Took a deep thought after reading about the whole article and it all made nonsense to me other than that this is just one of many other mechanisms in place by this serving (more of a ruling) administration to sensor and gag Nigerians from boldly criticizing the scattered limitations and deficiencies of their administrative policy through the use of the social media which has been the main channel through which we expose them to outsiders who the government media is deceiving by feeding wrong information about the country.

Since a lot of Nigerians don't use their real names in opening social media accounts it makes it difficult for the government to decode who is really behind a certain social media accounts that is constantly criticizing their unproductive policies and programs, so by connecting people's social media account to their bank account through KYC requirement it makes it easier to decipher through the bank accounts who's really behind a particular social media account.

Another means to enroll fear of attack into the citizens, but am sure this move won't work because, it goes against individual right to privacy and, it's impracticable on other hand been that social media is a community that is prone to scam attacks which is not something that is safe practices by linking our social media account with our bank accounts.

It's not really about the  how ease it is to download the gambling apps even if they put some hurdles any interested person in gamble will find his/her way at all cost. One thing that I see that is attracting more and more teens to gambling in our society today is due to their high consciousness and awareness about money and this makes them keen to easily get interested to engage into anything that promises to offer money, and that's what gambling does, it makes you believe you could seamlessly make some cash from it with just sheer predictions and catching fun.

Maybe when parents and every other person start shaping a different mentality into  their child and wards about how they perceive money they will be guided against getting involved in just anything just to make money.

We have been so crafted to believe that money is just everything nowadays, so how do we not expect the teens not to get involved in gambling growing up with these ideas. To gamble you don't need any qualifications, skills, experience neither will you go through any interview, and this makes it a great option for nay teen looking for money to take his or her chances in order to get that bicycle or video game he or she needs.
 
Implementing a gambling prevention education won't make that sort of positive change as many will be thinking it to achieve. The truth is that morals and ethics are quickly depleting among many things we teach our kids these days, and this makes them unable to know the boundary between adult activities from those of kids. They just literally want to try everything they can lay hands on.

Having gotten used to the word bitcoiner overtime, the word bitcoinist sounds strange to my hearing even though the
ist makes some sense as found in other conventional words.

Perhaps as we progress and bitcoin gains more larger acceptance even into the academic community to be studied as a discipline or field with different scopes (in theory and technical), we will be addressing academicians that study bitcoin to specialized in bitcoin as bitcoinist.

In as much as for now bitcoin is not studied as a an accredited course in schools (am open to correction if its already has),  I think it's fair  stick to the word bitcoiners as users instead of bitcoinist as one who specializes in the study as a profession.

Bringing in new players to the Arsenal squad to me won't change much a thing in results at the end of the next season,  as that's not really what  Arsenal main problem to winning the league holds. Reminiscing on the previous season and this very season how Arsenal performed from start to finish I discovered much similarities in both season's leaving them to a second place on the table with Manchester City coming from behind at the eleventh hour to whisk the trophy away.

Arsenal players are no doubt outstanding and incredible but they are deficient of what I call "a long standing winning mentality", among the squad. What Mikel Arteta ought to do against next season is to see how he can work on the mentality of his boys about endurance with every  each player understanding what it means by carrying the team on your shoulder.  That's the mentality with which Gardiola has refined in his boys, that when they play they play like a team that's aggressively hungry for victory even with or without their key players presence.

With the absence of key players like Kelvin Debruyne and Haaland as a result of injuries, yet Manchester City kept on raking points with Phil Foden and Bernardo Silva manning the ship like nothing happened. Also just compare the passion of both team:s coaches in games how they do react in every moments on the field, you will see the mentality of the coach reflecting in the players.

That was Chelsea, though I won't denote them to be a favourite losing team for me but in this just about to be concluded EPL season Chelsea was one of those team's I find ease to bet against in the beginning and some parts of the mid season in the EPL, cause they had a very poor start and it was as though they've already lost a match before it begun, but thanks to the improvement they have recorded recently.

In the case of Mr Tsitsipas it is what any gambler will be more than glad to take advantage of in getting a bet win as nobody really loves losing their bets even under fun. I am beginning to have the hunch that sports men with attitudinal problems finds difficulty in reaching to the top of their games in all competitions in their career. Not that they lack the connoisseur needed to excel excellently in that field but they for no just unexplainable reason struggle to reach the peak.

---

Maybe, Mr Tsitsipas needs to see this op about him here and make some redresses to his lifestyle as I would be more than glad to see him succeed beyond his standing records, because from what have read about him he's a fine tennis player.

VAR is just a technologic machine and doesn't act on its own according, it's rather humans that controls how they want it to work as at when they want and there could be some form of bias based on different interests of those in control.

Maybe I will say the idea to incorporate VAR into the EPL for a smoothie fair games wasn't bad, the problem is that those behind the curtain are introducing biases into the VAR decisions and that's what is sparking the revolt for the scrap by those that it doesn't favour.

In my opinion, let VAR be scrapped from the EPL and let have the football games as it were , cause the VAR referees have just changed the landscape, only allow us to see what they want us the fans to see when they want to make decision in many cases case, that wasn't how football games were.

Op, e clear malaria wey been hold you really strong!

Though we the focus the talk on cryptocurrency but conventionally anything investment be it real estate, bonds, stock, gold etc, wey person mind dey to invest the first thing wisdom demands be say the investor go first do him own research to obtain verifiable information about that investment before him go decide whether to put head or not based on wetin him don know.

Na ignorance the make plenty of this newbies the jump jump from one  coin to another, and na this ignorance the feed their greed for fast means of catch out.  Until newbies into cryptocurrency start to imbibe the habit of being patient and eager to learn not until then they will keep falling as prey into the hands of these shit coins with the small small money wey them get.

 Moreover sef, if you feel say you no wan  sit down the look as you don come inside the industry, then why not just first invest the small money you get into bitcoin way sure well well, while you dey learn about the industry your small investment for bitcoin the add small tin as profit way from their you go fit use the invest into other altcoins after you go don gain knowledge by then. Here no be where them the rush tins, all actions must be based on thorough calculation to avoid unwarranted losses.

Have been gambling for quite a long time now and had made numerous wins which right now can't recall my biggest win of them all, but I do have the attitude of getting myself something nice each time I win a bet not minding how small or big the amount won I make sure I gift myself an item or use that money to meet a need.

People will often celebrate and jump for joy when there stupid action luckily materialize in their favour against refusing to accept great advise. They only get to realize that their action was stupid only when it fails and backfire at them. Definitely, you're in the right, she won't have regretted her act if she had won.

Am excited to participate in this pizza contest. For me, it's a privilege.

The ingredients used includes:
1. Irish potatoes
2. Eggs
3. Fresh tomatoes
4. Fresh red pepper
5. Green-ball pepper
6. White onions
7. Vegetable oil
8. Salt.

Procedure for preparation of my bitcoin pizza:
Started by peeling and slicing the Irish potatoes in small sizes, fried for it to get softened then followed with mashing it a beat. Removed it from the pan into a bowl (allowed it to cool off a bit) then I added my eggs, onion, red pepper, tomatoes, a pinch of salt then  steer till it all get mixed.

Poured it back to the pan to bake for a few minutes after which I had to slice some tomatoes and green-ball pepper for decoration of the surface. The BTC logo design was done using green-ball pepper.
It was really fascinating for me throughout the process.

Stage 1.


Stage 2.


Stage 3.


Stage 4.

From how I see it on the other side of this, these casinos are not obliged to the community to render them some community services on the premise that they do pay regular taxes to the government the government can always take care of those community affairs. It is business and if they don't make sure to getting their pockets fattening they'll surely run out of business (competition). However, any casino that wish to commit itself to it can go on but it's shouldn't be something that should be used to discredit those not doing it.

I don't even subscribe to the idea of casinos carrying out community services because, that could be another form or avenue of advertisement attracting the indulgence of people that had never concerned themselves with anything gamble.  If casinos start doing this it can lead to a drastic increment in the number of gamblers in the society.

I  quit disagree with people attaching spirituality to gamble because from what I have known about these spiritual or fetish means people adopt to impel their winning chances didn't/doesn't work. For the ones I have seen for myself it failed them wholly.

You don't have to accept if you don't want to but I am however on the side of destiny because it has to do with the natural in determining how outcomes outplay in people's life without the people themselves having to maneuver the situation. Like I earlier noted that it's just a hypothesis for now even though somehow it sounds logical to an extend.

 If we  do agree for instance, that if a person is destined to be a great man in the future, he will undeniably become should he work hard towards it. If that's the case then, why can't same principle about destiny as we believe also be applied in gambling  fo someone who might  have been destined to  win some life changing bucks through gambling.

Oh really! He made a trade to withdraw his first profit of just 57$. Bravo!

 If I may ask you op, did he told you about taking the profit at this premature stage of his investment  before going ahead or he didn't? If it happens that he did and you didn't encourage him to be patient for the bigger profit ahead then you probably didn't do him any much good.

He may not know about this right now as he is excited about taking profit for now and if he continues that way with every little rise in bitcoin price then, in the long run when he gets to know the much benefit therein in holding for long, he might definitely not be happy with the decision you didn't discourage him from making today.

So unfortunate that newbie investors be taking evey little profit made at each bitcoin price rise when they ought to be buying and stacking (DCAing) for the bountiful harvest to come.

I was just having this thought just within myself (more of an opinion) about some comments have read in the gambling board and complains from gamblers outside the forum, that ever since they have been gambling they have never won a bet amounting to a thousand dollars for it has always been below, while some others say that no matter how much high or low amount they have constantly be using to stake in order to win millions it has never favoured them that it has only been a few thousand bucks they had been lucky to win.

But then, I also find out that there are people that will just start gambling for a short time and boom they have won a jackpot in millions when people that have been there years before them are struggling to win even thousands.

And this makes me to come to a hypothetical conclusion that in gambling each and every person is individually destiny to within the range of certain amount of win. And that if you are not destined to win the high amount you are after, you will never be able to no matter how much you use or the strategy you apply to your bets.

Not to bore us with many words... I want to ask to know about forum members opinions and views about this. Is it what it is or it's just a fallacy?

If you carry carry out an interview asking persons that were turned millionaires through some they bet won or jackpot, almost all of them will tell you they never expected it, neither did they had to use high stakes to have been able to win such millions. But that it was all just about luck unexpectedly.

Op what you have to know is that your high stakes won't bring you wins because it's not guaranteed to, and also there's no form of spiritual powers attached to casinos that is the reason for any gamblers' loss in a bet, it's a game of fortune and it's either you get lucky that fortune smiles at you or goes against you. 

When I saw this, I felt an indifferent feeling about Thiago Motta being link to this Juventus job because in as much as Juventus are showing much interest in a acquiring his service, the feeling am just having about it is just indifferent.

The indifferent feeling am having about it is that, moving to Juventus is a massive achievement for his coaching career, and it's a massive step forward, but my worry is that,  will Juventus be able to support him financially in the summer transfer window? Because it's very important that he comes into the club with his own player that he actually believed in, and will they be patient enough with him, if the results are not coming as quickly as expected? Because every coach need time to pass his message across to his players for expected results to start coming. .

I think the future of Chelsea is bright with Pochettino if he's patiently given the opportunity to stay for more seasons, he has managed to build the confidence of these players in the premier league just in a season and despite injuries faced by some key players of the team it didn't deter them from moving up the table.

 What I will like to see Pochi do is to get a calculative and strong standing defender with experience to replace the space of Thiago Silva as he depart the club at the end of this season. They already have a fine midfielder and attacking front, all they have to do is put in more work to be in the best of form's next season.

Yeah it seems  Chelsea is having a better ending of a season looking at how they moved from 11th position to now occupying the 6th position with 60 points.  They had won straight four game, an improved performance that Chelsea is making right now only illustrates that the players have started blending and also having a good flow of communication among themselves.  I think they are going to be a team to beat next season as they will definitely be competing in the top four  which is something most of us will want to see next EPL season.

Tonight Manchester united spirit was really high that they had to submerge Newcastle even to the advantage of their rival Chelsea who are at the brink of qualifying for the European league.

Honestly, Ten Hag needs to consider giving Amad  Diallo more chance as he had many times made so much impact in each game he olayed, the boy is always on fire in all games better than Anthony. I don't know if Manchester united fans has observed this too.

Chasing after loss happens as a result of the gambler failing to accept his losses, in otherwise, he or she fails or refuses to accepting being defeated. So they feel they can salvage something from not giving up at it. In consideration for me, I think this whole thing about loss chasing has a lot to do with discipline level of the gambler. So they do this not knowing until they are totally emptied with nothing more to stake with.

I guess people that go chasing for a recovery after some losses has been incurred, are gamblers that are without a deliberate bankroll limit, so they just gamble money beyond what they can afford to let go which is why they get bittered and pained thinking how can they actually walk away without trying more in getting it back.

It's proper that gamblers acknowledge the reality that losses are a related part of gamble, and it's for the good of the gambler that he/she accepts losses and walk off when it get to us (instead of chasing), just in same manner we accept wins when they happens. No gambler is immune to gamble loss.

It is not in all the cases that the people claim to have used those money for gambling that is actually the truth as they declare. Some may not have even used it to gamble, it could be that they have used it to acquire a property for themself or gave it out as loan to later get an interest profit after it's returned. Hence they claim to have used it to gamble and lost it, they assume that the case will not escalate beyond what it should if the money is said to have been used for something else profitable.

I witnessed a case in my former estate where a certain man in the estate had to use his association money that members contributed under his care to sponsor his two children to school abroad. Something he alleged to have lost the money to gambling he played within the period the money was contributed to him. It was a preliminary investigation after police was involved in the case that revealed what he actually used the money for. Humans can be very cunning.

I am someone that's very frugal  with exhausting money at a go, and I can say it vividly, martingale strategy in gambling is not for the low budget gamblers and maybe when we all know this we will know peace and stick to the lane that will be favourable with our budget while we tend to be consistent with it.

The few weeks I incorporated the martingale strategy for the first time into my gambling just to test how profitable it could be, I lost more than I could imagine and I concluded that it's not a strategy for a low budget gambler like me. It's a strategy that if you are not cautious with it can drive you into loss chasing without you knowing because, It's a strategy that demands you still  be consistent even under a streaks of losses...  how possible is that?