimum to 3LTC and the 110% for returns this way out of 100 equal players 85 will win! We are also going to run this for 14days just to give everyone a fair shot! Lets hope it works!
|
|
|
|