|
Can anyone confirm if this German translation is good or ok?
|
|
|
|
I like this coin
was mining for about a week few hours a day on a old laptop used for movies.
Mining on two cores at about 25-28 k's.
Got up to about 20-30BXC. then lost them.
Could it be because I installed another program/programs similar and wallet file got replaced?
example only not trying to blame it. DuckNote others I don't remember.
Yes i know i should have backup. But I'm a D..K
or is it just a bug?
This is my new backed up address if any kind heated people fell like replacing them or sending a private text.
cxozrTmHaDJhP3oUgUNSKVHbyggQCtYhJ5NtreBoqwfKEaHVyA7D6ekjHyQcqiZG2o1Q2wMnXtSufM6 MsaaD2y192sT4sYaAc
great to see cryptocurrency we can mine on everyday computers.
Read the main Post agian for bounties, facebook or twitter might earn you some BXC. |
|
|
|
And was something changed to remove any copyright related materia? it's funny what your point is but do you really understand whats contained in that copyright file? can you not find that @ https://github.com/lulworm/bitcediwallet/blob/master/copyright. I just feel like you are scared at whats coming, why didn't you just close source your digitalnote? and oh! i guess you also copy paste from cryptonote in a different way!  That should tell you that one must start from somewhere, or did you also say that the first version of ductnote released with all it's current features. The fact that Bitcedi does not have a new feature added yet does not mean it has no right in building it's community, well, that's the path chosen and very soon when the featueres begin to come, i bet you'll start mining bitcedi as well and when that time comes, people will still know Bitcedi was built on Digitalnote and that fact will not change. Do you think if thats what the developers of Bitcoin did, there will be innovations in cryptocurrency at all? Commenting on Bitcedi retweets by media platforms and other social media mentions about Bitcedi to let them know it's a copied digitalnote isn't going to kill the project, but rather making it grow stronger. And honestly, i don't know why you should be worried about a project that is less than 10 days old. Anyways, glad to have you around. |
|
|
|
|
Website up, contacted a couple exchanges, hoping to hear from them soon.
It's under code review on cryptopia hope to see it into voting list.
|
|
|
|
Downloaded and synced.  Looks like everything from Yiimp is now lost as well as the coins I staked... It's unfortunate, but i'll advice to desist from using both wallets at the same time as you are causing interference with the blockchain. This is what is happening, You are mixing data from blockchain1 and blockchain2 in the same data direcotry, some of them happen to broadcast and make it through some 1 or 2 peers and hence making it through to the blockchain as a "non standard transaction" because it passes certain validations/checks. Some of them are rejected right away without making it through a single node. This is the reality, When you send a coin using a properly synched blockchain with wallet v1.2.1, then you have no cause to worry even if the recipient is on the old chain. When you sync your data with v1.2.1 and later open wallet v1.2.0.0, since you are the only peer using that wallet, you are the only person to confirm your own transactions and blocks. PLEASE, copy your wallet file and delete your entire data directory, download a bootstrap and sync with wallet v1.2.1 ONLY, DON't ever open old wallet. If you don't follow as adviced, you will continue to loose coins because your coins will not even make it into Neither of chain1 or Chain2. |
|
|
|
What version of wallet are you using now?
I believe your coins are stuck in the old chain bacause yiimp used the old wallet v1.2.0
This one  But if you look at the former screenshot I posted, some of them went through from Yiimp and some didnt ofcourse, they can be confirmed on the oldchain! doesn't mean it's made it through to the new chain. But why are you still using v1.2.0.0?Please upgrade to v1.2.1.0 |
|
|
|
What version of wallet are you using now? I believe your coins are stuck in the old chain bacause yiimp used the old wallet v1.2.0 |
|
|
|
I think explorer is now ok! Non standard transaction is not an error! It's just a non standard transaction the the wallet reports. http://185.106.122.33:3001/ |
|
|
|
So lulworm.
What is going to happen when we have coins on the old blockchain and the new one ?
No one will loose their coins! Coins available before the fork are still valid and will be transferrable over the new blockchain. This is kinda messed up
A discussion took place in the old thread for over a week about a project takeover. Announcement was made and messages sent to exchanges and pool operators If theres anything you don't understand, address it here, this thread exist for a reason! |
|
|
|
Don't worry the problem is with the dump and restore. It's an issue with the format {json :: bson}
droping the database and reindexing should fix.
It's not like that with my dev explorer
you mean everybody should reindex their chains ? or am i missing smth will reindex to redownload blockchain into mongodb database for display. |
|
|
|
another strange thing, plenty of such shit (in many blocks) http://185.106.122.33:3001/tx/bb29f608beb6427dab85f2a27f21fa88fc2818a57bd09650477921f8fea44bdcand it looks real despite empty, chain garbage ? gettransaction bb29f608beb6427dab85f2a27f21fa88fc2818a57bd09650477921f8fea44bdc
{
"txid" : "bb29f608beb6427dab85f2a27f21fa88fc2818a57bd09650477921f8fea44bdc",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1464107908,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"coinbase" : "03d00803",
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 0.00000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
},
{
"value" : 0.00000000,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
}
],
"blockhash" : "b7f7adafe1041d7b725eb7e10a5ca2995a93f02f758504abd31e1b3581180ff7",
"confirmations" : 16
}
Yes! you are right. I guess i have to reindex the whole database on the sever itself. wait a minute, this shit is everywhere inside the blockchain, any wallet would give the same response. it's more serious than simple server reindexing Don't worry the problem is with the dump and restore. It's an issue with the format {json :: bson} droping the database and reindexing should fix. It's not like that with my dev explorer |
|
|
|
another strange thing, plenty of such shit (in many blocks) http://185.106.122.33:3001/tx/bb29f608beb6427dab85f2a27f21fa88fc2818a57bd09650477921f8fea44bdcand it looks real despite empty, chain garbage ? gettransaction bb29f608beb6427dab85f2a27f21fa88fc2818a57bd09650477921f8fea44bdc
{
"txid" : "bb29f608beb6427dab85f2a27f21fa88fc2818a57bd09650477921f8fea44bdc",
"version" : 1,
"time" : 1464107908,
"locktime" : 0,
"vin" : [
{
"coinbase" : "03d00803",
"sequence" : 4294967295
}
],
"vout" : [
{
"value" : 0.00000000,
"n" : 0,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
},
{
"value" : 0.00000000,
"n" : 1,
"scriptPubKey" : {
"asm" : "",
"type" : "nonstandard"
}
}
],
"blockhash" : "b7f7adafe1041d7b725eb7e10a5ca2995a93f02f758504abd31e1b3581180ff7",
"confirmations" : 16
}
Yes! you are right. I guess i have to reindex the whole database on the sever itself. |
|
|
|
just tried, can't open, maybe it's not running?. was restarting server. try again now! explorer is working, blockhashes the same as mine, BUT main page shows not block but tx hashes, database settings are wrong a bit sync.js was giving me lots of headache and server hosting had to suspend the server a couple of times due to over 350000 connections. I had to sync on dev machine before dumping and restoring mongodb files. wouldn't be suprise if something goes wrong somewhere but shouldn't be anything seriouse. |
|
|
|
just tried, can't open, maybe it's not running?. was restarting server. try again now! Let me know if it's working |
|
|
|
just tried, can't open, maybe it's not running?. was restarting server. try again now! |
|
|
|
|
Explorer coming up tomorrow on the new blockchain!
|
|
|
|
|
I think building the interest in Bitcedi is far more important than being on the trading platforms.
Will still contact cryptopia.co.nz today and add a request for review for votes.
When we are even listed for votes and there's no interest, we will still not make it into the exchange.
I'm working on materials to build interest and social media is a tool i intend to use.
Stay tuned!
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
