curious already wrote that he/she is done with digging in a few days (not enough time for a vote and change), but not selling. Personally I agree with curious that digging is a good idea, because it will distribute more CLAMs, probably mostly at market price at Poloniex, if another whale finds some addresses. The danger of 51% control is low.

Too bad that there will be no doogcoin, would have doubled my investment, but then maybe not, because people would have lose faith in CLAM then and would not trust the new coin either. But I like the idea of adding new voting features to CLAM.

Doesn't prove you are the digger, but confirmed. BTW, it is cheaper with the escrow feature on just-dice

I think most coins are the investors money in JD, not doog's personal money. There should be a vote option in JD.

The SSL certificate is expired and self-signed. I suggest to buy a professional certificate, they are not expensive.

I like this idea. Then the current rules of CLAM don't change and everyone can change who wants to use the new coin. But the exchange rate of CLAM might drop, because people would assume that some people might cash out to BTC for easy money doubling.

If we vote based on how many CLAMs we hold, would be nice if investors at JD could vote, too.

You are right, I mean the demand will outperform the inflation, because everyone hopes that they will get more money, which I think you can already see, because the rate was very stable in the last few months. Should have dropped more with just the inflation.

But I wonder how I explain CLAM interest profit to my tax accountant. She had already a hard time to understand and book BTC exchange profits

I think you are right. There will be a high demand for CLAMs, because it has such a good interest rate, which will outperform inflation in the end, until it stabilize at a high exchange rate. The only problem at the moment is the technical difficulties that you have to run your own CLAM client, if you don't want to invest in a gambling site, and the usual trader might not be comfortable with it. A reputable investment company should create a CLAM staking pool service.

Thanks, you got it, don't bust

No bid so far, I'll extend the auction until Wednesday, because of the Bitcointalk downtime. And you can even start with 0.0 BTC (for free). I have to get rid of the UIDs, otherwise it's too tempting to gamble again

Thanks ED. I'll remember your cute pictures, like your last one for me:

Bonus: you'll get my old account, too, for free:

Of course it is all random, but for the superstitious gambler this is your chance: lucky seed still not randomized, profit with it was 5,499 CLAMS:



And I was kind of famous for big tips, and it is a nice number

Bid in this thread, or by PM, I accept BTC or CLAMS. We can do the transfer with tip in just-dice chat with escrow service by a mod, if you like, or just send me the BTC and I'll send you the login data, if you are the auction winner. Bidding ends at Sunday. Suggested start price: 0.1 BTC.

Needs an update. I'm glad I stopped gambling, could have been me.

I could take a selfie

This was fun today. Too bad scabby-winnere got greedy, he did some crazy bets, this was the end:

Well, that was fast, someone lost a lot, site profit is up again:



Doog, an updated graph of the site profit would be interesting.

Currently some big bets are made on Just Dice, galoper is gambling for hours ( https://i.imgur.com/fLcBFW6.png ). Fun to watch if you are "/offsite 0" Maybe a good time for investors to start investing, depending on the outcome.

My address for the 10 CRE: 1H2MXh4dZCyJeKR2u6QxNJTG98VdVUjj4v Thanks.

I tried to compile boost (although it is a template class library, which means most of it are just header files, not much to compile), but it didn't work.

Turns out it used the boost installation from MacPorts, which was version 1.58. Brew wants to install boost 1.57, but the other installation was in the path first. I uninstalled the MacPorts boost installation and now it works, the Qt client is running and synchronizing with the networ. So there is some problem with boost version 1.58 and maybe the clang compiler, or some incompatibilities with the MacPorts boost installation, when using brew to install the rest. Someone should port it to C++11, then it should be possible to remove boost.

BTW, there are some serious compiler warnings, like using "false" for an argument to a function which expects "bool *" in main_tests.cpp and which is then converted to "NULL", which might be not what you have intended. And a lot signed/unsigned compare warning, which are possible attack points.

Yeah, like CLAM

I like "Credits", this is always used in science fiction movies. Another idea would be "latinum" (important property: non-replicable), but would cause even more SEO problems, and probably even copyright problems.